Slashdot Mirror


Using LED Ceiling Lights For Digital Communication

PatPending writes "A Minnesota start-up company, LVX, is developing products under several patents and about a dozen pending applications, e.g., 'Building illumination apparatus with integrated communications, security and energy management,' that put clusters of LEDs in a standard-sized ceiling light fixture. The LEDs are in optical communication with special modems attached to office computers. The first generation of the LVX system will transmit data at speeds of about three megabits per second, roughly as fast as a residential DSL line. LVX Chief Executive Officer John Pederson said a second-generation system that will roll out in about a year will permit speeds on par with commercial Wi-Fi networks. It will also permit lights that can be programmed to change intensity and color. Pederson said the next generation of the system should get even more efficient as fixtures become 'smart' so the lights would dim when bright sunlight is coming through a window or when a conference room or hallway is empty. Hurdles: speed and installation costs. No word on the reliability and security of this system."

143 comments

  1. Another link by PatPending · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Printer friendly" URL isn't correctly redirecting; use this URL instead. (Sorry about this.)

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
    1. Re:Another link by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      "Roughly as fast as DSL"

      - Or cable line (Comcast Economy at 1.5 Mbit/s for an outrageous $45).

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    2. Re:Another link by Galestar · · Score: 1

      For those of us in countries that actually care about their telecommunications infrastructure, 3mb/s is slow as molasses.

      --
      AccountKiller
  2. IRDA was 4 Mbps by billstewart · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't see how this is much better than the IRDA infrared that used to be built into laptops, printers, mice, etc. It got replaced by radio technology several generations ago.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by spun · · Score: 4, Funny

      IRDA doesn't flicker in the visible spectrum, and thus fails to cause hilarious non-fatal seizures in coworkers, which, I'm assuming, is the whole point of this new technology.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    2. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by hitmark · · Score: 1

      docomo demoed a one gigabit/s irda transfer a year or two ago.

      --
      comment first, facts later. http://chem.tufts.edu/AnswersInScience/RelativityofWrong.htm
    3. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by ArhcAngel · · Score: 0

      A wired connection requires a physical cable to be run to a specific location through the floor or ceiling and if the decision is made to rearrange the cubicles it adds thousands of dollars in rewiring. WiFi eliminates this requirement but necessitates an extra FCC license for every connection driving up the cost of the equipment. I suspect this would initially bypass the FCC as it does not use the RF spectrum. That's not to say at some point the feds won't decide they own the flickering light spectrum as well and start regulating it down the road. That's the only benefit I can see from this just glancing at it.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    4. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by giorgist · · Score: 1

      On this occasion DDOS will give you an epileptic attack

    5. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I don't see how this is much better than the IRDA infrared that used to be built into laptops, printers, mice, etc. It got replaced by radio technology several generations ago.

      There were, very briefly, vaguely wifi-esque IR "access points" designed for using IRDA connections in entire rooms(as opposed to the usual point-to-point between adjacent devices case). Some even supported multiple devices. I think the amount of IR you needed to pump out to get a reliable link without forcing the user to manually handle line-of-sight pretty much killed that one, though. I think these "access points" and contentional device-device IRDA were supposed to coexist in much the way wifi and bluetooth do today; but both were horribly murdered when RF silicon got cheap.

    6. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by icebike · · Score: 2

      Extra FCC license for Wifi?

      Wifi runs in unlicensed spectrum.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    7. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      IRDA doesn't flicker in the visible spectrum, and thus fails to cause hilarious non-fatal seizures in coworkers, which, I'm assuming, is the whole point of this new technology.

      The real problem there is (particularly bicycle) lighting systems which intentionally pulse at ~10 Hz. A lighting system which transmits data by inserting fast negative going pulses into LEDs is unlikely to cause problems.

      Background: I ride a bike and I have epilepsy, but my EEG results suggest my condition is not photosensitive.

    8. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by PitaBred · · Score: 2

      It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

      And then it's just fun.

    9. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      It's all fun and games until someone loses an eye.

      And then it's time to play "find the eyeball".

      FTFY

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
    10. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      It would be interesting to know exactly how much of a device's purchase price is caused by FCC anti-interference interference(sorry, couldn't resist); though there probably isn't a single number, depending on how many devices were manufactured with one model certification, and how much shielding/redesign/clocking cleverness was required to comply; but I'd be surprised if it were high enough to drive adoption of this optical stuff, unless they have the LOS issue truly figured out and are willing to accept very thin royalties on their patents...

      Since complex digital devices tend to need to be tested and certified for noninterference with licenced frequencies anyway, skipping wifi doesn't save you from the FCC(also, an increasing number of devices cater to markets that want some sort of cellular connectivity, so you can't skip that RF step) and, for relatively small-run stuff, you can always just purchase OEM wifi modules, pre-certified, and jam them into your product(this tends not to apply to hugely space-sensitive things like cellphones, or mass-market items with design-unique antenna systems, like laptops; but a surprising number of devices for commercial sale just have a little USB wifi dongle, caseless but with onboard antenna, stuck in an internal USB port or header. Dirt cheap, in quantity, works just fine through a plastic case, and is certified in itself.)

      If the transmitter/receiver units are cheap enough, they might have some success against the more poorly standardized low speed/low power RF stuff(zigbee, nordic, et al.) for home automation and the like; but unless their hardware is cheap and they are willing to be very generous on licensing they'll just get lost in the soup of semi or fully proprietary low speed wireless systems. Those things are already ubiquitous; but poorly interoperable.

    11. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by mpe · · Score: 1

      A wired connection requires a physical cable to be run to a specific location through the floor or ceiling and if the decision is made to rearrange the cubicles it adds thousands of dollars in rewiring. WiFi eliminates this requirement but necessitates an extra FCC license for every connection driving up the cost of the equipment. I suspect this would initially bypass the FCC as it does not use the RF spectrum.

      There's the issue of WiFi having quite complex propergation patterns. Whereas with visible light to can easily tell where the coverage area and confine it to specific rooms without needing exotic building materials.

    12. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by camperslo · · Score: 1

      Sorry, your suspicions are wrong.

      WiFi doesn't have or require F.C.C. licensing for the end users. It does have to comply with some F.C.C. rules, but any digital circuit switching at r.f. speeds does too even if not designed to radiate r.f.

      There are F.C.C. rules that apply to all electronics using radio frequency energy. The goal is to limit r.f. radiation that may cause interference. Anything that has circuits switching at an r.f. rate, even power supplies, is covered by the rules. The associated testing is required whether or not a device is intended to transmit. The F.C.C. doesn't regulate visible light, but still regulates the system if the system has signals/switching at r.f. speeds (as a fast data link would).

      Design, testing and certification costs are per product not per unit, so they become insignificant for anything sold in volume.

