Slashdot Mirror


Computer Glitch Leaves Some Australians Without Cash

An anonymous reader writes "National Australia Bank payments to customers were again delayed today after a computer glitch yesterday morning due to a corrupted file in its mainframe computer. Upset consumers are now demanding compensation for any fees for late mortgage and credit card payments, overdrawn accounts or bounced direct debits charged by any institutions as a result of the mess."

195 comments

  1. Money meet mattress by countertrolling · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Still the safest place until you house burns down

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Money meet mattress by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      Intermittent "R" key.. yeah, that's it

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    2. Re:Money meet mattress by Zedrick · · Score: 1

      Safest, eh?

      When I lived in Ireland and they switched to the Euro, I took all my Irish Puts, put them in two glass jars and buried them next to a church. My coins might still be there in a few hundred years when I hope some lucky person finds them, but at the moment it looks like the Irish banks could be gone.

    3. Re:Money meet mattress by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Or lots of currency floods the market, thus making that under your mattress worth far less than when you put it there. Gold, on the other hand...

    4. Re:Money meet mattress by BradleyUffner · · Score: 1

      Still the safest place until you house burns down

      Until everyone starts doing it. Then the crooks know there's a goldmine in practically every empty house.

    5. Re:Money meet mattress by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

      or burglarized. My Uncles lived through the depression and both kept money in there mattresses. Bad decision

      --
      Jack of all trades,master of none
    6. Re:Money meet mattress by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Or lots of currency floods the market, thus making that under your mattress worth far less than when you put it there. Gold, on the other hand...

      Gold, like any commodity, fluctuates a fair amount. It won't be worthless, but you can see your investment crash if you buy at a bubble. Just look at the history for the price of gold -- it can lose it's value by half over a several year period. Currently it's trending very high, though. Will it go higher? Will it crash? Who knows.

      It's also not as liquid as cash. You aren't going to get the best exchange price if you need your money within a day or two.

    7. Re:Money meet mattress by antdude · · Score: 1

      Or when a thief find money there. :D

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    8. Re:Money meet mattress by countertrolling · · Score: 1

      The joke's on them. I buried the mattress.

      --
      For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    9. Re:Money meet mattress by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Gold can't be counterfeited easily, as there are no printing presses that make it. Sure, its value fluctuates, even if one takes into account the part that is a reflection of the currency's value changing, but if you look at the long-term trend, it is stable.

  2. This could be good news by Nineteen-Delta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe some other big banks could copy this computer glitch and wipe out the billions of pounds /dollars /yen / euros / gold pieces that everyone owes each other, we could get back to some kind of normality.

    1. Re:This could be good news by jhoegl · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately for those in debt what people owe is more protected and backed up than what they have

    2. Re:This could be good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like a great way to get out of paying back what your country owes - oh wait, that's the game plan anyway, isn't it?
      Let's start by fingering the Chinese for the issues in Korea, and make sure we drag as many other countries into this as we can, to legitimize it.

    3. Re:This could be good news by lxs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because borrowing money and not paying it back is an honorable way to live?

    4. Re:This could be good news by newcastlejon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's about as honourable as lending what you don't have.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:This could be good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they didn't have it then they couldn't lend it. Please stop torturing the language.

    6. Re:This could be good news by kimvette · · Score: 3, Informative

      They don't have it; They create it on a computer. Research fiat currency and how fractional banking works. You might be shocked.

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    7. Re:This could be good news by plopez · · Score: 4, Informative

      The bible says to forgive debts every 7 years:

      “At the end of every seven years you shall grant a release of debts. And this is the form of the release: Every creditor who has lent anything to his neighbor shall release it; he shall not require it of his neighbor or his brother, because it is called the Lord’s release.” – Deuteronomy 15:1

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    8. Re:This could be good news by plopez · · Score: 1

      Read this:
      http://mises.org/journals/scholar/hatch.pdf

      That is only one article, there are others. The upshot is that banks loaned what they did not have and the Federal Reserve let them do it. And when the house of cards collapsed they are forcing other to pay for it and walking away from it. That is flat out theft and immoral.

      --
      putting the 'B' in LGBTQ+
    9. Re:This could be good news by afidel · · Score: 1

      Really? I guess you don't understand how fractional reserve banking works then...

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    10. Re:This could be good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only applies to Israelites.

      1.At the end of every seven years you must cancel debts. 2 This is how it is to be done: Every creditor shall cancel any loan they have made to a fellow Israelite. They shall not require payment from anyone among their own people, because the LORD’s time for canceling debts has been proclaimed. 3 You may require payment from a foreigner, but you must cancel any debt your fellow Israelite owes you.

    11. Re:This could be good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm guessing that there's a substantial minority (if not majority) of slashdot users who would not agree that The Bible is a good place to look for moral authority.

  3. Darn by War+Camel · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ide have had the first post, but my ISP payment bounced...

    1. Re:Darn by dbIII · · Score: 1

      Now I know how that feels.
      To truly understand someone you need to war camel in their shoes.

    2. Re:Darn by Pseudonym+Authority · · Score: 1

      That pun is bad and you should feel bad!

  4. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why? Since when did lack of information stop a troll?

  5. A shame by sonamchauhan · · Score: 1

    ... Because the NAB is really one of the 'good' banks , a leader in lowering the absurd fees and penalties banks charge in Australia. I hope they haven't put unfair pressure to reduce costs on their IT department.

    1. Re:A shame by ReneeJade · · Score: 1

      This is my bank. Hope I get paid next week. My accounts already overdrawn :/

  6. Here's what my bank says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My bank at least seems to be trying to avoid the need for any compensation to be claimed:

    Delay in processing payments and transactions to and from NAB - Update

    St.George is currently working with NAB to manage the flow-on impacts to our customers which have been triggered by NAB's processing delays. St.George will work with its impacted customers on a case-by-case basis to ensure that they are not unfairly penalised due to the delay of payments from NAB. This will include ensuring they do not pay any unnecessary fees or charges.

    1. Re:Here's what my bank says by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      If this had happened in US and customers demanded compensation, their homes would have been SWATted and TSA would have done a cavity search in their homes. The communists have won.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Here's what my bank says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Here's what my bank says by Bruha · · Score: 1

      And the bank will fix the credit of those who missed mortgage payments? I highly doubt it.

    4. Re:Here's what my bank says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That link has all the credibility of a music video. Sorry, you're going to have to spell it out for me, I'm just not that smart.

    5. Re:Here's what my bank says by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't mean Communists, you mean Fascists.

    6. Re:Here's what my bank says by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but we'd file a class action lawsuit and eventually win $2 coupons towards our next savings accounts.

    7. Re:Here's what my bank says by ilsaloving · · Score: 1

      So it's all because of Women and Jews?

      What kind of idiotic drivel is this? No wonder you posted as an AC.

    8. Re:Here's what my bank says by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      And the bank will fix the credit of those who missed mortgage payments? I highly doubt it.

      Australia, fortunately, does not have a credit system remotely like the insanity in the US, so a missed mortgage payment in this situation wouldn't cause anyone any major problems.

  7. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mainframe batch run was corrupted as I understand it.

  8. Reading the article by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It looks like consumers aren't demanding it so much as the bank is promising it, which is no surprise. Even if Australia doesn't have laws protecting consumers in that sort of event, the bank will do it anyhow because they have to.

    As a practical matter all it'll likely take is phone calls/letters to creditors explaining that it was a glitch and no fault of the person involved. As a somewhat related example a friend of mine got hit because of a glitch years ago. The power company double debited his payment. That happened right about when a number of other transactions came which caused some of them to bounce, including his rent check. All the fees from the bank overdrew his account, he had other fees from the people he owed money to, and his landlord notified him he'd be evicted if he didn't pay. Well, the power company made things right and gave him back his money. They also called the relevant parties saying "Sorry, it was our fuckup." Every single one canceled all the fees. Since it wasn't his fault, they didn't fine him. Had they not, the power company said to send them the bills for the fees and they'd reimburse him.

    So while this is doubtless a stressful time for those involved, in the end I have to imagine it'll all get worked out. Goes double since this is a major fuckup, and going to be well known.

    1. Re:Reading the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      No way that was in the united states...

      Companys doing the right thing... Not possible here. Or you got REALLY REALLY lucky.

    2. Re:Reading the article by newcastlejon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nor was it in the UK - see the direct debit guarantee. Besides, the OP didn't spell cheque right ;)

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    3. Re:Reading the article by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Even if Australia doesn't have laws protecting consumers in that sort of event

      Even if not we do have a fairly decent consumer advocacy group. The ACCC is in large responsible for the reduction in overdrawing fees from banks. I remember my bank once charging $50 because an automated internal transactions between two accounts held in my name at the same branch failed because one was short on cash. I remember being told tough when I complained. I remember getting a refund after the ACCC got involved. These days overdrawing fees are like $15 and only when the account is actually overdrawn, and not to some mythical can't move a number from here to there in my databasey type issue.

    4. Re:Reading the article by DiarrhoeaChaChaCha · · Score: 1

      While better than $50, a 15$ overdraft fee is still unreasonably and stupidly high.

