Slashdot Mirror


Tech History Behind New York's New Year's Eve Ball

Toe, The writes "A perennial icon of New Year's Eve is the geodesic ball which first dropped in Times Square in 1907. Over the past century, there have been seven iterations of this ball. The first one, made out of iron and wood, weighed 400 pounds and sported one hundred 25-watt bulbs. The current ball weighs almost six tons and uses 32,256 Philips Luxeon Rebel LEDs. The designers expect there to be more tech improvements to the ball soon. What do you think of the ball and the bizarre status it holds in our culture? How would you change it for years to come?"

106 comments

  1. 32256 LEDs? by Kazymyr · · Score: 5, Funny

    So what happened to the other 512?

    Are they on a private network?

    --
    I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    1. Re:32256 LEDs? by Phibz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They probably would go in the space occupied by the mast on each end of the ball.

    2. Re:32256 LEDs? by VanGarrett · · Score: 5, Funny

      Those addresses were lost to subnetting.

    3. Re:32256 LEDs? by Miamicanes · · Score: 1

      I guess this falls into the category of "only on Slashdot...", but yeah, it does seem kind of sad that they didn't go for the gold ring at 32,768. It's obviously not a rounding error, either, because then the news story would have said that there are something like 30000, 32000, 33000, or 35000. 32256 -- so close, yet so far... ;-)

      127 bottles of of beer on the wall, 127 bottles of beer...

    4. Re:32256 LEDs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens in 192.168.x.y stays in 192.168.x.y.....

  2. Round. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it should be very round.

  3. Just the east coast? by crow · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Growing up in Idaho, nobody particularly cared about the ball. Is this just an East Coast thing?

    1. Re:Just the east coast? by Tripp-phpBB · · Score: 1

      I live on the east coast and I would probably have to say yes. Over here we love to watch the countdown and ball drop.

    2. Re:Just the east coast? by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      i grew up on the east coast and never gave a shit. Probably a new york city thing.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    3. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Does anyone in Idaho care about anything? Seems like living there is a good reason to give up on life.

    4. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was born in New York City. I like watching it come down, but don't care if it's ten 100 watt light bulbs or 32,000 LED's, as long as it's visible on TV. (which means even a 40 watt bulb would be sufficient given the TV technology.) I prefer not to have the flashing lights, just a lit ball.

    5. Re:Just the east coast? by Kazymyr · · Score: 3, Informative

      I lived in NYC for about 10 years, and not many people I know did. It's mostly a Big Media thing.

      --
      I hadn't known there were so many idiots in the world until I started using the Internet -Stanislaw Lem
    6. Re:Just the east coast? by Swave+An+deBwoner · · Score: 1

      I live in NYC and couldn't care less about the New Year's ball or the whole wasted, drunken night of partying. It's a boon to the liquor industry though.

    7. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Is this just an East Coast thing?

      Yes. It happens in their time zone. New Yorkers probably don't care much about the "dropping of the big spud" in Pocatello either.

    8. Re:Just the east coast? by Threni · · Score: 1

      It's a little gaudy, isn't it? Perhaps an improvement would be one which was a little less tacky. Also, why is it dropping? What's that symbolic of? Wouldn't one which rose from the floor to some maximum height, combined with a light show/fireworks etc be a little more interesting?

    9. Re:Just the east coast? by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 5, Funny

      "dropping of the big spud"

      In Eugene Oregon where I grew up, we had the "lighting of the big joint", but a few years back they updated the technology to the "torching of the big bowl" with a giant 10 foot tall water bong. It's an Oregon thing...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    10. Re:Just the east coast? by oldspewey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Also, why is it dropping? What's that symbolic of?

      The US dollar?

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    11. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Arizona, and always watch the ball (they always rebroadcast the drop again for our time zone)

    12. Re:Just the east coast? by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0

      What's that symbolic of?

      It's symbolic of a man's balls dropping when the heat of the New Year's Eve sex causes his scrotum to relax and slap against the taint of his partner.

      Wouldn't one which rose from the floor to some maximum height, combined with a light show/fireworks etc be a little more interesting?

      A telescoping tower would make much more sense in that context.

    13. Re:Just the east coast? by eyeball · · Score: 2

      When I lived in NY I wasn't into the New Years Eve thing either. It was fun however to stick my head out the window right before midnight and hear the background noise of the city get a little louder.

      --

      _______
      2B1ASK1
    14. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New Yorkers probably don't care much about the "dropping of the big spud"

      I just "dropped a big spud". I named it "Michael Kristopeit". It was a "floater".

    15. Re:Just the east coast? by Chapter80 · · Score: 2

      Being from the Midwest, I had heard of the ball on occasion, but it wasn't until I was about 35 that I saw what the deal was. I pretty sick one New Years Eve, and I stayed in. And, Boy, was I disappointed.

