Slashdot Mirror


Cheap Metal-Insulator-Metal (MiM) Diode Created

An anonymous reader writes "Progress on metal-insulator-metal diode manufacturing was just reported online in the professional journal Advanced Materials (abstract). For the first time a high-performance 'metal-insulator-metal' diode was created with cheap materials. This is a fundamental discovery. It could change the way manufacturers produce electronic products at high speed, on a huge scale, and at a very low cost, even less than with conventional methods."

137 comments

  1. Ground breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    A complete gamechanger, just like memristors!

    1. Re:Ground breaking by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to memristors?

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:Ground breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I forget.

    3. Re:Ground breaking by contra_mundi · · Score: 1

      Like with every breakthrough, it'll take atleast 50 years to reach consumers.

    4. Re:Ground breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Oh, I remember! It was a- that is, the thing is a big--

      Hmm. I guess I forget too.

    5. Re:Ground breaking by Zerth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Whatever happened to memristors?

      HP just developed an implementation in the last year.

      It will take them a couple years to get a production line going, then a few more years before it starts showing up in products.

    6. Re:Ground breaking by TopSpin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Whatever happened to memristors?

      HP has partnered with Hynix to develop the manufacturing process and commercialize memristor products. Memristors used for storage will eventually appear as ReRAM (resistive RAM.) Meanwhile, other companies are working on memristor designs based on material other than TiO2 as is used by HP.

      Would someone with a good grounding in semiconductors please elaborate on why MIM diodes are significant? I have a good handle on basic electronics but not enough experience to deduce how MIM diodes would improve circuit design.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    7. Re:Ground breaking by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      I think it's that MIM is cheap, at least compared to doped silicon.

    8. Re:Ground breaking by i.of.the.storm · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think you're right, and I would guess that the startup costs are much cheaper with this technology. But I wonder how useful it is when we can already print thousands transistors for pennies after the initial cost of a fab. Maybe it will allow for easier tinkering for people sitting in their garage? Would be pretty cool to build your own diode.

      --
      All your base are belong to Wii.
    9. Re:Ground breaking by blackraven14250 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      even if it costs pennies now, the fact that it will cost a single penny later is definitely a step forward. That is especially true if the silicon supply is less abundant (not likely), or less easy to mine (possible), than the supply of the metals and insulators used here. That would mean a greater rise in the price of silicon over a given time frame than the price of the metal/insulator.

    10. Re:Ground breaking by kurokame · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Mainly, most immediately, it gives you an additional way to make a diode or diode-based structure when you're designing your fabrication sequence. Fabrication on the foundry / mass-production level occurs through processes which give you pretty much a set sequence of layers (deposited materials, treatments, patterning, etching, etc.). You can make anything you can design within that process...and most anything else usually stays in a research lab.

      The extraordinarily common CMOS process involves numerous metal layers "high" above the wafer (numerous layers intervene). These are separated by insulators. Normally, you make diodes at the wafer layer where you're doing your doping.

      MiM means you can put diodes in regions of your chip where they couldn't practically be fabricated before without a lot of time doing a one-off chip in a lab. With "a lot" often being several months to a year, assuming everything turns out perfectly, assuming your lab even HAS all the necessary equipment, and assuming you don't have something better to do - which is rare if you're not still a grad student.

    11. Re:Ground breaking by kurokame · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Silicon is not something we're going to run out of in the foreseeable future. If we do, it would probably be right after we ran out of nitrogen.

    12. Re:Ground breaking by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      It's not a matter us running out. If the supply of silicon is harder to mine and purify than the metal/insulator (whichever is harder) necessary for the new technology, then the new tech is an economic improvement.

    13. Re:Ground breaking by Pharago · · Score: 1

      faster speed or something like that

    14. Re:Ground breaking by kurokame · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The insulator is generally treated silicon, e.g. silicon nitride.

      Also, metals are something you find pockets of in the Earth's crust. The majority ended up in the core by virtue of its greater density. Silicon, on the other hand, is a key ingredient in the crust itself, and tends to be present in the minerals which you would have to find, extract, and process to get the metals involved in circuit-on-silicon fabrication.

      Also, the amount of material in the silicon wafer itself is far, far more than the entirety of all surface features comprising the integrated circuit.