    5. Re:Reading the article by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 1

      No it was in the United States. Might be because he actually spent some time working on the problem, making the company aware they had fucked up, rather than just whining online as so many people here are prone to do.

    6. Re:Reading the article by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I could not agree more!

    7. Re:Reading the article by Dabido · · Score: 1

      " ... Even if Australia doesn't have laws protecting consumers in that sort of event, the bank will do it anyhow because they have to."

      Um, we're talking Australian Banks. If it isn't law then the banks would keep the money and tell you where to go. If you decide to go to another bank if the same thing happens then the bank would keep the money and tell you where to go. We only have 4 major banks here and all the other banks etc are owned by one of them. Aussie banks are notorious for being greedy. They make huge profits and charge fees for everything. Fortunately, it is law in Australia for them to do the right thing.

      --
      Sure enough, the cow costume was hanging up next to the superhero outfit and sailors uniform. (S,Spud)
  9. Modern slavery by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They don't call it "servicing a debt" for nothing.

  10. Australian bank now looking to hire by guyminuslife · · Score: 4, Funny

    Something tells me a system administration job just opened up.at a major Australian bank.

    --
    I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    1. Re:Australian bank now looking to hire by freedom_india · · Score: 2, Informative

      I would say its a DB2 Admin, Informatica specialist, Z/OS development specialist and the batch file creator. Most batch jobs just run.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    2. Re:Australian bank now looking to hire by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      I would say its a DB2 Admin, Informatica specialist, Z/OS development specialist and the batch file creator. Most batch jobs just run.

      Funny, but when I hear z/OS and batch jobs, I think JCL . . . and then I run away . . .

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    3. Re:Australian bank now looking to hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I had been successfully cyber-attacked, I'd be calling it a 'system error' too!

    4. Re:Australian bank now looking to hire by TeraCo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When westpac fucked up like this, they just replayed the batch the next day and it was sorted.

      The fact that this wasn't fixed on day one means they're trying to put the data back together from scratch. (ie: they are so fucked)

      --
      Not Meta-modding due to apathy.
    5. Re:Australian bank now looking to hire by cwills · · Score: 1

      Ah, so your'e fine with a Perl script with some undecipherable regular expressions.... It's all a matter of perspective..

  11. They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "National Australia Bank payments to customers were again delayed today after a computer glitch yesterday morning due to a corrupted file in its mainframe computer. Upset consumers are now demanding compensation for any fees for late mortgage and credit card payments,

    If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

    Matters would be different if there was a problem at day X - 7 that lasted for 7 days, or X - 14 that lasted for 14 days.

    It is not reasonable to expect there will never be any problems with electronic payment systems. 1 to 2 days is reasonable to sort this out, you are taking an unreasonable risk if you don't attempt to complete payment to a bill at least 3 days before the due date.

    In other words, these consumers should get stuck with these late fees, and learn about a valuable lesson in taking reasonable steps to ensure their obligations are met, even if something goes not quite as expected with the payment.

    1. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Informative

      This actually happened on Thursday. Some people are still waiting for their money, with 40,000 or so likely to still be waiting on Monday.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by natd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

      I disagree entirely. In todays age of electronic payments and daily interest, it's important to pay things ON TIME. Paying early for most people means losing interest elsewhere. I pay on X date, not even X-1. I schedule most of this. Noone pays me 7 days early, the banks certainly don't clear a cheque early on assumption it'll be fine. The NAB appear to be acting very fairly on this matter, which is more than I've seen other banks (CBA) doing when a computer glitch duplicated a debit on my account. I was 50k down on an interest bearing mortgage offset account for a week - they didn't even remotely entertain my request $60 interest it lost me. They don't waste any time when the shoe is on the other foot though so good on NAB.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
    3. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by thoughtfulbloke · · Score: 1

      The batch file stuff-up happened Wednesday, and up to 40,000 customers may be waiting until Monday to get things fixed.
      By the reports, the compounding effects of the batch problems flowed through to Thursday and Friday. The bank opened some of its branches today (Saturday) so people could seek help (they would normally be closed in the weekend).

    4. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      RTFA

      The problem was not that they "left it too late" - the problem was the money that should have been put into their accounts to cover the bills (from paycheques, etc) did not actually make it into the accounts.

      If the money that was supposed to go in the account did not actually make it in, then they would not have anything to be able to pay the bills as they became due.

      Keep in mind also that many repetitive payments, such as like credit card repayments, are often timed to come out automatically the day after payday - this is not a matter of personal decision, therefore not their fault.

    5. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Splab · · Score: 1

      Really?

      Well my payment from work arrives the last day of the month, my bills are due the day after.

      So what you are saying is, at any given point everyone must have enough to cover all their next months bills?

      Also, why isn't it reasonable to expect the bank to be online? I'm 29 years old, in the 10 years I've been taking care of myself, I've never had troubles with paying the bills just in time, been using online banking since about 2000 without problems.

    6. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Psychotria · · Score: 1

      "National Australia Bank payments to customers were again delayed today after a computer glitch yesterday morning due to a corrupted file in its mainframe computer. Upset consumers are now demanding compensation for any fees for late mortgage and credit card payments,

      If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

      Matters would be different if there was a problem at day X - 7 that lasted for 7 days,
      or X - 14 that lasted for 14 days.

      It is not reasonable to expect there will never be any problems with electronic payment systems.
      1 to 2 days is reasonable to sort this out, you are taking an unreasonable risk if you don't attempt to complete payment to a bill at least 3 days before the due date.

      In other words, these consumers should get stuck with these late fees, and learn about a valuable lesson in
      taking reasonable steps to ensure their obligations are met, even if something goes not quite as expected with the payment.

      Yeah, I guess that's an option when you still live in your parent's basement and the most pressing payment is your latest Steam download or XBox live bill.

    7. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by anguirus.x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, any responsible adult will have enough in savings to pay bills/mortgage/etc. for *at least* one month. That will be impossible for some adults, but it is what you ought to try to save up at the very least. You should do just fine scraping by like you describe, but I hope you are able to figure out why it's a bad idea before you're too old to do anything about it son.

    8. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by contra_mundi · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they funnel the money to a seperate saving account and then use the money left over in their salary account as they need/please?
      And sometimes those saving accounts only allow so many withdrawals within a timeframe.

    9. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by TapeCutter · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, many people do live from paycheck to paycheck. You've probably seen them but don't recognise them, they are the people who man the cash registers, cut your hair, keep your office clean, serve you drinks and food, cut your lawn, and take away your garbage.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
    10. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      So what you are saying is, at any given point everyone must have enough to cover all their next months bills?

      That is reasonable; you need to have enough money to cover your bills. It is excessively risky to dispose of so much money you don't have a reserve to meet your obligations. It is most advisable to have enough money in the bank to survive for several months, even if you stop getting paid at all (even if that reserve amount accounts for you having to cancel some services/spending such as Entertainment for the reserve to be sufficient).

      A technical error with your bank is only one of many things that could delay you getting that payment, or delay that payment getting to your creditor.

      Your employer could delay or withold your pay temporarily for technical problems or other reasons. Something might happen to you during the month, illness, etc.

      The pay may not materialize.

      If you can't even make a 1 month reserve in checking, time to change your budget.

    11. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about this scenario - the way I manage my accounts.

      When I get paid, I put aside a certain amount of money to cover whatever I need to pay in cash. The balance of my income goes onto my mortgage (I have a fee-free redraw facility available.) Everything that I can, I pay on a credit card. At the end of the billing cycle, when the credit card comes due, I pay it off using the redraw facility on the mortgage.

      Doing things this way saves me 6.75% per annum on the amount that goes through my credit card. Which is a useful thing - it may not be a great deal of interest, but nonetheless.

      So yes, it's very likely that I will have no money in my regular day-to-day account on a given day. I do live from payday to payday; my buffer is on the mortgage, which is the most tax-effective way to earn effective interest on it. If I need cash, it has to go through my day-to-day bank account; I can't take it off the mortgage directly. So if my account is hit by issues like this, I'm not completely screwed, but I could easily end up in trouble if it lasted more than a day or two, as is the case here.

    12. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No no, blame the victim. Girls who get raped are always asking for it, right?

    13. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I disagree entirely. In todays age of electronic payments and daily interest, it's important to pay things ON TIME. Paying early for most people means losing interest elsewhere.

      Of course you can do so, but it is not advisable, and you bear the risk if you choose to wait to the due date, you are the one taking on the risk, and you get to pay late fees if your bet was wrong about how long the payment would take. That's why I say "deserve the outcome". Because it would be the risk that you took on, it makes sense your bank should not pay for unreasonable risk you created for yourself.

      Electronic payments are expected to be fast, and they usually are, but for most products, there is generally limited/no SLA. Your efforts to pay electronically can fail for reasons as simple as "Your internet connection went down" on that day, or "Your bank's website went down during your break, you couldn't get to the web page", or something went wrong with your username and password/login access, when you went to login at 11:50pm to pay tomorrow's bill.