      I thought they dropped a glass ball on Times Square. All they do is lower the damn thing. Whoopie. No shards of glass. No mess. What a disappointment.

    16. Re:Just the east coast? by Nyder · · Score: 1

      "dropping of the big spud"

      In Eugene Oregon where I grew up, we had the "lighting of the big joint", but a few years back they updated the technology to the "torching of the big bowl" with a giant 10 foot tall water bong. It's an Oregon thing...

      Naw, your fellow stoners, er, peeps up in Seattle do that same thing.

      End the year like you start the year. =)

      --
      Be seeing you...
    17. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I live in Texas and unless you're a doctor, it's pretty much illegal to watch balls drop.
      But seriously, when I was growing up, the only people interested in the New York celebration were one or two generations older than mine with age equating to level of excitement.

    18. Re:Just the east coast? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Well, if you're not in EST, the timing isn't even right, so I would imagine that it would have to be more than a little region-specific.

      Still, I can't bring myself to care. It's nice to be at a party with people who do care, though, because it really boosts the energy level.

    19. Re:Just the east coast? by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      I'm not familiar with the history, and just guessing, but... here in Britain, back before GPS, we had a big ball at Greenwich which dropped at precisely noon every day. Ships on the river could watch it through their telescopes and set their clocks by it, thus providing the most accurate possible time reference for navigation. Maybe the annual ball-drop is inspired by that?

    20. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Growing up in Idaho, nobody particularly cared about the ball. Is this just an East Coast thing?

      That's interesting because, growing up in the east coast, nobody particularly cared about Idaho.

    21. Re:Just the east coast? by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      They arm instead.

    22. Re:Just the east coast? by mattack2 · · Score: 1

      "Care about" is probably too strong (though it has been sad to see Dick Clark slurring in his brief propping up on the show the last year or two).. but it is/was something to watch, sometimes had interesting musical guests (and sometimes not just lip syncing). Nowadays, just like everything else, I record it and FF through for the few interesting bits. For pure entertainment value, the one on CNN with Anderson Cooper & Kathy Griffin is funnier.

    23. Re:Just the east coast? by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Growing up in Idaho, nobody particularly cared about the ball. Is this just an East Coast thing?

      It's covered by several major TV networks as the centerpiece of the New Year's Eve programming, and it's even repeated (and watched) in the Pacific Time Zone. So no, it's not just an East Coast thing.

    24. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Over here, we wired that up to the telegraph network, with the ball dropping at noon and at midnight every day in every major rail station so the town could see it. So it became a Big Thing to watch it happen on midnight. Then everyone stopped caring as we got good clocks that didn't need to be corrected all the time.

    25. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it not be wonderful if the money and time spent doing the stupid ball went to help the homeless folk there in NYC?

    26. Re:Just the east coast? by socsoc · · Score: 1

      They just delay the broadcast for other time zones.

    27. Re:Just the east coast? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As SOC said.

      And seriously lame, and downright untruthful, Fox"News" was showing it taped delayed in CST, with a banner saying LIVE. Sheesh!

    28. Re:Just the east coast? by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Wait, did you just say FOX News lied? I'm shocked! Shocked, I say! Shocked that suck a distinguished and reputable news source would be so disingenuous.

      Next thing you know, you'll tell me that Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny, and the Tooth Fairy aren't real, or that there hasn't been a truly fiscally conservative Republican since pre-Reagan.

      No, I'm quite certain that you're just misunderstanding the meaning of the word "live". It was live when it was recorded.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Nuke it from orbit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its the only way to be sure !

  5. Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a West-coaster, the ball seems stupid and pointless

    1. Re:Dumb by oldspewey · · Score: 2

      Most traditions are stupid and pointless from an outsider's viewpoint.

      But to answer the question posed in TFS, "How would you change it for years to come?", I would have it spray viscous white fluid all over the assembled masses at the stroke of midnight.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    2. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      As a ball, the west coast seems stupid and pointless

    3. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make the following requirements:
      - everyone attending must be a good-looking, 18 to 29 years-old female with big to huge breasts
      - everyone must be dressed in either a school, maid or nurse uniform
      - the Eve Ball must have tentacles

      Oh wait, you said New York, not Japan.

      Carry on.

    4. Re:Dumb by garcia · · Score: 2

      Nothing worse than in the Midwest where we're only delayed an hour and yet we watch the ball go down in NY and then wait through an hour of more after-ball-dropped third string acts to see the ball drop again. God it's painful.

    5. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a landmass, both coasts are a symbol of my oppression.

    6. Re:Dumb by Ethanol-fueled · · Score: 0

      by oldspewey

      But to answer the question posed in TFS, "How would you change it for years to come?", I would have it spray viscous white fluid all over the assembled masses at the stroke of midnight.

