Slashdot Mirror


NASA's Stunning Close-Up Photos of Comet Hartley 2

Several readers have sent word that NASA's EPOXI spacecraft performed a close approach to comet Hartley 2 yesterday, taking pictures within roughly 700km of the nucleus. Bad Astronomer Phil Plait has a collection of some fantastic photographs, and you can check out a ton of other images on the mission website. The Planetary Society blog put together a neat animation of the flyby. NASA's mission fact sheet (PDF) explains EPOXI's background — it's the supplemental mission of the Deep Impact craft that smashed a small probe into a different comet back in 2005 — and why Hartley 2 was chosen for this flyby (they couldn't find their original target).

62 comments

  1. My god... it looked like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a giant D_LD_.

  2. Pedantic Naming Clarification by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Informative

    Several readers have sent word that NASA's EPOXI spacecraft ....

    EPOXI is the name of the mission (an extension of a previous mission), the spacecraft itself is actually called Deep Impact. Just trying to clear up the ambiguity.

    1. Re:Pedantic Naming Clarification by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Also, if you ask me, the comet looks like a Lancer Frigate.

    2. Re:Pedantic Naming Clarification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you ask me, the comet looks like one of the planets in the Good Egg Galaxy:
      http://mycheats.1up.com/view/section/6402/20083/super_mario_galaxy_/wii

  3. Slow website by photonic · · Score: 1

    Anyone else having problems viewing the EPOXi webpage? It brings my Firefox to a halt and almost crashes my laptop. Nice way to design your website, embedding more than 70 big images that are just scaled. It shouldn't exactly be rocket-science to make some thumbnails! :)

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
    1. Re:Slow website by hondo77 · · Score: 1

      iMac/Safari: No problems.

      --
      I live ze unknown. I love ze unknown. I am ze unknown.
    2. Re:Slow website by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Yes. Same here. With luck we will slashdot it so loading won't be such a memory hog.

    3. Re:Slow website by simcop2387 · · Score: 1

      firefox 4 on linux also no problems.

    4. Re:Slow website by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It loads fine, if slowly, for me. I am sure the is some excellent reason to want to load very large image files where the magnified target consists of seven pixels, but I can't imagine what it is. The closer-up images are spectacular however.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    5. Re:Slow website by El_Oscuro · · Score: 1

      put in your CGI script something along the lines

      convert -thumbnail 100 $QUERY_STRING thumbnail-$QUERY_STRING
      echo Location: thumbnail-$QUERY_STRING
      echo

      --
      "Be grateful for what you have. You may never know when you may lose it."
    6. Re:Slow website by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 4, Funny

      Space pictures are big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind-bogglingly big they are. I mean, you may think it takes a long time to down the load of the CSS, but that's just peanuts to space pictures.

    7. Re:Slow website by daremonai · · Score: 1

      It shouldn't exactly be rocket-science to make some thumbnails!

      That's the problem. If it were rocket science, they would have got it right.

    8. Re:Slow website by Urkki · · Score: 1

      Anyone else having problems viewing the EPOXi webpage? It brings my Firefox to a halt and almost crashes my laptop. Nice way to design your website, embedding more than 70 big images that are just scaled. It shouldn't exactly be rocket-science to make some thumbnails! :)

      Indeed. It brought my firefox on an 8 years old laptop with original XP installation and 512MB of memory to a screeching halt. I had to close at least 10 tabs to get things back to normal. Unacceptable! Won't anybody think of the children?

    9. Re:Slow website by sharkey · · Score: 1

      You need to be careful with space. If you get to the edge, there's a vasty nothingness to be seen that is rumored to have profound negative effects on a man.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  4. That's no comet.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .. it's a rusty battlestar!

    Seriously, check out the animation:
    http://www.planetary.org/blog/article/00002758/

  5. Incredible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Amazing pics - those are the kind of photos that make you look at the universe in a whole new way.

  6. No rest for the weary by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The EPOXI team did a great job, but amazingly most of them are straight back to work after this. The Stardust NExT mission, another repurposing of a used deep space spacecraft is going to be revisiting Temple 1 (which deep impact originally hit) in another 4 months.

    Right after the flyby much of the team was in meetings to make sure Stardust gets where it needs to go. Not sure whether it'll be easier or harder though. The comet is larger and less likely to stray too far off course, but the spacecraft itself is a finicky thing that's nearly out of fuel... Should be exciting to see even more pictures like this in a few months.