      Or you got hit by a bus and couldn't get home in time after your hospital visit to pay the bill.

      Trying to wait until precisely the due date for preserving interest is Pennywise pound foolish, particularly when the best rate for an interest bearing liquid account is about 1%. The amounts involved have to be more than approximately $20,000, before even $0.10 of interest is at stake.

      You can lose more money long run, if for no other reason than due to your own mistake, or misunderstanding of your bank's rules; human error is likely to be costly for you, when you leave zero margin for error.

      Automatic payment systems always or almost always come with a disclaimer that payment cannot be guaranteed. Funds may be on hold unexpectedly, items can take longer to clear or for credit to be posted.

      Electronic auto payment systems don't relieve debtors of their responsibility to make payment, or excuse lateness, if the payment fails to go through in time, and the bank whose system fails is not responsible for covering the late fee, so this is the particular risk involved in taking this stance and waiting until T+0 to pay.

      It is still advisable to pay early. You may lose a day or two's interest; however, by not paying on time you are taking a bigger risk.

      Your payment might not go through. It may be declined; if it is declined, it could be either your error, your bank's, the receiving bank's, a system problem, or a delay in delivery of the electronic payment.

      In most of these circumstances you will be responsible for the late fee, unless you convince your creditor to waive it.

      For most payments the dollar amount of 'daily interest' is microscopic, and the '1 day late fee' is massive. It doesn't make any sense whatsoever to risk paying a $30 late fee, to try to get $0.005 extra daily interest over 3 days.

    14. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know how normal or common it is, but it can happen.

      A couple of years ago, my brother's business hit a rough patch. He asked me for financial help. I had a choice:

      • Either max out my overdraft and credit cards; or
      • Let my brother, his wife, and their kids sit in an unheated house in the middle of winter with no food

      The former was financially irresponsible, but the latter would have been utterly inhumane. I did the financially irresponsible thing. If banks and financial institutions give you the option of credit there are times when you might find yourself availing of it.

      For a long time I was living payday to payday because of that.

    15. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I guess that's an option when you still live in your parent's basement and the most pressing payment is your latest Steam download or XBox live bill.

      Exactly. In the real world, adults often have scary responsibilities. On the one hand, you want to save for a rainy day. On the other, it is pissing down right now, and has been for several months. When faced with creditors screaming at you for money or kids screaming at you for food, any reasonable adult is going to feed the kids and worry about the creditors later.

    16. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by jamesh · · Score: 1

      If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

      While most industries would _love_ it if everyone paid a day early and they got to suck on the interest, i'm keeping my money until the last minute. If my payment is delayed because of a bank error then it's the banks fault, not mine.

      Maybe you are a bit older than me, but for pretty much the whole time i've been paying bills it's been electronic and it's never gone wrong, ever. We generally try and keep a bit of a buffer in the bank but I suspect that if we were with this particular bank it might not have helped... a bit of a buffer doesn't really help if your bank deducts your homeloan repayment (or any other major expense) an extra 3 times from your account or otherwise marks your account overdrawn when you go to pay for your meal at a restaurant.

      That said, I get where your frustration comes from, there are plenty of people who could learn a few things about managing money, but second guessing a major failure like this is out of the scope of what I would call good financial management.

    17. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      If you can't even make a 1 month reserve in checking, time to change your budget.

      Some of us have dependants and we can't change our budget.

    18. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

      No, it's the bank's fault. To whit:

      Matters would be different if there was a problem at day X - 7 that lasted for 7 days, or X - 14 that lasted for 14 days.

      There is no difference between trying to pay at X-7 and trying to pay at X-1 and either failing, due to a bank problem. The bank is still at fault.

      It is not reasonable to expect there will never be any problems with electronic payment systems.

      Correct. It is, however, entirely reasonable to expect that the *bank* will handle any problems that result from their inability to process payments.

      Rest assured, that if you are unable to pay the bank on time for some random and unexpected reason, that they will be unlikely to show you any leniency. The converse should similarly be true.

      In other words, these consumers should get stuck with these late fees, and learn about a valuable lesson in taking reasonable steps to ensure their obligations are met, even if something goes not quite as expected with the payment.

      My obligation is met the instant I schedule a transfer or payment with the bank's online system (assuming I have sufficient funds when that transfer comes due). While I can understand Americans who are still stuck in the stoneage of banking not grokking this, the rest of us have higher standards. When I schedule a transfer or bill payment to happen on a particular date, and it doesn't because the bank screwed up, that's not my problem, it's the bank's problem, as are any additional fees, charges, penalties, or whatever "I" might happen to be charged as a result of their screwup.

      I hold my bank to the same standards they hold me. No more and no less. I pay them a (relative) fortune in fees every year, and for that I expect good service.

    19. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 5, Informative

      and it's normal not to have any money on your accounts and live from payday to payday?

      For some people, yes.

      Welcome to the real world.

      okay, the banks made an error and should compensate... but do people really find it normal not to save any money and be screwed when the tinyest thing goes wrong?

      Some people don't earn enough to "save any money". When 90% of your income goes in basic and essential expenses, being able to save even 10% is a luxury not always afforded should any emergency expenses come up.

    20. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      In other words, these consumers should get stuck with these late fees, and learn about a valuable lesson in
      taking reasonable steps to ensure their obligations are met, even if something goes not quite as expected with the payment.

      The obligation was that the customer would make the payment by day X, not that he would attempt to make it on day X-7 to pad against uncertainty. A "reasonable step" would be to attempt to make the payment on day X-1 instead of a few minutes before COB on day X.

    21. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Legion303 · · Score: 2

      Stupid fucking poor people! *shakes fist*

    22. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      Actually they would hate not being able to charge the 150-200% of the owed amount penalties and late fees. I would love to be able to tell Payroll that since they had a glitch, and didn't get me my check till a day late they have to pay me extra. $30 fee versus $0.00001 interest? Sign me up for that.

    23. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      The thing you seem to be missing is that the bank fucked up in exactly this way. The bank didn't cover their financial obligations first. Why would the customers deserve the late fees and not the bank when both failed to meet their obligations and the bank was the root cause of it? Regardless of how stupid you think the customers' cash-flow strategy is.

    24. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by jonwil · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem is things like automatic debits and rent/loan payments.
      My rent for example goes out every fortnight as an automatic direct debit setup via online banking. If I was affected by this (I used to bank with the National Australia Bank but switched years ago) and my automatic debit didnt happen or there wasnt enough money in the account for it, the rent wouldn't be paid.

      Same with things like my ISP bills and insurance (all of which are automatic debits)

      And I DO pay all my other bills (power, mobile phone, home phone) as soon as they arrive.

    25. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Yes, in the real world people live pay check to pay check. Let them eat cake.

    26. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And run your slashdot

    27. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by ischorr · · Score: 1

      In my case, they managed to BACK OUT some inter-account transfers I made on Wednesday, which screwed up some things (after rent payments and other things).

      At this point, I have a negative amount in my checking account (it's all in savings), with no way to move money into it. Attempts to purchase with this account or draw money from it fail, so I have no choice but to pay for things with credit card. If I get billed either credit card interest or any sort of debit fees on the checking account, it will be their fault, and not because I waited until the last minute for whatever.

      But the worst thing is that people aren't getting PAID. Some people do live paycheck to paycheck, even if it's only occasionally.

    28. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      The obligation was that the customer would make the payment by day X, not that he would attempt to make it on day X-7 to pad against uncertainty.

      The point of having due dates in the future is to "pad against uncertainty"; otherwise, you would simply always issued invoices due tomorrow.

      Instead, a reasonable amount of leeway is given by always issuing invoices due in 14 days or more.

      When you receive a bill it is your responsibility to always make sure that it is successfully paid, before that 14 day grace period expires.

    29. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Some of us have dependants and we can't change our budget.

      That might be true, but that would be your problem, not your bank's.

      Obviously you cannot spend money you do not have. Either your budget will have to give, or you will have to find someone else to take on your dependants, who can afford them.

    30. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by ultranova · · Score: 1

      If you have a payment due on X date, you wait until day X - 1, and something goes wrong and delays you by one day, this is your fault, not your bank's fault.

      If you have a payment due on X date, and you leave orders to the bank to pay said payment at X date, but the bank fails to do so, it is clearly the banks fault. How could it not be? Also, if you can't access the money on your account at X day, then yes, it is also the banks fault.

      Failure to deliver electricity is the power companys fault, failure to deliver water is the water companys fault, failure to deliver phone services is the phone companys fault, and failure to deliver financial services is the banks fault. Trying to blame customers for not expecting them to do a shitty job at it is beyond idiotic.

      It is not reasonable to expect there will never be any problems with electronic payment systems.

      No, it is perfectly reasonable to expect and demand that the banks, which have wormed their way to the heart of our economic systems, also deliver the reliability this requires, and pay the bill when they fail to do so.

      1 to 2 days is reasonable to sort this out, you are taking an unreasonable risk if you don't attempt to complete payment to a bill at least 3 days before the due date.

