Slashdot Mirror


With the Jack PC, the Computer's In the Wall!

cylonlover writes "The Jack PC from Chip PC Technologies offers a neat and novel thin-client desktop computing solution where the computer doesn't just plug into the wall, it is the plug in the wall. Running on power provided by the ethernet cable that also connects it to the data center server, the computer-in-a-wall-socket supports wireless connectivity, has dual display capabilities and runs on the RISC processor architecture."

119 comments

  1. Obligitory Hackers reference... by NoxNoctis · · Score: 1

    "RISC is good."

    --
    "You're awefully cute, but unfortunately for you, you're made of meat."
    1. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by JavaBear · · Score: 1

      You'll never achieve greateness without a little RISC.

    2. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by Bluesman · · Score: 1

      RISC architecture is going to change everything.

      --
      If moderation could change anything, it would be illegal.
    3. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by Misagon · · Score: 1

      Where I come from, any reference to the movie "Hackers" made without irony will yield you an immediate (and deserved) flogging.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
    4. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by NoxNoctis · · Score: 1

      I'm coming up short on irony. Where do I submit for my flogging?

      --
      "You're awefully cute, but unfortunately for you, you're made of meat."
    5. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by Requiem18th · · Score: 1

      Michigan?

      --
      But... the future refused to change.
    6. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      You're just asking for it. Really.

      And no, not Michigan. L.A.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    7. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      Active matrix, man. A million psychedelic colors

    8. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by Hordeking · · Score: 1

      Where do I submit for my flogging?

      Into BDSM much? Slashdot BDSM is probably far more extreme than normal BDSM.

      --
      Disclaimer: The opinions and actions of the US Gov't are in no way representative of those held by this author or its ci
    9. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you flirting with me? If so, it's working...

    10. Re:Obligitory Hackers reference... by AdamWeeden · · Score: 1

      Into BDSM much? Slashdot BDSM is probably far more extreme than normal BDSM.

      Nope, Slashdot is mostly into BSD-M.

      --
      I was quoted out of context in my autobiography...
  2. Old news. by bchickens · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used the JACK PCs before on a citrix environment (A couple years ago). Actually I installed and tested the system. Neat little things but hardley new news.

    --
    ~Bchickens
    1. Re:Old news. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These are kind of cute but I have to wonder why? I mean why not a tiny box that could use POE or a wall wart? Maybe even build it into a keyboard?
      They only benefit I see to having to bolt these into the wall is in a school or a public place where theft would be a concern.
      Other than that it seems more pain then gain to me.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Old news. by vlm · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They only benefit I see to having to bolt these into the wall is in a school or a public place where theft would be a concern.

      Bolt it into a wall behind the big screen. Instant super digital picture frame or announcement board, just add software.

      The main threat is from the long cable industry, using a traditional cheap PC somewhere else with long cables. The other threat is no upgrade path, if you'll need to do the long cable thing on the next generation anyway, why not do it now.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    3. Re:Old news. by Defenestrar · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or convention centers, church pulpits, wall mounted information displays, neo-classically designed retro-arcades, computer controlled entertainment centers, etc...

      You're certainly right in calling this in-wall mount a "niche" market though ;)

    4. Re:Old news. by mlts · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That is exactly where these things come in handy -- environments such as schools or places with computer labs that if a lab monitor turns around, equipment would be walking out the door.

      I can see using these Jack PCs (secured in the wall with Bryce Key-Rex security screws or something of that nature) in an environment where you want as little equipment out in the open as possible, where if a crackhead goes werewolf and rips a monitor off a Kensington cable and dashes off with it, that isn't as big a loss as losing a computer. Plus, the crackhead isn't going to be looking at a plug in the wall for something to steal unless he is going to try to rip out the wiring to sell the copper.

      Add Citrix or MS terminal server, and this is a decent solution for a number of applications.

    5. Re:Old news. by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      Add Citrix or MS terminal server, and this is a decent solution for a number of applications.

      And you just drove the cost way up. For those sorts of places a simple PXE linux environment would be enough.

    6. Re:Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jack in The Box won't be happy.

    7. Re:Old news. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not if they are Microsoft Office shops. Or are teaching Visual Basic or any number of other Microsoft products.
      As much as I like Linux it isn't the solution everywhere.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    8. Re:Old news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So many computer case companies make big-ugly-boxen, why don't more try to work out something like this that mounts inside a wall or as part of furniture like a desk or entertainment center? It can't be that terribly hard either. Just needs a place to bolt on an ATX or mini-ATX motherboard, power supply, hard drive, and have some convenient terminal or wall-jack to plug in the monitor(s) and other peripherals.