      If anything, you would want to be comparing the relative scarcity or value of the metals involved versus the dopants involved, the relative ease of fabrication, and the particulars of what you can fabricate like minimum feature size, chip area per circuit element, and compatibility with other things you want to do on your wafer.

    15. Re:Ground breaking by davester666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And even though everything about the process will be cheaper, faster and better, the 'cheaper' part will magically disappear through the use of patent fee's.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    16. Re:Ground breaking by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This might be true, but looking at the thesis linked below the main target seems large area/feature size devices devices such as TFT display backplanes and drivers.

    17. Re:Ground breaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In normal CMOS processes you can only create transistors on the silicon substrate's wells, meaning that you have at most one layer of transistors. The other layers above the substrate layer are generally polysilicon for transistor gates or metal layers for interconnects with dielectric insulation in between.

      If you could build transistors in the metal layers, one could build 3D chip layouts giving room to much higher transistor densities per chip area unit. I have not RTFA but making a diode in Metal-Insulator-Metal is a first step towards making a MIM transistor and I assume this is what the news are about.

    18. Re:Ground breaking by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      Silicon is like 70% of earths crust. If we have run out of it, we have run out of earths crust. Beaches would be mined for their sand, dirt would all be gone. I mean literally, you don't know how ridiculous that notion sounds.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    19. Re:Ground breaking by baegucb · · Score: 1

      Most references I've seen say it's 25-27% of the crust (still alot).

    20. Re:Ground breaking by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So much for the fast pace of new tech. ;)

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    21. Re:Ground breaking by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. It's that MiMs are fast. The best junction diodes run out of steam at a few THz while MiMs work up into optical frequencies and so can be used to rectify sunlight. MiMs have been made before and are used in some exotic lab equipment but those point-contact devices are hard to make and touchy. These guys claim to have produced MiMs using more or less standard planar processes.

      Here's a paper that explains MiM theory, though it isn't about this development.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    22. Re:Ground breaking by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      It's not the silicon that's the worry, it's the other materials that are doped in that makes it expensive, dangerous, or 'rare'.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    23. Re:Ground breaking by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      I guess that must be why there were no transistors in consumer products until the late 1990s.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    24. Re:Ground breaking by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      right, i was thinking silicon oxide, which is about 60 percent. But yea, either way, if we run out we will have bigger problems than running out of silicon.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    25. Re:Ground breaking by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to "point-contact devices" as in working on similar principles to cat's whisker or crystal-crystal rectifiers? Are we talking going back to the really nice clear and low-power function of pre-transistor devices, but with reliability and economies of scale those devices never achieved?

    26. Re:Ground breaking by jcr · · Score: 1

      The supply of silicon isn't the issue, it's the cost of purifying it.

      -jcr

      --
      The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
    27. Re:Ground breaking by DFJA · · Score: 1

      the 'cheaper' part will magically disappear through the use of patent fee's.

      I find it usually disappears as a result of the misuse of apostrophe's.

      --
      43 - For those who require slightly more than the answer to life, the universe and everything.
    28. Re:Ground breaking by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to "point-contact devices" as in working on similar principles to cat's whisker or crystal-crystal rectifiers?

      No.

      Are we talking going back to the really nice clear and low-power function of pre-transistor devices, but with reliability and economies of scale those devices never achieved?

      No.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    29. Re:Ground breaking by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      Like with every breakthrough, it'll take atleast 50 years to reach consumers.

      as wiki timeline suggests, the time is up ....

    30. Re:Ground breaking by Kvasio · · Score: 1

      Would someone with a good grounding in semiconductors please elaborate on why MIM diodes are significant?

      because some day rare elements that you need might be not available in your area code or too expensive?

