Slashdot Mirror


Most Anticipated Tech Products of 2011

adeelarshad82 writes "2011 is just around the corner, and with the new year comes expectations. Based on hype and recent announcements, PCMag put together a list of twelve most anticipated tech products of 2011. Some are new, like the technology to bridge Wi-Fi, PowerLine, and Ethernet or the 3D camcorders, which will let you create content for your 3D TV. Others will just carry over from what we anticipated in 2010 but never materialized like iPhone on the Verizon network or Phones with dual core processors."

155 comments

  1. Tablets by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I understand that Tablets are going to be the next big thing (according to tech journalists, anyway), is it necessary to have 3 separate categories for the RIM tablet, Honeycomb Tablets, and tablets in general?

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
    1. Re:Tablets by RapmasterT · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes. Otherwise the list of things to anticipate in 2011 would be much shorter.

    2. Re:Tablets by davester666 · · Score: 1

      This way, the PlayBook, Android tablets and the iPad2 all get equal footing.

      --
      Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
    3. Re:Tablets by grimJester · · Score: 2, Funny

      Top ten lists are so 2010.

    4. Re:Tablets by Suki+I · · Score: 1

      Yes. Otherwise the list of things to anticipate in 2011 would be much shorter.

      That was my answer and I will add, if there are no flying cars on that list I am not looking.

    5. Re:Tablets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was on my Top Ten responses to this article.

    6. Re:Tablets by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      (which are likely to suffer from the same thing android phones do: OS version fragmentation.)

      They're likely to suffer from a competitor-purported myth while all running the same OS, video system, and packaging manager?

    7. Re:Tablets by Lunix+Nutcase · · Score: 1

      If it's such a myth, why do the actual developers agree with the fragmentation statements? The Angry Birds developers are one of the more recent and high profile examples.

    8. Re:Tablets by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The squawking I always hear from these developers is that you never know your target, because everyone implements Android on a different platform with different amounts of CPU and RAM and sometimes there's a different set of system services running on it (like Motoblur etc) and so on. And also that some of them run 1.5, 1.6, 2.0. 2.1, 2.2.

      So they are complaining that some machines have different specs... like just about every freaking computer out there. They also complain that there's more than 3 versions of Android, I guess, since there's 3 of iOS and I always hear that iOS is better about this. They also complain that other software might be installed (Motoblur is a software package Motorola installs).

      Welcome to the world of embedded developers. It's a very specialized place, and when they meet something not so specialized they go apeshit. The problem is cell phones are general purpose computers now, not embedded devices.

      Think about PC developers complaining about how their stuff might crash with Crossfire but not with 4 nVidia cards, even though this is supposed to be transparent. Or maybe it'll blow out on a specific AMD CPU combined with a specific VIA north bridge. Or a particular sound card gives troubles. How ridiculous does that seem? Oh and on top of it all, you might be running XP or Vista or Windows 7 now. The market is so fragmented, it's impossible to write programs for!

    9. Re:Tablets by Altus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think a lot of the problem isn't that embeded developers are developing for phones, its that desktop application developers are developing for phones but they now have to make an application that, just like thier desktop apps, has to support a variety of machines and OS's and specifications but they have to sell that application for a fraction of what they might charge for a desktop application.

      The challanges are similar to the desktop and its possible that there is even more money to be made, but its difficult to make the decision to support a bunch of devices when you are going to sell your application for just a couple of dollars.

      Regarding OS fragmentation, you are right that iOS has several verison, but unike android you can install the latest version on the iPhone you bought last year so developers can insist on the latest OS and still support all but the very first iPhone (support 2 OS's and you can cover everything). Since many android phones are locked down or require a special version of Android from the Phone manufacturer you end up having to support more OS's just to make sure your app works on more phones. I know this isn't a technical failing of Android but it is a factor in developing for the platform.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    10. Re:Tablets by multisync · · Score: 1

      Nah, all they really needed was one for iPad 2. I don't think there are a lot of people 'hotly anticipating" windows tablets (which don't work... windows simply isn't touch screen friendly) or android tablets (which are likely to suffer from the same thing android phones do: OS version fragmentation.)

      The one I'm "hotly anticipating" is the Playbook. 7" form factor, duo core processor, supports flash, HTML 5, multi-tasking, POSIX compliant QNX OS, WIFI and 3G (via tethering to your Blackberry, so no need for a second data plan), 3 MP camera on the front, 5 MP camera on the back, HDMI & USB ports, supports wireless keyboard. I don't know what the price on these things is going to be, but it's the only tablet coming to market that gets me excited.

      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    11. Re:Tablets by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Yes. My list goes to 11.

    12. Re:Tablets by shadowfaxcrx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes. This. Thank you. Amazing how this "fragmentation recipe for failure" has caused the PC to fail so badly that PC sales have blown Mac out of the water for *decades.*

      Here's another way to look at it: If you don't like something about the iPhone, you buy an Android. If you don't like something about the Droid X, you buy a . . different Android. So if developers want to write for a single-device market, and not get sales from everyone on an Android phone, have at. Enjoy. Let us know how that works for you.

      --
      "I disagree with you" does not equal "flamebait."
    13. Re:Tablets by magnusrex1280 · · Score: 1

      The idea that Android fragmentation is a myth, is in itself a myth. Android fragmentation exists, and it's a problem. Does that mean I'm anti-Android? No. Some people don't make statements because they have an agenda, they make them because those statements are true. My biggest issue with Android hasn't been the fragmentation of versions, but when the various cellular carriers force-feed their own unwanted bloatware onto users. My own device has 5-8 carrier applications running at all times, and the default Android task manager doesn't even show them, so I can't kill them that way. I had to get a better task killer from the Market, and those apps start right back up after I kill them. It's decimating my battery life, and sucking up a fat chunk of my RAM. The fix for this is to Root it, but I upgraded from 2.1 to 2.2 before a root was available for my device, so now I either wait or downgrade back to 2.1.

    14. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 2

      As a mobile developer, I'll say Android fragmentation is the least of my concerns. Pick a line in the sand (2.1, 2.2) and write. Make sure your layers are % based rather than fixed width and form factor rarely matters.

      The killer to me in mobile development is app stores with strange approval processes and delays. If you do actually get an app in the Apple app store, then fix a simple bug, you have to resubmit your app, and it may be weeks before they (hopefully) approve. Until then there's nothing you can do because users can't (well, without jailbreaking) sideload.