    1. Re:No rest for the weary by ArsonSmith · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, the EPOXI team really stuck together. Bringing both parts mixed well and things really solidified. You could say the real glue of the mission.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    2. Re:No rest for the weary by david.given · · Score: 1

      I know that Deep Impact uses its spare time for exoplanet hunting --- apparently, a flaw in its primary telescope mirror makes it ideal for photometric observation of stars --- but does anyone know if it's going anywhere interesting after the Hartley 2 flyby? Nobody seems to have mentioned anything.

    3. Re:No rest for the weary by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      I believe that it's basically out of propellant. So while it will be able to continue the exoplanet hunt for a while (it can maintain attitude with what little remains) they don't have enough to retarget it to a new asteroid or comet.

  7. where is it by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Aren't there supposed to be alien spacecraft following behind these comets? Every few years there's another group offing themselves in order to get a free ride on one of those spaceships.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    1. Re:where is it by Quirkz · · Score: 1

      Yes, there are 7 behind this one. You can't see them? Obviously you're not one of the chosen. Sorry.

  8. On a related note by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just found this animation of the 1986 Giotto fly-by through the tail of Halley. (QuickTime required.) Very cool. Apparently Giotto's still out there and going strong, took a detour through another comet some years later, still does the occasional fly-by near Earth and can be reactivated if there's anything worth looking at. Not bad for a probe that they weren't expecting to survive the Halley encounter.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:On a related note by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      (QuickTime required.)

      It's not even in QuickTime format.

      http://sci.esa.int/science-e-media/video/12/140.mpg

    2. Re:On a related note by levicivita · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up.

    3. Re:On a related note by IrquiM · · Score: 1

      Do it yourself!

      --
      This is blinging
    4. Re:On a related note by the_arrow · · Score: 1

      When coming close, the blurry image of the Halley comet looked quite similar to this Hartley 2 comet.

      --
      / The Arrow
      "How lovely you are. So lovely in my straightjacket..." - Nny
  9. Call me when they find Mathilda May in one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0089489/

  10. Smooth terrain by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    Not sure how to explain the smooth terrain in the middle of the comet. Because the rough areas are associated with out gassing, the rough surface in that area is presumably the rubble left behind after much of the ice has gone. So is the smooth area non volatile? Maybe its mostly rock and the ice doesn't sublimate there.

    Or alternatively perhaps the smooth area had volatiles but only fine grained solid material so the surface left over doesn't look as rough.

    1. Re:Smooth terrain by Nyeerrmm · · Score: 1

      I think it was actually two bodies joined by impact. It probably compressed and melted the joint, and outgassing is more likely to happen on the ends.

      Everything but the fact that its a joined body is pure speculation by me though, so take it as it is. I'm a rocket scientist, not a planetary one.

    2. Re:Smooth terrain by CorvisRex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Looks like two objects bound together at one time due to gravity(low though it may be) not all the dust get blown totally away, some will settle back due to the week gravity. If the center part has less volatile and more dust, the dust will stay and not be out-gassed away. that would explain both the shape and the smoothness of the center part. just a guess.

    3. Re:Smooth terrain by Confusador · · Score: 1

      There's some commentary over at the Planetary Society that suggests (among other things) that the two bodies may not be joined, just gravitationally bound, and that the material in the middle is probably loose.

      What I think we are seeing here is a contact binary, two main bodies that orbit each other so closely that they are touching. Gravel and dust has flowed into the weird gravitational region between the two lobes, filling it almost as though it were a liquid. I'll bet that smooth neck traces out an equipotential surface.

    4. Re:Smooth terrain by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      test

  11. Ahhh Slashdot... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Yesterday's news, today.

  12. NASA sure is going downhill fast... by scourfish · · Score: 1

    What, so now they're making spacecrafts out of epoxi? I mean, sure I would expect the Chinese or Indian space programs to pull such. We'll lose our innovative edge if we can't do better.

    1. Re:NASA sure is going downhill fast... by bhcompy · · Score: 1

      What? You've never seen a 60s era muscle car that's more Bondo than metal?

    2. Re:NASA sure is going downhill fast... by stockard · · Score: 1

      You're probably just joking around, but there is at least one pretty advanced carbon-epoxy spacecraft, the White Knight. Plus, there have been a couple of new American carbon-epoxy aircraft in production the past few years:

      Bell-Boeing V-22 Osprey
      Boeing 787
      Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor

    3. Re:NASA sure is going downhill fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The struts that form the tripod for the High-Gain Antenna are graphite/epoxy composite, and the hexagonal bus itself is aluminum honeycomb sandwiched between aluminum sheets bonded with...you guessed it, epoxy. Nothing wrong with epoxy. She's a tough little spacecraft.

  13. Re:Similar to photos in my toilet bowl .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must have highly developed sphincter control to be able to form this kind of dumbbell shape without prematurely pinching off the two lobes. Did it take much practice?