    31. Re:Ground breaking by camperslo · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's a bit surprising to find out that some relatively unknown experimenters may have actually stumbled on tunnel-diode-like technology in the early days of radio over 80 years ago. I think they were officially invented by Sony in 1957, although most that I've seen in the U.S. came from G.E.
      http://www.sony.co.jp/Products/SC-HP/outline/overview/history.html

      Perhaps some here have experimented with a homemade cat-whisker diode for a crystal radio.
      As it turns out, making a little oscillator with a homemade metal-metal tunnel diode is easy enough that many here could do it. (a couple of variations using other materials are linked from the page below)

      http://home.earthlink.net/~lenyr/ntype-nr.htm

      I wish the story had made it clear just what sort of diode properties besides "cheaper" they were going for. It doesn't seem like they'd merge into current I.C. designs being of a much different process. The energy conversion thing is interesting, but that's much different than fast efficient diodes for switching power supplies or tunnel diodes for oscillators and high-frequency or pulse/trigger circuits. And it's a little hard to tell exactly how it ties in with LCD technology as that's pretty low frequency. Most digital I.C.s don't need or contain many diodes. They don't say anything about this helping to make better transistors. Normal diodes, even fast and cheap ones, usually can't replace transistors. And more unusual diodes with the negative-resistance effects of tunnel-diodes would certainly would not be a simple transplant into logic circuits. They've been well suited to a small niche of applications in the past.

      I guess it is time to dig up the old Trek episode where Spock was on old Earth building electronics with a bunch of vacuum tubes...

    32. Re:Ground breaking by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Well, then, could you please point to a decent reference where I could educate myself about what you do mean?

    33. Re:Ground breaking by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      I read the first 35 pages of that thesis so far, and it reads as if, yes, this is an attempt to manufacture a reliable metal oxide point-contact rectifier on a plane to be used in much the same way as the old unreliable iron pyrite crystal radio diodes. Please, if I'm wrong, point me to a correction. Your simple, "No. No." is not at all helpful to point out the differences.

    34. Re:Ground breaking by Pinky's+Brain · · Score: 1

      Metal oxide is not an insulator, it's a semiconductor ... using metal oxides is pretty common already, you might recognize the term MOS. The difference is the use of an insulator instead of a semiconductor.

    35. Re:Ground breaking by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      So the difference is in using tunneling through an insulator in some instances and not others rather than conducting through the semiconductor in some instances and not others?

    36. Re:Ground breaking by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      Metal oxide is not an insulator, it's a semiconductor ...

      Many metal oxides are insulators.

      ... using metal oxides is pretty common already, you might recognize the term MOS.

      MOS stands for "Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor". The metal is usually aluminum, the oxide silicon dioxide (an insulator), and the semiconductor silicon.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    37. Re:Ground breaking by ffreeloader · · Score: 1

      Would someone with a good grounding in semiconductors please elaborate on why MIM diodes are significant? I have a good handle on basic electronics but not enough experience to deduce how MIM diodes would improve circuit design.

      The article said one of the advantages of this is that it is faster than silicon technology. Instead of an electron having to travel through silicon in the normal way, with an MIM the electron "tunnels" through the middle layer and reaches the opposite metal side almost instantaneously. While the cost savings will be nice, the speed is the main advantage inside circuits.

      --
      "while democracy seeks equality in liberty, socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude." de Tocqueville
    38. Re:Ground breaking by whit3 · · Score: 1

      Are you referring to "point-contact devices" as in working on similar principles to cat's whisker or crystal-crystal rectifiers?

      No.

      Actually, I'd say yes here. The previous technology was
      a gizmo called a 'coherer' which was basically a bottle of metal
      granules. If it stopped rectifying, ya had to shake the bottle.
      That technology goes back nearly a century.

  2. Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by ka9dgx · · Score: 1

    I really hate this kind of thing... a potentially useful technology for building electronics devices at home, and it's behind a paywall.

    1. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      I wouldnt pass judgement without knowing how much they spent on developing it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by contra_mundi · · Score: 1

      In every case, either they'll be stinking rich or we'll never hear of this technology again.

    3. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by WarJolt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Everyone wants information to be free... Until they come up with an idea of their own and publish it.

    4. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      the article?

      There may be a building in your neighborhood that houses paywall penetrating tools. You can even go there and use them for free. I believe your community may call this building a "Library."

      Or, if you are talking about them patenting the "invention", then yeah.. that sucks.

    5. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      If they're rich, it's because it was a very important development and they were rewarded for taking the time and energy to make it useful. If we never see it again either it wasn't really all that important or somebody, in an effort to get around a patent, came up with an even better approach.

      Any way you slice it, it's good.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    6. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by coldmist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Information wants to be free. People want to control it and hide it and charge for it. But, if I told you a secret, you naturally want to share it. If I write a book, and people read it, that information is now theirs too, ie "free".

