Slashdot Mirror


$2,000 Bounty For Open Source Xbox Kinect Drivers

ptorrone writes "Open source hardware company Adafruit Industries is offering a $2,000 bounty for the first person or group to upload driver code and examples under an open source license to GitHub for the Xbox Kinect released yesterday. The Kinect sensor outputs video at a frame rate of 30Hz, with the RGB video stream at 32-bit color VGA resolution (640×480 pixels), and the monochrome video stream used for depth sensing at 16-bit QVGA resolution (320×240 pixels with 65,536 levels of sensitivity). The open hardware group would like to see this camera used for education, robotics and fun outside the Xbox." The bounty was originally $1,000, but Microsoft's dour response induced Adafruit to double it. ("With Kinect, Microsoft built in numerous hardware and software safeguards designed to reduce the chances of product tampering. Microsoft will continue to make advances in these types of safeguards and work closely with law enforcement and product safety groups to keep Kinect tamper-resistant.") In addition, the Xbox 360 dashboard update that preceded Kinect's launch contains upgraded anti-piracy restrictions.

27 of 274 comments (clear)

  1. Is reverse engineering still legal ? by JonySuede · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Is reverse engineering for interoperability purpose still legal ?

    --
    Jehovah be praised, Oracle was not selected
    1. Re:Is reverse engineering still legal ? by hedwards · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends how you do it. It's oddly ironic how now when it hurts MS they don't think reverse engineering is such a good idea. Especially since they made most of their money based upon IBM clones.

      Additionally, I like how they're claiming that this has something to do with product tampering.

    2. Re:Is reverse engineering still legal ? by ByOhTek · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Aye. A Kinect would be a great tool/controller for a computer.

      Then again, maybe that's it - they don't want the computer to have one more way to compete with the 360.

      --
      Self proclaimed typo king, and inventor of the bear destroying coffee table (patent not pending).
    3. Re:Is reverse engineering still legal ? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They'll want it when it's ready, nicely integrated and a must-have feature of Win8.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    4. Re:Is reverse engineering still legal ? by vux984 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They've got millions of hotmail users, a large ad network centered on Bing that also spans many high volume sites like Facebook, Wall Street Journal, etc.

      Google search backs 65% of US search. (Microsoft is pushing 11%.)

      Google controls 69%+ of the online advertising market.

      Microsoft doesn't have a copy of all your Microsoft Office documents. Google has a copy of all your googledocs documents.

      Google analytics infests more internet sites than i can count. Microsoft only gets analytics data for their own properties.

      if you use their services, MS is still collecting your data.

      Google gets *tons* of data on you even if you don't use there services thanks to adwords/advertising and google analytics.

      Microsoft's "large ad network" is just a little slice of the advertising market.

      Sure microsoft collects user data, but they aren't even in the same league.

  2. Is there cryptographic authentication? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Presumably there is cryptographic authentication here that needs to be broken. Sounds like some student's differential power analysis school project is about to get a bit more lucrative... and legally risky...

  3. Tampering by Shotgun · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Tamper-resistant? You mean, they're trying to stop me from using it the way I choose. Like how the screwdriver manufacturers add elements to the steel to make it so that I can't sharpen the end and make a pin-punch from it? Jeeesh!! What arrogance.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    1. Re:Tampering by robot256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think the screwdriver manufacturers are worried about you making a pin-punch from it. I think they're worried about their screwdriver breaking. If you've ever had the tip on a screwdriver crack off you know what I'm talking about.

    2. Re:Tampering by countSudoku() · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what a bad choice of language, not surprisingly from a MS spokesweasel. "Tamper-resistant" comes from the time when people were adding poison and other bad ingredients to Tylenol and other products which lacked the little foil "tamper-proof" seal on the package. Tamper-resistant should be protecting ME from something BAD, and NOT for assholes to lock down my new device to their RROD shitbox. Using this fucking hardware any goddamn way we see fit, even if it makes no sense, is what I demand. Crack open that fucking thing and fuck Microsoft in their stupid asses with a Sony Move stick!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  4. Safeguards, product tampering, law enforcement?!? by noidentity · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But Microsoft isn't taking kindly to the bounty offer. "Microsoft does not condone the modification of its products,"

    Once you sell one to me, it's my product, morons.