      With Apple, Android, and Blackberry (with the exception of OS6), you can target a previous OS and expect backward compatibily, but you lose out on new features you may or may not need.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    15. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Yup, Android fragementation is a carrier problem rather than a device/OS problem.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    16. Re:Tablets by david_thornley · · Score: 1

      There's also the issue that a cheap modern computer has plenty of CPU power and memory and disk space for apps, and mobile phones are more constrained.

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
    17. Re:Tablets by Plouf · · Score: 2

      Except that most applications don't care about the kind of GPU being installed. However they care a lot about input devices, screen layout, look-and-feel, available system APIs, network connectivity and so on. All things that have been normalized and didn't change between XP, Vista or Seven making the "fragmentation" of the Windows platform totally irrelevant for >99% of developers.

    18. Re:Tablets by jo42 · · Score: 1

      7" form factor

      Too small and like all the other 7" units, has that stupid wide screen form factor.

      supports flash, multi-tasking

      Battery will last less than an hour or two on a good day.

      POSIX compliant QNX OS

      Compatible with nothing and no apps.

      In other words, über fail just waiting to happen.

    19. Re:Tablets by JesseDegenerate · · Score: 1

      Except that app approvals have been under a week for months now, getting down to about 4 days recently if i've heard correctly. As a mobile developer you can't understand them wanting to defend the platform? You don't like frameworks? John Carmack disagree's with you:D

    20. Re:Tablets by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Flash on a Tegra 2 wich supports hardware acceleration do not kill the battery, old FUD is old.

      Speaking on multitasking, Why isn't the Notion Ink Adam mentioned in the article? Well I know PCMag is lousy but if there is an implementation of multitaking on Android that works, it's EDEN, see:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvMMZ8AdxnQ

      Thats real multitasking WHILE sending HDMI video at 1080p and several applications working in second plane. Why people put up* with less is beyond me.

      *Oh well the iPad jumped first and Galaxy tab was just released, Adam and others are going to be avilable after CES, most of them are just waiting for the FCC approval.

    21. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I love frameworks. I hate the fuzziness of the iPhone app market/approval process. PhoneGap is in, then it's out, then it's in again. Appcelerator mysteriously stops working, then works again.

      Not all app approvals are under weeks now. Also, consider the rejection of an app for a magazine because it covered Android. Or their inconsistency (which still exists) in approving functionality in one app while declining it in another.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    22. Re:Tablets by JesseDegenerate · · Score: 1

      You named about 3 apps in the history of the appstore History, the same three everyone else quotes, without actually knowing the full context of why they were declined. (i don't either, but i'm sure at least one of them was gathering to much info or doing something nefarious.

      Assumption! (the downfall of both our arguments)

      Regardless, my point was you don't have the foundation on your platform of choice to get awesome games - which you don't.

    23. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Erm, my platform is BB, iPhone, and Android. How do I not have the foundation then?

      I'm a mobile developer who has experienced the approval process in three app stores (nothing on WP7 yet). I switch between devices (usually weekly) to test apps and make sure I'm staying current in UIs. I hardly think I'm making assumptions here.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    24. Re:Tablets by JesseDegenerate · · Score: 1

      I wasn't talking foundation as in your ability, i was talking about the frameworks apple has put into place, lol, making it easier and faster for you to put out the Open GL ES accelerated game that plays so well!

    25. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      I wasn't either... I was talking about my foundation to speak from experience rather than making assumptions. FWIW, Android supports OpenGL ES 1.0/2.0 as well. However, not all Android devices do.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
    26. Re:Tablets by JesseDegenerate · · Score: 1

      No, you were, hence your "my platform is BB, iPhone, and Android. How do I not have the foundation then?" Again, by foundation i meant the built in frameworks in the dev kit, which allow you to in much less time and effort, accelerate your game. Thank you for brining up another developer pitfall of android though, fragmentation through tons of devices with different requirements and android versions.

    27. Re:Tablets by I8TheWorm · · Score: 1

      Wrong again sport. By foundation I still meant platform... by mentioning the three what I was saying was that I have the magic included in the iPhone platform, as well as the drudgery of the other two.

      The only fragmentation in the Android is by device manufacturers, and most people who see it for what it is rather than regurgitating Lord Jobs, which is as a good thing. Read: choice.

      As a developer, I love writing for Android. I can do more with it than the other two, and with ease. I don't have to use Objective-C which is a chore at best. And, here's the shocker, both Android and Blackberry have dev kits as well.

      Take your uninformed Apple fanboi'ism elsewhere.

      --
      Saying Android is a family of phones is akin to saying Linux is a family of PCs.
  2. No Nintendo 3DS? by Daverd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It promises 3D without glasses! That sounds way bigger to me than a slightly better smartphone.

    1. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by Renaissance+2K · · Score: 2

      The list is mostly tablets and smartphones.

      Even if any one of those products manages to trump the Apple counterpart in features or specs, it won't matter. The brand recognition and loyalty that Apple carries negates any competitor superiority.

      I agree with you. I'd rather see something that offers something I've never seen before over the "better, faster, stronger" wannabe of a device I've been using for a year now.

    2. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by OzPhIsH · · Score: 1

      I had the same thought: "Where is the 3DS?" Alot of people I know are interested in the 3DS, if not for the gaming, but just the allure of 3D tech without the glasses in general. I think we can all agree that the glasses are the main stumbling block for the low 3DTV sales. To leave this off but include the Playstation phone? I guess they're out there, but In a world of Android and iOS, I don't know a single person who is really interested.

      --

      "To lead the people, you must walk behind them"

    3. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boring - why is this on slashdot? I know it's a weak time for news but....

      wake me up in 2012!

    4. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by EdZ · · Score: 2

      And its not even a Playstation phone! It's an Android 'gaming' phone: i.e. a regular android phone from Sony-Ericsson which replaces a slide-out keypad with a slide-out gamepad, and happens to run the Playstation app available for all other Android handsets. If people are expecting a PSP phone, they're going to be sorely disappointed.

    5. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      Disappointed? That's nothing new. We were promised a revolution - pah! - with the n-gage and what did we get? A taco.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    6. Re:No Nintendo 3DS? by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Do you get the impression that the list might have been sponsored, with a couple of items thrown in to give it the illusion of ... for want of a better word... legitimacy? Although it doesn't really feel right to associate the word legitimate to any list like this.

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
  3. 3d camcorders? by alen · · Score: 0

    my iphone is my camcorder

    history has proved many times that cheap and mobile wins over single use and cool gee whiz tech

    1. Re:3d camcorders? by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      my iphone is my camcorder

      history has proved many times that cheap and mobile wins over single use and cool gee whiz tech

      Ahh the irony.