      Of course people want free information. But, some people keep it in chains and lock it up and prevent it from becoming "public" knowledge, for their own personal gain. It's a war that has been waged for ever and will continue to rage...

      --
      Don't steal. The government hates competition.
    7. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by martin-boundary · · Score: 5, Insightful
      What are you smoking? Sounds yummy.

      Just about every scientist who's employed in a university wants to give away their published articles for free to anyone with even a tiny interest. The only ones who like paywalls are publishers.

    8. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by mdmkolbe · · Score: 5, Informative

      As a published academic myself, I concur. I don't get a dime from my published articles so paywalls don't help me. I benefit from people hearing about, reading, being influenced by and eventually citing my work because those things lead to higher academic ratings which lead to better positions, grants, etc.

    9. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not very useful or important to anyone else if they are the only one who can do it.

    10. Re:Ugh... yet another paywall stopping innovation by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      The patents are published for all to examine. In fact, one of the risks of patenting something is you're telling the competition the secrets to your magic. If the patent is rejected, you've just laid it all on the table for everyone to see.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

  3. Cheaper than silicon? by seanadams.com · · Score: 0

    the most abundant element in the universe? Or is it cheaper somehow in terms of production process?

    1. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Informative

      er never mind, the point is _higher performance_ done more cheaply than before, not a cheaper diode in general.

    2. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with silicon parts is the ridiculous levels of purity required and the expense of melting/reacting it.
      Brief overview: http://pvcdrom.pveducation.org/MANUFACT/REFINE.HTM

    3. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      er, never mind, the point is _lower performance_ done more uselessly than before

      tunnel carrier transport is fundamentally a low current density process

      a tunnel junction may be just dandy for low current density applications like solar cell interconnects (yes, even at the pitiful current densities encountered in concentrator photovoltaics), but they don't get past low GHz switching speeds (even if individual carriers can zip through at THz rates)

      low-speed electronics don't need to be made any cheaper - they already have almost worthless value

    4. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Tailhook · · Score: 4, Informative

      the most abundant element in the universe?

      The most abundant element in the universe is Hydrogen. Silicon, while plentiful in raw form, must be purified, crystallized, doped, etc. for use in microelectronics. This is an expensive, energy intensive process with less than perfect yield. Copper and aluminum are vastly easier to deal with.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
    5. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moreover, this is VERY old news
      http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy03osti/33263.pdf

    6. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by yariv · · Score: 1

      Well, silicon is quite abundant on earth, about 15% of it, and more importantly almost 30% of the crust (still second to oxygen, by the way), but it's not even close to being "the most abundant in the universe". As irrelevant as it is to chip manufacturing, almost all baryonic matter in the universe is hydrogen and helium. Silicon is not even close...

    7. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by modmans2ndcoming · · Score: 1

      hydrogen is the most abundant.

    8. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      How about durability?

    9. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by seanadams.com · · Score: 1

      The most abundant element in the universe is Hydrogen.

      For Si vs H, does it matter if we're talking about by mass versus by number of atoms? It never occurred to me to consider which metric people might be talking about.

    10. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honour the local colours.

    11. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter, no. Wikipedia says hydrogen makes up 75% of normal matter by mass and 90% by number of atoms in the observable universe. Silicon is just one of dozens of possible byproducts of, say, a supernova—its presence is tiny compared to even carbon and helium. No idea what GGP was smoking.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    12. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Do you call platinum "platinium"? No? Then fucking stop calling aluminum "aluminium".

    13. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by my+$anity++0 · · Score: 1

      75% of the universe's elemental mass is hydrogen. So either way...

    14. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boy, someone sure woke up on the wrong side of the Atlantic this morning.

    15. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Do you call mercury "hydrargyrum"? Why not? Are you ignorant?

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    16. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you call platinum "platinium"? No? Then fucking stop calling aluminum "aluminium"

    17. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by treeves · · Score: 1

      He was probably thinking of abundance in earth's crust and assuming the universe is the same.
      But no, Si is a distant second to oxygen in abundance in the Earth's crust.
      It's the most abundant element in the Earth's crust that is a solid at room temperature. There you go.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    18. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More importantly who modded parent insightful.