    13. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by magarity · · Score: 2

      Depends on how much power it puts out. Home units are low enough power they don't need any extra licensing but model for large enterprises using over 1 watt of power, do need a license.

    14. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by moonbender · · Score: 1

      The F.C.C. doesn't regulate visible light

      ... yet! ;) SCNR.

      --
      Switch back to Slashdot's D1 system.
    15. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by cheater512 · · Score: 1

      I wonder how a 3 watt Luxeon Irda led would work in a room. If a Wiimote can pick up two tiny leds, a mammoth led should be very visible in a room no matter how the receiver is pointed.

      Perfect for transmitting in a single direction. :)
      Bi-directional would need work.

    16. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by icebike · · Score: 2

      Large enterprises tend to use many low power access points. Especially in office buildings.

      Walk into (or near) any office campus with your smartphone running an wifi analyzer and you will see 10s of APs (often "hidden" by not broadcasting any SSID).

      Virtually nobody uses high power APs.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    17. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where's the "Monorail" and "Simpson's Did It" tags for the obscure solution to a non problem.

      Seriously. I'm glad St Cloud has money to blow on proprietary lighting fixtures and modems for every connected device under the premise they "cost so little, we can't afford NOT to buy them" theory.

    18. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my old-school iPAQ's 900MaH battery would probably not be happy about running a Luxeon for long...

      On the other hand, with the absolutely spooky optical MEMS stuff and CMOS/CCD imagers you can get for absolute peanuts today, you might be able to whip up a little solid-state device that tracked 2 or 4 "target" LEDs located around the room's receiver and then steered a low power IR laser right into its lens...

      That would still only work with a clear LOS, and with the emitter window less than 90 degrees away from being dead on target; but it would cut the power requirements pretty drastically...

      Wholly impractical for handhelds, minimally practical for laptops; but having a dongle velcroed to the top of every cubicle partition would do just fine.

    19. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't really see what good high-power wifi does you... because the network needs to work both ways, and your laptop/netbook/smartphone is going to transmit at the same level it does normally. It would be like trying to have a conversation across a room with only one person yelling.

    20. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2

      IRDA doesn't flicker in the visible spectrum, and thus fails to cause hilarious non-fatal seizures in coworkers, which, I'm assuming, is the whole point of this new technology.

      Joking yes. But being a self-proclaimed expert who hasn't even read the article my guess is that they are piggy-backing on the PWM commonly used to control LED brightness. The PWM frequencies for normal LED control are in the kilohertz range which is 100s of times faster than is visible to the human eye.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    21. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by icebike · · Score: 2

      Exactly.

      Which is why high power WIFI is only used on factory floors, and usually only with specialized workstations.

      Even large hotels simply use commercial grade low-power unlicensed APs.

      --
      Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
    22. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by spun · · Score: 1

      You killed the joke, you bastard.

      I mean seriously, I think we all know that if this thing operates at 4Mbps, it can't be pulsing at anywhere near the brain-fritzing frequency. But that isn't the point. The point is, you epileptics are funny because of how you flop around. :P

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    23. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by spun · · Score: 1

      God damn it, what is wrong with you people? Just let me enjoy my vision of thousands of office workers flopping around like fish on the floor, will you?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    24. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I think we all know that if this thing operates at 4Mbps, it can't be pulsing at anywhere near the brain-fritzing frequency.

      Consider that activity LEDs on older hubs were connected directly to the data lines and could be used to transmit data. These LEDs also pulsed visibly. These LEDs could certainly pulse at visible rates because the data starts and stops at those rates. Even if "down" is "on" a second or so of sustained load would make the lights dim. Obviously the drivers would work to avoid that.

      Sorry about wrecking your joke. I just think that LEDs are both tempting and dangerous to pulse at certain rates. Lots of trucks are getting LED brake and indicator lights now. I noticed in Malaysia recently those lights are pulsing at 10Hz. Its the kind of thing which is going t bite us eventually.

    25. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      I wonder if the "local start-up" has any useful buddies in local government? It sometimes pays to be civic minded...

    26. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to paint over the windows or your competitors only need to rent a room across the road to get all your datas...

      The big problem with these things is they need to be lighting the room for the data to flow... when everyone goes home and someone turns out the lights it cuts off all the PCs in the room and you can't do remote admin stuff like software updates and security patches. The solution of leaving the lights on will get the environment crazies on your back.

      The health and safety people will probably have a thing or two to say about this as well since the level of office lighting is subject to legal controls in most countries...

      Personally I can't wait to see a room of PCs with bright flashing lights on top that are positioned so they aren't obscured with the photos of the users favourite dog... http://sliceofstyle.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/LED_USB_lights.jpg
      or the city wide version... http://media.rd.com/rd/images/rdc/mag0901/four-ways-of-looking-at-a-lamp-01-af.jpg

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    27. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by mindwhip · · Score: 1

      There's the issue of WiFi having quite complex propergation patterns. Whereas with visible light to can easily tell where the coverage area and confine it to specific rooms without needing exotic building materials.

      Not really... visible light can be as unpredictable... light reflects off walls and floors and can propagate quite far... you can be upstairs in bed and notice the downstairs light is still on since there is a faint light visible around the edges of the closed bedroom door...

      --
      [The Universe] has gone offline.
    28. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      this is better than current IRDA used by laptops because that one is slow and a pain in the rear to use. Also, light is less vulnerable to interference / interception than wifi

      From what i see in the summary description from the article they are using a modified RONJA design but instead of the long-range with narrow beam they adapted it for a wide angle with a way smaller distance, fit for office ceiling usage.

      A RONJA optical network has been capable of working at 10 mbps full duplex at 1,4 KILOMETERS (about 0.9 miles) since 2008

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RONJA

      http://ronja.twibright.com/tetrapolis/

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    29. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by galaad2 · · Score: 1

      P.S.
        about the patent thing... this smells to me like patent system abuse... ronja was already using LEDs for network communications in 1998, using an AUI interface.
      the only addition these guys made is mounting a ronja system into a light frame and using spectrum filters to filter out normal light

      how can you patent such an obvious usage?

      --
      root@127.0.0.1
    30. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by JoelKatz · · Score: 1

      The patent, aside from using "degrees Kelvin" twice, only covers combining the communications device with building illumination. This is a remarkably pointless thing to do and conveys no obvious benefit. (Oddly, the patent also would only be infringed by a system including at least one name tag that communicates with the system.)

    31. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by kheldan · · Score: 1

      Higher transmit power, but also higher gain antenna and higher gain LNA on the receive side.