  14. Thanks for the clarification by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

    I thought it was the name of the material they made the spacecraft from.

    --

    Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
  15. Oh, I dunno. by jd · · Score: 1

    Looks very much like the description of the alien vessel in Rendezvous with Rama, minus the airlock. If it had had the airlock as well, THAT might have stirred some interest.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  16. So close by Joe+Snipe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think one of our best bets on searching our galaxy would be to shoot a probe that burrows into one of these far reaching comets. It would give us a better observable range, and chances are that other intelligent life would be interested in observing the comet as well, should there be any.

    --
    Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
    1. Re:So close by sznupi · · Score: 1

      "Probes searching our galaxy" - probably not the best way we could spend our time and resources. For a probe not to be destroyed on impact, it would need to be on virtually the same orbit before contact already - and all this for a fairly slow ride into still very close emptiness (the comet being the target of exploration - that's a different thing)

      However I do agree, in principle, that this might be how we will explore the galaxy, eventually. Oort cloud harbors perhaps even a trillion comets - that's a lot of resources for space habitats. Establishing them should be easier than interstellar travel (which almost certainly would just give another "barren" system, no reason to hurry) - and after thousands of years, some groups might hitch a ride in some other cloud, when its star will pass nearby.

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  17. If a comet this sized collided with earth.. by joshier · · Score: 0

    what would happen? I read on wikipedia it is a mile in diameter roughly.

    1. Re:If a comet this sized collided with earth.. by pitterpatter · · Score: 1

      what would happen? I read on wikipedia it is a mile in diameter roughly.

      You can see what some people think here: http://www.purdue.edu/impactearth.

  18. Outgassing? Jets? Ha ha ha! by zentext · · Score: 1

    It's amazing, how doggedly the existing 'outgassing icy comets' paradigm hangs on despite so much contrary evidence.

    How can anyone look at those pictures, and NOT recognize corona point discharges? Sigh. I suppose most people have never worked with high voltage systems, especially in vacuum, so they have an excuse. But still, NASA... it's really sad.

    If you have no idea what this is about, google 'Electric Universe'.

    1. Re:Outgassing? Jets? Ha ha ha! by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      People would take Electric Universe theory more seriously if it didn't violate conservation of momentum.

    2. Re:Outgassing? Jets? Ha ha ha! by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Don't you know? It's just more lies! (conservation of momentum) All a conspiracy to make the few true geniuses struggle. But eventually, they will be recognized and place on the pedestal, among other few greatest minds of science...

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  19. Intermediate steps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You could have gone through the obligatory intermediate steps in naming the organ, and people would still get your "point."

  20. Re:Similar to photos in my toilet bowl .. by fkx · · Score: 0

    .. all my life.

  21. Couple Questions... by segwonk · · Score: 1

    I'd like to know a couple things:

    1) Do these images imply that the comet is not spinning? Or was it not in frame long enough to tell?

    2) Anybody know if there's an animation or a graph depicting the Deep Implact's flight path?

    Thanks!

    - jw

    --
    - ------ Go 'til ya know.
    1. Re:Couple Questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to know a couple things:

      1) Do these images imply that the comet is not spinning? Or was it not in frame long enough to tell?

      2) Anybody know if there's an animation or a graph depicting the Deep Implact's flight path?

      Thanks!

      - jw

      There are plots of the spacecraft trajectory at
      http://epoxi.umd.edu/3gallery/graphics.shtml

      If you're sufficiently bored/motivated, you can also obtain ephemeris data from http://horizons.jpl.nasa.gov

    2. Re:Couple Questions... by MMatessa · · Score: 1

      JPL's new Eyes on the Solar System has a 3D+time simulation of most current spacecraft including the approach of Deep Impact (EPOXI) to Hartley 2.

  22. It's hard to visualize the scale by Provocateur · · Score: 1

    Is there a photo or sketch of its size compared to scientific units like a) Bruce Willis, b) Aircraft carrier, c) Library of Congress?

    --
    WARNING: Smartphones have side effects--most of them undocumented.
    1. Re:It's hard to visualize the scale by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

      At the lower right of the smooth middle, there's a small white lump just inside the shadow-line, poking up into the sunlight. A shard of ice or rock projecting through the surrounding dust. It's apparently 100 metres high. (330ft.) What's that, about 20 stories?

      Stare at that spot for awhile, imagine you're standing at the base of a 20 story building, and someone's taking an aerial photo of the area. Let your brain adjust to that scale. Now look at the rest of the comet.

      Happiness?

      --
      Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
  23. Looks like.. by dragin33 · · Score: 1

    Someone set us up the bomb.