    19. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by dannycim · · Score: 1
    20. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      I do, specifically because I deal with hydrargarum iodide lamps.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    21. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by Raenex · · Score: 1
    22. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by HiThere · · Score: 1

      I think you mean Hydrogen. Silicon is after, at least, both Hydrogen and Helium.

      Or perhaps you meant "most abundant element on the surface of the Earth"?

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    23. Re:Cheaper than silicon? by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Not Iron yet, guess I can go back to sleep again.

      --
      Je me souviens.
  4. Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A diode !!

    WTF is a diode ?? No really what is a diode ??

    1. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously?

    2. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It like transistor but operate reverse polarity. When polarity reversed diode operate like PnP junction not conjungate junction. Purpose to exist is speed in gate switch of unpower cMOS sunblimated ovaries prior to.

    3. Re:Dooooood !! by marciot · · Score: 0

      A diode is the triode's retarded brother.

    4. Re:Dooooood !! by mail2345 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A diode maintains a one way flow of current.

    5. Re:Dooooood !! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 4, Funny

      What about Smoke Emitting Diodes? (or Light Emitting Resistors?)

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Dooooood !! by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      A diode *permits* a one-way flow of current.

           

    7. Re:Dooooood !! by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 2, Informative

      In other words, it's an electronic check valve.

    8. Re:Dooooood !! by DiegoBravo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it's a car without retro.

    9. Re:Dooooood !! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I once created smoke emitting LEDs and I evacuated my workshop fast. I was using a clever power supply my dad had built. It had a pot from 0-10V and a rotary switch for +0, +10, +20. Very convenient but I left it on +10 by mistake. From model airplanes and bicycles I have seen a few smoke emitting NiCD batteries. One cold morning the battery pack on my bike shorted. Years ago a friend of mine chucked his NiCDs into the bottom of his backpack and walked home. The batteries melted a hole in the pack and were unusable afterwards.

    10. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (or Light Emitting Resistors?)

      You mean an incandescent bulb?

    11. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Had a couple of incandescent resistors at work, once. 1 KW of power put into a 10W metal can resistor... Helped pinpoint the problem with the inverter circuit though.

    12. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Back when I was in school, a student in my electronics class invented a light emitting resistor. He stuck a low value resistor between the line and neutral in an AC outlet.
      I myself, am the proud inventor of the 100% efficient lithium battery spot welder. I used one of my fingers as a thermistor in that project. (it reached Ahh!!!!!111 degrees celcius)

    13. Re:Dooooood !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I don't quite follow. Having read up I see the silicon has to be doped. Is there a similar material in the MiM that also needs to be drugged into submission ?

    14. Re:Dooooood !! by FriendlyPrimate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...or Light Emitting Resistors?

      You mean light bulbs?

  5. Fundamental discovery? by sosaited · · Score: 1

    I am no Electrical Engineer, but I am sure diodes are not the only component used in electrical circuits, so how is it a fundamental breakthrough that is going to affect the overall manufacturing speed of electronic products? Moreover, From TFA

    High speed computers and electronics that don’t depend on transistors are possibilities

    Which high speed computer in use today doesn't use transistors? The only related research in transistor-less gates I can think of is QCA and magnonics, both of which are a few years away from being used in Computer manufacturing, and neither uses diodes as the base.

    1. Re:Fundamental discovery? by IorDMUX · · Score: 1

      High speed computers and electronics that don't depend on transistors are possibilities

      Which high speed computer in use today doesn't use transistors?

      I believe they meant: (High speed computers) and (electronics that don't depend on transistors) are possibilities.

      Though... I'm not really certain *how* this invention enables such things, even after reading it over.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    2. Re:Fundamental discovery? by OpinionatedDude · · Score: 1

      I would have to agree -- you are no Electrical Engineer.

    3. Re:Fundamental discovery? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      well, the electrons tunnel instead of 'moving',
      one thing the article didn't touch on is that if the electrons tunnel instead of moving then entropy is good.
      so heat should be next to zero I should imagine?

      electrons tunnelling is a bit like 1+1 = 3
      the extra 1 that's missing is the work, which would create heat and slow things down.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:Fundamental discovery? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But isn't a transistor just a diode with a way to control the junction? So maybe you could position a third wire and get some gain out of it.

