Intel Talks 1000-Core Processors
angry tapir writes "An experimental Intel chip shows the feasibility of building processors with 1,000 cores, an Intel researcher has asserted. The architecture for the Intel 48-core Single Chip Cloud Computer processor is 'arbitrarily scalable,' according to Timothy Mattson. 'This is an architecture that could, in principle, scale to 1,000 cores,' he said. 'I can just keep adding, adding, adding cores.'"
I hope he never works for Gillette.
Sometimes, life itself is sarcasm...
http://xkcd.com/619/
Imagine a Beowulf cluster of th^H^H^H
Ah, forget it, the darn thing practically is one already! :/
"Imagine exactly ONE of those" just doesn't sound the same.
Make a processor with four asses.
1000 cores on a chip isn't too bad. I already have one with 110 cores.
That's only 10 more cores!
1.3 billion transitors!!! When I was a kid we had 9 and you could open the box and count 'em.
And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
I will need to buy a pair of sunglasses, and crush them when I find that the new Intel processor has over 9000 cores.
Why would you care to see one on your desktop? Do you have any use for one?
You got that right. I've never used more than 639 K of RAM either.
Know your pads. One time pad: good for cryptography. Two timing pad: where to take your mistress.
Yes, an while we are at it gat a working EMH/ECH(star-trek voyager) and a mobuile emitor :)
Or a working spell check program ;-)
Look where all this talking got us, baby.
What? Tell me. WHAT ARE THEY SEEING?
... problems with data truncation.
Dammit dude. Blow the dust out of your case.