      I don't need a whole friggin' pre-built computer system. I just want more options available in regards to ready mount fixture style case hardware such that I can easily build my own. (Sure, if one's clever enough one can take a saber-saw and dremel to a case to gut it and hack something new out of it. But it would be trivial for a factory to stamp out stuff that would let you skip all that extra work.) There's a public market for this kind of thing that's being neglected by only considering businesses and institutions.

      I guess there'd be the argument about UL safety and things like that. But I've often seen traditional cases in less than ideal environments and full of dust bunnies and who knows what else. They are no more or less a fire or electrical hazard. If exercising common sense during installation, it's a moot point.

    9. Re:Old news. by wgoodman · · Score: 1

      It can use PoE. I'm also not sure why this is news since these have been out for 4-5 years now.

    10. Re:Old news. by hitmark · · Score: 1
      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    11. Re:Old news. by flyneye · · Score: 1

      In Russia, wall IS computer.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    12. Re:Old news. by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      That will work but you will still need a Windows server like Windows Terminal server or Citrix.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  3. Jack PC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Sounds like a computer that has the porn pre-downloaded.

    A great time saving feature!

  4. Welcome... by Cloud+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...to 2006.

    Am I missing a development (the 'news') bit or is this just a slashvertisement?

    1. Re:Welcome... by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't know what's more pathetic- that three of ten commenters immediately remembered some random Slashdot story from 2006, or that I did.

    2. Re:Welcome... by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I didn't knew it was actually the same product, same concept though. So sign me up on those 3/10 to =P

      Anyway, funny how the specs is the same now to, impressive, no development in four years :D
      And totally comparable with a 1.2 GHz x86 chip even today, never mind any efficiency progress of x86 chips.
      (As if it was even back then?)

      P3? P4? Pentium-M? Core i7?

    3. Re:Welcome... by mcgrew · · Score: 4, Funny

      Too bad they're not sold at the Wal mart in the mall. Then you could get a Wal Mart Mall Wall Wart.

    4. Re:Welcome... by poena.dare · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those who cannot remember posts of the past are condemned to re-read them. -- G-Dawg "Santa" Yanayana-bing-bang

    5. Re:Welcome... by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Slashvertisement? No way. I mean, it "runs on the RISC processor architecture". No way that could be marketing material. Nor this: "PC Technologies offers a neat and novel thin-client desktop computing solution". And what could be better than having the computer inside the wall? Imagine all the problems this crea..er, solves.

    6. Re:Welcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they're not sold at the Wal mart in the mall. Then you could get a Wal Mart Mall Wall Wart.

      I hate you so much. This same comment has been posted every time there's a wall wart story.

    7. Re:Welcome... by monktus · · Score: 1

      And if it fries your switch, or you slice your hand open installing it, you could get legal advice from Bob Loblaw's Law Blog.

      --
      Weaseling out of things is important to learn. It's what separates us from the animals... except the weasel."
    8. Re:Welcome... by ari_j · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's how you can tell it's not news, even without looking for the same story from 4 years ago: The headline has an exclamation point.

  5. Just slightly old news/dupe by spec8472 · · Score: 2, Informative

    From 2006: http://hardware.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/06/01/1255225

  6. Old news? by Trracer · · Score: 1

    Hmm, I remember hearing about this one years ago.
    A quick google brought this one up, from 2006:
    http://crave.cnet.co.uk/desktops/you-dont-know-jack-pc-you-should-49283851/

    I, for one, wouldn't call it news worthy.

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  7. data center server by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So the ethernet cable runs directly from the device to the "data center server?" Interesting.

    1. Re:data center server by aliquis · · Score: 1

      And that one is also a jack pc running on ethernet power! Amazing!

    2. Re:data center server by Talderas · · Score: 1

      It's powered over ethernet and supports wireless connectivity!

      I can't be the only person that realized the pointlessness of the wireless connection.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    3. Re:data center server by NeverVotedBush · · Score: 1

      Dude, doesn't your data center server have at least 256 Ethernet ports on it?

      Any server worth its salt has them built in on the motherboard! All 256 of them... ;-)

    4. Re:data center server by tepples · · Score: 1

      I can't be the only person that realized the pointlessness of the wireless connection.

      Two words: Access point.

