Slashdot Mirror


NASA Records Solar Blast of Epic Proportions

Arvisp writes "As predicted, the a 'mega-filament' of solar magnetism erupted on Dec. 6th, producing a blast of epic proportions. NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory recorded the action as the 700,000-km long structure lifted off the stellar surface and--snap!!--hurled itself into space. The eruption produced a bright coronal mass ejection (CME) observed by the STEREO-A spacecraft: video. Earth was not in the line of fire; the cloud should sail wide of our planet. Earth-effects might be limited to pretty pictures."

123 comments

  1. Sunfart by Hognoxious · · Score: 0

    n/c

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Sunfart by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sun says, "Oh, SNAP!"

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:Sunfart by dmbasso · · Score: 1

      What a fart! Appreciate it in better detail:
      mplayer ahead_20101206_cor2_512.mpg -loop 0 -fps 5

      --
      `echo $[0x853204FA81]|tr 0-9 ionbsdeaml`@gmail.com
    3. Re:Sunfart by fyngyrz · · Score: 1

      But they cause really pretty side effects, which I'm kind of addicted to photographing.

      --
      I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.
    4. Re:Sunfart by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The sun's on food stamps now?

      Did its face turn red after it farted? Must be the cheap food you get from the SNAP program.

  2. Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do CME's often have a direct, measurable effect on weather, etc. on Earth?

    1. Re:Interesting... by u17 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, and the most descriptive metrics measure the effect of CMEs in terms of the number of comments in articles posted about them on the Internet. Let's see how big this one can get.

    2. Re:Interesting... by spun · · Score: 2

      That depends on how close they come. If they come close, they have a direct, measurable effect on all sorts of things, like power lines, which are essentially giant antenna. CMEs in the past have caused massive blackouts.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    3. Re:Interesting... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      We'll find out in 3.5 years when an article in Wired describing the failure of the power grid due to transformer saturation later this week asks why nothing was done to prevent such saturation after the last N such events.

    4. Re:Interesting... by syousef · · Score: 1

      Yes, and the most descriptive metrics measure the effect of CMEs in terms of the number of comments in articles posted about them on the Internet. Let's see how big this one can get.

      Well if you had 0 articles posted, it may imply you've destroyed all Internet communications. That would be pretty big. ;-)

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    5. Re:Interesting... by unity100 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      if they hit, as much as they hit, they have a huge effect on magnetosphere. and also can cause failures in electrical, electronical equipment.

      it is also possible that by presurizing earth's magnetic field, they are affecting all creatures on the planet. (Since all gets affected by the magnetism). shrinking magnetic field also means more cosmic rays coming in, i presume.

      energy of the blast, its emissions, may increase heating of the planet, i presume. but i dont remember it well.

    6. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is also possible that by presurizing earth's magnetic field, they are affecting all creatures on the planet. (Since all gets affected by the magnetism). shrinking magnetic field also means more cosmic rays coming in, i presume.

      energy of the blast, its emissions, may increase heating of the planet, i presume. but i dont remember it well.

      In other words, you're just making shit up. Kind of like the rest of your posts on any subject.

    7. Re:Interesting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if they hit, as much as they hit, they have a huge effect on magnetosphere. and also can cause failures in electrical, electronical equipment.

      True...

      it is also possible that by presurizing earth's magnetic field, they are affecting all creatures on the planet. (Since all gets affected by the magnetism). shrinking magnetic field also means more cosmic rays coming in, i presume.

      Whaaaaaaaaa?????

      energy of the blast, its emissions, may increase heating of the planet, i presume. but i dont remember it well.

      I also often have trouble remembering events which have not yet occurred.

    8. Re:Interesting... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      TFA says that it didn't come this way. Lucky us!

  3. Detecting CMEs Aimed Directly @ Earth by BoRegardless · · Score: 1

    Have the detection systems advanced to where NASA and the sun watchers can detect CMEs when they are not on the limb of the sun, but bursting directly at Earth?

    I know a satellite is supposed to go up to help with that at some point, but can they detect them ahead of time now?