    2. Re:3d camcorders? by danbert8 · · Score: 1

      Do I smell smoke?

      --
      Yes it's an anecdote! Were you expecting original research in a Slashdot comment?
  4. Ten most anticipated things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ten most anticipated things -- broken down into 10 pages for your reading convenience.

    1. Re:Ten most anticipated things... by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      The anticipation is killing me.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
  5. decent hardware webOS device by tacroy · · Score: 3, Informative

    My one wish for 2011 (early 2011) is webOS on solid and fast hardware. I believe it is the BEST mobile OS but it is REALLY in need of some hardware to support it!

    1. Re:decent hardware webOS device by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 2

      WebOS is a great design concept waiting for a sane and reasonable manufacturer.

      I can only hope the post-Carly, post-Hurd HP is that place.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:decent hardware webOS device by tacroy · · Score: 1

      What I am hoping is that HP in an effort to BUY marketshare, puts out a $900 device for $400. They have the cash, and could make a HUGE dent.

    3. Re:decent hardware webOS device by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget about it. HP is no longer a company capable of bold moves. Carly destroyed the company culture, and it should take at least 20 years for them to produce anything bleeding edge, assuming everything goes right.

    4. Re:decent hardware webOS device by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      WebOS? Yawn. See my sig.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    5. Re:decent hardware webOS device by tacroy · · Score: 2

      Heh, webOS can be rooted by just turning on dev mode (just type in the konami code and press the "dev mode on" toggle) And palm not only SUPPORTS homebrew they actually paid to have the lead homebrew developer flown to the dev day as a keynote speaker.

    6. Re:decent hardware webOS device by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Well that's nice, and I see you can now run native Linux apps on WebOS (as long as they don't need an X desktop environment), but WebOS is mostly closed source, while Maemo is mostly open-source and its successor, MeeGo, is 100% FOSS.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    7. Re:decent hardware webOS device by tacroy · · Score: 1

      About the only thing that ISN'T oss in webos is the display layer on top. And you can get X server running on the pre as well. http://forums.precentral.net/webos-internals/240926-x-server-pre.html So yeah it's not as FOSS as MeeGo, but it's still a HUGE win for oss and unlocked phones.

  6. Improved article technology by swanzilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hope 2011 will bring us the technology to load twelve items on a single page.

    1. Re:Improved article technology by noidentity · · Score: 1

      Just wait, one way you'll not only be able to load 10 items on a page, but it'll scroll if they don't all fit on screen! I can't wait until that's possible.

    2. Re:Improved article technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It already exists in Safari.

      Safari reader not only declutters the page, it also merges multiple pages into a single continuous page.
      http://www.apple.com/safari/whats-new.html#reader

    3. Re:Improved article technology by JustinOpinion · · Score: 5, Informative

      The "Products & Technologies" are:

      1. Verizon iPhone
      2. BlackBerry PlayBook
      3. Honeycomb Tablets
      4. Even More Tablets
      5. Chrome OS Notebooks
      6. Phones with Dual-Core Processors
      7. Mac App Store
      8. Google TV: Take 2
      9. Hulu for Magazines
      10. Intel's Sandy Bridge and AMD's Fusion Processors
      11. Sony PlayStation Phone
      12. Net Neutrality Rules in Practice

      In terms of subject areas, this is:

      1. Smartphone
      2. Tablets
      3. Tablets
      4. Tablets
      5. Netbooks
      6. Smartphone
      7. Content Access
      8. Content Access
      9. Content Access
      10. Processors
      11. Smartphone
      12. Content Access

      The base technology (processors, etc.) is under-represented compared to hot product categories (tablets and smartphones). Clearly they were more focused on "products" (and "business models") and not so focused on new "technologies".

    4. Re:Improved article technology by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      It was actually 12 items on 13 pages, the first page was there to tell you that you had 12 pages more to go.

    5. Re:Improved article technology by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      Wouldn't merging pages onto a continuous page require site-specific hacks, or some kind of logic to try to detect page change buttons? Sounds like a cheap hack.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    6. Re:Improved article technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For once, Slashdot mangling the title made it *more* accurate: "Tech Products" (erroneous Slashdot title) vs "Products & Technologies" (actual PCMag title.)

    7. Re:Improved article technology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, it's a product from Apple, it just works, it's magic, you don't question why or how does it work, you simply use it because it was the first that did it, the only one that does it and the only one that will do it EVER until the heat death of the universe/sarscasm -since theres a Firefox plug in that does that since ages and better.

  7. Duke Nukem Forever by verbatim · · Score: 5, Funny

    Don't forget about DNF. It's supposed to come out in 2011. This year for sure!

    --
    Price, Quality, Time. Pick none. What, you thought you had a choice?
    1. Re:Duke Nukem Forever by hedwards · · Score: 1

      I was disappointed that it wasn't included. Perhaps they've been bitten and are now shy.

    2. Re:Duke Nukem Forever by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      The Do Not Fail registry is coming out in 2011?!
      Where do I sign up?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    3. Re:Duke Nukem Forever by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was disappointed that it wasn't included. Perhaps they've been bitten and are now shy.

      I guess that means it really is coming.

  8. Speaking of anticipation by d6 · · Score: 1

    I know it doesn't qualify as 'tech', but I thought of this immediately.

    "with an expected release date of 2011" :]

    1. Re:Speaking of anticipation by clone52431 · · Score: 1

      What... not this?

      --
      Distributed Denial of APK: It takes 15 seconds to reply to him anonymously, but wastes tons of his time if we all do it.
    2. Re:Speaking of anticipation by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      Anticipating Linux on the Desktop is so 2001. Ubiquitous Android tablets are the new mobile equivalent of LotD.

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  9. Verizon iPhone? by RapmasterT · · Score: 1

    How long are we going to beat that horse? Does that many people really care? Granted, an iPhone on a non-ATT network is automatically a better iphone, but the bloom is kind of off the iphone rose these days anyway.

    And white? jesus christ...if it's black, we want a white one...if it's white, we want a black one.

    1. Re:Verizon iPhone? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

      How long are we going to beat that horse? Does that many people really care? Granted, an iPhone on a non-ATT network is automatically a better iphone, but the bloom is kind of off the iphone rose these days anyway.

      Yeah, sadly, a Verizon-based iPhone will be a BFD. The bloom is so NOT off that rose for non-techies, which is the vast majority of people. And a lot of techies are into the iPhone as well. Wishing it weren't so doesn't make it not so. *sigh*

      I'm more interested in a dual-core LTE-based phone with a big screen (4.3" like my EVO). Running Android, of course. :)

    2. Re:Verizon iPhone? by hedwards · · Score: 1

      To be honest, white makes it look pretty hideously ugly. Sure that's not what I base my buying decisions on, but it seems fugly like those gen 1 iPods.