    With Kinect, Microsoft built in numerous hardware and software safeguards designed to reduce the chances of product tampering. Microsoft will continue to make advances in these types of safeguards and work closely with law enforcement and product safety groups to keep Kinect tamper-resistant.

    What the hell, are these X-ray machines or something with radioactive material in them that would sicken the user if he opened it up?!? I had better be sure thisn't some strange dream.

  5. Ah the good old days by Nursie · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whatever happened to people selling devices to other people, so they could use them as they see fit?

    Not providing drivers fro other systems, fine, whatever you like, not your responsibility. Working with law enforcement to prevent 'product tampering?

    Screw you MS, really.

  6. bounty by DeadDecoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is it me or is 2000$ kinda cheap to hire someone with the expertise required to extract out kinect's source?

    1. Re:bounty by rokstar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'd say that Microsoft making a statement like that will push people into doing it faster. Seems like nothing motivates nerds more than being told that they can't do something by a large company or organization. Forget about money, this is now about ego.

  7. Re:Kinect for Robotics by BlueRaja · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course if this happened, sales of Kinect sensors would go up without sales of Kinect video games going up... and since MS is actually *losing* money on these sensors, suddenly the price of Kinect sensors would go up...

  8. law enforcement by DarthVain · · Score: 5, Insightful

    BS.

    I am not licensing this product. Your not renting it to me. I am not leasing it. I am buying it, and I'll do with it what I damn well please.

  9. On What Grounds? by keytoe · · Score: 3, Insightful

    On what grounds can Microsoft even begin to claim any sort of right to restrict reverse engineering this product?

    If they are hoping to invoke the DMCA for circumventing a content protection mechanism, I'd like to point out that these things are essentially a couple of cameras and a mic shoved in a plastic housing. Any content captured by these cameras is, in no uncertain terms, mine as it is me 'performing' in front of them.

  10. Microsoft's position is tricky by denobug · · Score: 4, Insightful

    On one hand, yes, it is a hardware. You are please to use it as you see fit.

    On the other hand, the key to Kinect is not the hardware components itself, rather it is the embedded code that brings everything together, process the data, and make the whole thing work. To that end they do have right to safeguard their code and software design to keep anyone from knowing exactly what they are doing, and how they are doing.

    So I think it is not wrong if someone figured it all out by themselves how to use those components or use Kinet in its entirety in other purpose besides connecting to XBox. But I would venture to guess that whoever attempts to extract the code internal to the device would be subject to legal action, and like it or not, Microsoft's litigation would be legitimate.

    1. Re:Microsoft's position is tricky by wierd_w · · Score: 5, Insightful

      While it might smack of 1984 paranoia, we ARE talking about a motion tracking camera, attached to a closed architecture and DMCA protected computing platform, equipped with broadband internet capabilities, communicating in a DMCA protected communication protocol.

      No matter how "OMFG! AWESOME!" this thing is, unless I know for sure what software is being run, I consider it an unsafe product for my privacy.

      Just imagine the "Fun", should Microsoft decide to roll out an update that causes the camera to 'passively' track and analyze images of logos it sees, so they can datamine their gaming public for "enhanced products and services", such as "Value added partnerships with partner companies" to offer "Special product offers" to said people? Suddenly, your XBOX becomes the equivilent of a secret shopper in your home, suggesting more Hostess, Dolly Madison, and Pepsi products.

      Doesnt matter if the resolution is really crappy, grainy, and the framerate is slow-- it only needs to focus on what the person is wearing/doing in front of the TV. Even surreptitiously snapping and sending jpegs of "logo candidates" to microsoft for bulk processing once a week would be of IMMENSE value to advertising fuckwads. (of course, microsoft would make 'every effort' to prevent personally identifiable information, like your face, and to avoid capturing images of naked users of the Kinect motion controller for privacy reasons, and then trumpet these as being 'good faith'-- but they would still happily capture the logos on your shirt and pants, on the can of pop/beer you are sipping, and what bag of deep fried somethings you are snacking on for their "advertising partners")

      But why stop there? This thing has several acoustic microphones too! Just IMAGINE the fun, should this device get co-opted by law enforcement! Why, they wouldnt NEED to "Mandate" cameras be installed in your house-- Why, they stupid sheeple would BUY IT, and INSTALL IT themselves! Just imagine the fun that the security theater types in Great Britain would have with this! The "Full monitor" mode could be activated based on "excessive motion", and or "Highly variable sound input matching XX baseline", and suddenly you are on candid camera while you spank your naughty child's butt. Better have a good explanation when child protective services shows up. (etc.)