    5. Re:Fundamental discovery? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      But isn't a transistor just a diode with a way to control the junction?

      Not CMOS transistors, which are the dominant type used today.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Fundamental discovery? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Your comment, while factually correct, is unhelpful.

      So is this one.

  6. How does this work? by Required+Snark · · Score: 4, Informative
    I went and asked Mr. Google how this worked, and I couldn't find any answers. The best clue I got was that these devices use quantum tunneling, but this still does not explain how they exhibit diode behavior. Even the font of all online knowledge, Wikipedia, doesn't seem to know. Someone please post about this.

    One thing I did see is that this kind of diode can operate at 100's of THz frequencies, and that this enables nantennas. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nantenna If these kind of MIM diodes can be made cheaply then a new cost effective class of solar power device may become feasible. So it could be a really big deal.

    --
    Why is Snark Required?
    1. Re:How does this work? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I expect the 'diode' behaviour is to tunnel or not to tunnel.

      hardly surprising you don't find an explanation, if you had have done, surely it would have been invented already.

      with all tunnels open, is that like a superconductor version of a computer? where work always equals 1 no matter how much it computes?

      I don't know tunnelling too well.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    2. Re:How does this work? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      If these kind of MIM diodes can be made cheaply then a new cost effective class of solar power device may become feasible

      Heinlein had them in several stories. The idea was to build a photovoltaic cell as a radio receiver.

    3. Re:How does this work? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 3, Informative

      I found the patent for it. The background section has a pretty good looking writeup, and is not a PDF.

    4. Re:How does this work? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is plenty of things that work, and noone out of the manufacturing copany knows how. This makes the company competitive.

    5. Re:How does this work? by IceFoot · · Score: 1

      Agreed, the MIM diode seems to be shrouded in mystery. (Wikipedia, you have failed us!) From reading the links at oregonstate.edu and uspto.gov, it looks like this. A metal-insulator-metal device is a capacitor. If you make the insulator very thin, electrons can tunnel through from one metal-1 to metal-2. Also backwards, from metal-2 to metal-1. The device is inherently symmetrical, passing electrons both ways, and is not a diode but a leaky capacitor. To make it work like a diode, there has to be some asymmetry involved. One way is to bias the junction with a DC voltage. Another way is to use metal electrodes with different work functions. Either way, you make it easier for an electron to tunnel in the forward direction than going backwards -- a diode. The rest of the story is that an MIM diode can be made very small so it will work at extremely high frequencies, such as visible light, which means it could be used to rectify sunlight -- a new kind of photovoltaic device to provide solar energy.

  7. Re:Dooooood !! gayness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A diode is a GAY-NOT-GAY dude, of bicurious persuation, dude.

  8. Whats the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When I hear electron tunneling I can't help but see oxide or whatever the hell these things are made of slowly being eaten away.

    Does this really mean cheaper, better, faster switching for free or is there a catch? Does it degrade with use like flash memory?

    1. Re:Whats the catch? by Guy+Harris · · Score: 2, Informative

      When I hear electron tunneling I can't help but see oxide or whatever the hell these things are made of slowly being eaten away.

      You need to look elsewhere.

    2. Re:Whats the catch? by treeves · · Score: 1

      Electron tunneling is not like going *through* a layer, so much as it's like having a certain probability of being on the other side to begin with. One of those quantum things.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    3. Re:Whats the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In flash chips sometimes the electrons don't quite exactly tunnel thru the insulating layer to be held in the floating conductor and as a result they eat some of the insulator away.

      With this technology it is a different arrangement of insulating layers but I'm curious if the same degregation effect applies or if there are other potential reliability or performance issues related to this technology.

    4. Re:Whats the catch? by Khyber · · Score: 1

      It's like a light emitting diode of sorts, but instead of emitting light it permits unidirectional travel of power.

      With use, most anything degrades. How fast depends on the amount of power you're pushing through.

      --
      Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
    5. Re:Whats the catch? by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      You need to RTFM. The electrons held in the insulating layer are the stored data.

      Tunnelling is the way that electons move though solids by behaving like waves instead of particles. Its like ghosts going through brick walls only smaller. (Or light behaving like waves instead of particles, but bigger).