      I'd better shut up about that before Steve focuses his reality distortion field on me.

    3. Re:Verizon iPhone? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one immune to Steve's RDS and the only not-gay person immune to this girl's sweet, impossibly-blood-boiling begging and flirting? (I have a friend that can basically get any guy to do anything, she has her own reality distortion field... oh it gets my blood moving alright, but it doesn't distort my judgment ... various tech presenters get the same thing these days: a look from me and a lot of interest, but a critical eye looking for the eventual letdown).

    4. Re:Verizon iPhone? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      I am interested in when the hell are they going to put up 4g service nationwide so I can take advantage of the $10 mandatory extra data fee on my Epic on a regular basis instead of the rare occasions I visit New Orleans or Atlanta.

    5. Re:Verizon iPhone? by Tumbleweed · · Score: 1

      I am interested in when the hell are they going to put up 4g service nationwide so I can take advantage of the $10 mandatory extra data fee on my Epic on a regular basis instead of the rare occasions I visit New Orleans or Atlanta.

      Well, it's in most metro areas at this point, I think. The real problem I have here in the Seattle area is that WiMax signals SUCK indoors. It's mostly pointless for the way and where I use my phone. Honestly, the EVO is a great 3G phone, aside from the battery life.

      I'm definitely ready for a dual-core 45nm-based phone with LTE, as long as it has a big-ass screen. I couldn't use something with a screen as tiny as that of the iPhone now that I'm spoiled.

    6. Re:Verizon iPhone? by ColdWetDog · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one immune to Steve's RDS and the only not-gay person immune to this girl's sweet, impossibly-blood-boiling begging and flirting? (I have a friend that can basically get any guy to do anything, she has her own reality distortion field... oh it gets my blood moving alright, but it doesn't distort my judgment ... various tech presenters get the same thing these days: a look from me and a lot of interest, but a critical eye looking for the eventual letdown).

      I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Are you telling us you're not gay? (Thanks, I suppose, kept me up all night wondering about it). That you manage to not turn into a testosterone fueled blob of manliness at the sight of a pretty girl? (Ditto.)That Steve Jobs 'isn't your type'? (Really, some things should just be left as secrets.)

      Oh, you don't want a white iPhone! Ahh... There's the rub!

      Well, I don't want one either.

      So there....

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    7. Re:Verizon iPhone? by bluefoxlucid · · Score: 1

      Yes I'm trying to insinuate that white iPhones are for liberal arts degree faggots that don't like pussy. Genius.

    8. Re:Verizon iPhone? by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Am I the only one immune to Steve's RDS and the only not-gay person immune to this girl's sweet, impossibly-blood-boiling begging and flirting?

      Probably. I'm immune to Steve's field, but there are a couple of women who can get me to do damned near anything.

  10. Depressing by __aagmrb7289 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If this is the exciting tech for 2011, I have to admit - I'm a bit depressed. Luckily, we rarely know at the beginning of the year what'll actually be big the next year. More tablets, gaming phones, and processors really just isn't that exciting, however.

    1. Re:Depressing by mlts · · Score: 2

      I agree with you. If it was an advance in phones, I'd like to see more storage space, or even SDXC support so when 64 and 128 GB MicroSD cards come out (there are SD cards out with this capacity, but not MicroSD), the device can easily handle that.

      Some things I would like to see in 2011, instead of more tablets:

      1: A hard disk controller that can autotier. This way, it can have 4-5 standard hard disks in RAID6 configuration, as well as a SSD, and blocks of data that are often used get dropped on the SSD.

      2: A consumer level tape drive that has modern capacities. Even if it means having a SSD [1] for storing data temporarily until it gets streamed to the tape to slow down the incidence of shoe-shining.

      3: Significant price drops on SSD technology.

      4: US Internet infrastructure improvements. Shouldn't we have 100gbs wireless mesh networks in all metropolitan areas by now, instead of getting mobile plans changed so we pay $10 a gig for already slow wireless connections?

      5: Other operating systems than Windows have BitLocker-like functionality so they too can boot using a TPM chip for key storage without needing a password on IPL.

      6: A wholesale move to LTE-Advanced, so it doesn't matter which carrier you use, just swap SIM cards into your device.

      7: A new HDD design specifically built for libraries. Use the same 2.5" platters, but have a different enclosure for the platters, head, and controller that is made specifically for automated changing in and out of a library, not to mention the ability to slap barcodes on. The result of this would be the advantages of disk (random access), with tape's advantages (resistance to physical damage, long archive life, etc.) If not a HDD design, then a standard robot-friendly enclosure for 2.5" or even 3.5" drives that is used by multiple vendors, with a read-write/read-only switch on them.

      [1]: Ideally an AES-256 encrypted SSD that uses transitory keys in RAM, so when the tape transaction is up, it forgets the keys (overwriting the DRAM locations multiple times), then generates new ones for the next transaction. This way, old data isn't still accessible even if the tape is secured.

    2. Re:Depressing by ColdWetDog · · Score: 2

      You sure put a high bar up for next year. I'm just looking for the Higgs Boson. That'll be enough.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    3. Re:Depressing by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      It's the year of Linux on the flying car!

    4. Re:Depressing by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1

      I too read the list and thought, "So there will be mobile devices and multimedia applications in 2011? I could never have guessed!"

      I'm hoping for a few more game-changing developments, though I have no idea how many might arrive in a useful form within the next 12 months. For example:

      • One or more open, secure, distributed social networks could take off.
      • Someone might release an "open" smartphone platform, providing good hardware and standard APIs but letting developers build the rest of the UI and consumers install whatever they want to.
      • We might see multimedia, storage and household devices start pushing interoperability standards as a major selling point, so I can finally connect all the bits of kit in my home wirelessly and watch/listen to/play stuff on whatever device I want, wherever the various relevant kit is physically located. (Much of this is already possible to some extent, but usually only found with very high-end devices and/or with expensive household automation systems.)

      What I would really like, from both a personal and a professional point of view, is for some people with clue to start taking technology-related law seriously as well and deal with issues like net neutrality, IP (from both the fair use and the effective enforcement angles), DRM and EULA abuse, on-line privacy, vendor lock-in and de facto monopolies, defective-by-design hardware, and so on. Alas, given the current make-up of the government in most countries that affect me, I don't see that sort of thing happening within a year, so I suspect we are stuck with broken-by-design products and dubiously controlled content for a while yet.