    1. Re:Detecting CMEs Aimed Directly @ Earth by nametaken · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just read somewhere that these filament bursts contain cooler plasma, so they show as dark areas when observing the sun.

    2. Re:Detecting CMEs Aimed Directly @ Earth by afidel · · Score: 2

      Yes, STEREO currently is out at L4 and L5 and so can see CME's pointed towards earth however they are not in a stable orbit there so that ability will be lost for a bit during 2015 when their orbits put them on the far side of the sun.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    3. Re:Detecting CMEs Aimed Directly @ Earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In space, no one can hear your STEREO

    4. Re:Detecting CMEs Aimed Directly @ Earth by CrimsonAvenger · · Score: 1

      Yes, STEREO currently is out at L4 and L5 and so can see CME's pointed towards earth however they are not in a stable orbit there so that ability will be lost for a bit during 2015 when their orbits put them on the far side of the sun.

      STEREO were in the vicinity of the Earth-Sun L4 and L5 late last year. They are no longer there.

      --

      "I do not agree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it"
  4. Hello CmdrTaco.. Helloo anybody home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    ", the a 'mega-filament'.."

    pick one, the or a, but not both.

    or did you fail to mention the b 'mega filament'..

    1. Re:Hello CmdrTaco.. Helloo anybody home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ", the a 'mega-filament'.."

      pick one, the or a, but not both.

      or did you fail to mention the b 'mega filament'..

      Yes, but it is only a concern for the "b" ark.

    2. Re:Hello CmdrTaco.. Helloo anybody home? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe a Kennedy typed the summary.

  5. video by Internal+Modem · · Score: 5, Interesting
    1. Re:video by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      The big yellow one is the sun! http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ORTLn-RDnQ4

      But seriously, if you look at the sun in the middle of your video, the mass ejection appears to be much larger than the Sun itself. Wow!

    2. Re:video by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      After watching that video, I have to say that the funniest part is that the comedian had no clue what the audience member was talking about. Granted, it was almost 30 years later, but I would think he would remember his own material.

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  6. Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Orga · · Score: 2

    I'm not up on these sorts of things, it does look quite spectacular though. Does anyone know what kind of effects we might have seen on Earth if this had been directly towards us?

  7. Scale by pete-classic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For scale, 700,000km is half the diameter of the Sun.

    -Peter

    1. Re:Scale by TheNinjaroach · · Score: 5, Funny

      For scale, half the diameter of the Sun is a radius of the Sun.

      --
      I went to eat some animal crackers and the box said, "Do not eat if seal is broken." I opened the box and sure enough..
    2. Re:Scale by Stregano · · Score: 0

      For scale, this was approx. one quarter (or one fourth or 1/4) of the circumference of the sun

      --
      The world is how you make it
    3. Re:Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      i think it would be closer to 1/6 (or one sixth) of the circumference of the sun.

    4. Re:Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For scale, half the diameter of the Sun is a radius of the Sun.

      What's that in Libraries of Congress?

    5. Re:Scale by init-five · · Score: 1

      how about in football fields or libraries of congress?

      --
      Hallowed are the Ori
    6. Re:Scale by NanoGeek · · Score: 1

      Yes, but we must know. How many Libraries of Congress is that?

    7. Re:Scale by Centurix · · Score: 1

      What's that in Hogsheads per fortnight?

      --
      Task Mangler
    8. Re:Scale by bhiestand · · Score: 1

      You have to do some dimensional analysis.

      LOCs are a unit of storage space, and storage space can also be measured on slashdot by vans filled with tape backups traveling down the highway. From there, it's not hard to get to your standard units of furlongs, fortnights, and parsecs.

      --
      SWM seeks new sig for a brief fling
    9. Re:Scale by bar-agent · · Score: 1

      I don't know how big the plasma cloud left over from this flare is, but as for the flare itself, 700 000 km is 0.004 AUs, so it was nowhere near Earth's orbit.

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    10. Re:Scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better scale I read was the Earth is about 5 pixels across in that picture....

    11. Re:Scale by rtyhurst · · Score: 1

      Or better yet... furlongs per hectoliter?

