Slashdot Mirror


Apple Counter-Sues Motorola Over Touchscreen Patents

Earlier this month, we discussed news that Motorola had sued Apple, alleging infringement of 18 patents involving the iPhone, iPad, and other Apple devices. In response, Apple has now launched a pair of lawsuits alleging that Motorola is the infringing party, pointing to a number of patents involving touchscreen displays and multi-touch technology, and also methods for interacting with settings and data on a device. Apple wants the court to award them damages and prevent Motorola from continuing to sell the offending devices, which include the Droid, Droid 2, Droid X, BackFlip, Devour i1, Devour A555, Cliq, and Cliq XT.

9 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. And The Dining Patent Philosophers Starve!! by TheNarrator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This whole patent war reminds me of the famous computer science analogy: the dining philosophers.

    If each fork represents a patent, all the philosophers have picked up a fork and now are unable to eat because they don't have enough forks to make a smartphone.

    1. Re:And The Dining Patent Philosophers Starve!! by Dogtanian · · Score: 4, Funny

      If each fork represents a patent, all the philosophers have picked up a fork and now are unable to eat because they don't have enough forks to make a smartphone.

      Er.... yeah.

      Unfortunately, you're likely to get sued because BadAnalogyGuy owns the patent on making very bad analogies on Slashdot. :-)

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    2. Re:And The Dining Patent Philosophers Starve!! by russotto · · Score: 4, Funny

      If each fork represents a patent, all the philosophers have picked up a fork and now are unable to eat because they don't have enough forks to make a smartphone.

      Fortunately they've learned they can stab each other with the forks, which doesn't make a smartphone but does provide entertainment value.

  2. Poor lawyers by thegarbz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clearly someone thought of the poor struggling lawyers. They needed some love too. There can only be one winner here, and it won't be companies who are suing each other.

    1. Re:Poor lawyers by countertrolling · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The companies are doing fine. Now you know why iPads are 500 dollars. The only loser is the customer.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  3. Re:Begun, the clone war has by rtfa-troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's a lie, TekGoblin, if that's your real name. You are hereby summonsed to appear in a lawsuit before Judge T. John Ward. To be sued for your infringement of our patents on "a method and apparatus for limited truth delivery through use of over-extensive categories".

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  4. Got it! by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. Do something. Or perhaps nothing.
    2. Sue!
    3. Profit!!! [1]

    [1] Profit only available to lawyers and other assorted douchebags.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  5. Progress by steveha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm just glad to see another example of patents promoting the Progress of Science and useful Arts.

    Because we all know that without these patents, Apple would never have bothered to produce devices with multitouch, nor would Motorola, nor would anybody. And really, the whole idea of using compound gestures like pinching is completely non-obvious. And we wouldn't want little startup companies to make multitouch products; we only want big companies with lawyers to be able to do it.

    Can't you just feel the Progress?

    Go, Apple! Cry havoc and let slip the lawyers of litigation!

    steveha

    --
    lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
  6. get rid of multitouch already by t2t10 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Multitouch is a gimmick, something Apple can use to distinguish themselves from the rest. It's like their menu bar and their Finder.

    Anybody who thinks that multitouch helps usability hasn't tried explaining it to their mother. And even for experienced users, it's an exercise in frustration: it works in some apps and not in others, it does different things, and you need to cover up even more of the screen with your hand. Furthermore, it doesn't carry over to pen-based input, and as the number of handwriting and drawing apps on App Store shows, people want pens.

    Let Jobs pursue his insane obsessions. Google should focus on usability, do everybody a favor, and eliminate multitouch from Android.