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would love to see an open, but secure social network. One idea is to build it using Hushmail-like technology and have every object (be it a picture, status update, note, or file) be encrypted, but have keys attached to it, including a key for the "everyone" user. So, Alice posts up a status update only for two people, it gets encrypted on Alice's end via a client, Bob and Charlie's keys are attached, and it is stored. Decryption would be transparent. The advantage of this system is that compromised servers would not mean that social data is divulged. Of course, for LEO reasons, each key would have an ADK, with it presented to the user that the crypto used is to protect against server compromise; not Interpol or the police.

      For an open smartphone platform, Maemo/Meego comes close. Android is also quite open (on an open cellphone like the ADP series, one can essentially replace any component); the closed-ness can be blamed squarely on the cellphone makers who sign kernels and other crap.

      As for interoperability, I'd love to see that. However, I have a feeling we won't be seeing any of that unless it comes with an obnoxious DRM system that doesn't just patch itself, but auto-bans what it thinks are hacks (think Valve's Anti-Cheat system and the fact that access can be removed from multiplayer games with no recourse and no appeals.)

    6. Re:Depressing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > so they too can boot using a TPM chip for key storage without needing a password on IPL.

      Honest request; can you elaborate on that please. What defence is "Bitlocker" in the common use-case of laptop theft?

      If the machine boots without a challenge, then surely all the data might as well be clear-text?

      And let me guess, you were an AS/400 administrator in an old life? IPL indeed :-)

    7. Re:Depressing by mlts · · Score: 1

      With BitLocker, Windows uses two partitions, first is equivalent to the /boot in Linux, which stores the OS kernel and some basic utilities. The second part is the usual C: volume. The Bitlocker boot process essentially scans the MBR, drops that hash into the TPM, and before each segment gets loaded, it gets hashed, the hash also sent to the TPM. As soon as the first phase of booting is complete and the machine is about to load the C: system, it asks the TPM for the key. If all the hashes match, the TPM hands the key over. Otherwise, it doesn't, and the machine asks for a recovery key to be typed in or a USB flash drive with it put in.

      The main advantage of this setup is that should someone boot the box from another disk (a recovery CD), the contents of the system volume are encrypted. Same if someone yanks the hard disk and puts it in another machine, or tampers with the MBR.

      Of course, the disadvantage is if the attacker knows an admin user's password, is able to execute code on the box with an admin context, or is able to dump the RAM.

      Bitlocker can be configured to require a PIN on bootup, stored in the TPM... too many bad guesses, the TPM starts demanding a longer and longer period of waiting. This is good on a laptop to prevent brute-force attacks.

      Nothing is perfect; but Bitlocker does add a solid avenue of security while not getting in the way for daily use. I just wish other operating systems would use similar functionality with TPMs. This way, an unattended server that has some hard disks walk off would have their data protected. Same with someone booting a box from CD in efforts to change a password without authorization.

  11. No more 2010 or 2011 articles by aethelwyrd · · Score: 1

    Especially super crappy ad heavy or flash based ones.

  12. Fleshlight with lab grown skin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    woot

  13. White iPhone by oodaloop · · Score: 1

    OMFG, I just have to have it in white! When will Steve Jobs figure out how to make white plastic?

    --
    Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
  14. Dual core cell phone ? by DarkOx · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really why would that be an anticipated product. To the end user it should mean nothing. The only time multiple cores is better is when the power use / price / performance ration of a single core system has reached a maximum for the current capabilities of a single core. In the case of phones usually you are optimizing for performance / power use. I think we can still get more umph out of building a better core than adding more cores at this stage. Unless you scheduling is teh 5ux0r its still just as good a user experience if apps are otherwise properly threaded as N cores for smallish values of N and if apps are not properly threaded its a better experience.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    1. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by mlts · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If the cores are different, it may be useful. Say a phone has two low power/low speed cores, one core dedicated to the radio, and two cores that have high speed/power. This would make the phone useful. When playing games, it could have one or both high speed cores running, but when just idle and sitting there, it could just be using one low-speed core for the OS and background apps.

      The advantage about cores is that for devices which run a number of separate discrete tasks, it provides smoother performance. To boot, cores can be turned on and off for further power savings.

      This isn't to say a fast, single core CPU is a bad thing, especially if it had the ability to power off or throttle back clock speed for battery savings. However, it might be easier for engineers to design a dual core system where one core is optimized solely for power savings and the other for performance as opposed to try to make one core do the whole show.

    2. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't have to be different. One core can be allocated to the OS and background tasks, while the other core can be used for the currently open program. This is pretty much how most people benefit from dual-core desktop machines.

      (Of course, I'm not saying one should use this heuristic core allocation algorithm. I'm just claiming it's the typical usage scenario that increases responsiveness and justifies having two cores.)

    3. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      I had not thought of that. I agree if the cores have different functions / feature sets that are not always needed at the same time, that could be a useful approach, it would be innovative in terms of cellular handsets and probably worthy of anticipiation.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    4. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Kjella · · Score: 1

      If the cores are different, it may be useful. Say a phone has two low power/low speed cores, one core dedicated to the radio, and two cores that have high speed/power. This would make the phone useful. When playing games, it could have one or both high speed cores running, but when just idle and sitting there, it could just be using one low-speed core for the OS and background apps.

      Isn't this pretty much the way cell phones already work? One extremely low power standby mode, and one active mode. I seem to remember that was talked about when the Atom was introduced and they said it was way too power hungry in idle mode, that cell phones already had idle power in the <<1 W domain and had specialized on this for years. I'm guessing more cores would only matter between the "simple" active mode and entertainment mode. The limiting capacity will still be the battery, the dual core will just let you use it up much faster.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    5. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      faster battery use is not something to strive for. Its a pain in the ass to keep charging my Epic. It lasts about 3 hours of heavy use, about 6 of light use or less than 30 hours of nothing but standby.

      Besides that, the biggest power sinks on a smartphone are the screen and radio (especially 4g), not the processor.

    6. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Until I got my first multi-core CPU computer, the most responsive computer I ever used was an 800 MHz dual processor computer I had a long time ago. Later computers I owned could certainly crunch numbers faster, but they were less responsive. The UI never lagged on the dual processor computer even if operations took longer in the end. If you're running more than one thread at all, a second processor makes for a better user experience.

    7. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by whiteboy86 · · Score: 1

      The second core is for the big brother.

    8. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by rrohbeck · · Score: 1

      Agree. Some phones are underclocked already, running at 800MHz while the processors are spec'd at 1 or 1.2GHz, to save battery life. Unless you want more gaming there isn't much use for additional CPU power in phones.