      No, you aren't. It is not at all unreasonable to consider the failure of the wire transfer system that handles nearly all financial transactions to be the same type of Force Majeure failure as earthquakes, hurricanes etc.

      But then again, I'v understood that you UScritters still use the antiquated system of mailing cheques to each other, so I guess your mileage might wary.

      In other words, these consumers should get stuck with these late fees, and learn about a valuable lesson in taking reasonable steps to ensure their obligations are met, even if something goes not quite as expected with the payment.

      Paying bills days early (and losing the interest) is not a reasonable step. Also, it is not reasonable to hold people to their obligations but release the bank from theirs.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    31. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      I could afford to support my dependants. I couldn't support my dependants and build up enough of a buffer to allow for glitches from the bank and so on.

    32. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 0

      My obligation is met the instant I schedule a transfer or payment with the bank's online system

      Well, legally that is not what has happened. You scheduled a payment to be made, and until the payment is actually made, as scheduled, the obligation is not yet met. You have merely taken an action that can be expected to meet the obligation; if that action fails, it's still your responsibility.

      and it doesn't because the bank screwed up, that's not my problem, it's the bank's problem, as are any additional fees, charges, penalties, or whatever "I" might happen to be charged as a result of their screwup.

      That depends on what you mean by "screwed up". If you 'scheduled a withdrawl' with the bank you owe the money to, and they failed to initiate the withdrawl as requested, then yes, they should waive late charges.

      On the other hand, if you scheduled a "bill payment" on date X from a different bank that you do not owe the money to, and they initiated payment in their system, but it took them a day or two days to transfer funds, and the extra day delay caused you to incur a late fee, then No, the bank is not responsible, delays of that nature are to be expected, you are responsible, not either bank.

    33. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > ...any responsible adult will have enough in savings...

      More than 50% of the children in my country will grow up in poverty. That's 50% will grow up beneath the poverty line. 50% will grow up in families that are unable to meet the bills on time. Over here, the cost of living increases at a notably greater rate than the median wage.

      Hell, the last time my job got a pay increase was when minimum wage was increased this year. The time before that was two years ago, when minimum wage was increased. You can bet your arse the board members get increases every half hour.

      And no, getting an education didn't help one little bit.

    34. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Why would the customers deserve the late fees and not the bank

      Because the bank the obligations are to are different banks.

      People had bill payments setup on institution X's bill payment system to pay institution Y who the money was owed to. Institution Y has a right to charge the late fees and no obligation to give customers a break based instution X's flawwed system.

      This is no different than if you mail a check 2 days before it's due and the postal service takes an extra day to get the item, so it arrives after the due date.

      The amount will be credited the day it is received, and a late fee will be due. The postal service owes you nothing, even though they "screwed up".

      The fact of the matter... you have an obligation to ensure you meet your obligations, including deadlines, while anticipating common obstacles, such as reasonable delays in postal service, and other services you utilize to send payments.

    35. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      In my case, they managed to BACK OUT some inter-account transfers I made on Wednesday, which screwed up some things (after rent payments and other things).

      Reversing or rejecting valid transactions is of course a more serious failure, that the bank should provide ample compensation for.

      Although, I think with clear errors like that example (which are much more severe than a 2 day delay in sending a scheduled payment) it might be time to switch banks.

    36. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      When you receive a bill it is your responsibility to always make sure that it is successfully paid, before that 14 day grace period expires.

      And as others have pointed out to you, your responsibility is fulfilled the instant you schedule the payment through your bank. That's how modern finances work. If you don't accept that, you're free to attempt some sort of barter system with your creditors.

    37. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      I could afford to support my dependants. I couldn't support my dependants and build up enough of a buffer to allow for glitches from the bank and so on.

      A buffer will build up, as long as expenses are properly kept less than cash earned.

      If a buffer is not able to be built up over time to handle financial emergencies like pay delay, then you can't really afford the dependants, either, because there is not enough cash to pay for emergencies or unexpected large single-event costs related to the dependants.

    38. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Oh a buffer will build up. Maybe a few quid a month when things are tough. And that buffer can be completely eroded by something happening like say the cooker needing fixed.

      What do you suggest doing with dependants that I can't afford, BTW? Feeding kids on alternate days? Dependants aren't things like holidays, cars, or computers that you can decide to purchase. They are people who are there whether you want them to be or not.

      In an ideal world everyone would always have enough spare money to be able to survive for several months with no income. In the real world that doesn't always happen. Even with the best planning things can change.

    39. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Failure to deliver electricity is the power companys fault, failure to deliver water is the water companys fault, failure to deliver phone services is the phone companys fault

      And yet, sometimes power outages and telephone outages occur. I can just about guarantee, if you have a power outage or ISP outage and it stops you from logging on with your computer and submitting a payment for your credit card bill due tomorrow, the power company will not be willing to pick up the tab for you.

      If you have a payment due on X date, and you leave orders to the bank to pay said payment at X date, but the bank fails to do so, it is clearly the banks fault.

      That depends on if the bank actually promises you the payment will actually be made on X date, or if you just selected that date and "scheduled" it to happen then, meaning the bank will try their best to pay it on that date, but depending on their policies, your agreement, and how things go, it might take an extra day. Banks' "bill payment services" almost always inform you how much delay there might be, you should read the user agreement.

      You can drop a check in the mail, and the post office generally tells you, it will reach its destination within 2 days.

      If one time it takes 3 days, and that causes you to incur a late fee, that's your fault, because you should have reasonably anticipated that sometimes there is a delay in a business completing their work.

      No, you aren't. It is not at all unreasonable to consider the failure of the wire transfer system that handles nearly all financial transactions

      Hold it. Transactions scheduled on free auto bill payment systems are not full blown wire transfer orders. Electronic cheques are not wires; the service level is lower, they take longer to clear than wire transfers, and generally there is not a promise that they will be next day, so there is not a fee for them.

      Wire transfers are something you pay your bank to perform. They are "ordered" by you submitting an order to your bank for a wire, which is different from using some bank system to "schedule your bank to make a payment for you".

      Paying bills days early (and losing the interest) is not a reasonable step. Also, it is not reasonable to hold people to their obligations but release the bank from theirs.

      The interest is insignificant, it solves the basic problem, and provides the consumer protection against unforseen circumstances and errors on their own part, it seems amply reasonable.

      As for people who subscribe to bill payment service at institution X who failed to pay institution Y, there is no basis for cancelling obligations to institution Y, based on problems with institution X.

      Whether institution X feels like reimbursing late fees to institution Y would depend only on institution X's actual obligations, and whether or not "errors on their part" are actually errors in light of the user agreement.

      Their user agreement for bill payment services may very well allow for some possible delays in the timeline of transfer orders related to scheduled payments being created and processed.

    40. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      And as others have pointed out to you, your responsibility is fulfilled the instant you schedule the payment through your bank.

      No. All you have done is scheduled with your bank a payment to be made to the other bank that your credit card account is with.

      If the payment never gets made, for example, because you don't have enough money in your account, your bank sucks, and decides to just steal your money without paying the creditor, or your bank goes under and never pays, then you still owe the money to your creditor.

      Payment remains your responsibility until payment is made.

      Now, depending on your agreement with the bank you had deposited money with, they may have an obligation to pay the other bank, or (depending on your agreement with them), they might at their discretion cancel the transfer. However, both obligations exist until they are satisfied

      If your bank you have the money deposited with fails to pay, your obligation to the other bank doesn't cease to exist.

      If it takes them longer to perform the transfer order than they were supposed to, then your other bank can still create a bill for late fees and send it to you.

      Your bank that you use for bill payment services might or might not have an obligation to pay late fees or reimburse you. It depends on the user agreement for the automated bill payment service; you are probably in pretty bad shape if they only delayed by one day, their lawyers most likely anticipated delays like that for "bill payment services".

    41. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, at any given point, you should have 18 months' living expenses in savings for when your next emergency arises.

    42. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by JustOK · · Score: 1

      I'll see your anecdote and raise you 1 reality.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    43. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Welcome to the real world. Some people, in fact more people than you think, live like this. It's not due to not saving, but many other factors.

      Take for example my in-laws. He use to have a great job at ChemCut in State College, PA. The downsized, and he (as well as another friend of mine) got laid off. His wife had a great job at a nursing home, but due to MS a doctor basically said with her knees the way they are and the pain of MS, she couldn't work. It took 3 years for her disability to go thru, so for a long while they were living off of the pay check he now received for his new, lesser paying job at Advance Auto. They had saved, and saved a good amount, but over the course of the 3 years with loss of income, those savings disappeared quickly, and an IRA (if they have one, I'm sure they do) is something you really don't want to touch or can't touch until a certain time).

      Now for someone like them, if the bank Advance Auto used were to have a glitch around the payday time and he was unable to be paid, that would really cripple them. Worse if the state used the same bank for the disability benefits and neither of them had the money show up when it should, and even worse yet if they wrote out the checks for the bills and had mailed them because their due date was soon approaching.

      Not all people, and like I said with the economy, more than you think actually do live paycheck to paycheck and are able to only save a little if any at all.