      So, simply because I have had my "healthy" distrust of corporations and their use of technology turn into a pathological paranoia, I GREATLY desire to see the ENTIRE kinect data stack and software algorithm tree reverse engineered like a Diebold voting machine. The problem is that I have a hard time convincing myself that this one is paranoia.

      I want to know EVERYTHING this device does, how it does it, when, and why-- before I would even consider buying one.

  11. Re:Kinect _SOFTWARE_ for Robotics by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hardware-wise, Kinect isn't anything particularly special - basically few mics, simple visible light webcam, two stereoscopically arranged IR ones (take out IR filter from an ordinary webcam, replace it with non-exposed part of photographic film) capturing projected light pattern, very limited tilting.

    Everything very interesting and useful happens on the CPU of X360...

    It's not merely a case of drivers, you'd need highly specific software anyway. Might as well use 2 inexpensive webcams.

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  12. Re:Safeguards, product tampering, law enforcement? by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Regardless of the business model, there is no place for this aggressive rhetoric. Microsoft needs to understand that when they sell someone a piece of hardware, it is no longer Microsoft's to control outside of allowing it on their network or not.

    --
    Good-bye
  13. Re:Safeguards, product tampering, law enforcement? by sznupi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft is losing money on these Kinect units

    ^this one is really one of those [citation needed] cases

    --
    One that hath name thou can not otter
  14. Re:Why do they care? by clone53421 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How can it possibly hurt Microsoft if there are customers who want to purchase and repurpose their hardware for something other than playing a game?

    Which do you think is more in Microsoft’s best interests, selling a bunch of high-tech electronics in a molded plastic case for $150, or selling a piece of stamped plastic for $40?

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  15. Case study: The Wii remote drivers by Captain+Spam · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, I honestly forgot. Did Nintendo flip out when people started developing PC drivers for the Wii remote? I don't seem to recall them raising hell over someone making drivers for their controllers (and Nintendo WOULD be the ones to do so), but Microsoft is doing that for what is effectively a couple cameras?

    --
    Demanding constant attention will only lead to attention.
  16. Re:Kinect _SOFTWARE_ for Robotics by coniferous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    >MS said they dropped doing the heavy processing on Kinect itself...

    There is still that arm processor. It's being used for something. It could be used for something different.

    > so I just checked - it's 512 megabits

    Thats still too much for buffer. 512 megabits is 64 megabytes. Still more likely that it's for processing

    We are arguing about symantics. my point is: This is more then just a couple webcams and a couple of mics. We could debate about the symantics till the cows come home, but at the end of the day there are no hardware solutions that quite reproduce what the kinect does. It's worth hacking.

  17. Re:Safeguards, product tampering, law enforcement? by greenbird · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Microsoft needs to understand that when they sell someone a piece of hardware, it is no longer Microsoft's to control outside of allowing it on their network or not.

    That's just not true anymore. They've managed to pervert copyright law from the constitutional purpose of "to promote progress" to one of absolute control of anything, including ideas, anyone makes.

    --
    Who is John Galt?
  18. Unwarranted differentiation by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Microsoft just wants me to pay for it...
    Apple? They want to sell things too, but they are also control freaks that would want to make sure you are using it the way they want you to.

    I don't see how you come to that conclusion, at all.

    Apple is the one that doesn't really take many countermeasures against jailbreaking. They've not made a fuss about AppleTV or iPhone jailbreaking.

    Now here in this same story you find a dour letter from Microsoft about misusing the Kinect. And in Windows Phone 7, you have exactly the same degree of lockdown you do with the iPhone.

    I could see an argument for saying both companies are just as locked down, but to say Microsoft is substantially better just ignores what they are doing, in any space they compete in.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  19. Re:Why do they care? by jonwil · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Its simple. This device costs a LOT less than a similar set of cameras+processing hardware from someone like PrimeSense (OEM for the kit in the Kinect). If you could use it for something other than playing games, there is suddenly a LOT less reason to buy the expensive kit.