Slashdot Mirror
Assange Secret Swedish Police Report Leaked
letsurock writes "The 68-page confidential report prepared by Swedish police got leaked which tells the police version on the alleged sexual misconduct by the Julian assange. The Swedish report traces events over a four-day period in August this year when 39-year-old Assange had what he has described as consensual sexual relationships with two Swedish women."
just like US police,
they can write anything they want in the affidavit and the women can claim whatever they want. All of that fails to focus on that this was pushed by the US gov't and that the US gov't is very clearly to blame for trying to blow this out of proportion (and making the US look even worse). Really, interpol for this? a 200k pound bond for a $700 fine in sweden?
I'm amazed that we still see this being pushed around the globe even though it just highlights everything and creates that much more scrutiny.
That article has every known detail.
in Sweden if the woman withdraws consent during the act it is still considered rape, with prision terms.
If julian was half as smart as he thinks he is he wouldn't have done what he did. Instead he fscked two women without knowing the local laws regarding such things, and is in turn being fscked back.
If you screw a woman in some countries without their father's approval beforehand it is rape. Under Islamic law if your brother rapes and beats your wife, you have to kill the wife for tempting him and forgive the brother. Why is the fact that different countries have different standards so hard for people to understand? the UK rape laws don't apply in sweden, Islamic law doesn't apply in the USA, chinese law doesn't apply in Russia.
Why should Julian be treated any differently than any other tourist as they visit foreign lands? oh I know because he is special, god like even. he is like the Catholic church immune from doing something wrong ever, any crime he might have done is automatically a crime againist GOD and therefore not really a crime.
He freely admits he slept with both of those women. he is trying this case in the court of public opinion because he knows he will lose in a court of law because he is guilty, of a crime in sweden. i don't have to like the swedish law but I do have to respect it when i am there.
i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
Wikileaks doesn't divulge personal private information of an individual's sex affairs.
Get a grip on reality. They DO divulge personal private information which can get informants and their families killed. Wikileaks, to date, has done so TWICE ON A MASSIVE SCALE. Given an option, I'm sure the informants would rather have their bedroom secretes released rather than the fact they informed on murderers.
Clearly some time before you, Mr Fox News.
And here's more of my rant talking about Assange's lack of credibility and his propaganda machine. Remember, according to Julian Assange, "Killing people is fun."
I guess that Slashdot, Taco, and letsurock have forgotten that when the women says stop and the man doesn't, it is rape, even here in the U.S.
Informants names are redacted.
Bullshit. That's a complete lie. Informant's names were absolutely not redacted in the first massive release. The names were redacted in the second release ONLY because everyone believed it was wrong to do what he did the first time. And for the record, after the second release, in an interview, he was unrepentant about the disclosures on the first release, basically saying the end justifies the means.
At what point are you going to stop being a propagandists tool?
Right back at you, sir.
So now stating the COMPLETE facts makes me a propagandist tool? What an ignorant tool you are.
Read my other post, which provides a link to the source material. But I'm sure you'll still refuse to apologize, or even admit you're a tool, even though the source is Julian Assange himself.
The summary implies that Assange couldn't be guilty because they women initially consented, disregarding the fact that with one, he refused to stop and with the other, he waited until she was asleep and did something to which she did not consent.
In other words, no, you do not know what happened. Rather, you are assuming that Assange, against all evidence to the contrary, is a saint who never would, nay could, do such a thing and as such the claims should not be investigated, at all, ever.