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
    6. Re:Whats the catch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is my entire point.

      For the love of god PLEASE STOP telling me I don't understand what quantum tunneling is. Flash memory works by storing electron(s) in a floating conductor between two insulating layers.

      There is only a *PROBABILITY* that the electron will actually tunnel where you want it to. When it falls short or long the result can be oxide breakdown. The ONLY question I am asking here is if the same effect on the order of what happens with flash memory applies to any degree in this instance.

  9. Re:Cheaper than silicon? - ObQuote by Crash+McBang · · Score: 1

    "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."

    - Albert Einstein

    --
    To put a witty saying into 120 characters, jst rmv ll th vwls.
  10. Convenient discovery by Palmsie · · Score: 1

    This seems like an incredibly convenient discovery considering China's new embargo of rare metal exports to Japan and the US.

    --
    Carl Sagan quotes get you an automatic +5 on all posts.
    1. Re:Convenient discovery by treeves · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, rare earths are not used to make diodes or semiconductors, so this doesn't help that situation.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
  11. Accuracy in reporting by Dutchmaan · · Score: 1
    "This is a fundamental discovery. It could change the way manufacturers produce electronic products at high speed, on a huge scale, and at a very low cost"

    This is a fundamental discovery. It could change the way manufacturers produce electronic products at high speed, on a huge scale, and at a very high profit. There.. fixed that for ya.

  12. Not Tunnelling by mim · · Score: 1

    Quantum synapsing would be a more accurate description. Though the development is a few years out, this will revolutionize computing as we currently know it.

  13. Most abundant element...? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 1

    Man, I really dig the far-out way you spell "hydrogen".

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  14. How it works? by Kim0 · · Score: 1

    As a solid state physicist, my fast and sloppy guess as to how this works, is that the fourth thin layer that is visible in the picture, is a sort of stair step so electrons coming from that direction have to do two easy tunnelings, while those from the other side have to do one hard tunneling.

  15. So, will this get the Nobel Prize in ten years? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    So, will this get the Nobel Prize in ten years or later? It does really sound like a radical idea.

  16. How the MIM Diode replaces a transistor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is very little information online without subscribing to a journal, but it appears that the tunneling can be controlled in these devices. That is, a transistor is turned on and off by varying the electric field profile in the channel, a MIM diode can somehow have the tunneling modulated to turn it on or off.

  17. Horrible horrible public science by Bender_ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I am a semiconductor scientist, but I completely fail to understand what this news is about. The article does nowhere mention the materials used, the device behavior, the application, the purpose or anything else.
    A MIM device as is, is a capacitor. And that is exactly what the picture is showing. When this type of capacitor is scaled to the nanometer regime it starts to get leaky due to quantum mechanical tunneling through the dielectric. The abstract mentions 'controlled quantum mechanical tunneling'... Aha, this could be what it is about. But as long as metal electrodes are involved this will only create a nonlinear resistor. Still no idea what the exact purpose is.

    Are nanoscale MIM capacitors new? No, not at all. Right now you have billions of them doing their job in your computers main memory. Depending on the vintage of your computer, these capacitors employ nanolaminates of ZrO2 and Al2O3 at a total thickness of 5 to 10 nanometers. Quantum electrical tunneling is of high relevance in these devices, since it leads to loss of stored information. So, is cheap new? A quick calculation suggests that the manufacturing cost of a single MIM device in a DRAM is approximately 10^(-10) US$.

    1. Re:Horrible horrible public science by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      They use different metals with different work functions on each side of a nanometer-scale insulating layer. MiMs have been made before using point-contact techniques but are hard to make and touchy. These guys claim to be able to make them using planar technology.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Horrible horrible public science by GrepNut · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree that the article could be a lot more informative. However, one can actually figure out quite a lot. For instance, since they call it a diode, it means the leaky capacitor you mention is asymmetric, and leaks more easily in one direction than the other. This is born out by the picture, which seems to show two layers of insulator, of different thickness, between the metal layers. And once you have electrical asymmetry, you can start building all sorts of interesting logic. But I agree they do not explain why tunneling through two layers A and B in the order "A then B" should be different from "B then A". Is it because of the direction of applied voltage, or are the insulator materials asymmetric at the molecular level, or is there some deep fact about quantum tunneling that makes it work? I would certainly have liked to see that covered.

