NASA Confirms Discovery of Organism With Phosphorus-Free DNA
GNUALMAFUERTE writes "As we mentioned before, NASA's Department of Astrobiology had an important announcement to make today. It looks like Gizmodo was right. You can watch the presentation online right now. It looks like the bacteria in question uses arsenic as a phosphorus replacement in its DNA."
It replaces MOST phosphorus atoms with arsenic, but not all.
It wasn't phosphorus free, in fact they hadn't confirmed how much of the phosphorus had been substituted with arsenic, but they did mentioned it was not 100%. They also mentioned it was more than just DNA (ATP was also mentioned, although they implied more).
According to this NYT article this is a normal earthly bacterium that, when placed in an environment full of arsenic, started swapping arsenic for phosphorus. It's not a totally new form of life unrelated to what we know.
NASA has discovered a completely new life form that doesn't share the biological building blocks of anything currently living in planet Earth, using arsenic to build its DNA, RNA, proteins, and cell membranes. This changes everything.
That is not the case. The DNA is largely the same, except that phosphorous has been exchanged with Arsenic. Don't get me wrong, this is still a hugely interesting discovery, but it was implied during the pre-conference speculation that this was an entirely separate instance of abiogenesis, and that is simply not the case, unfortunately.
This wasn't "bred" or modified by the scientists from an existing bacterium, it was occurring naturally in Mono Lake and was transported to the lab for concentrated study. That was the second-to-last question answered in the NASA TV broadcast.
My thoughts are as follows:
THIS IS BLOODY AMAZING! followed by a little more tempered cogitation:
Arsenate is a triprotic species just like phosphate, each has a valence of +5, and it's directly one period down on the table so available electron shells in ground state will appear very similar. However arsenic possesses filled d orbitals and is about 7% less electronegative than phosphorous - these factors, among others, tend to make arsenate a little more reactive than phosphate which would make it less stable as a backbone of DNA. So if the degree of replacement is as thorough as NASA claims (they said they cultured it with zero phosphorous present - so only trace impurities) the cell has either found a way to strengthen the backbone or has developed an amazing repair mechanism which can deal with frequent DNA damage.
NASA has two summaries here and here.
Astrobiology has an article here.
And http://www.sciencemag.org/">Science will release a paper later today.
What they did was take samples of bacteria from the mud, and placed them in three conditions. In one condition they kept raising the cells in normal, phosphorous containing substrate, removing a small portion to another phosphorous containing substrate, and repeating for generations. In another they put the cells on a substrate lacking phosphorous or arsenic, and removed a small portion to another empty substrate, and so on. Finally, they put some on a substrate containing phosphorous and arsenic, and kept pulling out small proportions an introducing them to plates higher and higher in arsenic. The serial dilutions eventually decreased the amount of phosphorous to amounts too small to account for the needs of bacteria. Cells grew on both phosphorous and arsenic plates, but they grew better in phosphorous. The arsenic cells had some weird vacuoules which might be helping to stabilize the arsenic based compounds.
They don't know if cells in the wild have this ability or if they evolved the ability over the course of serial dilutions. A simple mass spec can tell that the ones in the wild are not mostly arsenic based though.
See, this is why I hate slashdot.
Instead of telling us 'Gizmodo was right', like we all read Gizmodo and keep constantly up to date about what's going on over there, how about TELLING US THE ACTUAL THING THAT HAPPENED.
No, I shouldn't have to follow a link to figure it...there's supposed to be an 'article summary', which, you know, gives some hint as to what happened.
Instead of just saying 'Oh, hey, these other people were right in their guess about a thing which i won't mention that they thought NASA would say.'. Well, woo-fucking-hoo. I'm sure we were all on the edge of our seat betting in the 'How correct is Gizmodo?' pool, and they just got a point! Wow! Who cares about actual news events, let's all sit there and count Gizmodo's points, or something.
Timothy, you goddamn fucking moron. It's one thing when the article summary is misleading or just flat out incorrect, but slashdot has now managed to hit a new low where the article summary doesn't even exist.
If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
I captured and converted it to mp4 format for anybody that wants to view it.
http://www.wuala.com/danathar/public
file is nasa.mp4 (it's the only one on that page)
Actually, they DID discover a new life form. They didn't actually coax an existing bacteria to "use phosphorus". Instead, they discovered an existing organism that can use arsenic in its DNA and RNA rather than the phorphorus other life on earth uses.
Free Martian Whores!
It wasn't "political based bashing", it was a joke at the expense of David Icke and his weirdos. And it was damn funny, too.