      --
      Are YOU using the TOOL, or is the TOOL using YOU? Think about it!
    32. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      The biggest problem with these patents, is everything they are claiming has been done before so all they are claiming is, they are doing with leds. So blindingly obvious that all previous technology applications facilitated by light emitting devices will transfer over to LEDs. So if they invented LED's fine if they did not, gees, just fuck off.

      Hint, hint, a video display device communicates information to the human brain via lcds and leds, making use of the biological receiving devices of the human eye, which transfer the data upon the human internal nervous system network. Next the asshats will want patents upon the human eye and the optic nerve ie obvious application is obvious, the only thing distorting the obvious is those pesky dollar symbols flashing of in their eyes, a veritable plethora off them.

      Even in wired networks there is no problem in adjustment of networks with changes in workstations, because of course shifting power points is still far more expensive (so the best way to save costs is to use electricians who can do both jobs at the same time).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    33. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is not better. It is an alternative to a patent held by Lutron. (5,982,103) The patent basically covers anything with RF capabilities that fits into a wall box meant for light switches. Wall boxes required by building code, so you must have and and can't easily get around the patent.

      1. I just spent a considerable amount of time figuring out how much it would cost to build light-switch with zigbee with some programmable logic and a relay.
      2. Mass produced, I can do it for about $5. I said WOW! went to research the market and WOW only three companies that sell 'em, and they are all starting at around $65.
      3. Profit.

      2a. check why... find patent, foiled again.

      Patent should expire around 2018, expect a shit-ton of zigbee or other cheap RF based home automation crap to flood the world in 2019....
      This probably explains the crappy adoption rate of technologies like zigbee.

    34. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It helps the Wiimote that the two tiny LEDs (actually there are 10 discrete LEDs in 2 groups in a real sensor bar) are not sending any data. A better comparison would be a TV remote, which can often work non line-of-sight in many rooms, and those actually do send data, but the data rate is very very slow.

      Also you realize that the Wiimote really only sees those LEDs when it is line of sight? The controllers communicate over bluetooth not via the Infrared LEDs and most motion sensing is handled by an accelerometer, not the optics.

      If you are trying to send data, just being able to see the light isn't enough. Once you start dealing with diffuse light and reflection you now have multipath and need a lot more sophistication to get a decent data rate. Trust me, if it were easy, this would have been marketed years ago

    35. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by Doggabone · · Score: 1

      God damn it, what is wrong with you people? Just let me enjoy my vision of thousands of office workers flopping around like fish on the floor, will you?

      I wish I had points. Some days it feels like "Hey, you're killing the joke" is my catch phrase. You'd think that, since she's dating me, the gal has a sense of humour. But nooo ...

    36. Re:IRDA was 4 Mbps by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Most rooms have more than one lightbulb. If they are all using PWM to control brightness it could be hard to pick out the data from just one. Also you need some kind of receiver in the bulb for two way communications as well.

      Infra red makes more sense. A single high power IR LED can cover an entire room. As it happens I have recently been experimenting with a system that uses a single IR LED to broadcast the current time so that all the clocks in my room can receive an accurate setting. I was planning to use RF but interference is an issue, no so much from other devices but from some of the clocks themselves as they use multiplexed LED displays that generate a lot of EM.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
  3. Company Network Hacked ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    .... with a telescope!

    1. Re:Company Network Hacked ... by magarity · · Score: 1

      Parent was making a joke, probably, but back when 10Mbit network hubs were the latest thing the LEDs would flicker directly with activity and it actually was possible to spy on the network given determination and the proper equipment.

    2. Re:Company Network Hacked ... by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          You know, I heard rumors about that, but I don't see how it could have possibly worked. The light flickered as traffic went by. Knowing that a packet was sent is useless if you don't know the payload of it.

          This is a different case entirely though. Well, mostly. They've reinvented fiber optic networks, without the fiber. Of course, that increases the noise for the receiving end, the chances for interception, and the ability for someone to break a connection with a Post-It note or paintball gun.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  4. Possible patent suit approaching? by Deathnerd · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Kohls has had technology like this in their stores for a little while now. They use the lights to update little LED price tags throughout the store. I think Fujitsu makes the tech, though I could be wrong. Anyone wanna help me out on this?

    1. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by jeffmeden · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google wants to help (although they dont take credit for the kohls devices) http://www.altierre.com/index.html

    2. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Good idea.

      When I worked at JcPenney we would waste a day just ticketing items..... and oftentimes did not finish because of customers demanding service. Having signs that automatically update is the quick and labor-saving solution. Also helps to avoid fines when the government audits the store and finds "Sale $9.99" for a promotion that ended three days ago.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    3. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Kohls has had technology like this in their stores for a little while now.

      A little while? My local food store had that in the early 90s. Had some weird modulator thing that plugged into the florescent lights. It was some kind of weird boost/buck converter that varied the line power / light brightness by a volt or so from cycle to cycle. I had the EE background to understand it but no one at the store knew how it worked.

      The interesting thing is if you only have a couple tens of thousands of price tags, it doesn't take a very high bandwidth signal to reprice everything in a couple hours.

      I have no idea what this place wants to do with 3 megs/sec, as that is tremendous multicasting bandwidth. You could almost ghost machines with that, slowly.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    4. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by spun · · Score: 1

      When does the government audit retail stores? They may respond to consumer complaints, but I do not believe there is a government agency that actively audits stores to find sales price violations.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      State governments routinely audit stores to verify the price charged at the register matches the price advertised on the sign. When I was at JCP the corporation had been caught twice - once by Pennsylvania in the early 90s and again by Texas in 2002.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    6. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Florescent lights ? Were they in bloom ?

      --
      I'm not a coward by any name.
    7. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by dziban303 · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Good idea.

      When I worked at JcPenney we would waste a day just ticketing items..... and oftentimes did not finish because of customers demanding service.

      Those fucking customers and their fucking demands. Hey, asshole, can't you see I'm busy ticketing items? What, just because you pay my salary you think I should drop this mundane task to assist you?

    8. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by vlm · · Score: 1

      Well, during the "boost" cycle of a boost/buck converter, yeah, I guess.

      --
      "Science flies us to the moon. Religion flies us into buildings." - Victor Stenger
    9. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Whether they have been caught or not (and twice in 20 years is approaching zero errors with the millions of price tags they put out in that time) is irrelevant to the question of whether state governments "routinely audit stores" without any complaints. My understanding is that they do not, and you've said nothing that contradicts that opinion.

    10. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A couple of years ago I spoke with a student at the local uni, who was encoding data in LED light flicker as part of a paper of his. Seemed neat, but I imagined that because of the one way communication and shaded corners it would only be used for emitting orientation ids for very exact indoor positioning.

      Maybe that's why they added "and security, and energy management" to the patent since the communication part is old?

