ITU Softens On the Definition of 4G Mobile

alphadogg writes "After setting off a marketing free-for-all by effectively declaring that only future versions of LTE and WiMax will be 4G, the International Telecommunication Union appears to have opened its doors and let the party come inside. In October, the global standards group declared that after long study, it had determined which technologies truly qualified for its IMT-Advanced label, sometimes called 4G (fourth-generation). Only two systems made the list: LTE-Advanced, an emerging version of Long-Term Evolution technology, and WirelessMAN-Advanced, the next version of WiMax, also called WiMax 2. Neither is commercially available yet. Stripping the official 4G title from current LTE and WiMax, which both had claimed it, was the perfect foil for T-Mobile USA to wholeheartedly advertise its HSPA+ (High-Speed Packet Access) network as 4G. But in a recent press release about the opening of the ITU World Radiocommunication Seminar 2010, the august United Nations-affiliated agency appears to have caved in."

Comments

I'll have a go at it...

[mevets]

Technological innovation in the mobile space has been swept aside by marketting innovation.

Re:Can someone summarize the summary?

[SuperSlacker64]

Well, I just skimmed it, but it didn't make anything clearer. What I get from it and understand is this:

• The ITU defines what 3G and 4G mean, and who can call their services by those names.
• The ITU hadn't defined 4G officially, so LTE and WiMax called themselves 4G without official permission.
• The ITU made a big long study on all this.
• The ITU defined 4G, and neither LTE, WiMax, or any other existing '4G' network made the cut.
• LTE-Advanced and WiMax 2 can be called 4G, but neither of them is in usage yet.
• If you have a phone that says its 4G, it's lying.