  8. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    I'm not up on these sorts of things, it does look quite spectacular though. Does anyone know what kind of effects we might have seen on Earth if this had been directly towards us?

    We wouldn't be seeing much of anything if this had been coming straight for us.

  9. Article is very light on information... by TWX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...and it would be nice to know how strong such a solar flare would be by the time it reaches the ~150,000,000 kilometers distance that the Earth is from the Sun, and what kind of ramifications such a flare could have, now that we've actually seen one for real. I'm not looking for the gloom and doom worst-case type stuff either, rather I'd like to know the range of effects, including human-eye-observable effects, that such a discharge could have...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Article is very light on information... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    2. Re:Article is very light on information... by dgatwood · · Score: 2

      As I understand it, smaller CMEs happen periodically. They can cause blackouts, satellite problems, and increased radiation risk to astronauts and air fliers, but otherwise they're a nonevent. Mostly just brighter aurorae. A big one could really wreck the power grid, but that's probably the extent of the impact as far as most people are concerned. At least that's the current thinking.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    3. Re:Article is very light on information... by natehoy · · Score: 5, Informative

      These things aren't mysteries, even to many laypeople. Of course, I'm a private pilot, so the potential interference to radio communications, GPS, etc maybe makes me a little more aware of it than most, but it's not like this is a new phenomenon or something we've just now discovered thanks to modern science. Humanity knew about these before the 1800's, and their effects on electrical devices were pretty clearly demonstrated by Mother Nature since at least 1859 (the Carrington Event, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859 ).

      We've been hit by CMEs in the past, and their effects are pretty well understood. The potential impacts of this are real, and very inconvenient, in that they can knock out power grids with relative ease ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_1989_geomagnetic_storm ). We haven't had a strong hit since the cellular telephone was invented in 1989, so we have little experience with the really strong ones and modern electronics, but frying a few million computers and smartphones would (if not fatal) have some pretty nasty economic consequences for the owners of same.

      The only level of lethality would be if you are somehow dependent on electricity, or the possible introduction of electricity into places you weren't expecting it. So, for example, if you hear about a strong geomagnetic event, it's probably not a good idea to go out and lean on any local ungrounded aluminum-sided house or any very large piece of ungrounded conductive material. You might become the grounding strap. That could be bad. Think of it as a lightning event, except it's smaller lightning but appears everywhere, even inside things.

      Upside: While it's dark at night what with all the lack of power and your neighbors not burning their 10,000 watt back yard lights all night, you'll see the coolest aurora display ever if you live far enough north (and that could be as far south as Texas with a strong event). "Aurora Borealis, shinin' down in Dallas, can you picture that?"

      We know it damages things as crude as telegraph machines, including setting the paper in them on fire from sparks, because it has. CMEs can impart energy into metal, and the electrical network is a huge freaking CME antenna, so in a strong storm expect at least temporary loss of power, and longer if there's enough strength to overload transformers and the like.

      The CME can either cancel out the existing electricity in the power grid, or it can add to it, depending on polarity. A modestly strong CME impact can actually impart electricity into unshielded electronics and fry them where they sit due to nothing more sophisticated than voltage overload, even if they are not plugged in (this is known as "geomagnetically-induced current").

      A little light reading for when you get curious.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_storm#Historical_occurrences

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geomagnetic_storm

      --
      "This post contains words, known to the State of California to cause thought. Wash brain thoroughly after reading."
    4. Re:Article is very light on information... by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Informative

      ...so we have little experience with the really strong ones and modern electronics, but frying a few million computers and smartphones would (if not fatal) have some pretty nasty economic consequences for the owners of same.

      We don't need such experience. We have physics, which tells us that even extremely severe geomagnetic storms won't affect such devices at all.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    5. Re:Article is very light on information... by Tumbleweed · · Score: 3, Funny

      We don't need such experience. We have physics

      One of the funniest things ever said on Slashdot. Congratulations!

    6. Re:Article is very light on information... by MokuMokuRyoushi · · Score: 2

      Interestingly, as I read your comment, I pictured a gnarled old farmer being lectured by a sharp-nosed scholar, fresh from the city, as to how to run his farm. The farmer seems to be torn between laughing uproariously and walking away with a disbelieving shake of his head.

