Slashdot Mirror


Curious NASA Pre-Announcement

CrtxReavr was one of a small avalanche of readers to let us know about a press conference NASA scheduled for Thursday at 2pm to discuss an "astrobiology finding that will impact the search for evidence of extraterrestrial life." I've heard rumors ranging from "proof of life on Titan" to "first contact," depending on how optimistic/crazy you are.

8 of 286 comments (clear)

  1. Titan seems plausible by bl8n8r · · Score: 5, Informative

    "NASA believes it has found vital clues that alien life does indeed exist on Titan, "
    http://news.gather.com/viewArticle.action?articleId=281474978743812

    --
    boycott slashdot February 10th - 17th check out: altSlashdot.org
  2. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by Thelasko · · Score: 5, Informative

    It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on Saturn's moon Rhea.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
  3. Just idle speculation by Snowblindeye · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's funny how quick idle speculation turns into news. Apparently it all started with this blog post.

    He's now updated his post with a tweet from someone at Nasa that the press conference is not about proof of life:

    I'm sad to quell some of the @kottke-induced excitement about possible extraterrestrial life. I've seen the Science paper. It's not that

  4. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by durrr · · Score: 1, Informative

    It might be news from the O/OREOS satellite launched a few days ago. according to wiki it's supposed to rehydrate/feed a bunch of extremophiles on board a "few days" after launch. Given the time for bacterial growth cycles they could quite likely have news already fromt his one, which would probably either be "bacteria revived in microgravity thrives perfectly well in!" or "bacteria revived in microgravity catch fire and die"

  5. Dr Felisa Wolfe-Simon's work. by anzha · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the individuals in the scheduled press announcement has a website and based on her work my bet is that they may have found some indications that there is life on earth that uses arsenic instead of phosphorus.

    --
    Do you know why the road less traveled by is littered with the bones of the unwary?
  6. Re:Did they find the ancient gene? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    except it was a stargate joke ... whoosh

  7. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by pz · · Score: 4, Informative

    It probably has to do with the recent discovery of oxygen on saturn's moon Rhea.

    Doubtful, for two reasons: (a) that has already been announced, and (b) the oxygen there has a plausible nonbiological origin (energetic particles in Saturn's magnetic field interacting with water ice on the surface).

    The smart money says this press announcement will be disappointing to most people. Not unlike like the whole Apple/Beatles thing.

    Extra doubtful that it's about Rhea because Carolyn Porco, the head of the Cassini project, isn't on the list of participants.

    Doing a few minutes' worth of work in Google comes to the following information about the listed participants in the press conference:

    Mary Voytek -- director, NASA Astrobiology program
    Felisa Wolfe-Simon -- evolutionary biology including metallic enzymes, specifically the potential role of arsenic in DNA
    Pamela Conrad -- biogeochemistry and organic chemical signatures of extremophiles
    Steven Benner -- geobiology of RNA, including detection of DNA and RNA
    James Elser -- the influence of nitrogen and phosphorus in biological processes including ecosystems, speciation and RNA

    Since the announcement of the press conference says that the finding will impact the "search for evidence of extraterrestrial life," chances are they've found some potential signature of a metabolic process. Notwithstanding what I said above about Carolyn Porco, Cassini flew within 100 km of Rhea earlier this year (March) to "determine what is coming off Rhea" according to NASA's site on the flyby. The timing (March to December) fits well with the amount of time it takes to do data analysis, write a paper, and have it accepted for publication for something that gets fast-tracked. Science is published on Fridays. Nature is published on Thursdays. It would seem like the paper is going to appear in Nature no matter what the exact announcement is.
     

    --

    Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  8. Re:Ranging from proof of life to first contact? by nabsltd · · Score: 3, Informative

    The version on iTunes are MP3s made from the 24-bit, 44KHz remaster from last year. Like every remaster for the past 15 years or so, it has dynamic range compression applied.

    This results in several things:

    • People notice sounds they never heard before, because the quiet parts of the songs are now 3-8dB louder than before. Almost every review comments on being able to hear things they couldn't before. In general, you will never hear anything "new" in a remaster that uses the same master tapes (as this one did) that you couldn't have heard before by turning up the volume.
    • The relative loudness of songs on the same album is messed up. For example, on Sgt. Pepper, "Fixing a Hole" now has peaks about 3-4dB louder than before, while other songs have peaks where they have always been. This is because of the "Loudness War" mentioned in another post. Despite the fact that it's supposed to be a quiet song, quiet songs are now "bad". "Blackbird" from the White Album suffers a similar fate.
    • Sounds that are supposed to be "big" just don't feel that way. For example, the hammer "Maxwell's Silver Hammer" doesn't stand out as much...it doesn't have as much impact, because it's not as much louder than the rest of the song as it should be. The classic example for this is Phil Collins "In the Air Tonight". Compressed on radio or the latest CD releases, the drum solo has very little impact.