  8. The RISC processor architecture? by CigarBuff · · Score: 1

    "runs on the RISC processor architecture – which gives the solution the equivalent of 1.2GHz of x86 processing power."

    "comes with either a 333MHz (800MHz x86 equivalent) or a 500MHz (1.2GHz x86 equivalent) RMI Au processor."

    I always enjoy when people write articles without actually understanding what they're saying.

    1. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

      Maybe RISC architectures are like the Highlander, there can be only one. Watch out MIPS, they are after your head!

    2. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by aliquis · · Score: 1

      I always enjoy when people write articles without actually understanding what they're saying.

      Yeah, they should stay out of tech press and stay in politics!

      Obligatory: Get of my lawn!

    3. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by a_nonamiss · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, clearly it is you that doesn't understand that making chips out of RISC makes them faster. That has always made me wonder, why don't they just make all chips out of RISC. I mean, it's clearly better than whatever other stuff they make the other chips out of. 2.4 times better in fact.

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    4. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by gman003 · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Ignore this if above poster was being sarcastic. I think he might be, but I'm not sure.

      First off, we're disputing the use of a general type ("RISC architecture") instead of the actual architecture (ARM, MIPS, etc.). That's just bad tech reporting. I'd expect such sloppiness from Fox or MSN, not /.

      Second, pretty much all processors now are RISC internally. Yes, i386 is a CISC instruction set, but processors translate those complex instructions into one or more RISC-type instructions, which are then run. That's arguably more efficient - instructions are stored on disk and in memory as complex instructions, for better code density, but they are processed as efficiently as RISC instructions. Only downside is more complex processors, and a bit more power draw from the translation unit.

    5. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

      Definite sarcasm. I guess I should have made it sound even more ignorant. :)

      --
      -Arthur
      Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
    6. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously do not understand the workings of the X86 processor. Today's X86 has a risc core but, the most common CISC instsructions never see it. They are hardware processed. Comparing RISC to CISC today is like comparing a VW bug to a MACK tractor.

    7. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      No problem. I'm just a bit cynical about things like that.

    8. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      It also runs on power from a wire, has two things that plug into other stuff, and connects to a center somewhere!

    9. Re:The RISC processor architecture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The most pathetic part is that it uses a "RMI Au" CPU, which is just bog standard MIPS32. Even their 500MHz model is not going to touch a 500MHz Pentium III in performance.

  9. Re:Slashvertisement by JavaBear · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Not even close.

  10. wtf is a data center server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this thing has a special cable that plugs into a "data center server?" I love bullshit marketing nonsense.

  11. dual display over the network must needs lots of b by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

    dual display over the network must needs lots of bandwidth to be at a speed that does not fell like the old dial up days of slow loading pages.

  12. New Features of Wall Socket Engineering by happy_place · · Score: 1

    The good thing about having a computer right in your wall is that when the thing overheats, your wall burns down... taking out your whole house.

    --
    http://www.beanleafpress.com
    1. Re:New Features of Wall Socket Engineering by oddaddresstrap · · Score: 1

      Sort of gives a new meaning to the phrase "crash and burn".

    2. Re:New Features of Wall Socket Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      When it overheats due to heavy portscanning, it will spontaneously create a firewall. Problem solved.

    3. Re:New Features of Wall Socket Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't believe 5W peak-power are enough to burn your wall down. Regular outlets can be more dangerous IMHO.

    4. Re:New Features of Wall Socket Engineering by StuartHankins · · Score: 1

      I doubt that's an issue with this low-voltage, low-amp RISC device. Your cell phone charger probably pulls more amperage and creates more heat.

  13. Re:dual display over the network must needs lots o by Bert64 · · Score: 1

    Over a 100mb lan it should be fine, even better over gigabit.

    --
    http://spamdecoy.net - free throwaway anonymous email - avoid spam!
  14. BFD. by AnonymousClown · · Score: 2, Insightful
    So they put the computer in the wall and run it off the power of the ethernet - it can't have much of a processor if that's the only power it needs.

    If I want a less cluttered desktop I'll get one of those all-in-one machines from Lenovo, HP, or Apple.

    Maybe someone should come up with an buried computer - dig a hole in the yard, put the computer in their, and run cables into the building and have it run off of its own heat pump!

    Or the cat box computer! Put the computer in the cat box have it run on the heat of the turds and the energy of the cat burying its shit!

    I mean. there are TONS of useless gimmicks to sell a commodity appliance like PCs - just see what the toaster manufactures are doing.