      --
      Humans are terrible replicators of Godly things.
    7. Re:Article is very light on information... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 3, Informative

      I really don't know where you get your "intel", but for the most part your very mislead into the effects.

      CME and flares have 3 main effects.

      In space the plasma(high energy charged particles) is effectively a very high dose of radiation to satellites. This can cause temporary, or even in extreme cases, permanent failure. The radiation damages microelectronics, and cause little currents that cause parasitic transistors to "latch on".

      The radiation also affects the ionosphere. This can have a dramatic effect on radio wave propagation through and off this layer of the atmosphere and will strongly affect communications that depend on this layer. It can in fact improve performance of some long wave bands.

      Finally we come to the fact that the CME is a plasma and has a magnetic field with it. This pushes the earths magnetic field and can cause induction effects on earth surface. This is the only thing that affects terrestrial equipment. The radiation does not penetrate the ~10 metric tons of atmosphere per m^2. However the shifting magnetic field could lead to locally higher levels of background radiation, this would be more prevalent around the poles where its higher anyway. Also note that much of the little stuff blamed on the 1989 event is dubious. Even the wiki citation about "microchips" leads to a story where 3 hard drives failed (This happened to our raid system last year, we didn't blame CME).

      The earth magnetic field is quite weak so the induction only affects very large "loops", like a telegram network or a electrical grid. Small "loops" like microelectronics, Aluminum buildings, ungrounded "metal" etc don't notice anything. It is nothing like lightning. Long range communications is now done with fiber for the most part, so the "large loops" are only city wide now days, and are unlikely to be badly affected. But electrical grids are somewhat susceptible, there are massive loops 100 even 1000 of km across. The voltage induced is still quite low, but this can still produce a very large current. This current is typically DC compared to the normal AC load power. This can have a detrimental effect on transformers by pushing the magnetic core into saturation. This typically disrupts wave forms and causes a "short circuit" and breakers should trip in at that point without serious damage being done. This was the case for march 1998 event, power was restored within 9 hours. However one large transformer was damaged. But this kind of redundancy is built into most grids and this did not seriously affect electrical supply in Canada outside the immediate affects.

      Just to get a feel for the kind of "volts" we are talking about. Even if the full magnetic flux "swing" at the north pole (about 60uT/m2) in 1sec will induce just 18mV on a 10m radius *wire* loop. In practice this is very unrealistic and true swings is orders of magnitude less. From your links a swing of only 1.6uT for the 1859 event or 37 times less and over longer time intervals, ie a loop need to have an area of 625000m2 to induce 1V if that swing takes 1 sec (typically it takes *much* longer). Note you can't "ground" this emf, this is not how induction works, so you can't be a grounding strap it you touch the loop.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    8. Re:Article is very light on information... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      We have physics, which tells us that even extremely severe geomagnetic storms won't affect such devices at all.

      The other two responses to your comment correct. You are not. You might want to read up on it before showing your ignorance. During the Carrington Event, for instance, wikipedia says that people leaning against a metal shed were electrocuted -- and people can take far more electricity than semiconductors.

    9. Re:Article is very light on information... by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      The earth magnetic field is quite weak so the induction only affects very large "loops", like a telegram network or a electrical grid.

      "Weak" is a relative term.

      My dad was an electrical lineman for forty years, much of it in construction. He told me that even before the big, high tension towers were connected to generators, you could loop a wire around the cables, and weld your initials into the tower with them. He said he could never figure out how that worked.

      I surmised that the miles and miles of newly installed cables swaying through the earth's magnetic field produced the current.

    10. Re:Article is very light on information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I surmised that the miles and miles of newly installed cables swaying through the earth's magnetic field produced the current.

      Weak is a relative term and the Earth's fields are way too weak to induce the current you're talking about. More likely, what your father saw was static electricity generated by wind blowing over the cables.

    11. Re:Article is very light on information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ~10 metric tons of atmosphere per m^2

      Damn, the air's a lot thicker in your neighborhood than where I live!

