Slashdot Mirror


Windows 8 To Be Released In October 2012

dkd903 writes "Microsoft has been very secretive about the next version of its Windows operating system. After the success of Windows 7, everyone is very interested in the next iteration – Windows 8. A few leaks have been the only source of news about Windows 8 till now. However, a slip up from Microsoft Netherlands has put the release date in October 2012."

7 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Surely they'll come up with a marketing name... by e065c8515d206cb0e190 · · Score: 5, Funny

    that can match past successes, such as Vista, Zune, or Kin.

  2. Better translation by Barryke · · Score: 5, Informative

    Verder werkt Microsoft uiteraard aan de volgende versie van Windows. Maar het zal nog zo'n twee jaar duren voordat 'Windows 8' op de markt komt.

    Correctly translates to:

    Furthermore Microsoft is ofcourse working on the next version of Windows. But it will take about two years before 'Windows 8' will arrive on the market.

    I'm dutch. The translation was engrish, i thought this might help.

    --
    Hivemind harvest in progress..
  3. Re:Let me be the first to say to Microsoft... by sznupi · · Score: 4, Informative

    Or we can just look at the version numbers in "about"...

    XP 64bit & 2003 = 5.2
    XP = 5.1
    2000 = 5.0
    NT 4.0 = ...4.0

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  4. If Microsoft wanted to be evil... by MikeRT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    this would be the perfect time.

    Google, Apple and Oracle, their biggest competitors, are in a major shoot out.

    What Microsoft needs to do is exploit the patent conflict by publicly ending its patent threats against FOSS. Completely, no exceptions.

    While it does that, it should make Windows 8 the first release that breaks with the past by moving all legacy technologies into a sandbox a la what OS X originally did.

    Finally, they should work on extending whatever POSIX compatibility they still have left until Windows 8 can reliably run code originally written on Linux and OS X. Why? Because it would bridge one of the last gaps between Windows 7 and OS X.

    Apple is getting increasingly controversial. Microsoft could exploit by becoming the first vendor to make peace with everyone.

  5. Re:NT 7.0 or NT 8.0? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Try a phased roll-out to 20,000 desktops - with unknown compatibility in 4,000 departmental desktop applications.

    You can see the regression issues that make a desktop roll-out of ANY new OS a suicidal risk for any IT organization of size. The answer they are grasping for? Consumerization of IT. Bring your own device, and we'll police connection/identity and document policy.

    You see, people have already been bringing in their own Macs and Androids for a couple of years now - and "self servicing". This is how the IBM PC showed up next to the 5250 terminal, 25 years ago.

     

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  6. Re:NT 7.0 or NT 8.0? by DrgnDancer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Mostly because of three things:

    1) Many companies (and governments) have glacially slow approval processes for new OSes. My facility would like to move to Windows 7, but there's still no official DoD hardening and approval process for it. Since we're planning to jump over Vista straight to 7 we're on XP till we get official blessing.

    2) A *staggering* number of companies still need IE6 for various internal web apps. A little hunting will turn up companies still selling solutions that require IE6 right now, as XP runs down the clock on even security support. Someone must be buying this crap, though I can't imagine who or why. I don't know which is worse, that Microsoft made IE6 so standards incompatible that this happened in the first place, or that they then immediately reversed course and left all these standard's non-compliant apps hanging. (Though at this point the companies still using them have no one to blame but themselves, XPs retirement schedule has been public for a good long time).

    3) A lot of companies just don't feel the need. XP has the distinction of being probably the first Microsoft OS that really worked so well that there's not a lot of compelling reasons to upgrade it (besides its support clock running down). DirectX 10 is mostly unimportant to business, and the rest of Vista and 7's improvements can often be matched by just installing 3rd party software on XP (which many businesses did long before 7 was available). There's some really nice functions in the newest version of AD, but so far MS hasn't allowed XP-AD integration to break.

    I suspect the only thing that will actually force companies to upgrade will be XP finally becoming completely unsupported. Even then I wouldn't be shocked to see a lot of companies jump to Vista instead of 7 on the theory that it's been around longer and is therefore better supported.

    --
    I don't need a million points of light, just two points of multi-mode fiber and a 10 Gig-E router.
  7. Re:Only one week to go! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You don't understand.

    The ERP incumbents are guys like ORACLE.

    They make SURE that the upgrade path for their ERP front end brings the whole stack. Ten, if not HUNDREDS of millions. So. Not the kind of IT big spend that will be driven, in a down economy, by an IT sub-department's need for Windows licensing.

    Trust me, Oracle knows that Windows desktop and MS Office revenue are Microsoft's lifeblood.

    By holding off IE-next or FF compatible rendering for Oracle Financials and PeopleSoft, they hit Microsoft where it hurts - core revenues. They also reinforce the perception of Microsoft as a difficult upgrade, and a general poor technology choice.

    Larry likes this. There are other vendors, playing this game, too. Some are MS partners, so work th angle with more ambiguity.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."