    44. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mab · · Score: 1

      That how a lot of people including myself do it.

    45. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mab · · Score: 1

      The way the banking system is here in AU. it would be bad financial management to have 18 month worth of cash in the bank if you have a mortgage.

    46. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by curious.corn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know... you're right, besides you normally don't get any interest on the deposit anyway.

      BUT: you're being pedantic and acting righteously... Ok, so you pay your bills in advance and accidents such as this wouldn't affect you? Fine, good for you... want a pat on the back? ;)

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
    47. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Cwix · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This entire thread you've been racing to the defense of the banks. If I have money in the bank, and cannot use it due to a corrupted file on the bank's server or whatnot, THEN IT IS THE BANKS FAULT.

      Its that simple.

      Its not that I didn't have enough money, or that I didn't initiate the transfer. The bank fucked up. They sure as hell want to charge me for everything under the sun when I'm late. If they are late its their fucking fault, and I will pass the late fees on to them.

      --
      You are entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts.
    48. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Payment remains your responsibility until payment is made.

      It turns out due diligence is still in effect, and in our electronic society, your obligation is NOT to pay your creditors on day X-7, but on day X. If the bank that was supposed to handle that transaction for you screwed up, then they are responsible for fees and charges, not you. I believe the opposite was your initial argument.

      Good luck getting payment to every one of your creditors in cash, or gold bars, or whatever the fuck it is you use to avoid banks and their various electronic failures.

    49. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious: did your job circumstances change, or did you just not realize that maybe you should stop fucking if you can't support the kids you made?

    50. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Define "poverty".

    51. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Of course you can do so, but it is not advisable, and you bear the risk if you choose to wait to the due date, you are the one taking on the risk, and you get to pay late fees if your bet was wrong about how long the payment would take.

      Why, exactly? Banks are perfectly capable of scheduling transfers to happen on a certain date. Banks are perfectly capable of keeping their systems running 24/7. If they didn't the modern banking system would not function. Now I would agree that it's risky to wait until the due date to schedule a transfer; in addition to the reasons you listed you could have some personal emergency disrupt your day... But if I have scheduled a bill to be paid automatically on a certain date, then by god it better happen (and in fact it does, every month, multiple bills, for years and years now). Seriously, in what scenario would it be excusable for a bank to say "whoops, well, we know you scheduled your transfer, but we just didn't do it"? How exactly is that different than saying "whoops, well, we know you had good funds in your account, but we returned your check anyway"?

      I don't know what country you're in, but do know what can happen in the U.S. to a bank that fails to process checks for 24 hours? Do you think maybe they know how to keep systems up and running?

    52. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My work is currently paying me to move house overseas. I placed orders for about 20,000AU for furniture etc and they will reimburse me. I moved money in my account so that i could pay off my Credit Card, and due to this glitch it doubled up the movement. So currently i have an imaginary 20,000AU missing from my account.... i am assuming they are going to fix this but i am not happy at all, Otherwise it would be about $10 a day in overdraw fees..

    53. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Well, legally that is not what has happened. You scheduled a payment to be made, and until the payment is actually made, as scheduled, the obligation is not yet met. You have merely taken an action that can be expected to meet the obligation; if that action fails, it's still your responsibility.

      No, it's not. If I instruct my bank to take an action, and they fail to take that action, the fault is theirs and theirs alone.

      On the other hand, if you scheduled a "bill payment" on date X from a different bank that you do not owe the money to, and they initiated payment in their system, but it took them a day or two days to transfer funds, and the extra day delay caused you to incur a late fee, then No, the bank is not responsible, delays of that nature are to be expected, you are responsible, not either bank.

      No, they're not to be expected in the Australian banking system. If I make an online bill payment on day X (either directly or scheduled) then I expect that payment to have been credited to the target account on day X+1. Anything less is a failure of the bank to deliver the service I'm paying for.

      The *only* scenario where I would not expect this to happen is one of an international transfer, since that has to deal with non-Australian banking institutions.

      Again, if you're an American you might not be used to this sort of thing, but it's how it's been in Australia for 10+ years now. So long as I schedule my transfer or bill payment before my bank's cutoff time for the day, then if that transaction hasn't arrived at the target institution by open of business the next day, it's the banks' fault (either mine or the payee's), and consequently their responsibility to remedy.

    54. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      The way the banking system is here in AU. it would be bad financial management to have 18 month worth of cash in the bank if you have a mortgage.

      Not when you have it in an offset or redraw account.

    55. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      This is no different than if you mail a check 2 days before it's due and the postal service takes an extra day to get the item, so it arrives after the due date.

      Actually it is, because in Australian banking systems transactions are expected to be instantaneous, or at worst batch-processed at CoB each day.

      The correct analagous situation is if I mail a cheque in a "guaranteed next day delivery" envelope, and it doesn't arrive the next day. In that situation the postal service is absolutely at fault, and I would expect them to pay any fees or charges that may have accrued due to their screwup.

      The fact of the matter... you have an obligation to ensure you meet your obligations, including deadlines, while anticipating common obstacles, such as reasonable delays in postal service, and other services you utilize to send payments.

      There's no such thing as a "reasonable" multi-day delay in a modern banking system. That's the whole point. Banks aren't mailing cheques or shipping gold bars between themselves to complete transactions, they're flipping bits in a computer.

      Indeed, there's little justification for a confirmed transaction not being instantaneous, in this day and age, at least within the same country.

    56. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Kijori · · Score: 1

      Tell me, do you hold everyone you contract with to such a low standard? If sometimes your box of cereal turns out to be totally empty do you just shake your head sadly and say "well I should have checked at the supermarket"? If you pay a mechanic to fix your car and he doesn't bother do you write off your loss while mentally chastising yourself for not training as a mechanic yourself so that you could verify what he'd done?

      I don't know about where you are, but in this country if someone fails to do what they've promised to do then they have to make right any damage. That goes double if, like here, they have been negligent. And in general they cannot exclude liability for this sort of thing when dealing with a consumer. Would you really want it to be otherwise? For big companies to be able to do whatever they want, safe in the knowledge that if they screw up, costing their customers a great deal of money, the consumer has no recourse and "no-one to blame but himself"?

    57. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by univgeek · · Score: 1

      I make sure all my savings get socked away asap, and live on the rest 'paycheck to paycheck'. In this case, I couldn't have put in additional money into my account from my savings!

      --
      All bow to his Noodliness!! His Noodle Appendage has touched me!
    58. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Wildclaw · · Score: 1

      More than 50% of the children in my country will grow up in poverty. That's 50% will grow up beneath the poverty line

      Not being able to keep a buffer is not a matter of poverty or not. It is a matter of foresight and discipline. In fact, if you live in poverty, a buffer is even more important than if you are rich, because the margins of error is smaller.

    59. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      The business world is all about contracts. The banks charge you fees because it's part of the contract you agreed to. You'd have to check the contracts to see if they specify a certain level of service. They also may be subject to consumer protection laws. In the end, they may tell you to stuff it, and then it's up to you to sue for damages.

      It does help to be an enraged consumer, though. If enough people are pissed, and threaten to leave the bank, then they might cough up regardless.

    60. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Again, if you're an American you might not be used to this sort of thing, but it's how it's been in Australia for 10+ years now.

      FYI, in the U.S. it is often but not always the next day. It depends on exactly how the transfer goes from bank to payee. However, you are most certainly told the maximum time the transfer will take, and that most certainly does not change randomly month to month, and you can most certainly use that information to schedule the payment to arrive on the date due, and you can most certainly expect that to happen.

      The above all is about going to your bank's website and scheduling a transfer out. For nearly all the big bills (mortgage, credit cards, car payment), you can go directly to your creditor's web site and schedule the transfer in for the date due. They will initiate the transfer on that date and credit your account on that date, and then the debit will hit your account in 1 or 2 days, depending on the banks involved. That's the way I do it.

    61. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      I'm gay. I don't have any kids. Family members circumstances changed, and they turned to me for help.

    62. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      It depends on the user agreement for the automated bill payment service...

      I seriously doubt that. Banking is a highly regulated industry, and failure to perform one of the most basic of all banking tasks, inter-bank transfers, seems unlikely to be an allowed option for banks.

      Your point about the creditor's obligation to the debtor remaining is correct, however I seriously doubt that the bank in error can simply shrug off failure to timely perform transfers as "shit happens, get over it".

    63. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Actually it is, because in Australian banking systems transactions are expected to be instantaneous, or at worst batch-processed at CoB each day.

      FYI, this is not relevant to electronic transactions, but 20+ years ago when I worked in banking (in the U.S.), if a bank failed to process checks for 24 hours, the regulators could step in and take over the bank's operations. That's the kind of standard to which banks can be (and should be) held.

    64. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Some of us have dependants and we can't change our budget.

      It is highly unlikely that you cannot change your budget at all. It is far more likely that you do not want to change your budget.

    65. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      ...delays of that nature are to be expected, you are responsible..

      Please explain why, exactly, "delays of that nature are to be expected" in electronic funds transfers.