    12. Re:Article is very light on information... by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

      The air pressure is equal to the weight of air above it. Sea level pressure is ~100000Pa or 100 000N/m^2. If you use g~10m/s^2 then the mass of air per m^2 is 10000kg/m^2. The value is a little higher with g=9.81 and the fact that gravity very slightly weaker as you get higher. Hence the amount of mass of air per m^2 is a bit higher than 10 metric tons per m^2.

      Remember that at sea level 1m^3 of air is slightly more than 1kg in mass.

      So even if you live in Denver it won't be that much different.

      --
      The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
    13. Re:Article is very light on information... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I missed the fact that you were referring to the air column. Just figured you were putting out a rough figure for the mass of atmosphere in a cubic km and made a unit typo. Wiseass fail on my part!

      Thanks for the instructive reply.

  10. strange brew that's also good for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That would be home made Kombucha.

  11. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm not up on these sorts of things, it does look quite spectacular though. Does anyone know what kind of effects we might have seen on Earth if this had been directly towards us?

    Dr Ray Stantz: Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
    Dr. Egon Spengler: Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
    Winston Zeddemore: The dead rising from the grave!
    Dr. Peter Venkman: Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  12. Is this enough mass to form a new planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! Oh, wait...

  13. To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wikileaks founder arrested on suspicion of sexual assault, United States and many other countries partake in secret, scandalous dealings outside of the public view, the DOJ cracks down on piracy sites thus paving the way for internet censorship, the space shuttle launch delays another month, slashdotters begin to buy tinfoil hats by the case as human society faces major upheavals....

    "And the universe does not even notice...."

    1. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean Blizzard didn't cause the flare as part of the Catalysm launch?

    2. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Posting on the wrong story takes some serious fail. Or maybe it's just a covert fail.

    3. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by Tanktalus · · Score: 2

      First off, this is /., posting on the wrong story is expected at least once in every article.

      Second, this was not posted on the wrong story. Translation: "We're fucking ourselves up, universe continues normal course." That better?

    4. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by imrec · · Score: 1

      Ugh, no kidding. I actually felt kind of sick watching the animation. The heat and pressure happening there... Man, so small. We are sooooo small... all of humanity's trials, triumphs, defeats, accomplishments... Not even a cosmic blip.

      I recall Neil Tyson making a remark to the effect of how it's difficult to consider the idea of a benevolent deity/god/whatever when the universe is trying so, so badly to kill us. We have such little business existing at all.

      Well... back to watching Jackass.

      --
      Note: This sig contains nine S's, nine I's and five O's which... means absolutely nothing.
    5. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      Wikileaks founder arrested on suspicion of sexual assault, United States and many other countries partake in secret, scandalous dealings outside of the public view, the DOJ cracks down on piracy sites thus paving the way for internet censorship, the space shuttle launch delays another month, slashdotters begin to buy tinfoil hats by the case as human society faces major upheavals.... "And the universe does not even notice...."

      You might want to ground that tinfoil hat in the event of a CME impacting the earths magnetosphere... because tinfoil will become an antenna and you an earthed conductor.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    6. Re:To Paraphrase Dr. Manhattan by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      Thanks, you saved me a response to an AC. ;)

  14. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by countSudoku() · · Score: 2, Funny

    We're all dead from the last CME. This is a very elaborate dream-like state you're having just like in Brainstorm when they recorded that dead brain on the optical tape machine thing. Just go into the light... we can't keep this hallucination going for much longer.

    --
    This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
  15. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but now tell him about the twinkie.

  16. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by blair1q · · Score: 5, Informative

    Not really. The magnetosphere protects us from most of it. It makes some radio noise, brighter aurorae at the poles, and a lot of hoo-ha on the tee-vee.

  17. lame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Call me when one hits the Earth directly and rips off half of our atmosphere.

  18. Blast of epic proportions by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This happened to me last night at Taco Bell.

  19. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Huh.
    How dead? Like, everyone day-side gets cancer, or the lithosphere gets scrapped off?