    11. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess JCPenney had a corporate, continent-wide meeting for their ~100,000 employees to emphasize the importance of proper pricing for no reason at all??? I think you're wrong. - Governments also audit timecards for companies that hold government contracts and fine those companies when errors are discovered. I suppose you will sit there & claim "That doesn't happen" too?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:Possible patent suit approaching? by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess JCPenney had a corporate, continent-wide meeting for their ~100,000 employees to emphasize the importance of proper pricing for no reason at all??? I think you're wrong.

      Feel free to feel I'm wrong, but nothing there indicates that the problems found were the result of random audits. My opinion is that there were errors noticed by patrons that were then reported for a very targeted investigation, not the result of some government agency that routinely audits stores without complaints.

      Governments also audit timecards for companies that hold government contracts and fine those companies when errors are discovered. I suppose you will sit there & claim "That doesn't happen" too?

      What? Are you insane? What does a private company pricing things and never getting an audit until a complaint is lodged (my claim) have to do with the government investigating its own suppliers for fraud? They aren't even tangentially related. Every company (including governments) audits the hourly fees of their contractors, or if they don't, they should. But feel free to make up whatever makes you feel better. We know you refuse to have discussions, and instead lecture people on how the Real World works, even when you are wrong and have to make up things (we call them lies, but then you'll call them "supporting evidence").

  5. no computers under the desk then? by slshwtw · · Score: 1

    The "integrated security" of the "illumination apparatus" means you can kill the communication link by quickly putting the computer with the "special modem" under your desk, and out of line-of-sight with the ceiling LEDs.

    1. Re:no computers under the desk then? by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Embedding it into a monitor (or having a small remote pickup) would solve that... Maybe shoot holes in the low speed, and need for the lights to be on for the network to be up?

    2. Re:no computers under the desk then? by pryoplasm · · Score: 1

      You are also susceptible to what I would like to call "flashlight in the middle"

      any chance of someone being able to purposely disrupt it?

      --
      Those who live by the sword, get shot by those who live by the gun...
    3. Re:no computers under the desk then? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      This is not a problem: leave the modem on the desk.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    4. Re:no computers under the desk then? by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would say that it depends. It may work just fine with reflected light so it may not be an issue.
      It is an interesting idea for things like automation and data acquisition as well as location services.
      imagine this in a large corporate campus. If you need to find someone or something each room would have an identifier telling you where you are.
      A lamp could tell you that it is on or off, an AC unit could be reset. It will really depend on how cheap it all is.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:no computers under the desk then? by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      With enough power, you could certainly saturate whatever receiver tech they are using(presumably some sort of reasonably high speed photosensitive semiconductor, TFA isn't clear on what kind); but in the visible spectrum that sort of thing would be pretty noticeable. If they are actually just including some IR LEDs in their lamp array(which isn't entirely unlikely, "white" LEDs, since they are phosphor-coated blues or UVs, actually have lousy switching speeds because the phosphor keeps glowing momentarily after the diode is turned off. Though they could, I suppose, be using RGB arrays, which would have full switching speed...) "flood" interference would be less obvious; but still pretty unsubtle.

      Because of little things like "eye safety" and "that guy in the truck with the generator and 5kw of stage lighting is pretty obvious at 300 meters" the classic "directional antenna and illegal power levels" that works so well on Wi-Fi probably won't work on this thing. On the other hand, TFA makes the company sound like they decided to go it alone, develop all their own patented tech and protocols and stuff. If the history of RF is anything to go on(Why hello WEP and the assorted nameless 900mhz and 2.4ghz cordless phone systems, we were just talking about you...) people who do that tend to make protocol and/or cryptographic mistakes. Assuming this stuff ever gets out of complete obscurity, I assume that snarky grey-hats will be flooding the system with garbage frames at defcon and you'll be able to buy little LED flashlights from ebay that exploit buffer overflows and execute arbitrary code on the microcontrollers in the ceiling fixtures...

    6. Re:no computers under the desk then? by badkarmadayaccount · · Score: 1

      Who's the idiot putting crypto at L2? IPSec, SSL, use something appropriate, FFS.

      --
      I know tobacco is bad for you, so I smoke weed with crack.
  6. Security of the system? by girlintraining · · Score: 2

    If it operates in the infrared spectrum, the bonus is that most glass blocks it, so it would be harder to get a signal. The downside is, a sufficiently sensitive thermal camera with LoS to the bulb or a reflector in LoS with the bulb would give it to you.

    --
    #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    1. Re:Security of the system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck LEDs. That's why I use... LAZARS!!! Security = beam splitter = my data was tampered with.

      Coupled with my proprietary "Double Retina Singularizer" beam, and "WARNING! Do NOT look into laser with remaining eye!" poster; I feel my datas are safe.

    2. Re:Security of the system? by blincoln · · Score: 1

      If it operates in the infrared spectrum, the bonus is that most glass blocks it, so it would be harder to get a signal. The downside is, a sufficiently sensitive thermal camera with LoS to the bulb or a reflector in LoS with the bulb would give it to you.

      Infrared devices of the kind that you're describing don't operate in the thermal part of the spectrum. They use near-infrared light, which is easily visible through most kinds of glass.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    3. Re:Security of the system? by girlintraining · · Score: 1

      Although I know that you're being sarcastic and a troll... I must point out that unless your laser is operating in a complete vaccum, there is some diffraction of the beam thanks to particles of dust and what-not in the air.

      --
      #fuckbeta #iamslashdot #dicemustdie
    4. Re:Security of the system? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Actually glass is transparent to Infrared, which is why camera sensors have a sheet of glass over them which has a very expensive coating on the surface that blocks near and mid IR frequencies. I think you might be thinking of the UV spectrum which passes far less easily through standard glass.

    5. Re:Security of the system? by jbengt · · Score: 1

      Actually glass is transparent to Infrared . . .

      Modern window glass is typically formulated/coated to absorb or reflect UV and infrared as much as possible while transmitting as much visible light as desired. Not sure if it would be enough to block a signal at a particular infrared wavelength or not.

    6. Re:Security of the system? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Glass doesn't block infrared, it blocks UV.

    7. Re:Security of the system? by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      When the power company comes by your house to do a thermal image, the windows always show heat loss/gain (depending on outside temperature). Glass does not block infrared. It does block UV, which is why reptile keepers can't put their UV lights on a glass aquarium top (but can for their infrared heaters).

    8. Re:Security of the system? by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Ok here's an easy test to confirm. Get the TV remote, your phone and an assistant. Have the assistance stand outside and point the TV remote inside through the window and press buttons. In the meantime set your phone to take a picture (cameraphones are far better at this than most digital cameras), and just look at the remote through the eyes of the cameraphone. You should see the LED pointed at you light up quite well. This is near-IR passing through.

