Slashdot Mirror
CIA Launches WTF To Investigate Wikileaks
krou writes "In an effort to investigate the impact of the leaked diplomatic cables, the CIA have launched the Wikileaks Task Force, commonly referred to at CIA headquarters as 'WTF.' 'The Washington Post said the panel was being led by the CIA's counter-intelligence centre, although it has drawn in two dozen members from departments across the agency.' Although the agency has not seen much of its own information leaked in the cables, some revelations (such as spying at the UN) originated from direct requests by the CIA. The Guardian notes that, 'WTF is more commonly associated with the Facebook and Twitter profiles of teenagers than secret agency committees. Given that its expanded version is usually an expression of extreme disbelief, perhaps the term is apt for the CIA's investigation.'"
Testimony? They don't need testimony. They have chat logs implicating Assange in aiding Bradley Manning with submitting the documents. The law is pretty clear about these things. We'll just have to wait for his trial.
If you mean this, then what they have are chat logs of Manning telling Lamo that Assange helped him with the upload to WL. Read the article. This is very different to Assange helping Manning to *obtain* the documents, and while IANAL it appears that helping to publish secret documents as such is not a crime. And Assange claims not to have any contact with Manning.
A trial may bring some light into it, but as far as the Manning case shows it appears that the US military prefers to torture its soldiers instead of shedding light by a speedy trial. And Assange is neither a US citizen nor is he located in the US, so I still fail to see why he should be subject to US laws.
"When I first heard Daydream Nation it quite frankly scared the living shit out of me." -- Matthew Stearns
That's not the case. Many politicians and public officials were members of the PNAC. Dick Cheney, Don Rumsfeld, Doug Feith, and Richard Pearle to name a few. And they didn't close down so much as change their name. They are now called the Foreign Policy Initiative IIRC. It was a weird and random troll though.
People, is this really transparency? Or is this espionage? Frankly I think that all the wikileaks documents fall on the side of espionage. Allow me a minute to elaborate my position. The government, private industry, and even individuals. Have private things that they want to keep private. By law, everyone's privacy is protected. When documents that are supposed to be private are "stolen" that is espionage and theft. How would you guys like it if the content of your hard drives was stolen and then posted on the internet? How would you like it if they did it under the guise of keeping you honest? I am sure all would agree that even under this "explanation" you would still feel like and have the rights under the law that information was stolen. Yes I understand that our government has to be transparent. There are however, methods to get information in the properway. Using the law, one can subpena the governemet, private industry, and individuals. Using legal ways information can be forced to be released. So what is my point? Basically, the protections must be in place to protect everyone, lest they be excluded whimsically. Much like our right to free speech. Everyone, has the right to free speech in the US. Even people that speak with hate. Any lawyers care to chime in? 01110000 01100101 01100001 01100011 01100101
It doesn't matter what is 'considered' the leak.
The US has no Official Secrets act. It is perfectly legal for anyone to tell classified information to anyone else as long as they have not sign documents stating they will not do that.
Basically, all punishment for leaking classified information is contractual. Mannings agreed to it, and hence he be punished.
No one else did, certainly no one at Wikileaks, and hence the government cannot do anything^W^W^W will instead torture Manning until he claims Assange 'incited' Manning to or something so they can extradite Assange from the country where they've got him held on a bogus rape charge now. (Whereupon the charge will magically go away.)
The game is really obvious, people. Really REALLY fucking obvious.
I'm just a little baffled that the CIA is openly admitting the government is trying to figure out ways to charge Assange with a crime. (Since when does the CIA investigate crime? When they need to invent a crime, that's when. The FBI and whatnot have moral objections to framing people, the CIA does it all the time.)
If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
I considered the "Woosh" but I felt like mixing it up a bit
Sarah Palin could pull it off. No, I'm super serial! She would make the NWO look so bumbling and clumsy it would be about as scary as your goofy Auntie from Omaha. Everyone would go "We're supposed to be scared of that? The lady that writes her notes on her hand because she apparently can't see the cue cards? Riiiiight." She reminds me of some green office worker that knows she isn't on the ball or knows what the hell she is doing, but is so damned plucky she is just gonna plow through it even while fucking up horribly with a "go get'em!" attitude and can do spirit.
As for TFA, THIS, this is what the CIA is doing with taxpayer dollars? We've got two wars going on, NK acting like they just can't wait to push the button, and all they can come up with is a snarky acronym and an investigation of a whistleblower site where everybody and their fricking dog knows the score? (Hint: His name is Assange, and he likes to be on camera). If that is the best use they can come up with for taxpayer money, well then maybe it is time to start cutting their budget. Maybe with the purse strings tightened they'd get their shit together and be more interested in putting boots on the ground in the right places, like gathering Intel on the Pakistani border.
ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.