    I'm just getting really cranky with sales and marketing bullshit that tries to sell mediocre products.

    --
    RIP America

    July 4, 1776 - September 11, 2001

    1. Re:BFD. by Lennie · · Score: 1

      Most people call it a thinclient.

      --
      New things are always on the horizon
    2. Re:BFD. by lavacano201014 · · Score: 1

      I got my kerosene powered toaster running Arch once.

      --
      A wise man once said, "Where is my other quotation mark?
    3. Re:BFD. by Dunega · · Score: 1

      Put it in their what? Actually don't tell me, I don't want to know.

  15. GPL viotation, by Zappy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uses modified Debian, source nowhere to be found.

    Asking by e-mail several questions consistently ignored my request for the sourcecode until all other questions where resolved then I got completely ignored.

    1. Re:GPL viotation, by Maavin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then go with the WinCE version, no GPL problems there ;)

      --


      Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
    2. Re:GPL viotation, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Uses modified Debian, source nowhere to be found.

      Asking by e-mail several questions consistently ignored my request for the sourcecode until all other questions where resolved then I got completely ignored.

      Time to load Harald Welte (http://gpl-violations.org/) onto the trebuchet and open fire at them.

    3. Re:GPL viotation, by TheBrutalTruth · · Score: 1

      Eh? Ours had Windows CE on it...

      --
      Enlightenment is a pipe dream. So where's the pipe?
    4. Re:GPL viotation, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uses modified Debian, source nowhere to be found.

      How do you know they modified the source?

      It's my understanding that running a reduced package-set and recompiling the kernel wouldn't warrant bringing out the GPL violation pitchforks.

    5. Re:GPL viotation, by Minwee · · Score: 1

      The GPL has a few things to say about providing access to source code, even if you're just distributing unmodified works.

  16. Wireless wires? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Running on power provided by the ethernet cable that also connects it to the data center server, the computer-in-a-wall-socket supports wireless connectivity" ...

    I know it's a fad right now to make everything wireless, but there are some applications where it's just not justified.

  17. That's nothing! by SIR_Taco · · Score: 1

    Pfffft.... that's nothing... they've had servers running in walls for years now :)

    --
    I say don't drink and drive, you might spill your drink. Before you get behind the wheel just stop and think.
    1. Re:That's nothing! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That might be entertaining except for the fact that I get "This article has been moved/deleted from the system" when I click on the techweb link in the slashdot summary you've linked to.

    2. Re:That's nothing! by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      Nobody read that article anyway.

  18. Cost? by Osgeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    the problem with most thin clients is that they cost more than a cheap PC, we just setup some clients at work, they are 1.6ghz dual core atoms with 2 gig of ram and a 160gig laptop drive at around 150$ each new (not counting software which is mint anyway) vs a $200+ thin client

    1. Re:Cost? by Maavin · · Score: 1

      but you can't integrate 10 of your cheap PCs into the desk construction of a small industrial control room, where heat and dust are very prevalent faktors...

      --


      Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
    2. Re:Cost? by Osgeld · · Score: 1

      maybe, the ones we just used are fanless though

  19. Upgrayedd by plastick · · Score: 1

    You may need to learn about drywall to upgrade your PC.

  20. Re:Yet another press release from cylonlover by aliquis · · Score: 1

    when all there is is yet another model?

    Seemed like the same one to us.. :D

  21. Re:dual display over the network must needs lots o by a_nonamiss · · Score: 1

    It's just RDP or ICA. It would be just fine over 10mb, probably even coax, although I don't think you can do PoE over 10base2.

    --
    -Arthur
    Cave ne ante ullas catapultas ambules
  22. but how many systems on the same switch or link by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

    but how many systems on the same switch or link back to the data center?

    also how much more power does the data center need for dual display over 1 display per systems?

    1. Re:but how many systems on the same switch or link by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Same as with any other Citrix setup. It is not that unusual, and obviously you aren't going to use this machine for video editing.

    2. Re:but how many systems on the same switch or link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even for you, this is an impressively stupid question. I often wonder whether you're a very subtle troll, 12 years old, or retarded.

  23. WiFi? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 1

    I saw "supports wireless connectivity" and wondered why a device that is POE would need WiFi. Need more caffeine.

    --
    "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    1. Re:WiFi? by gman003 · · Score: 1

      I saw "supports wireless connectivity" and wondered why a device that is POE would need WiFi. Need more caffeine.