    9. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I agree that the radio+CPU idea sounds good, why not just buy ready-made radio chips from people with the fabs to make them and do all the R&D on them? You certainly wouldn't use a GP CPU for radio because software radio - as I understand it - is valued more for flexibility than anything else and would probably be trounced by an ASIC in the same way that most things are (i.e. radio, DSP, GPS etc.)

      But five cores? I don't think we'll need that much muscle for a while yet - certainly not in 2011.

    10. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the new thing here would be to have these in one processor but different cores, instead of having different processors for them. Smartphone generally already have one processor running the GSM stack and one general purpose processor, which runs the applications etc. They may already be in one "package", i.e. integrated processor for the GSM stack w/ other stuff, but so what...

    11. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by chgros · · Score: 1

      why not just buy ready-made radio chips from people with the fabs to make them and do all the R&D on them?
      Gee, I wonder why not. Maybe because they're already doing it.

    12. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was my point exactly. Why bother taping out a new design with questionable benefits when you have an apparently superior option already? In short, why integrate the radio gubbins?

    13. Re:Dual core cell phone ? by M3lf.cz · · Score: 1

      Smartphone users are quite sensitive on GUI lag & applications startup time - this are times when every spare CPU cycle comes handy. Also, multitasking is slowly becoming commonplace - browse the web + listen to music + have IM running + running but minimized navigation app.

  15. Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Huh. They forgot to mention it.

    1. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wasn't that a couple of years ago already?

      The funny fact is that some people didn't see it. It's like the jews who missed the christ and still await their messiah.

    2. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by oodaloop · · Score: 1

      Not sure why I'm responding to an AC who's responding to another AC, but with somewhere around 2% of US desktops running Linux, it's not exactly as widespread as some slashdaughters would hope. Ubuntu et al are good solid replacements for many users for XP, but it's nothing compared to the runaway success of Android.

      --
      Tic-Tac-Toe, Global Thermonuclear War, and relationships all have the same winning move.
    3. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by loufoque · · Score: 1

      Thankfully the US is only 3% of the world.

    4. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looks to me like we'll be calling it the year of Linux on the PS3. You can almost bet that whatever hardware supports the liberated console is going to sell well.

    5. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure why I'm responding to an AC who's responding to another AC

      Having your fake name attached to your post certainly made it more relevant for all the world leaders who are hanging on you every word.

    6. Re:Year of Linux on the Desktop!! by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      But we have something like 25% of the computers, and about 100% of the processor companies that make it into computers.

      India and Russia and Germany and Britain and Japan and even China are all even more Windows bound than the USA anyway.

      You should be groveling in the dirt, thanking God or Science for the existence of the USA.

  16. They missed my #1 anticipated item by DoofusOfDeath · · Score: 1

    Diablo III

    Seriously - I've only really liked a handful of games over the past decade+: StarCraft1, Diablo2, Civ III, UT2004. But I'm really looking forward to Diablo III. I think it will definitely enter my small personal Pantheon of beloved, replayable games.

  17. Extra features most anticipated in phones by rossdee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hand warmer
    lock deicer
    car battery charger/jump starter
    Hair drier
    snow blower
    fish finder
    microwave oven
    humidifier
    coffee maker

    and built in toilet

    1. Re:Extra features most anticipated in phones by Dtyst · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Extra features most anticipated in phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Extra features most anticipated in phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Next version of the pomegranate phone has all of these features.

    4. Re:Extra features most anticipated in phones by newcastlejon · · Score: 1

      I'd settle for bluetooth that actually works on my iPhone. C'mon, Apple, would it really hurt to just have OBEX? Please?

      I mean, I can live without FM radio but it sure would be nice to be able to receive videos from people who are even more apathetic about mobile email as I am.

      --
      If God forks the Universe every time you roll a die, he'd better have a damned good memory.
    5. Re:Extra features most anticipated in phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > and built in toilet

      iPoop on my iPhone...

  18. Captions by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    I'm anticipating a new technology where a PC Magazine slideshow will finally be able to include captions with its images.

    In that bright future, we won't have to speculate regarding what we're looking at.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:Captions by bruce_the_loon · · Score: 1

      They were on the top right side.

      --
      Trying to become famous by taking photos. Visit my homepage please.
  19. Tablets, Tablets Tablets by Stevecrox · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one looking forward to seeing the first proper Meego Phone? I've been putting off buying my next phone until I can have a play with one.

    We have people thinking Microsoft will release desktop windows for ARM.

    Lastly we've got colour e-ink finally making it's way on to the scene.

    What's on their list? A White iPhone, Tablets and Chrome OS tablets.

  20. Anal Intrusion Device by threaded · · Score: 0

    Karma to burn babies!

  21. "hulu for magazines"?? by BobMcD · · Score: 1

    Isn't "hulu for magazines" commonly called 'the world wide web'?

    1. Re:"hulu for magazines"?? by Domint · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing . . . any reputable magazine already has a web presence - why would I need Hulu to navigate to http://www.some-magazine.com/ for me?

    2. Re:"hulu for magazines"?? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      I think the idea is that magazine-hulu would deliver a queue of new articles from magazines the user subscribes to.

      Its the reason I use hulu. It queues up new episodes of shows I subscribe to.

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
    3. Re:"hulu for magazines"?? by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      That's what RSS is for. It queues up web pages for you.

    4. Re:"hulu for magazines"?? by Rockoon · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because every magazine has RSS feeds for articles... oh wait.. nearly all of them don't.

      The first Magazine I looked at (Card Player) only has an RSS feed for news items. Most of the articles are only available to subscribers, while the RSS feed only covers stuff available to everyone (essentially.. their in-house blogger crap)

      --
      "His name was James Damore."
  22. It's odd... by virgnarus · · Score: 1

    How the article gives somewhat 'honorable mention' to the innovative techs like the 3d camcorder and yet the main presentation ends up being a mishmash of iphone/ipad successors.

  23. Apple App Store by InlawBiker · · Score: 1

    So turning a software free market into another Apple walled garden is an advantage? Maybe they should call it "Apple Genuine Advantage."

    1. Re:Apple App Store by david_thornley · · Score: 2

      While I've rarely been so unexcited about an Apple release, it isn't supplanting the ability to put anything I want on a Mac. Heck, Apple supplies free dev tools with each Mac; I can make sure mine always has non-Apple-approved software on it (with my own bugs, too!).

      --
      "When you have eliminated the unacceptable, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truthiness" - Holmes
  24. Meh by WED+Fan · · Score: 1

    A huge list of Meh. 80% will be non-starter or failures on Tech Fails of 2011.

