Slashdot Mirror
Do Firefox Users Pay More For Car Loans?
RandyOo writes "Someone wrote in to The Consumerist to report an interesting discovery: while shopping online for a car loan, Capital One offered him different rates, depending on the browser he used! Firefox yielded the highest rate at 3.5%, Opera took second place with 3.1%, Safari was only 2.7%, and finally, Google's Chrome browser afforded him the best rate of all: 2.3%!
A commenter on the article claims to have been previously employed by Capital One, and writes: If you model the risk and revenue of applicants, the type of browser shows up as a significant variable. Browsers do predict an account's performance to some degree, and it will affect the rates you will view. It isn't a marketing test. I was still a bit dubious, but at least one of her previous comments backs up her claims to have worked for a credit card company.
Considering the outcry after it was discovered that Amazon was experimenting with variable pricing a few years back, it seems surprising that consumers would be punished (or rewarded), based solely on the browser they happen to be using at the time!"
Obviously it would be high as the user would be a risk taker!
wha'? where am i?
I got a quote for -£240 using Lynx
I work at IHOP you insensitive clod!
"A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
Correlation may not imply causation, but it certainly does waggle its eyebrows meaningfully in causations direction.
http://xkcd.com/552/
they could use that information to find people using apple products. and charge such people 9.5%. as long as the car was titanium white, such people would happily purchase at that rate
intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
Statistics motherfucker, do you understand them?
Technically, i think the W3C standards for HTML 4.0 require a 3.5% interest rate. The other browsers are just providing proprietary rates in a standards breaking battle of oneupmanship. I think HTML 5 attempts to address this issue with the new heavily scriptable InterestCanvas element.
Sure, but in this case it makes perfect sense. Obviously anyone using Firefox is a filthy open source hippy who demands everything for free. If you tried to loan money to a Firefox user he'd probably just spend it all on weed and then claim your demands to pay back the money violate his privacy in some way.
Opera users aren't good people to lend to either, since none of them have any income. They spend all of their time scanning the Internet for stories about browsers (any browser) so they can jump in and extol the virtues of Opera. This leaves no time to hold down a real job.
Safari users are good people to lend to because, since they're using an Apple product, you already know they're accustomed to paying huge premiums for slightly shinier versions of various consumer goods. All you have to do is send the bill in an elegantly designed box and they'll pay it without question every month.
Chrome users are the best because their close relationship with Google shows they've already given up on the whole concept of privacy and will gladly supply you with any information you ask for. Plus, all you have to do is tell them you're not evil and not only will they allow you to do whatever you want no matter how evil it is, they'll actually defend your actions to others!
Clearly browser choice is and should be a significant factor in the lending business.
It is sometimes. For example, they should be charging the Safari users more, as those Mac fanboys will pay anything if it's marketed right.
"He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
After reading about this, I am completely {outraged}{amused}{indifferent}{turned on} by this practice.
Javascript error. Aborting script.
The sad thing is that you have to use your choice of browser to define yourself and make yourself feel superior to others. I don't need to resort to such immature behavior to validate my self worth. I'm a Mac owner.
Alex, I'll take keybindings not used by Emacs for $400....
Repeat after me
after me
after me
after me
after me
after me
after me
after me
after me
Let q be a radix > 1. I am in ur base-q, killing 10 d00ds.