Slashdot Mirror


TSA Investigates Pilot Who Exposed Security Flaws

stewart_maximus writes "The TSA is investigating a TSA deputized pilot who posted videos to YouTube pointing out security flaws. Flaws exposed include ground crew clearing security with just a card swipe while pilots have to go through metal detectors, and a 'medieval-looking rescue ax' being available on the flight deck. Three days after posting the video, 6 government officials arrived at his door to question him and confiscated his federal firearm (and his concealed weapon permit)."

18 of 394 comments (clear)

  1. What I don't understand... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Granted, I haven't seen all the videos this pilot made, but from what I have seen and read so far it sounds like what this pilot was pointing out was things that were already publicly known. Things like airport ground crews having access to restricted areas without themselves having to go through screening, no TSA agents searching them or anything they carry prior to having access to aircraft, etc. Anybody with an ounce of intelligence could have figured out what this pilot documented by just sitting at an airport and watching for a little while, or by getting chummy with airport employees at a nearby bar and asking a few basic questions.

    And I certainly don't think this pilot was the first one to point out these flaws. It just sounds to me like the TSA is trying to make a scapegoat out of him.

    1. Re:What I don't understand... by Joce640k · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I read an article on this about six months ago. It's public knowledge, yes.

      The guy with the controls in his hands and a locked cabin door behind him needs to be searched to see if he's carrying a weapon. Makes sense, right?

      --
      No sig today...
    2. Re:What I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The persecution of this pilot isn't for giving away security secrets. It is for making a popular video on YouTube that exposes the security theater. The purpose of the TSA is to make the public feel like they are protected. Pointing out real security issues breaks the illusion.

    3. Re:What I don't understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You forgot your sarcasm tag. The guy flying the plane doesn't need any weapons to destroy it, he's controlling the biggest weapon, the plane itself.

    4. Re:What I don't understand... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, like Patrick Smith (aka 'Ask the Pilot), a professional pilot and writer who has been complaining, and writing, about these exact things for years.

      Maybe he will get a lump of coal in his stocking tomorrow.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
  2. I shot the messenger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    but I did not catch the terroriiists.

    (c) 2010, the TSA.

  3. Re:Take Note by nettdata · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with terrorists winning, and everything to do with people who are friends and associates of those that are in power, taking advantage of a fictitious threat scenario, and cashing in on it. It's greed, plain and simple.

    Idiots are getting more and more power granted to them, and making more and more cash in the process, all for dealing with this "threat" that they've manufactured. They will do anything and everything they can to perpetuate it, as long as they retain and grow that power base and make more and more money.

    Security Theatre relies on keeping the public ignorant of what the real threats are, and of the proper ways to deal with them.

    And the morons in charge are making laws to protect themselves and keep it all going.

    The real terrorists are running the show.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  4. The Emperor has no clothes on by jenningsthecat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wow. Airport 'security' is a joke, and almost everyone knows it; a Google search for "security theater" turns up over a half-million results. Yet this guy tells us something that we're all aware of already, and gets put throught the mill because of it. It's bad enough when people get crucified for revealing some hidden truth, but when it happens to someone who is simply stating the obvious, that's just sad.

    Just what ARE we paying these clowns for anyway? They should go back to allowing knitting needles on planes; pissed off Grandmas would probably deal with terrorists a whole lot more effectively than these clueless idiots.

    --
    'The Economy' is a giant Ponzi scheme whose most pitiable suckers are the youngest among us and the yet-unborn.
  5. Re:Doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Except the pilot is not working for the TSA, he is working for an airline.

    And let's put it in another perspective: TSA is not a company (correct me if I am wrong), it is public: which means he is informing the owners of the company (the public)
    about a problem with the management (the TSA policy makers).

  6. Re:more leaks by thijsh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being realistic never meant you should just accept everything that is wrong. Compromising with evil makes you an accessory to evil. And even the impossible is worth fighting for, especially since sometimes taking on this impossible fight makes previously impossible things possible. People who fight an impossible fight like Rosa Parks, Nelson Mandela or even Thich Quang Duc are heroes because they refuse to compromise with injustice even in the face of prosecution, imprisonment and death.

  7. Re:Solved with dogs by thijsh · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Real reason: Dog's are unpatentable.

    So you hit the nail on the head, exactly *because* these measures are 1000x more expensive is why they are being pushed... The smell of fear smells like profit to some.

  8. Not to make them feel protected at all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The purpose of the theater is to make the public fearful, not protected. Our government needs a fearful public to enable the erosion of public rights. We gave up a bunch of rights with the Patriot Act that we would never have tolerated the loss of without the "it's for your protection" lie. TSA is part of the cover for this lie and others.

    1. Re:Not to make them feel protected at all by Opportunist · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It does both. It gives those that didn't consider it a problem the idea that there is one (else, why would they search everyone like crazy) while at the same time calming those that are already properly hysteric (and make them feel protected by their wonderful government).

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    2. Re:Not to make them feel protected at all by joebagodonuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's a CYA move "Look! We are doing everything we can to protect American lives." As far as any negative consequences? Well, as an elected official I would rather cover my ass from criticism than actually do the hard things. Hard things take time and I'm forced to focus most of my time on getting re-elected these days.

      Security Theater is a good compromise. /sarcasm

      --
      "Give a woman two glasses of wine and some pad thai, and they'll agree to just about anything." the Sports Guy
  9. Re:Take Note by corbettw · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If we do get to the point where we rewrite the Constitution, we need to put some teeth in that sucker. For instance, establish a points-based system for unconstitutional laws. If a law is overturned as being unconstitutional, every member of congress (both the House and the Senate) gets one "point". Get to 10 points, and you are automatically barred from reelection or holding any kind of elective office, ever again. Get to 15 points and you're kicked out of office before the expiration of your current term. As it is now, Congress can pass all the fucked up laws they want with no danger of being called to account for it.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
  10. Re:Classic TSA by blind+monkey+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA is clearly a firm believer in security through stupidity.
    Fixed.

    --
    BM3
  11. Re:more leaks by t2t10 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being realistic never meant you should just accept everything that is wrong. Compromising with evil makes you an accessory to evil.

    All true, but that doesn't apply here. Laws like the US Patriot Act, organizations like the TSA, and wars like Iraq are ill-conceived and ineffective; they are not part of an evil master plan to subjugate Americans or take over the world. And if you treat them like that, you can't effectively work against them.

    Educate yourself and others about politics and history, participate in the political process, donate, volunteer, write, expose, leak, whatever: that's the way things get better in a democracy. Dividing the world into "good" and "evil" is empty demagoguery.

  12. Re:Pretty sure... by jimrthy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The TSA already knows all about this. Harassing this guy is just more proof that the TSA has absolutely nothing to do with keeping people safe.