    --
    Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong fix.
  25. Commentary.. by Junta · · Score: 2

    Verizon iPhone, not my thing, but I get it.

    Blackberry Playbook, most interesting aspect is blackberry ripped off WebOS gestures/display for multitasking. However, I am generally skeptical that Blackberry can get out of their niche of mostly business only, they spent way too long with a behind-the-curve platform.

    Honeycomb, will see, but I don't see how people get excited over a "we'll get it right *this* time" promise.

    If they were going to say 'tablets', they could've skipped Blackberry and Honeycomb. I personally still don't get the tablet fuss and wonder if it is destined to be a dead fad. I would be more excited over phones with glasses display and 'Kinect' like controls, though I really like tactile feedback. Done right that gives 'bigger' personal experience with increased convenience and privacy.

    ChromeOS, I view as a dead-end. They should have focused more on enriched Android as a common platform. I don't think Google's name will salvage a concept even more limited than the Linux-only netbook attempts that did not do so well in the market.

    Dual-core phones, I wouldn't mind *but* I don't know the power draw difference expected. Memory has hurt my experience more than processor.

    Mac app store, please don't be *eager* for that. Why seek more and more ongoing draconian control over the product you purchase?

    Google TV falls under the Honeycomb category, "this time it will be better" with no substantive evidence is not the makings of interesting news. Generically saying improved internet enabled TV, maybe. I personally treat my display as a dumb display and prefer the 'smarts' to be small, relatively inexpensive changeable parts.

    Hulu for magazines. I think a magazine company might dream of a day where the magazine model dominates, but I just don't see that happening. A web presence in which articles are published as they are ready (not waiting for the next publish date) and adaptive formatting is well-established means e-magazines don't make a whole lot of sense.

    Sure, Intel and AMD tech refreshes belong there.

    I suspect the playstation phone will be more n-gage than DS. Nintendo 3DS is probably a more 'sure thing' for this sort of slot.

    Will see if the net neutrality stuff has any impact. Most commentary I saw was that it was enough to give some annoyance to carriers, but not enough teeth to actually do anything.

    I would be willing to be wowed by a second-chance WebOS set of devices. I loved so much about the Pre (WebOS, plug-free 'dock' that can be detected by software, remarkably malleable to consumer manipulation with blessing of vendor). If they did have a portrait slider & keyboardless phone to flesh out their portfolio, that could be exciting. Too bad I don't have hopes of more than just Android and iPhone long term in the mobile market.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  26. 3D Skype by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some newer 3D TVs support Skype video calling (with their own USB camera attached). IE: Samsung UN55C8000.

    What I would like to see is some support for 3D skype video on these 3D enabled TVs.

    With a little be of hacking I sure someone would quickly offer live interactive 3D porn on some of these 50+ inch 3D displays. Almost like leaving your mom's basement!

  27. Not just software... by Junta · · Score: 1

    I think Touchstone is a fantastic thing to have baked into your platform strategy, *particularly* with the exposition feature opened up to third-party stuff.

    It's the only platform I see that is feasible to build a blind-dock automotive application. Bluetooth pairs with stereo system, and GPS/Internet radio app auto-start when user just slaps the phone in the vicinity of a car-mounted touchstone. iPhone comes closest, but their docking is generally clumsy in cars (most of the time a cable coming out clumsily somewhere, best case a headunit that still requires relatively precise guidance to get in right.

    --
    XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  28. My COCK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's cuming to your local store in 2011?

    My cock!

    You'll want to cuddle up and sleep with my cock at night, or give it to your boss when you score that big promotion. Give my cock to your grandparents or local priest. Stick it in your mouth to help quit smoking or give your girlfriend or wife my cock today and she'll get a night she won't soon forget. Get my cock and change your life for the better (cuming this spring 2011).

  29. Halographs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I, for one, will be over the moon when halographs come out; www.lucid-code.com/Halographs. Apparently, "It's like getting a personal visit from God."

  30. Open diplomacy by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

    The most anticipated product of tech for 2011, IMHO, is this "open democracy" and "open society" thingie.

    --
    The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
  31. Basic phone that will do wifi tethering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    yeah yeah, I can get a 3G dongle; that's another device (to lose), another line (to pay for), and it only works for my laptop, not my iPod Touch.

    All the wags who have told me about various inexpensive smartphones that I can tether with -- don't bother telling me again. The truth is, I don't want a smart phone AND an iPod Touch. My Moto RAZR is the perfect size. All the smartphones are bigger. Do not want.

    Most of the time I don't carry my iPod and/or don't want to carry my laptop---

    But when I do, I want to be able to use the internet on them with the one device I'm already carrying with me -- my phone.

    And those deck-of-cards-size myfi devices are nearly as bad as a 3G dongle -- did I already mention that they're as big as a deck of cards?

    Why not just get an iPhone and ditch the iPod you ask? Obviously it's on AT&T, another thing I do not want.

    Maybe when I can get a myfi device that's no bigger than a gumstix that might be good enough, although the iPod is still too big---

  32. Clone getting burned, again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1927208&cid=34713476

    LMAO

  33. 3d Video, been here- See FinePix REAL 3D W1 and W3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    3D Camcorders? Fuji has had the FinePix REAL 3D W1 and now W3 out for 18 months. And it works nicely with the Sony 3D Bravia TVs and presumably the others. It does still and video and does it pretty well. How did PCMag miss it?

    Now 3D video and still packed in with my iPhone 5 or next-gen Android, that would be handy because it is always there. :-)

  34. That's not how Verizon iPhone will look! by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

    One thing we can be sure of is that a Verizon iPhone won't look like the one in their picture. What were they thinking putting a Verizon label on the phone itself?

  35. Keep this list for one year by houghi · · Score: 2

    This list be used by posting it in December 2011 by just changing anticipated with overhyped.

    --
    Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
  36. Looking forward to 3D iPad at Xmas 2011 by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 1

    Now that is going to be a killer app, if you will.

    That will be the tipping point (sorry, Sony) when 3D will really take off, thanks to the boost Nintendo gave it on the handhelds.