    Now, for a comet or meteroid, we could theoretically nudge it out of our path with a nuke,
    if we got lucky enough to see it beforehand,
    and the rocket scientists with the slide rulers didn't botch the deep-space billiards,
    but is there anything at all we could do to survive this?

    Even, say, with 50 years warning and mankind's unified effort?

  20. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I'm mixing up my solar activities, flares and CME's and whatever elses.

  21. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by caluml · · Score: 1

    Wake me up when I can see the Aurora from here in Bristol, UK (51 degrees north). I don't really want to have to go to the Arctic circle to freeze... Wait a minute - it's cold here too. :(

  22. Volkswagens? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 1

    How many Volkswagens is that?

    --
    "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    1. Re:Volkswagens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Beetles or Rabbits?

    2. Re:Volkswagens? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      About 4.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Volkswagens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many Volkswagens is that?

      Well, the VW Golf Mk6 is 4.2m long, so... 166,666,666.

    4. Re:Volkswagens? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 1

      OMG, that's the devil's number two and two third times, with a one in front of it! It's a sign! That solar blast was the beginning of the apocalypse!

  23. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    move.

  24. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    You should be able to see big ones from 50N.

    This event won't produce one, though. It won't hit Earth.

  25. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Oh! Oh! I wanna see hoo-has on the TV!!! What channel are they on?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  26. One possible side-effect by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

    Snooki gets a darker tan...

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  27. Earth was not in the line of fire... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1

    ... the cloud should sail wide of our planet.

    Damn! There goes my chance for super powers.

    --
    That is all.
  28. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by IndigoDarkwolf · · Score: 1

    Realistically, it would have probably taken out a lot of satellites, and utilities would likely have needed to turn off power in order to preserve transformers. Discovery Channel had an interesting series "Perfect Storms" that covered a mega-sized CME hitting Earth.

  29. Cataclysm by Kazymyr · · Score: 1

    Now we know what happened to Azeroth...

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
  30. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_storm_of_1859

    No, we'd probably have enough warning to get some looting and pillaging in, even if the event was cataclysmic. Light takes about 8 minutes to get from the sun to earth. Plasma, not being quite as fast, takes slightly longer.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  31. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Oh! Oh! I wanna see hoo-has on the TV!!! What channel are they on?

    The Playboy Channel.

  32. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Gilmoure · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  33. Copypasta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come on, editors, submitter - the abstract is directly copied from the source website - so much so that the words that form a link to the video there is in it, but the link itself hasn't been copied across. This is pathetic - try just a LITTLE next time!

  34. Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a big... fire stick.

  35. Predicted ? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 2

    "As predicted" ? I thought we were lacking a model to predict this kind of eruptions ?

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    1. Re:Predicted ? by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 1

      You thought wrong.

    2. Re:Predicted ? by The+Living+Fractal · · Score: 1

      I predict another one will happen, someday, eventually, for sure.

      There's a model.

      --
      I do not respond to cowards. Especially anonymous ones.
  36. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by sharkey · · Score: 1

    That sounds like it would be bad.

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  37. oooh by unity100 · · Score: 1

    In other words, you're just making shit up. Kind of like the rest of your posts on any subject.

    hello, cowardly conservative. great to see that you are participating, well, anonymous.

    lets say all of my views and information is made up. i still have much more spine than you, since i have the guts to actually voice it myself, instead of posting anonymous like spineless cowards.

    1. Re:oooh by vertinox · · Score: 2

      lets say all of my views and information is made up. i still have much more spine than you, since i have the guts to actually voice it myself, instead of posting anonymous like spineless cowards.

      Maybe he was too lazy to log on or trust the terminal he was on?

      Also, its not that hard to just make up throw away account. So simply posting as anon doesn't invalidate the poster.

      Of course he didn't have a valid point but it had nothing to whether or not he logged on.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    2. Re:oooh by unity100 · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was too lazy to log on or trust the terminal he was on?

      from my experience with making remarks that can annoy zealots/conservatives/extremists, i kinda know that whenever someone posts a comment like that, they are generally one of them. subjective of course ...