      For the second trick put an infrared heater next to the window, or just stand next to it on a sunny day. This is mid-IR and far-IR passing through. Glass is quite bad at blocking IR, and even "blocking as much IR as possible" is still nothing that would normally stop IR communications or thermography wavelengths.

      IR blocking is done on a coating level and is quite visible. Thisis a (scratched) piece of optical glass with an IR blocking coating on the surface.

  7. What need is this fulfilling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saving you from running cable that last 6 feet?

    1. Re:What need is this fulfilling? by Mr.+Foogle · · Score: 1

      Having this in offices/factories would eliminate 'network' from the list of worries when you restack cubes, or re-arrange focus factories.

      --
      Display some adaptability.
    2. Re:What need is this fulfilling? by plover · · Score: 1

      Saving you from running cable that last 6 feet?

      It saves the company from running cable that last average of 100 feet or so from the wiring closet to each desk, multiplied by the number of desks on the floor (in this building there are about 100 desks per floor) multiplied by the number of times cube moves take place (you don't want to know how often this is, but triennial is not far from the truth) multiplied by the cost for an electrician to run a single line of cable. I think the average cost to pull a single run ranges from about $200-$400 on up, depending on the city and state, and that's in a newer building designed to have cable runs to desks. If you consider a older building with no pre-existing trenches in the floor, the costs treble.

      And LED light fixtures are more efficient than fluorescent tubes. Electricity costs spent on lighting will be cut in half or more. LEDs have a much longer lifetime than fluorescent tubes, and will cut maintenance visits to replace bulbs by a factor of 10.

      The numbers multiply out rapidly. Fixed wiring and fluorescent lighting might cost a company several hundred dollars per employee annually to run and maintain. A Fortune 500 company might have 10,000 employees or more, so that could be tens of millions of dollars a year in savings.

      Of course, there are the offsetting expenses. This licensed and patented blinkenlight technology isn't free. It needs expensive LED lamps to be installed at each light fixture. It will need ethernet runs to each fixture to carry the data, if the power lines can't do it, or if it doesn't use RF. It'll require special light receiver dongles for each PC and laptop. And this new technology won't be bug free. It will have maintenance costs of its own, not to mention a few rounds of upgrades as people realize they screwed up the security protocols when they first invented it (WEP is neither gone nor forgotten.)

      So far, 802.11 is much cheaper as the components are off-the-shelf, but the band is crowded and congestion isn't improving over time. This looks like one way to mitigate it, but until they address the low bandwidth I doubt it will take off.

      --
      John
    3. Re:What need is this fulfilling? by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

      This will be nothing more than a toy communications protocol or a very niche market for manufacturing or retail outfits that can use a low bandwidth, unreliable, wireless, non-radio communications protocol. It could be really helpful in places with lots of RF interference that precludes the use of the wireless 802.11 protocols. But even if they do address the bandwidth, I can't see how this could be much more reliable than the existing IR or laser based networking products.

      Bandwith-wise, this has the same problems as wireless. Wireless communications (aside from lasers or directional microwaves) are by necessity a shared transmission medium. With 802.11b/g (2.4 GHz) you can only colocate 3 access points without them starting to interfere with each other. 802.11a (5 GHz) is better. It allows 4 access points before they impede on each other, but it's also more expensive. That may be fine for some cubical farms, but for most, sharing 33 Mb (802.11b), 162 Mb (802.11g), or 216 Mb (802.11a) of bandwidth is unworkable. Only 802.11n is potentially usable in this sort of situation with a maximum of 600 Mb per access point. These numbers are all theoretical, of course, so real world conditions will reduce throughput significantly. With a white-light based technology you wouldn't probably even have the option of co-locating 3 or 4 transponders. Wired Ethernet does not have this problem, which is why we use it for dense computing environments, like computer labs and cubical farms.

      I also think you also misrepresent the costs of a wired installation. At 200 to 400 per drop, your number are probably pretty accurate for a new installation. 10,000 empoyees x $400 = 4 million bucks. But even if these drops only last 3 years, it averages to only around 1.3 million per year in rewiring. However, when reconfiguring a network it is not necessarily required to pull new wire. Wires can be relocated as long as the new location is not farther from the wiring closet. If the original installers were smart, they would also have left some extra wire spooled up just in case of a move. If all that is needed is moving a drop 5 feet to the right, the wire can probably accommodate it, and that will cost far less than pulling new wire. A 12 foot patch cable and some wire management can also mean drops don't have to be relocated. Our hypothetical Fortune 500 will spend far short of tens of millions per year on rewiring. And since you mentioned the trienniel cubical reconfiguration, don't ignore the trienniel desktop refresh. 802.11cards don't come standard in desktops. Dell charges about 50 bucks to add an 802.11b/g wireless card. That's an extra half a million dollars every three years when you refresh desktops for your 10,000 cubical dwellers

      OK, so I know my back-of-the-envelope calculations are not exactly accurate either, and I've left out more detail than I included. But every time I hear someone say how much cheaper it is to go wireless, I just have to point out the flaws in the scheme.

    4. Re:What need is this fulfilling? by plover · · Score: 1

      Thanks. My back-of-the-envelope is a lot less optimistic than yours, as I was trotting out worst cases on all counts.

      What I really wanted to do was answer the GP as to "why" a company might want to avoid the last-mile expenses of a cubicle farm. I don't think for a moment that it's a good idea, mind you, because I agree that hard-wired installations are always technically superior to wireless in terms of performance.

      For grins, follow the LVX link to their "technology introduction" page, where you'll find some great FUD:

      On the other hand, it has long been established that light is an extraordinary carrier of digital information. The fastest networks today are equipped with fiber optic cabling and equipment. The next generation of wireless networks will use light as its communication medium because of these superior attributes.

      The way they weasel-worded it is as if the technical benefits of fiber optics are magically conferred upon all optical communications media, especially including their scheme.

      But my original point was that there is a complex cost equation that goes hand-in-glove with the technical arguments, and that it's not just as simple as "saving you from running cable that last 6 feet". And yes, Fortune 500 companies are stupid enough to put in bad or inferior technical solutions just because they "reduce costs". Trust me on this one. :-)

      TFA's point is that if the company is already going to replace fluorescent or incandescent ceiling lamps with LEDs for energy reasons, this company is saying they should consider offsetting the higher cost of the LEDs by adding the extra hardware to outfit them as networking transceivers.

      --
      John
  8. Re:news? by PatPending · · Score: 1

    From TFA:

    Mohsen Kavehrad, a Penn State electrical engineering professor who has been working with optical network technology for about 10 years, said the approach could be a vital complement to the existing wireless system. He said the radio spectrum usually used for short-range transmissions, such as Wi-Fi, is getting increasingly crowded, which can lead to slower connections. "Light can be the way out of this mess," said Kavehrad, who is not involved in the LVX project.

