Is Linux At the End of Its Life Cycle?
Glyn Moody writes "That's what Nikolai Pryanishnikov, president of Microsoft Russia, seems to think. Quoted in the context of continuing questions about Russia's plans to create its own national operating system based on GNU/Linux, Pryanishnikov said [via Google Translate]: 'We must bear in mind that Linux is not a Russian OS and, moreover, is at the end of its life cycle.' An off-the-cuff comment, or something more?"
...good OS dies first
The world is how you make it
This just in, WIndows person says non-windows product will fail! Gets frontpage on slashdot!
Well, the president of Microsoft Russia should be a reliable, trustworthy source for this kind of analysis, right? Right?
PinkOS.
slashdot: where everyone yells sarcastic metaphors to themselves to understand the issue
We knew that fools would Russian, to try and Finnish it off.
"Flyin' in just a sweet place,
Never been known to fail..."
He could also be saying "We must bear in mind that Linux is not a Russian OS, and moreover, is the ass of a living bicycle."
or
"Die, capitalist pig."
All open source projects evolve to the point where the current developers want to throw away all the code and start again.
I'm expecting Linux NT, an entirely new kernel using a microkernel architecture. :-)
"This is news?"
It has the words Linux, Microsoft, and Russia in it. News? This to Slashdot is like the Ark of the Covenant is to religion.
Then they discarded 95/98
That's a funny way of describing the Windows ME production process, but after a couple of seconds thought, I think it is accurate.
After listening to Nikolai's comments, a more accurate translation turned out to be, "If 'I' use Linux, 'I' will be at the end of 'My' Life-Cycle." It's a common translation mistake.
I thought RMS's primary goal was to ensure that everyone called it GNU/Linux :-)
Coder's Stone: The programming language quick ref for iPad