    3. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe he was too lazy to log on or trust the terminal he was on?

      from my experience with making remarks that can annoy zealots/conservatives/extremists, i kinda know that whenever someone posts a comment like that, they are generally one of them. subjective of course ...

      Well I don't know why that guy posts AC, but I'll tell you why I do.

      It's because comments like this get a +4 Insightful:

      it is also possible that by presurizing earth's magnetic field, they are affecting all creatures on the planet. (Since all gets affected by the magnetism). shrinking magnetic field also means more cosmic rays coming in, i presume.

      Pressurizing the magnetic field? Pressurizing the magnetic field? Since when, exactly, are magnetic fields subject to pressure?
      And this is a discussion of solar wind, not cosmic rays, which won't make it through the atmosphere.

      The magnetic field does not stop solar particles, it deflects them to the magnetic poles. The more intense the storm, or weaker the field, the less the amount of deflection... thus the aurora (due to the charged particles hitting the atmosphere) is visible farther south (or north if you're in the southern hemisphere).

    4. Re:oooh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      So, your definition of a zealot/conservative/extremist is someone that thinks you are an idiot?

    5. Re:oooh by unity100 · · Score: 1
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_pressure

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetopause

      In terms of planetary science, the magnetopause is the outermost boundary of the region controlled by a planet's magnetic field. It separates the magnetosheath and the magnetosphere. It is the location where the outward magnetic pressure of a planet's magnetic field is counterbalanced by the solar wind plasma.

  38. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Lumpy · · Score: 1

    Nahh, the people on the dark side in bunkers would have survived. I highly doubt it would have completely exterminated all life on the planet.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  39. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by gmagill · · Score: 2

    Thought you were mistaken or trying to be funny when you mentioned "slide ruler" but I see they do exist:

    http://www.amazon.com/ThinkGeek-Slide-Ruler/dp/B003M5B84C

  40. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by newcastlejon · · Score: 2

    You want to know the difference between Northerners and Southerners?

    Northerners don't start complaining until the snow is higher than their wellies.

    Thanks, I'm here all night.

    --
    If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
  41. EPIC PROPORTIONS? by scarface71795 · · Score: 0

    Every time i hear that all i can think of is that fucking bed commercial

  42. Re:Desvastation if we were in it's path by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except we have a lead time and electricity providers who are very interested in not losing their expensive transformers. The space agencies provide space weather warnings including CME warnings. If a very large CME is inbound most of the affected transformers are going to be disconnected.

    Plus, with CMEs on the scale we have seen so far, large-scale generator damage would only occur in certain areas, not worldwide, allowing functioning generators to be imported to rebuild at least part of the network in much less than several months.

    Note that the last severe geomagnetic storm that caused a lot of damage... cut off six million people in North America for about nine hours.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  43. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by corbettw · · Score: 2

    Italian broadcast after 11pm.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  44. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by ushering05401 · · Score: 2

    It would completely depend on the details. I think the event in question would have to be more significant than what we are witnessing, but I'm no expert...

    Here are some theories for different scenarios I have heard arranged by suspected insanity of source (sane -> unsane -> insane):

    1) Seemingly Sane - Particle bombardment from flare event causes irregular sterilization pattern near areas beneath weak magnetic field (they wander a bit, so google is your friend for locating).

    Incidence of high exposure elsewhere, but likely not everywhere due to convergence of factors. Massive infrastructure disruption in orbit. Lesser infrastructure destruction on the ground. What happens to planes aloft near the weak zones? Don't know.

    If exposure is high enough the impact on phytoplankton living in the upper reaches of the photic zone causes runaway reactions in oceanic chemistry. This would be very very bad as these organisms are estimated at half of the daily terrestrial oxygen production. Combine this with out-gassing of necrotic fumes and you have a threat of poison stinking clouds.

    2) Unsane - Massive deformation of the Earth's magnetic field and atmosphere results in large quantities of gas achieving escape conditions. This happens naturally over time, I have no idea if a magnetic field deformation could actually cause a sudden catastrophic event, though.

    I was also told HAARP was designed to deform the upper atmosphere to 'deflect' events like this and ballistic missiles. Which gives me pretty good confidence the my source didn't have the science behind the theory either.