    --
    What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
  9. This isn't their only product. by localman57 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're also working on a getting a patent for a new modem where you just set the phone headset right on the modem, by sticking both round parts in little earmuff thingies. Apparently it's only good for a couple hundred bits per second now, but they claim the next version will reach speeds in excess of 1000 bits per second. No word on whether it will work with cell phones.

    1. Re:This isn't their only product. by Delusion_ · · Score: 1

      But can you war-dial with it?

    2. Re:This isn't their only product. by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

      Would you like to play a game?

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  10. roughly as fast as a residential DSL line. by commodore64_love · · Score: 0

    Or cable line (Comcast Economy at 1.5 Mbit/s at an outrageous $45).

    --
    "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    1. Re:roughly as fast as a residential DSL line. by Anarki2004 · · Score: 1

      Ouch. That's rough. You would almost be better off with something like shitty HughesNet with their 250Mb per day bandwidth cap. Of course latency would be an issue. Also, who's the asshat that modded C64 offtopic? I suppose the bit about comcast doesn't add anything useful to the discussion, but it is at least partially related to the article at hand. If anything my comment is offtopic.

      --
      The teachers will crack any minute, purple monkey dishwasher.
  11. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    slashdot = stagnated.

    This from the /. Troll with dozens of /. accounts. From

    http://slashdot.org/~MichaelKristopeit300

    now through

    http://slashdot.org/~MichaelKristopeit328

  12. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your mother is from TFA.

    Signed,

    Kristomikopeet23195573712419382901

  13. Re:news? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    More intelligent use of the spectrum is the solution, not light.

  14. 'communicating' about almost nothing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    an 'art form' in & of itself. keep it light, that's stuff that matters

  15. Re:news? by localman57 · · Score: 2

    Technically speaking, isn't light part of the spectrum?

  16. Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

    From what I've read about this, while the LED lights are optical, the transmission line, aka the power line will still be used to carry data transmissions to and from the LED lights, I don't see how this or any other BPL tech being allowed by the FCC then again anything these days is allowed to pass through and transmit whatever it wants all over the Shortwave radio bands under FCC Part 15 rules, Plasma TV's being just one example which plasters the lower shortwave radio band with an insane amount of interference. Please lets stop using power lines for data transmissions, all it does is cause headaches and takes a dump all over the shortwave band! We've already got WiFi, we don't need yet another standard that is just going to end up plastering interference all over the entire street, and probably causing rife with our bodies as well. Just imagine what the implications would be of this, every person in your street or unit could then have a hardwired connection to your ethernet network as long as they knew the correct password, usually default, no need to use high powered wireless adapters anymore.... I can see how a means of optical data transfer would be a good idea over infrared, It would be more healthier for our brains than wireless, IRDA springs to mind, but as soon as you put the blanket over your laptop the signal drops out completely. Its a worthless technology which will just end up spluttering interference over the entire lower shortwave band, making the valuable and irreplacable shortwave band useless for long distance DX contacts, what happens when we need that band in times of emergency? Oh wait, we can't use it because somebody needs their broadband fix, doh!

    1. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Magic Decoder Ring:

      QRM means "radio interference"

      HAM means licensed amateur radio operator

      BPL means Broadband over Power Line

    2. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CQ, CQ, CQ DX, CQ DX, this is Executive One Foxtrot calling CQ DX.

      Just static, must be the lights. ;)

    3. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      You forgot LED Light Emitting Diode :oP

    4. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by localman57 · · Score: 1

      I think that's what the patents are for. They don't use BPL. The light fixtures are located in dropped ceilings. Above the ceiling each light fixture has another light sensor. The data comes from yet another lightbulb even higher above the dropped ceiling. Those really high up lightbulbs use WiFi.

    5. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      CQ, CQ, CQ DX, CQ DX, this is Executive One Foxtrot calling CQ DX.

      Just static, must be the lights. ;)

      Hi Hi :) Its a massive problem in some areas: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK3MuTPlHS0 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6sYD3C0jo8 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGA4MCNeN7c

    6. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      I think that's what the patents are for. They don't use BPL. The light fixtures are located in dropped ceilings. Above the ceiling each light fixture has another light sensor. The data comes from yet another lightbulb even higher above the dropped ceiling. Those really high up lightbulbs use WiFi.

      http://appft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO2&Sect2=HITOFF&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsearch-adv.html&r=1&p=1&f=G&l=50&d=PG01&S1=(%22building+illumination+apparatus%22.TTL.)&OS=ttl/%22building+illumination+apparatus%22&RS=TTL/%22building+illumination+apparatus%22 Go there and search for "BPL" and "BOPL"

      [0088]The lights shown in FIG. 5, in accordance with an embodiment of the invention, will have AC wiring with data carriers such as S-BPL, and static locations encoded into the system. Thus a person 190 entering a hallway 192 with a communications badge 170 could use only those lights needed for his travel. As the person progresses toward a destination, the lights behind may be no longer needed and so may be programmed to turn off.

      Power, which may be either AC or DC current is coupled through a power line bridge 150 with data from a network cable input, for example. The source of the data is not critical to the operation of the present invention, but may include various computer outputs such as might, for exemplary purposes, include control processor output or network connections such as commonly found on Local Area Networks (LAN), Wide Area Networks (WAN) or through the Internet. In accord with one embodiment, the wiring between power line bridge 150 and LED light source 161 is shielded by passing through a conduit or the like, defining a Shielded Broadband-over-Power-Line (S-BPL) connection that is both resistant to interfering communications and also produces almost no radiant energy.

      And:

      [0085]As seen in FIG. 4, the electrical wiring in the hallways and/or rooms may include BOPL.

      At least they are considering using shielded power cabling, aka "S-BPL", but I would think using WiFi would be a wiser choice, one lousy installation of S-BPL can wipe out half a building with radio interference, and what happens to the radio signal once it reaches the end of the line? aka the light socket? are they going to be installing shielded light sockets too? I Hardly think so.

    7. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      From what I've read about this, while the LED lights are optical, the transmission line, aka the power line will still be used to carry data transmissions to and from the LED lights, I don't see how this or any other BPL tech being allowed by the FCC

      How is that not a problem for (say) cat 5 cable? Maybe because it consists of twisted pairs? So twist the power cable, or shield it, or plug your cat 5 directly into the light fitting as the data input.