    66. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      This entire thread you've been racing to the defense of the banks.

      Seems pretty clear to me that a lot of /. PHP script kiddies don't have a clue about the level of reliability that is expected (and required) for banks to maintain. The concept of it simply not being allowed for a "glitch" to delay service is more than they can handle.

    67. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      That is almost painfully naive. Today my budget is pretty good - outgoings lower than income, luxuries present but identified, etc. - but there have been times in my life where the only way I could reduce my outgoings were by doing things like walking home (about an hour) instead of spending £1 on the bus.

      Life can be really difficult at times. Having a buffer of a month's salary may be easy for some people, but an impossible dream for others.

    68. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Parent says he schedules the payments. As in, he goes into the bank's website weeks ahead of time and sets up a bill-pay, choosing X as the target date. In this case, I find it difficult to argue that it could be anyone other than the bank's fault for the payment not going through on time.

      Though I still leave a week's buffer in my bill-pays, because I'm a pretty small account, and the bank can afford better justice, especially when it's spending my money (and yours) for it...

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    69. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      FYI, in the U.S. it is often but not always the next day.

      Well, it's two days for all the payees in my Wells Fargo BillPay, except for the Wells Fargo Credit Card, which is one day.

      The above all is about going to your bank's website and scheduling a transfer out. For nearly all the big bills (mortgage, credit cards, car payment), you can go directly to your creditor's web site and schedule the transfer in for the date due. They will initiate the transfer on that date and credit your account on that date, and then the debit will hit your account in 1 or 2 days, depending on the banks involved. That's the way I do it.

      I have had bad experiences with direct debits in the past, and try to avoid them wherever possible (unless it's within the same institution). I'd be even less inclined to trust them in the US.

    70. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Studies show that you move up the pay-scale faster by changing jobs, rather than "hoping for a raise." Probably for the same reason that you get a better deal when you change to a different broadband carrier than when you simply renew your contract with the same company.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    71. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      That is almost painfully naive.

      Hardly. I've been there myself with a rock-bottom budget. However the vast majority of people who complain about not being able to cut their budget further, are simply full of it.

      This is not to say that they have so much income that it should be obvious how to build up a pad, nor that they're lazy, nor that they're not underpaid. Just a simple observation that people will blithely pay >$50/month for cable tv, and a decent amount on entertainment, and eat out for lunch, and buy expensive convenience foods, and still claim that their budget has no room to cut. There's a huge gulf between "I can't cut my budget and still live the way I'm used to" and "I actually can't cut my budget and survive." And saying "I have dependents" is more often than not a sloppy excuse for "I do not wish to force myself or my children to make choices".

    72. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Dependants aren't just children.

      A few years ago an elderly relative needed help with medical expenses. She needed treatment medical treatment, and the only treatment the NHS could offer would have been very distressing to her. Was it right that I helped her with the cost of private treatment rather than saving that money as a buffer in case my bank made a mistake one day?

      You also have to take quality of life into consideration. Suppose you have a housebound dependant. All they can do all day is watch TV. Is $50 a month for cable *really* something you would be happy cutting?

      I do agree that a lot of people who complain about a tight budget are crazy about the way they do spend money. I remember seeing a TV programme about people who were living on government benefits. One complained that his benefits should be increased because after he had paid for alcohol, cigarettes, and mobile phone expenses he didn't have enough money for food. At the time I myself was working full time and bringing in a good salary, and I couldn't afford alcohol, cigarettes, or mobile phone expenses for myself after I had met my obligations.[1] I could really see why people like that annoy the Daily Mail.

      [1] This is slightly academic as I don't drink or smoke, and was lucky enough to have a work phone, but even still it would have been nice to have an entertainment budget.

    73. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by afidel · · Score: 1

      Exactly, when Fleet Boston was taken over by BoA I had my ACH payment scheduled, they sent me emails with confirmation numbers showing they were withdrawing the payments from my checking account but it never went through. After two months of this I got a notice of non-payment and assessed all sorts of fees, I called in and explained the situation and they told me they could take care of it right away through an e-check but there would be a $45 fee. I quietly explained that there would be no fee and furthermore there would be no late fees or interest either or they would never collect the debt and would hear from my attorney for fraud. Large banks have the resources and personnel to do things right, when they don't it's their own damn fault and they should bear all the responsibility, blaming the victim of the cockup is just insane.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    74. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're completely (and I think purposefully) confusing the obligation someone has to a creditor and the obligation the bank has to its clients. Yes, in the creditor-you relation, it is of no concern to the creditor that your bank made a mistake and you still owe them the money even if you asked your bank to pay him. However, contrary to what you imply, the bank can't go, "our mistake but since in the eyes of the creditor you're the one at fault in the creditor/you relation, that means I'm not at fault at all in the me/you relation".

    75. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Was it right that I helped her with the cost of private treatment rather than saving that money as a buffer in case my bank made a mistake one day?

      Just to be clear, the notion that banks shouldn't be expected to make transfers on time, the notion that you need a buffer against bank errors, is absolutely insane--as I've argued elsewhere here.

      I'm speaking specifically to the notion that one needs a buffer for one's own unexpected expenses--as far as I'm concerned, helping an elderly relative with treatment as you did falls under the category of things for which you need to save up a pad, in other words, things for which you properly spend your pad, things for which it is fine to go into deficit spending.

    76. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Agreed :-)

    77. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Actually it is, because in Australian banking systems transactions are expected to be instantaneous

      expected does not mean guaranteed.

      The correct analagous situation is if I mail a cheque in a "guaranteed next day delivery" envelope, and it doesn't arrive the next day. In that situation the postal service is absolutely at fault, and I would expect them to pay any fees or charges that may have accrued due to their screwup.

      "Guaranteed" next day delivery does not mean you will be reimbursed the late fees if the postal service fails. Generally it means they will reimburse you exactly the cost of postage you spent to mail the letter.

    78. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      BUT: you're being pedantic and acting righteously... Ok, so you pay your bills in advance and accidents such as this wouldn't affect you?

      I'm not claiming I always succeed in paying things early; however, if I wait to the last minute to log into my bank's website, tell them to make a payment at the last minute, and there is a minor delay, it's my fault the payment is late.

      It's my bank's fault that there was a delay, but it's my fault the payment was late because of a small delay I should have anticipated.

    79. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by sribe · · Score: 1

      Agreed :-)

      On slashdot? Are you kidding me? Or do I need to explain to you how this site works?

    80. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      Stranger things have happened :-D

    81. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      Good luck getting payment to every one of your creditors in cash, or gold bars, or whatever the fuck it is you use to avoid banks and their various electronic failures.

      There are these things called checks that banks are required to pay, within a defined time frame, when presented to them. Your bank cannot refuse to pay your check within the settlement period, as long as the check is genuine, and your account has the funds, unless you issued a stop payment before funds settled.

      The special status of checks means the creditor is required to credit your debt account immediately when the check was received, even though payment has not cleared, and funds might settle 3 days later.

      If your bank fails to pay a legal check, they are not responsible for your late fees, you still have to pay those. But your bank owes you compensation for failing to pay your check; in other words you owe late fees to your creditor which you are responsible for and your bank separately will owe you compensation for failing to perform as required by banking laws.

      This contrasts against electronic payments, where your account is not credited until payment is actually received. The paying bank does not tell your creditor that their customer has scheduled a payment to them tomorrow.

      Your bank has generally covered their ass with respect to delays, by indicating an allowed number of days for delays. Your expectations for it to be fast do not represent a guarantee on the part of your bill payment bank.

      The person you owes money to receives nothing until a transfer order is actually created in the inter-bank electronic transfer systems.

      If the paying bank's bill payment service fails to create a transfer order with your creditor, then your creditor not only does not know about the payment request, the creditor is also not required to credit or waive late fees, until you pay those fees to your creditor.

      Even if your bank does decide to reimburse you for reasonable late fees incurred, that will take them some time, and, there will still be a time you have to pay the creditor before the reimbursement is made to you, and your failure to pay additional late fees and interest incurred if you refuse, will be your responsibility.

    82. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      If sometimes your box of cereal turns out to be totally empty do you just shake your head sadly and say "well I should have checked at the supermarket"?

      No. However, if I was required to buy cereal brand X by a certain date, and for some reason there are no boxes of cereal at my store on that date, the store is not responsible for my failure. They are only responsible for their failure.

      If I make a haircut appointment, and my barber is out sick on that date, my barber does not owe me compensation for the job opportunity I lost because my hair did not look good at the interview. The most I am owed is the haircut I paid for.

      If you pay a mechanic to fix your car and he doesn't bother do you write off your loss while mentally chastising yourself for not training as a mechanic yourself so that you could verify what he'd done?

      No, but if my mechanic tells me in the morning it should be fixed by the end of the day, and later in the day tells me it is going to take an extra day, does not mean my mechanic has to reimburse me for the superbowl tickets I bought, because unavailability of my car will make me unable to travel to the game.

      If my mechanic estimates my repair cost at $1000 and a few days later, the total cost turns out to be $1100, because an extra part turns out to have been bad, my mechanic does not owe me $100.