      One, it can be used as a Wi-Fi hotspot. Second, it can also use a normal power adapter, for cases of unpowered Ethernet, or using Wi-Fi connection. There might be other uses as well, but those are the two main ones.

    2. Re:WiFi? by Amouth · · Score: 1

      same thing here..

      then i realized hey just means it has blue tooth..

      then i read the article/crap and realized it is via an optional USB adapter.

      surprised they don't just start listing support for everything imaginable that can be connected via USB.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  24. This is news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Must be a slow day

  25. you for got to add the backedcosts for thin pc t by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 0

    you forgot to add the backed costs for thin pc that cost alot more then just backed cost for full power pc.

  26. What a stupid idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So you put your PoE-powered thin client inside the wall, and that's somehow a good thing? If something on the device fails then you have to move a desk/cublice and pull out a wall plate to replace the unit. That sounds smart. And now you have cables for mouse/keyboard/audio/video that have to be long enough to run to the wall plate? And if you move your desk/cubicles around then you have to consider whether or not the new location is within USB/DVI/audio cable distance of a wall jack?

    Here's a better idea: make a tiny thin client that uses PoE and put it in a 5"x5"x1" box that can live on your desk. Then you only have the single ethernet cable to run tot he wall plate. Or if you don't like desk clutter, make one that has screw holes to have it fit the VESA mount on the back of your LCD monitor.

    1. Re:What a stupid idea by cynyr · · Score: 1

      I was thinking if it could run boxee with netflix support it would be great for behind the tv that is already mounted to the wall with the vesa mount. Or in the kitchen to drive a touchscreen. Give me this with high bitrate VC1 and h264 and DTS decoding and I'd gladly shove one in the wall behind my TV. The way it is i already need a small switch in my living room... TV, PS3, HTPC, xbox360, If i had a separate bluray player, some receivers have Ethernet connections. very quickly i hit around 6 connections in my living room. being able to stick one of those behind a wall would be nice for the cords.

      Also it looks like you could just cram it in a standard depth double gang outlet box here in the USA. A bit of plexi/polycarb and you have a vesa mounted system.

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
  27. Title by L4t3r4lu5 · · Score: 1

    Jack PC + OnLive = Cheap gaming cafe?

    --
    Finally had enough. Come see us over at https://soylentnews.org/
    1. Re:Title by besalope · · Score: 1

      Jack PC + OnLive = Cheap gaming cafe?

      Cheap.. until you get your bill from your ISP.

  28. But what's the application? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

    I will agree that it's kina cool to have such a tiny server, but how many companies are so extremely short of space that they can't even find room for an ITX? This doesn't seem to be any more powerful or useful, and it's rare that an office wil be so small that there's no room for one of those.

  29. Mechanical Horrors by Maavin · · Score: 5, Informative

    I deployed about 200 of these things in an industrial environment (control rooms in a steel plant). They are small and perform rather good.
    BUT
    The electrical connection between the the JackPC and its shell is terrible! Some are so weak, that you only have to bump into the table and they lose connection.
    It's so bad we considered soldering a short cat5 pigtail directly to the damn things and fix everything with hot glue...

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
  30. Or you could get something useful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like a Lenovo Q150 net top that isn't that much bigger, has wifi, 2 GB of memory, 160 GB of hard drive space, can run Windows 7 decently, and comes with a mounting bracket where you can stick it on the back of a monitor or bolt it to a desk.

  31. RISC is good! by Chas · · Score: 1

    Oh for the love of Moore's saggy left...

    The differentiation between RISC and CISC simply ceased to have any real meaning years ago, and people still drawing this pointless distinction would do well to stop living in the past.
    Most of the chips some poor, benighted "RISC purist" would identify as CISC are, in fact, hybrid chips implementing technologies from both RISC and CISC architectures.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
  32. Re:dual display over the network must needs lots o by Amouth · · Score: 1

    although I don't think you can do PoE over 10base2.

    Not sure either -- but I've got a car battery and some cable - let see if it lights up any thing, quick be ready to catch the magic smoke.

    --
    '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
  33. I love the "specs" by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

    http://www.chippc.com/thin-clients/jack-pc/

    2 of the 3 models they sell list this as a spec in the spec sheets

    100% Virus / Trojan Immunity

    On top of that, they run (unlike someone incorrectly said they run linux) Operating System Enhanced Windows CE-6.0 R2

    Read the specs for each of the three models yourself lol

    1. Re:I love the "specs" by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Correction, ALL 3 models list that

  34. Edgar Allen Poe's . . . by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    "The Tell-Tail PC" and "The Cask of PC!" Does it make strange noises in the wall in the night, slowing driving the owner insane? Or does the owner go back fifty years later, and say, "May it rest in peace!" . . . ?