    8. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      You can't twist power cable, bad things happen, like current appearing on the neutral line from the live line, and things like reflected power heating up the cable, instead of transmitting power the cable will then just act as a heater, and a large amount of current making it back to the transformer, burning that out and tripping fuses, among other things. Hence why you get a warning sticker on every appliance with a really long extension cord on it, please don't lay the power cable in a circular fashion. And connecting CAT5 to anywhere near where a light socket is, will be a spectacularly bad idea, for example: one outside light socket gets struck by lightning and the lightning then makes the very short (1-2 centimetre) trip to your ethernet socket then suddenly your entire network sees millions of volts over every switch and computer in the building before its finally earthed out in the equipment racks containing all of your servers.

    9. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      At least this is true in a single phase system, 3 phase systems can be twisted to a certian limited extent, its called Transposition. and is done to balance out the voltage and current of each phase with one another. Dunno what effect it would have on a single phase transmission system.

    10. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more about modulating the DC feed to the LEDs but as you point out the data and power circuits are going to have to come together at some point and I suppose the solutions to that problem are isolation and grounding. Once standards are developed for both it should go okay. Its possible to do it safely, even if the switches have to be on a fibre backbone, or some such.

    11. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      I was thinking more about modulating the DC feed to the LEDs but as you point out the data and power circuits are going to have to come together at some point and I suppose the solutions to that problem are isolation and grounding. Once standards are developed for both it should go okay. Its possible to do it safely, even if the switches have to be on a fibre backbone, or some such.

      I suppose you could have a CAT5 switch in every section of a building which feeds data to every light socket via means of CAT5, but uses a fiber backbone for the long haul back to a central point, that would prevent lightning from passing any further past that room or section of a building. But I would imagine maintenance after a lightning strike or power surge would then require the complete disassembly of the entire roof to remove all of the dead and melted CAT5 and power cabling, not too different to what would normally happen if a normal light socket got struck by lightning to be honest, definitely more costly however.

    12. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by freaxeh · · Score: 1

      What I would like to see is a combination of this technology along with laser technology to distribute throughout an entire room invisible laser light, along with a fiber optic cabling that is tacked onto the side of power line cabling, its a sensible combination of power distribution and data distribution all rolled into one single power cable, so every light socket then automatically becomes a high bandwidth laser reception and transmission point, and every portable device then transmits back to the light socket via means of laser. But that would be amazingly costly at least in today's market, a decade or two down the road and this might just be possible, would definatley be pretty cool to have every light socket and every room an access point for unlimited bandwidth with future proofing built into it.

    13. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by pregister · · Score: 2

      No.

      Its lightbulbs all the way up.

    14. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When was the last time shortwave was used during an emergency where tech like this could have interfered? I'm being serious here, though I know it might sound like trolling. I would think that in any emergency where shortwave would be useful, tech like this stuff would be knocked out or otherwise not functioning very well, wouldn't it?

    15. Re:Rife with QRM, HAMs will NOT be happy! by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      The reason shortwave as you call it is useful in emergencies is because ham operators can just cobble radio transmitters and receivers together out of parts lying around. They need is to form a tuned circuit and then start keying out morse and a crystal radio receiver to receive it. They understand about propagation and interference and just why human to human morse solves such problems in a worse case scenario. And it won't take too long for a ham operator to build an AM or even an SSB transceiver.

  17. Re:news? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    *sigh* More intelligent use of the radio frequency spectrum.

    Damn pedantics =)

  18. Re:news? by MichaelKristopeit328 · · Score: 0
    from the implications of my post:

    an industry ignored for 10 years, still crying that it provides a relevant option in the face of obvious drawbacks and alternatives is not a news item

  19. Re:news? by SlashDotDotDot · · Score: 1

    Damn pedantics =)

    I believe you mean "damn pedants". Pedantic is an adjective.

    Just sayin...

    --
    /...
  20. one word for stability and security of system: by MichaelKristopeit329 · · Score: 0

    No word on the reliability and security of this system.

    here's one: SUCK.

  21. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd just like to congratulate you on the excellent work you've done on your website:
    http://michael.kristopeit.com/

    It sucks that you're claiming copyright on that excellent design, otherwise I would steal it immediately. I figure though that I can just add a 4th circular link to my two sentences on a white background. the official anonymous coward website is gonna blow you out of the water like you're 8 Minute Abs.

  22. Re:news? by MichaelKristopeit329 · · Score: 0
    the truth = troll.

    slashdot = stagnated with marketeers attempting to lie to anyone that will listen, while attempting to silence anyone who points out their hypocritical ignorance.

  23. Re:news? by MichaelKristopeit329 · · Score: 0
    keep making promises. i'd just like to congratulate you on your perfect record of not fulfilling any of the claims you've made.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  24. Bozos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give me symmetrical transmit and receive speeds or give me something else!

  25. Re:news? by Anynomous+Coward · · Score: 2

    +1, Pedantic.

    --
    I'm not a coward by any name.
  26. useless by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Informative

    The first generation of the LVX system will transmit data at speeds of about three megabits per second, roughly as fast as a residential DSL line.

    Is that physical layer rate? If so, what's the rate after protocol overhead?

    Let's assume that is the physical layer rate. Which would make it three and a half times slower than 802.11b, and 18 times slower than 802.11g, which is virtually everywhere. And, drumroll please, at least one hundred times slower than 802.11n, which is 300-600Mbit/sec (physical layer speed.)

    1. Re:useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it might still be useful for places like hospitals, where they don't allow a lot of the wireless rf devices. It might also be used in other places that are otherwise RF sensitive or are at risk of jamming.

    2. Re:useless by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

      3-6Mbit/s ought to be enough for anybody ... playing TETRIS with the office lighting :)

  27. Think of the possibilities by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

    Hide a sensor anywhere nearby, and you can read all the internal traffic.
    Drop a tiny node in a plushy on someones desk, spewing out all sorts of Window virus, and see how long it takes for the IP staff to find it.
    Shine a modulated laser beam through a window, and disrupt all the network traffic in an office.

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  28. Might be useful with SAD light therapy LEDs by Khopesh · · Score: 1

    Light therapy for Seasonal Affective Disorder ("SAD") can be implemented with LEDs. While it's typically used in 30min bursts first thing in the morning, I wonder if it can be spread out through a longer time and worked into standard lighting via this kind of array. Very intersting...

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  29. cellphone by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    3Mbit/sec is plenty for voice and texting. With every room/hallway fed separately (via fibre) you can run every single cellphone in the building without using RF. If you wanted to eliminate exposure to RF/EM fields that would certainly help. Also you can modulate different colours independently to multiply bandwidth. Your so called white room lights could easily consist of a dozen LED's tuned to a specific frequency. Also given that cheap fibre systems can use LED's as transmitters and your total bandwidth could easily reach 1000 MBit/sec range.