    3) Insane - The intense pressures and energies involved at the center of the earth generate a particle trapping anomaly. It becomes a unstable if you overcharge it with hard particles. We are only alive on earth because the core is in a cool enough and stable enough state. Solar particles will kill us all, and this is actually an alien test to see if we are smart enough to save ourselves in time.

    I'm sticking with option 3, but all those science types would probably go with option 1 ;)

  45. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by rtyhurst · · Score: 1, Funny

    Had this been pointed at Earth, cockroaches would now be the dominant species.

    The fact that pictures of Paris Hilton's poontang are freely available on the interwebs means for sure these are the End Times.

    I'm sure The Creator is just having a few practise shots before loading up The Rapture Cannon...

  46. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by w0mprat · · Score: 1

    No, we'd probably have enough warning to get some looting and pillaging in, even if the event was cataclysmic.

    Now that is the good news I was after.

    --
    After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
  47. looks like a CD by droidsURlooking4 · · Score: 1

    I just Disc Doctored

  48. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 2

    Nothing. Really. Even a really big CME will have an effect on the electrical grid and perhaps some local communication loops. But most will trip overloads and be able to be reset in short order (hours). The odd hard to replace transformer may pop and cause more serious disruptions. But we are talking about no electricity in restricted areas for a few days sort of thing.

    Some people watch too many movies or read too much 2012 crap.

    --
    The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!
  49. Looks like the sun got shot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so there's a bit of activity all around, but the top-right of the picture has a mini emission bubble thingo, and then "boom" out the opposite side. Reminds me a lot of the slow motion videos of bullets going through things.

    Of course, then the rest of the slow-mo video shows the object slowly disintegrating, so I'm not saying I reckon that's what happened... unless they aren't telling us something. *tinfoil hat*

  50. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by Tobias+Lobster · · Score: 1

    Inconstant Moon

    Inconstant Moon was mentioned on here a few months ago so I picked up a copy from Amazon. It's one of the best things I've read this year.

  51. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    I doubt anybody is seriously using them any more. I had one in high school, but that was before scientific calculators.

    I haven't seen one in decades. I'd buy one just to have it, but I doubt I'd ever actually use it these days.

  52. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

    It's 16 degrees outside right now (that's minus nine for everyone but folks in the US). Being without power in this kind of weather for a few days can be fatal.

  53. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by HeckRuler · · Score: 1

    Yeah, apparently monkeedude was a bit rash with that whole "WE'RE ALL GONNA DIE" bit, so thanks for the correction.

    On a side note though, Dad used to be the guy at the power company keeping the lights on, and he has some horror stories about the frailty of our power grid. There was one oversubscribed power-line in Jersey and a suicidal squirrel that caused a rolling blackout that got to Chicago.
    The joys of deregulation.
    So, a global event that mucked about with the power grid? It could be more like a week, depending how things go.

    Of course, Dad is pretty cynical about human nature. He said that 3 days without street lights and people revert to animal-like tribes. I chaulk that up to the fact that he had to talk to all the nut-jobs bitching about their power being out.

  54. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by IronWilliamCash · · Score: 1

    Pffff I'm Canadian, at minus nine, I still wear shorts while hiking mountains. Won't be freezing to death anytime soon.

  55. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    You ever notice that "TiVo" is an Italian word?

  56. yes by unity100 · · Score: 0

    proper discussion happens with arguments. if there is none ..

    forget it you dont deserve or need an explanation.

  57. Re:Had this been pointed at Earth? What then.. by TheTurtlesMoves · · Score: 1

    Thing is that loosing power for a few hours or even days is not the end of the world (weeks and months get interesting.. but hardly the end of the world). Sure we are kinda dependent on it unlike 100 years ago, but in a cold climate people aren't just going to sit in there house and wait to freeze to death. Most people don't live in climates that cold anyway. Its unlikely to be as bad as a hurricane or flood in the bigger scheme of things.

    --
    The Grey Goo disaster happened 3 billion years ago. This rock is covered in self replicating machines!