    83. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      A shame you were modded flamebait ... I think it more truth.

      --
      .
    84. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Up until around age 27 I lived from payday to payday. During any point at that time if you had asked I would have told you that there was no way I could save cash.

      But then I met somebody who made a few suggestions. The first one was record a spreadsheet of *every* cent you spend. You have to be really honest here .... EVERY cent. At the end of the payperiod if you are out by a cent then you have to do it again.

      After doing that, you then go through and classify every cent. Essential, non-essential. Build up a rating system from 1-5 where 1 is absolutely essential ... rent/mortgage, petrol. Note that electricity is not a 1 because you can save cash by monitoring your electricity usage in exactly the same way.

      7 years later and I've built up a buffer that is 3.5 times my yearly wage.

      --
      .
    85. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      expected does not mean guaranteed.

      Nor does it need to. If the bank says it's going to do X, then fails to do X, it is the bank's fault to rectify any penalties incurred from its failure to do X.

      When I schedule a payment using BPay, or a transfer between accounts, the bank says that transfer will be completed before opening of business the next day (or often instantly, for transfers within the same institution). If they fail to deliver that service, the fault is theirs, not mine.

      It is not my responsibility to ensure the bank does the job I am paying them for. It is the bank's responsibility to ensure they deliver those services as promised, and also their responsibility to make amends if they fail to do so.

    86. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by aamcf · · Score: 1

      That is a good plan.

      It's bloody scary when everything is a 1 though.

    87. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by mysidia · · Score: 1

      It is not my responsibility to ensure the bank does the job I am paying them for.

      Sure... if you pay for a service, you have a right to have the service performed as agreed; how much are you paying them to do the job, exactly, and do you have paperwork from the bank signed by an employee that the bank will do X on Y date?

    88. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and program your computers, at least in my case. My wife has a lead on a new job and I'm really hoping a second job teaching my change things. Between a custody battle ($2,000 to my lawyer, which is a month's take home salary), my wife being laid off, and two kids whose moms refuse to get jobs (one has two Master's degrees yet claims she can't find a job and the other claims she can't work due to being bi-polar yet she manages to go to college just fine) we're unfortunately living pay check to pay check.

      Considering I had my first child at 18, I guess I should consider myself lucky.

    89. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by kramulous · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'll admit there can be a lot of those. But there are lots of very small transactions that are 3,4 or 5 that you just don't realise or 'forget'. Hence how important it is to write down *EVERYTHING*. Every single transaction (If you have cash in your wallet, you are making these sorts of transactions). It is that small stuff that 'doesn't matter' that does really matter.

      --
      .
    90. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Sure... if you pay for a service, you have a right to have the service performed as agreed; how much are you paying them to do the job, exactly, and do you have paperwork from the bank signed by an employee that the bank will do X on Y date?

      My banks services guide states: "Payments made to BPAY billers by 3pm (EST time) Monday to Friday will be processed the same day."

    91. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      Even if any of these affected people had handed a check to their creditors in person, even 3 days in advance of the due date as you demand, the bank's electronic glitch from last week would have ensured a bounced check and subsequent late fees, all your gratuitous handwaving to the contrary. Thank you for refuting your own argument so deftly for me.

    92. Re:They deserve any late fees they get? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But I thought the cake was a lie?

  12. Human error not computer glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A person in NAB made an error while processing a batch of transfers, then tried to fix it and ended up ruining an entire batch, or about 1million transfers between accounts, and because NAB don't put through batches on the weekend everyone who was affected has no money this weekend.

    1. Re:Human error not computer glitch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would think that they would have to have good protection against file corruption surely. It's a BANK. If people don't trust them they don't have a business. Human error would be far more likely, surely.

  13. Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ....until now :-)

    1. Re:Nobody ever got fired for buying IBM... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although it is still a truism in industry that "no one was ever fired for buying IBM," Bill O'Neil, the chief technology officer at Drexel Burnham Lambert, says he knows for a fact that someone has been fired for just that reason. He knows it because he fired the guy. "He made a bad decision, and what it came down to was, 'Well, I bought it because I figured it was safe to buy IBM,'" Mr. O'Neil says. "I said, 'No. Wrong. Game over. Next contestant, please.'" -- The Wall Street Journal, December 6, 1989 -- fortune

  14. Hardest hit by retech · · Score: 1

    The pubs will need compensation since they'll be the hardest hit in all of this.

  15. other banks... by narkotix · · Score: 1

    I know firsthand that at least the top two banks are not penalizing customers who either overdraw or are now subject to late payment fees.

    --
    We played dungeons and dragons for 3 hours.....then i was slain by an elf
    1. Re:other banks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  16. For some Australians... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This will be the first sober weekend they have had in a long time.

  17. Meanwhile, the rest of the world ... by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    ... are out of cash because the world economy tanked.

    Although, the Aussies do deserve some sympathy . . . I recently saw a documentary, which showed how many poisonous varmints and critters are trotting around there. I would be afraid to put my hairy ass into bed at night there.

    Having no cash would be one of the least of my worries.

    My favorite is some type of squid, who is tiny, but a sting of it will kill an adult human in about two minutes.

    Yo. "When I say it's not safe to surf this beach, it's not safe to surf this beach, young Captain!"

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    1. Re:Meanwhile, the rest of the world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Just don't touch the red-back spiders or the brown snakes. First rule you teach your kids.

      At least red-backs don't come into the house all that much.... ...but my favourite is the funnel-web spider - for a long time there was no antidote to its venom.....

      I remember people people dying from its bite up until the 1970s.

    2. Re:Meanwhile, the rest of the world ... by HeadlessNotAHorseman · · Score: 1

      My favorite is some type of squid, who is tiny, but a sting of it will kill an adult human in about two minutes.

      I think you are talking about the blue-ringed octopus. They look pretty, but don't touch them! Actually what they do is completely paralyse your body so that you cannot breathe anymore. If you are lucky and someone else is around to help or call an ambulance, they can continue to perform CPR until the toxin wears off and then you will survive.

      --
      I like my coffee the way I like my women - roasted and ground up into little tiny pieces.
    3. Re:Meanwhile, the rest of the world ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blue-ringed octopus.

  18. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by JustOK · · Score: 1

    via a console on a windows box.

    --
    rewriting history since 2109
  19. A fine opportunity by thePowersGang · · Score: 1

    Ooh, maybe now they can fix up their terribly out of date computer systems! ... or, knowing any sort of big business, just kludge it back into a semi-working state and call the bugs "features".

  20. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by jamesh · · Score: 1

    My sources tell me they doing their batch run on a cluster of PS2's.

  21. Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you take everything down to the wire to maximize interest, fine, but you are gambling the gains in interest vs the potential loss in terms of fees. If you are ok with that, fine, but then don't cry when you do get hit with fees and lose out. Personally I think the other way is smarter. I keep an amount of money in my non-interest bearing checking account since that is where all my transactions draw from. That way if there is a miscalculation there's no overdraw, no bounced payments, no fees. Likewise I pay things before the drop dead date.

    Do I miss out on some interest? Sure, if I messed with funds all the time and tried to keep everything in savings till the last second I'd get a bit more interest. However it wouldn't take much in the way of a fee to negate any of that.

    So I think there's some real validity to the GP's statement. Don't take things down to the wire, build in time to make sure if there's a glitch, there's no problem.

    1. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by ultranova · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If you take everything down to the wire to maximize interest, fine, but you are gambling the gains in interest vs the potential loss in terms of fees.

      You aren't gambling anything, you are making use of modern infrastructure and a service your bank offers. It is no more of a gamble than not getting up early just in case the bridge on your way to work has collapsed during the night.

      If you are ok with that, fine, but then don't cry when you do get hit with fees and lose out.

      Well, no, you shouldn't cry but simply tell your bank to pay the bills that resulted in their failure to deliver a service as advertized, and sue them if they don't.

      I keep an amount of money in my non-interest bearing checking account since that is where all my transactions draw from. That way if there is a miscalculation there's no overdraw, no bounced payments, no fees.

      If your financial institutions really are this unreliable, then I can kinda see why your economy collapsed.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    2. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by carvalhao · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't understand your point. I pay my bank a bunch of fees for them to keep my money safe and available, otherwise I'd keep it under my matress. You mean that when they fail to provide me the service I pay for I should be punished for their mistake?

    3. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by sribe · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you take everything down to the wire to maximize interest, fine, but you are gambling the gains in interest vs the potential loss in terms of fees.

      Please explain exactly how asking a bank to transfer funds on a certain date, and expecting it to happen on the requested date, is a "gamble". Under exactly what circumstances do you expect banks to fail to process scheduled transfers on time?

    4. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you take everything down to the wire to maximize interest, fine, but you are gambling the gains in interest vs the potential loss in terms of fees.

      You aren't gambling anything, you are making use of modern infrastructure and a service your bank offers. It is no more of a gamble than not getting up early just in case the bridge on your way to work has collapsed during the night.