    1. Re:cellphone by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      The trouble with 3Mbit/s is that, while it is luxury by the standards of "ambient" devices(ie. anything that you would consider using X10, GSM/SMS, zigbee, assorted proprietary facilities automation stuff, etc. for) it is painfully low unless the ratio of computers to light fixtures approaches 1(and, not just light fixtures; but optically separated light fixtures that don't interfere with one another; if this is anything like RF wireless, that physical layer rate has to be shared between all devices in the same area).

      The kicker is line of sight: Users don't want cellphones that stop receiving calls when they pocket them and, while desktops and laptops aren't likely to be a problem, IT pushing 100megs of patches to each workstation on Monday morning while everyone tries to access their network shares will be.

      Potentially promising, if cheap enough, for thermostats and light switches and wall clocks, and every other little device that would be a lot easier if you could just talk to it at even a few hundred bits/second every few minutes; but a lousy fit for anything pocketable or data-heavy, unless they seriously bump the speed.

      From unpleasant experience, I can say that 802.11G is noticably worse than basic 100mb ethernet for even a single device(not to mention, common system-imaging products tend to only support wired networks and you lose PXE and WOL). Get a roomful of systems, even with multiple high-end APs, and you are looking at sub-10Mb rates. N is better; but not as better as one might like, though a real improvement for residential scenarios that were marginal under G.

  30. IBM did this decades ago by bernieS · · Score: 1

    IBM has/had key patents in this area for decades, and offered wireless office networking from ceiling-mounted LED lamps about 30 years ago. Some of those patents were apparently used in the first wireless PC keyboard--for the PCjr (aka "Peanut")--the second version of which was actually a very nice wireless keyboard. I'm assuming IBM's patents in this area are what kept other optical wireless keyboards and networking gear off the market. -bernieS

    1. Re:IBM did this decades ago by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      Either they licensed them, or they lapsed; but optical wireless remained relatively uncommon, outside of IRDA(and, of course, almost every remote control ever made, except for the earliest acoustic models and a few fancy BT or wifi networked ones).

      For whatever reason, there was one area where absolutely enormous numbers of IR wireless keyboards showed up: Hotel TV entertainment systems(I think "lodgenet" may have been one, my memory is a little fuzzy). For various usurious fees, you could use the keyboard to browse through pay-per-view movies(Adult titles euphemized on your bill for your convenience when expensing the room...), play a few little games, change channels, maybe call up weather reports.

      For them, since hotel guests will steal everything and the towels if it isn't nailed down, the fact that IR keyboards showed up basically nowhere else on the market was a virtue; because it reduced the keyboards' tendency to walk(I'm sure a decent hardware hacker would laugh at whatever obfuscation they did; but Joe Consumer would find that nothing he could buy would talk to the things...)

      I don't know whether there was a patent licensing deal going on, or whether LOS problems and the ubiquity of cheap-and-ghastly proprietary RF dongles killed them for the home market; but I've never seen an IR keyboard outside of a hotel room.

  31. Spying by currently_awake · · Score: 1

    Modify all the lights produced by a factory to carry network traffic, but don't advertise it. Modify all cellphones (in software) to listen for that network, and send back a ping when it gets a connection. Make a list of all the replies and wait for a target of interest. You've now got an unmonitored link to that targets cellphone/pda/laptop. This would be very useful for spying on Iran/China/Interpol etc. If the system rarely sends traffic then the odds of accidentally finding it is very low. And yes, even though China makes everything they just build to plan so they wouldn't know about the "extra" bits.

  32. I just can't see why this has to be wired by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    I just can't see why this has to be wired.

    I mean, don't LED lights get their energy from the aether?

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  33. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the truth = troll.

    slashdot = stagnated with marketeers attempting to lie to anyone that will listen, while attempting to silence anyone who points out their hypocritical ignorance.

    Yet you still come here. Drunk? Drugs? Brain cell count low?

  34. Re:news? by MichaelKristopeit329 · · Score: 0
    your admission of the truth of the preconditions i present is troubling... you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    why do you cower? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  35. Re:news? by RatherBeAnonymous · · Score: 1

    That's all well and good until the visible spectrum gets overloaded with competing and incompatible communications protocols. The way out of this mess is for upcoming 802.11 wireless protocols to get their own piece of spectrum.

  36. If you want Security, use Crypto by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Even if windows gave you some filtering, you'd still have to deal with insiders, virus-infected users, etc. If you want security, you still need to use crypto.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  37. Prior Art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The supermarket here has little LCD price tags for every line on the shelves. The prices are updated in real time using central LED illuminators.

  38. Re:news? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

        I prefer mine much higher on the spectrum. Closer to 10^20Hz. It takes care of pesky problems in your transmission stream too.

       

    --
    Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
  39. Looking at the patent, they... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Didn't invent anything. They just put LED in front of inventions that existed for decades. Worse, those inventions already exist in the telecoms technologies. This is just a typical case of "yes but now we do it with a computer! So it's new!".

  40. Don't you mean... by mindwhip · · Score: 1

    -1, Pedantic. ?

    --
    [The Universe] has gone offline.
  41. Talking Lights? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Talking Lights http://www.talking-lights.com/ has been doing this sort of thing with standard lighting fixtures for a dozen years now. Prior art?

  42. By the Shannon's Law, I smite thee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your 802.11n is what.. 4*40 MHz band? With (visible) light, the bandwidth potential is in Terahertz figures.
    Also, it's potentially easier to shield against noise as the walls in your typical home are opaque.

    This is the fucking future shining at you, but you are too damn blind to see.

    The communication is indistinguishable from noise (i.e. regular light) with naked eye, thus you can harness
    the full power of room lighting for communication purposes. Since we're talking THz, the useful unit for
    measuring linkspeed might be Tbps as well. BlueRayDisksPerSecond? LibrariesOfCongressPerSecond? Go figure.

    ps. Keep in mind current or near-future technology is incapable of handling anything but a tiny fraction of
    this available bandwidth, and with ridiculous inefficiency at that. Long way to go.

  43. Big Brother by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

    If your lights are being used as a cableless fiber optic system, what is to keep big brother from sitting outside and picking up the communications from the street?

  44. This technology is already in use in supermarkets by (Score.5,+Interestin · · Score: 1

    It's used to send pricing information to LCD price displays attached to shelves via the supermarket lighting (it's done at night when there's no-one around to be affected by it, and in any case since it's at a much higher frequency than the usual 50Hz flicker it wouldn't be noticed anyway). Think of the usual paper price tags in plastic holders attached to shelves, but now they have LCD displays and are updated automatically by modulating the in-store lighting.

  45. Re:news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    +1, Pedantic.

    You mean +1, pedantry.

  46. HHI by fulldecent · · Score: 1

    HHI is already doing that, saw it in FOE2010.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  47. Link To Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here's a video piece put together by ElectricTV showcasing this technology.

    http://www.electrictv.net/Home.aspx?PlayID=70