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  37. New? by Khyber · · Score: 1

    "Some are new, like the technology to bridge Wi-Fi, PowerLine, and Ethernet"

    Yea, sorry, we've had that for quite some time in software (tomato, DD-WRT, etc.) so a hardware version isn't unexpected, new, or really that anticipated.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  38. the Apple iProduct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://thewarp.org/blog/index.cfm/2007/1/11/Announcing-the-Apple-iProduct

  39. Im not waiting for a 3D tv by bobjr94 · · Score: 2

    From what Ive read seems like studios are dropping 3D releases of some movies due to the lower turnouts for 3D movies the last year. I am one of them people, avatar 3d was cool, but once movies like step-up 3D came out, it officially went from a technology back to a fad. Since I dont often sit and watch a movies in its entirety at home 3d glasses would be a pain. Put them on, take them off goto the kitchen, put them back on, them them off to look up someone on imdb, put them on, take them off let the cat in/out.......

  40. 3D violates the cool rule by xtal · · Score: 1

    Anything that makes you look like a dork will never take off.

    3D glasses are a pain in the ass if you have real glasses, and you look like a dork.

    --
    ..don't panic
  41. Already a handwarming app by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    There's already a handwarming app.

    With dual cores it will just have to add that many more digits to the pi computation I guess.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  42. Responses by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Blackberry Playbook, most interesting aspect is blackberry ripped off WebOS gestures/display for multitasking. However, I am generally skeptical that Blackberry can get out of their niche of mostly business only, they spent way too long with a behind-the-curve platform.

    One of the more interesting things about it is that you develop on it using Adobe Air, instead of the traditional Blackberry SDK.

    It'll be interesting to see if they manage a wave of developer support.

    Mac app store, please don't be *eager* for that. Why seek more and more ongoing draconian control over the product you purchase?

    But that's not what it's about. It's about a curated set of software that is all updated more automatically than current software. What's wrong with that?

    Apple knows it's a computer, you can always get software from other sources and I don't see them changing that.

    And the flip side of the Mac App Store, is the Cydia Mac App Store which I am actually pretty excited about.

    Sure, Intel and AMD tech refreshes belong there.

    Come on, who is excited about processor refreshes at this point? I lump this with dual-core phones in things that few people will really be interested in for their own sake.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Responses by Junta · · Score: 1

      One of the more interesting things about it is that you develop on it using Adobe Air, instead of the traditional Blackberry SDK.

      I suppose that could be interesting for them. I wonder if Adobe has their game together on mobile devices yet, the time from initial promise of flash first appearing on devices to first time it actually appeared was a long time. The company can't even consistently deliver a 64-bit build alongside their 32-bit build. It gives me some doubts about their ability to maintain a lot of architectures and OSes (QNX, Linux w/ X, Android, WebOS Windows, OSX, x86, arm)

      But that's not what it's about. It's about a curated set of software that is all updated more automatically than current software. What's wrong with that?

      If it were like apt or yum where any organization could set up their own repository and augment/replace Apple's source, then I would be less worried. My understanding is they do not, however Cydia is going to set up another one. I consider that to be aggravating as it means it isn't extensible. WebOS has a similar situation, the App Catalog and the Preware repository. The Preware view does endeavor to present the app catalog as a subset, but the app catalog will not. I find this a bit sloppy.

      I don't mind it as a strictly additional feature, but I'm wary of Apple having a taste of control over the iPhone/iPod (where users are *forbidden* from sideloading) and seeking to pursue that end game in OSX or alternatively giving up on OSX altogether in favor of iOS. I suppose I have little 'right' to worry or complain since I never buy apple stuff and I find plenty of competent alternatives that do what I want.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  43. Where is my flying car? by $0.02 · · Score: 1

    a whole decade overdue

    --
    If enithin kan gow rong it whil. (Murfey)
  44. You missed this one! by courcoul · · Score: 1

    I can't believe the droves of geeks orbiting the /slashdot cyberverse did NOT MENTION IPv6!!

    Ok, not anticipated but something dreaded and inevitable. Any and all products, hardware or software, needed to make IPv6 work across the board will be an inescapable necessity. Latest projection (10 min ago) indicates the last few unassigned bits of IPv4 address space will be gone before February is out.

    See here: http://inetcore.com/project/ipv4ec/index_en.html

  45. clone has 2 user accounts here? wtf! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1927208&cid=34718828 and from you posts history I see there are actually 2 clones here yours clone52431 (1805862) and yours clone53421 (1310749). Smells of dishonest trollery to me.

  46. forgive english, i am Russia-apk (captcha: deviant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    forgive english, i am Russia.

    i come to study Mechanical Engineering at American university. i am here little time and i am very hard stress. i am gay also and this very difficult for me, i am very religion person. i never act to be gay with other men before. but after i am in america 6 weeks i am my friend together he is gay also. He was show me American video game and then we are kiss.

    We sex together. I never before now am tell my mother about gay because i am very shame. As i fuck this American boy it is very good to me but also i am feel so guilty. I feel extreme guilty as I begin orgasm. I feel so guilty that I pick up my telephone and call Mother in Russia. I awaken her. It too late for stopping so I am cumming sex. I am very upset and guilty and crying, so I yell her, "I AM CUM FROM SEX" (in Russia). She say what? I say "I AM CUM FROM SEX" and she say you boy, do not marry American girl, and I say "NO I AM CUM FROM SEX WITH MAN, I AM IN ASS, I CUM IN ASS" and my mother very angry me. She not get scared though.

    I hang up phone and am very embarrass. My friend also he is very embarrass. I am guilt and feel very stupid. I wonder, why do I gay with man? But I continue because when it spurt it feel very good in American ass.

    -apk

  47. Let's be practical: 100% ELECTRIC CARS by ivi · · Score: 1

    Haven't we have enough "next big things" (that often weren't so hot after all... with tiny screens to squint at, etc.), already?

    Let's focus a moment on UK's freezing weather, AU's flooding in Queensland, & USA's Eastern Seaboard - to name a few spots with "Climate Change" screaming at us...

    Let's push for & (and, when we get the happy chance to...) ...buy Electric Cars in 2011 or ASAP.

    Bumper-Sticker Idea: " Next year in an All Electric car! "

    1. Re:Let's be practical: 100% ELECTRIC CARS by RocketRabbit · · Score: 1

      Looks like you totally missed the Hadley CRU mail scandal.

  48. Re:Translated into Geek: by indi0144 · · Score: 1

    mod up

  49. If they don't have a real article.... by Tomsk70 · · Score: 1

    ....I wish they wouldn't bother with this guff.

    After a single paragraph (and an 'Skip-this-ad'), we're treated to several blurry tablets, a couple of phones, a game-phone and a building, based on a slideshow with no text that reloads every page (meaning it's not really a slideshow).

    I didn't realise PCMag had the cheek to make copy out of techno-fap material - but more worrying is the issue of Slashdot then linking to it as if it's worth reading.

    I know it's NYE, but really guys if there's no news, don't bother with filler.