      Second, in terms of benefits, it seems this device would be far easier, simpler and cheaper to fabricate than a normal PN diode. In a PN diode, you essentially need to arrange a metal wire, a small P-doped semiconductor region, a small N-doped semiconductor region and another metal wire. In addition, the two semiconductor regions need to be insulated from their surroundings somehow. This all requires pretty careful alignment. It looks like the MiM diodes would be self-aligning, in the sense that you could just create a pattern of vertical metal wires on one layer, then overlay the two layers of insulator, followed by a layer of horizontal metal wires. The diodes would form at the points where the wires cross, without any precise alignment being needed. And the fact that the middle layers are insulators would mean no further insulation was necessary. One could probably fabricate giant sheets of these things very cheaply.

      Finally, the fact that they can use these for rectifying infrared radiation implies they can operate many orders of magnitude faster than normal CMOS diodes.

      Googling a little also hints that MiMs are better at extracting the full energy from incident photons in photovoltaic applications, which could be a useful side benefit, allowing one to efficiently convert optical or infrared radiation into DC current with a single type of device. But I'm just guessing, an expert would need to confirm that.

      In summary, I agree this article could be a lot better. However, I have seen a lot worse, and it does seem to be alerting us to something which could turn out to be important.

    3. Re:Horrible horrible public science by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > ...CMOS diodes.

      There is no such thing as a CMOS diode.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  18. Patent by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

    A patent has been applied for on the new technology, university officials say. New companies, industries and high-tech jobs may ultimately emerge from this advance, they add.

    Yeah. In twenty years.

    Not saying this isn't a great invention; they deserve to earn from this (unlike software patent trolls). But the likely outcome of this system is that the technology will rot for decades until it enters the public domain.

    Example: Perpendicular recording has been around since 1976 as an idea. It was commercially implemented in 2005. Part of that time was probably spent on making it viable, but the patents filed between 1976 and 1985 conveniently ran out before it ever reached the market.

  19. For free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm an academic, and I pay to have my articles published. Giving it away for free would actually be a step up for me.

  20. Displays? Meh. by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That may be where the money is but the interesting applications are elsewhere. For example, MiMs could be useful as mixers and detectors all the way up to the visible. If they can be fabricated with a negative-resistance region they could serve as oscillators over the same range.

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  21. We're NEVER ever going to run out by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 1

    of silicon.

    We would have to run out of gravel, sand, rock, pebbles, stones and dirt first.

    1. Re:We're NEVER ever going to run out by znerk · · Score: 1

      But...
      Apparently, we are running out of rocks...

      --
      This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
  22. Yeah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's really hard to find and mine sand. In fact, we're going to run out real soon now! (Purification is another matter).

  23. SAWEET! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we get a brand new PS4 for $150??? :DDD

  24. Metal on Metal diodes are not new... by metaforest · · Score: 2, Informative

    The appearance of them is as old as corroded copper wire.. What has changed is that some materials specialists have figured out how to characterize these so called "parasitic" diodes and fabricate them with predictable parameters. As others have pointed out they are quite useful as they can be fabricated in the metal layers above the doped silicon, thus removing this type of component from the die and placing it in the metallization layers where there is a lot more room.

    Now basically, as I understand it, diodes do not take up 1/2 a transistor foot print on the substrate. "Free as in beer" diodes.... from a floor-planner's perspective.

    1. Re:Metal on Metal diodes are not new... by metaforest · · Score: 1

      Please forgive the self post.... this also means that diode protection in the I/O ring of a chip just got a lot cheaper to fabricate. (in the long run)

  25. Re:Displays? Meh. by kurokame · · Score: 1

    Money means production, production means process integration, process integration means it's available to anyone making a foundry order. Less interesting but profitable applications work fine for me.

  26. Free access to the original paper by AdrianMiller · · Score: 1

    If anyone’s interested in more on the science behind the story, including details on how the diodes were constructed and tested, we’ve set the original research article free to access for the next four weeks; you can find it here: http://www.materialsviews.com/details/news/874437/New_Diodes_Quantum_Tunnel_Their_Way_To_Improved_Electronics.html Adrian Miller Advanced Materials