Slashdot Mirror


UK To Track All Browsing, Email, and Phone Calls

Sara Chan writes "The UK government plans to introduce legislation that will allow the police to track every phone call, email, text message and website visit made by the public. The information will include who is contacting whom, when and where and which websites are visited, but not the content of the conversations or messages. Every communications provider will be required to store the information for at least a year."

10 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Senationalist headline by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    How about: *Proposal* in UK To Track All Browsing, Email, and Phone Calls?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Senationalist headline by fuyu-no-neko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about: *Proposal* in UK To Track All Browsing, Email, and Phone Calls?

      I guess it depends how cynical you are about the law-making process. Whilst I'm yet to make my mind up on the current government, I can definitely see why some people make the jump to thinking that this is as good as done. It's not as if the previous government particularly cared about our rights after all.

      --
      Don't take the above poster too seriously. He doesn't.
    2. Re:Senationalist headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How about: *Proposal* in UK To Track All Browsing, Email, and Phone Calls?

      Not even a proposal. It's speculation that there might be a proposal. If you read the actual quote from the defence review from the article, it more or less says: 'we need to upgrade lawful intercept capabilities to help fight terrorism'.

      Now OK, there may be some civil liberties issues with what the government eventually comes up with. But there is a difference between being worried and making shit up, and this article has crossed that line.

  2. Attach a simple addition by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All politicians will have to register all their communication devices, email addresses, phone numbers, and then make the list of all communication (not the content) available to the public.

    Who watches the watchers?

    We have met the enemy, and it is us.

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  3. Re:Encrypte Everything by dotKuro · · Score: 5, Informative

    Encryption of your files is worthless when you can be arrested for failing to give up passwords as per the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000. (Which would be more accurately named the Irregulation of Investigatory Powers Act, as it pretty much declares open season on those under suspicion.)

  4. Oblig. by Weaselmancer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  5. Re:They already track you with cameras by characterZer0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I guess the ACLU was unsuccessful in setting up a branch office.

    The same thing is going to happen in the US, ACLU or not. The bills are already written. They are just waiting for another 9/11 to they can ram them through.

    --
    Go green: turn off your refrigerator.
  6. Seems like Fiction by VoiceInTheDesert · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This really reads like something out of fiction. I did not think I'd see the day of such a government, but here I am at 22 years old and already, a modern, 1st world country is to the point where it feels the need and justification to monitor every action of it's populace. The precedent here is staggering, terrifying and morally bankrupt. The possibility for abuse here is strong to the point of certainty. I pray this never makes it to a country I call home.

  7. Lessons learned from 2006 AOL data scandal: Bupkus by shoutingloudly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The implicit assumption here is that, as long as Big Brother doesn't see the content of the messages, there's nothing to worry about. Of course that's total bullocks. The AOL search data scandal of 2006 shows that one's search history alone can reveal far, far more about a person than an unwarranted government search should be able to see. Amp that up to a list of every site visit, plus everyone I email, call, or text, and this represents the government demanding the right to dig very deep into Brits' communication.

    I hope Britons go ballistic in opposition to this proposal.

  8. How Quaint by Bob9113 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The UK government plans to introduce legislation that will allow the police to track every phone call, email, text message and website visit made by the public.

    How quaint -- they use laws to grant government authority for such things. Over on this side of the pond the President just declares it to be so and tells the judicial they're not allowed to hear any petitions for redress of grievances. Much simpler that way.