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Edgar Allen Poe's . . . by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Thornton is in the next room, but they prevent me from talking to him. They are trying, too, to suppress most of the facts concerning the network. When I speak of poor Norrys they accuse me of this hideous thing, but they must know that I did not do it. They must know it was the computers; the whirring buzzing computers whose humming will never let me sleep; the daemon computers that race behind the padding in this room and beckon me down to greater horrors than I have ever known; the computers they can never hear; the computers, the computers in the walls.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
  35. Re:dual display over the network must needs lots o by kgkeys · · Score: 1

    A lot of ham radio accessories use power injectors at the transceiver to power remote antenna switches, tuners, etc. I think coax just fell out of use before PoE really came out in force.

  36. The Jack PC, BRILLIANT!!!! by bigtone78 · · Score: 1

    Jack PC Sales Man: Hey potential customer this PC has no power cable!!! This is the next big thing.

    Potential Customer: No power cable? Really? But it still uses electricity right?

    Jack PC Sales Man: Of course, don't be silly.

    Potential Customer: So where does the power come from?

    Jack PC Sales Man: From the ethernet cable!!!

    Potential Customer: So you're using the ethernet cable as a power cable? How is that not the same as having a power cable?

    Jack PC Sales Man: ...um....ugh...It's an ethernet cable. You can now get rid of that unsightly power cable and get the power from this other cable that's not a power cable.

    Potential Customer:....right.....(backs away slowly)

  37. x86 equivalent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    My eyes started glazing over when the press rel-- I mean the story -- explained the processor speeds in "MHz x86 equivalent." Is that a single-in-order-core Atom x86, or a multi-core OoO with lots of L3 cache i7, or a really-long-piped Pentium 4 or...? Seriously, this tells you nothing. It's totally ok to use "x86" as shorthand for certain qualities of a processor, but performance (especially in terms of clock speed) sure as hell isn't one of those infer-able qualities.

    This car has a color, similar to a painted Ford.

  38. Let's go even further by giuseppemag · · Score: 1

    Would be even cooler if we could have similar computer inside CELLPHONES!!! Oh, wait...

    --
    My book: Friendly F#, fun with game development and XNA; my game: Galaxy Wars by VSTeam; my gamedev language: Casanova.
  39. Re:moed down by lavacano201014 · · Score: 1

    Wild Goatse appears!

    --
    A wise man once said, "Where is my other quotation mark?
  40. I have never bought anything... by sootman · · Score: 3, Informative

    ... from a company with a page like this. If I can't buy easily, directly from your site, I'm not going to buy. FFS, do you want to sell things or not? If so then set up a damn store somewhere--Yahoo, eBay, etsy, I don't care. But don't tell me "Here's a bunch of links to the front page of some resellers, start searching." At the very least, post a "suggested price" so I know if it's even worth the effort to pursue.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:I have never bought anything... by BigSes · · Score: 1

      This is very common now. Bad example, I know, but have you tried to buy a BTX case recently? All the "current" and "well-known" manufacturers simply link to other sites. Yes, they are no longer actively in use, but if your company still PRODUCES them, sell them yourselves! I'm sure Ill get trolled, flamed and modded into oblivion now, but its great way to create a multicore PC totally on the super cheap for a non-nerd user, like ourselves. I agree with you, the OP, that's shitty for business.

  41. Junk in the Wall by TheBrutalTruth · · Score: 1

    We got one for testing a few weeks ago. Never got past a boot screen. Re-install OS per manufacturer resulted in a brick. Waiting for a week for support to respond.... (Disclosure: Other folks working with it. I have no exposure to it other than laughing at their increasing frustration / cussing). Now, this can happen with any product, so I'm not dead to it. But DOA unit on the 1st try certainly dampens perception.

    --
    Enlightenment is a pipe dream. So where's the pipe?
  42. Re:dual display over the network must needs lots o by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget a bucket to catch the bits if the cable melts...

  43. Re:you for got to add the backedcosts for thin pc by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

    What backend cost?
    Elec will be pretty low with atom, neither one will ever be fixed, just tossed and replaced.

  44. I hear these devices are also behind... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... the Bob Loblaw Law Blog.