      Except the bridge was built with safety margins to handle 150% (or more) of the load it is expected to handle. He's doing the same thing: the payment is expected to be handle in Y hours/days: he's making the transaction with a safety margin.

      If you are ok with that, fine, but then don't cry when you do get hit with fees and lose out.

      Well, no, you shouldn't cry but simply tell your bank to pay the bills that resulted in their failure to deliver a service as advertized, and sue them if they don't.

      Riiiiight: because the $100/hour lawyer's fee and time spent being depositioned is cheaper than the extra $20 I "lose" by simply paying on day X-5 instead of the day the payment is due ("X"). Is there a posted SLA that your bank has for transfers? Did you read the "EULA" (?) for this service? Do you really think Legal wouldn't give them some wiggle room on this topic? Do you really want to spend (say) ten hours on the phone with them trying to extract the fees?

      I keep an amount of money in my non-interest bearing checking account since that is where all my transactions draw from. That way if there is a miscalculation there's no overdraw, no bounced payments, no fees.

      If your financial institutions really are this unreliable, then I can kinda see why your economy collapsed.

      No, he's being prudent. You don't plan for when things go right, you plan for when they go wrong.

      Shit happens, and if you want to assume that it doesn't (or doesn't happen too often) then that's your perogative. But other people sleep better at night knowing there's some slack in their life.

      It's why banks offer both fixed and variable rate mortgages: some want a set cash flow schedule and are willing to pay a bit more for it, other's are willing to take a bit of risk on where interest rates will go. Some people are willing to pay a little money for a security blanket: it's why insurance exists.

    5. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          No, actually you pay for the privilege of letting the bank hold onto the idea of your money. Once you hand it over, it's just a number in a database. With that privilege, you let them make money by loaning out your money, until which point where you may want it back. Converting that idea of the money back to currency is at the discretion of the bank. For example, if you've deposited $100/wk into your account every week for 10 years, you can't just walk in and tell them to give you $52,000. They may give you another idea of your money, in the form of a cashiers check, but rarely does a bank have that much cash on hand. Any mistake on the bank's part leaves the burden of proof on you. If you deposit $1,000, but the bank teller miskeys it as $10.00, you have to prove that the amount was wrong. Good luck with that. Additionally, any time a transaction should fail, the burden of arbitrary fees falls on you. An "overdraft" of even $1.00 can result in $70 or more in fees. It's a much higher rate than interest on a loan, if they were simply to open a line of credit for that error.

          While the bank has your money, they'll invest it as they see fit, use it to issue loans, etc. The loans that they make go to others who don't have the funds. The bank makes a very healthy profit from the interest on the loan, while you most likely won't see a penny of it. If your account happens to be an interest bearing account, you might see a very small percentage of that loan activity, but don't hold your breath.

          You're better off purchasing a good fireproof/waterproof safe. That is, one that is rated for real fires, and submersion, not the crap that you can buy at big box stores. It should be bolted to the floor (or mounted in the floor), so it cannot be stolen. If your house should burn down, be flooded, or burglarized, your property should remain safe. Consider, how many times have those three issues happened at your own home? Compare that to how many times you've been charged fees by the bank. Which has the higher risk? If you've had accounts open for several years, think about to how much you've paid the bank for the luxury of holding your money. It's probably a lot more than the cost of a safe.

          The proverbial "under my mattress", as long as it's thought of as "a safe place in my home" is safer and more cost effective than using a bank. Just don't tell anyone else that you have a safe with cash in it. The criminal element know that banks have cash. They don't know that you have a safe at home. In the event of a random home burglary, they may steal your TV, but they won't be able to steal a properly secured safe.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unexpected service outage in the time window you scheduled for (for either bank). Also sufficient funds not being available in your account because of things like check deposits taking longer than usual to be approved, checks that were deposited unexpectedly bouncing, unauthorized withdrawals, etc.

    7. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by Johnno74 · · Score: 1

      Read the article - you are barking up the wrong tree. The problem is people who were paid on thursday haven't had their pay go in yet. Doesn't matter what date you scheduled a payment to go out if you don't have any cash in your account because your deposits haven't been processed...

    8. Re:Sorry but doing that is gambling more or less by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, I take it you'd be perfectly okay with your employer firing you and suing you for their losses the first time you make a mistake as well?

      What, you aren't? You hypocrite.

  22. Will be interesting to see if anyone switches bank by jonwil · · Score: 1

    It will be interesting to see how many people end up switching to another bank over this (either because of the stuff-up or because of the lack of communication from the NAB when it initially happened)

    I for one am glad I left the National Australia Bank years ago. I no longer keep my money in the bank, I use a Credit Union :)

  23. Mainframe: File Corruption? by kramulous · · Score: 1

    "corrupted file in its mainframe computer"

    Do they honestly expect us to believe this shit?

    --
    .
    1. Re:Mainframe: File Corruption? by o2sd · · Score: 1

      Do they honestly expect us to believe this shit?

      Believe what you like, but you have obviously never worked for an Australian bank. I wouldn't be surprised if they said that they lost the punch cards. F*cktards, the lot of them.

      --
      - Nothing to see hear.
    2. Re:Mainframe: File Corruption? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1

      The western world's financial sector runs on ancient clunky COBOL batch systems that have accumulated a horrendous amount of cruft and as a result are very hard to update. Fuck ups are common although they're rarely as bad as this.

    3. Re:Mainframe: File Corruption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I happen to know it wasn't a file corruption. Lets just say that this will never see the light of day.

    4. Re:Mainframe: File Corruption? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, a 'corrupted file' is a lame excuse at best and of course the media buys it hook, line and sinker. I'm thinking any hacker worth their salt would never draw this much attention to themselves, a disgruntled employee would have blogged about it by now (and would have been a better media excuse than a file) so leaves only the possibility of a successful virus infiltration, potentially a foreign government extending thier cyber attacks of our government into the commercial sector.

  24. No cash proposal in Slovenia by DavMz · · Score: 1

    And a few days ago, there was a link on /. to the article of a Slovenian economist proposing to get rid of cash.
    No cash + computer glitch = ??

  25. Telephone sanitizers better not lose their jobs... by wyoung76 · · Score: 1

    Otherwise all of civilization will fall...

  26. Re: but the PHB said what can go wrong outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something tells me outsourcing to Infosys in Bangalore will cause a PHB at NAB a lot of grief.

  27. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    Well, I've never heard about a Windows mainframe...

  28. Telephone sanitizers got re-hired by tepples · · Score: 1

    Telephone sanitizers got re-hired by Apple as App Store curators. Now instead of sanitizing the phone, they sanitize what you can get on the phone.

  29. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mainframes run neither *nix nor Windows (usually - IBM mainframes can run Linux, but that's probably rare for bank stuff)...

  30. Whats the fee on the Emergency $500 advances by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Whats the fee on the Emergency $500 advances?

  31. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I've heard of a UNIX mainframe, but they're pretty rare. You've be much more likely to run something like z/OS on one than a toy OS like UNIX.

    --
    I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  32. Quite possibly by LongearedBat · · Score: 1

    As nothing is ever perfect, it is actually quite possible. But was is a manual stuff up, or genuine failed write? Who knows (outisde the IT team)?

  33. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by afidel · · Score: 1

    https://www.unisys.com/products/enterprise__servers/insights/insights__compendium/The_Emergence_of_a_Windows_Mainframe_White_Paper.pd Unisys has been slogging their large scale x86 machines running Windows Datacenter Edition as mainframes for almost a decade.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  34. Re:Windows or *nix mainframe... by butlerm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Unisys has been slogging their large scale x86 machines running Windows Datacenter Edition as mainframes for almost a decade.

    Few people take that claim seriously, any more than they would believe a claim that a 32 CPU Sun or HP server was a "mainframe". Such machines are just mid range servers with a larger than usual number of CPUs.

    The basic difference is that mid-range servers (system software and hardware) are more "commodity-ish" (and much less expensive) than true mainframes where companies spend on the order of ten times as much just to gain additional advantages in reliability, availability, and serviceability. If you don't spend at least $1M on a computer it probably isn't a mainframe.

    Even if you do, by convention Unix is a mini-computer operating system, and Windows Server even lower down the scale, and systems running those operating systems aren't generally considered mainframes no matter how much extra RAS effort is put into them.

  35. It will all be OK by wgmari · · Score: 1

    I can guarantee that all late fees incurred will be paid by NAB. This is a MAJOR news story here in Australia - the bad publicity is huge. If they reneg on any fees, there'll be blood in the water while the reporters circle.

    I incurred some fees from a third party once when my main bank set my account up incorrectly. A simple letter was enough to get them to refund all of the fees. If they didn't, the banking ombudsman has the power to force them.

  36. They did get compensation... by Kit+Kat100 · · Score: 1

    Just a note, but NAB has made an effort to get every who has lost money due to the glitch compensation. No one, or very few should lose money due to the glitch. http://www.heraldsun.com.au/business/nab-cash-woes-all-weekend/story-e6frfh4f-1225961904137 "The bank also said it won't leave customers out of pocket through any penalties as a result of the technical glitch."