      I see what you did there, pervert.

    7. Re:Dumb by ushering05401 · · Score: 1

      Pervert and a Prude. Come on 'spewey, you can't go making too many distinctions with a nick like that. At a certain level it all spews, man - it all spews.

    8. Re:Dumb by ColdWetDog · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nothing worse than in the Midwest where we're only delayed an hour and yet we watch the ball go down in NY and then wait through an hour of more after-ball-dropped third string acts to see the ball drop again. God it's painful.

      What kind of twisted masochist are you that watches that stupid thing more than once? Don't you have anything else on the TV where you live? Gillagan's Island reruns? Hell man, you could log into Slashdot. Even that would be better. You need help.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    9. Re:Dumb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't watch it go down. I'm too busy jerking off to your +4 karma on Slashdot and wondering why I'm not as cool as you. Fucking moron.

    10. Re:Dumb by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Don't you have anything else on the TV where you live?

      Nope. They had a second TV station in our state for a little while, but it was too liberal, so nobody watched it. I think it was called PBS or something.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  6. Hover Ball by android.dreamer · · Score: 2

    In the future, the ball should float in the air just like my hover car.

  7. Grumble by Zouden · · Score: 2

    What do you think of the ball and the bizarre status it holds in our culture?

    Very little. Are there really no better stories to post at the moment?

    The first one, made out of iron and wood, weighed 400 pounds ... The current ball weighs almost six tons

    So the current ball is... much lighter? Or is it heavier? If you're not going to use the metric system, at least use consistent units.

    Yes yes, get off my lawn. Happy new year.

    --
    "A week in the lab saves an hour in the library"
    1. Re:Grumble by whitehaint · · Score: 0

      2,000 pounds is one ton, so the ball used to weigh 0.2 tons. I wonder how the hell you get a ball with some damn lights to weigh that much....

    2. Re:Grumble by Lumbre · · Score: 1

      Well if you're going to be picky, they're using significant digits. 400 is accurate to within 50 pounds; 6 tons is accurate to within 0.5 tons, 1,000 pounds.

      Essentially, 400 pounds +/- 50 pounds and 12,000 pounds +/- 1,000 pounds.

    3. Re:Grumble by arielCo · · Score: 4, Informative

      six tons in pounds
      Yup, Google is a cooler overlord than Yahoo ever was ;)

      --
      This post contains no rudeness or derision of any kind. All arguments are friendly. Terms and exclusions may apply.
    4. Re:Grumble by oldspewey · · Score: 1

      I wonder how the hell you get a ball with some damn lights to weigh that much....

      Shhhh ... you're going to ruin the surprise.

      --
      If libertarians are so opposed to effective government, why don't they all move to Somalia?
    5. Re:Grumble by Scratch-O-Matic · · Score: 1

      The old one weighed a little more than 28 stone; the new is nearly 860 stone.

      --


      Evil is the money of root.
  8. Zerglings. by Octopuscabbage · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It should drop and explode and 500 zerglings should pop out. It would be cool, because I live far away, and im sure our marines would have teched by then.

    1. Re:Zerglings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hopefully we'll have finished researching Stimpacks at the tech lab by then.

    2. Re:Zerglings. by Octopuscabbage · · Score: 1

      Hopefully they aren't speedlings.

  9. Say, whaaaa? by msauve · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Foley says it's a team of about six people who operate and take care of the ball year round."

    They must be members of the Ball Handlers Union.

    --
    "National Security is the chief cause of national insecurity." - Celine's First Law
    1. Re:Say, whaaaa? by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, I'm pretty sure the TSA is not involved in any way.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Say, whaaaa? by migla · · Score: 1

      >"Foley says it's a team of about six people who operate and take care of the ball year round."

      I wouldn't trust much of what this Foley person says. Must be pretty dumb not to be able to count the number of people with exact precision, when they seem to be as few as "about six".

      --
      Some of my favourite people are from th US; Vonnegut, Chomsky, Bill Hicks.
  10. Six Tons? by FatLittleMonkey · · Score: 1

    Six tons? What's it made of, depleted uranium?

    --
    Science is all about firing a drunk pig out of a cannon just to see what happens.
    1. Re:Six Tons? by SuperSlacker64 · · Score: 1

      Ooo! That could be a fun improvement! In years to come it could just be made out of active uranium, and then you won't even need all those thousands of light bulbs!

    2. Re:Six Tons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stupid expensive crystals. RTFA

    3. Re:Six Tons? by crovira · · Score: 1

      No, its real U 238.

      Gives my friends and I a real glow (in the dark!)

      --
      MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  11. More Surprising... by damn_registrars · · Score: 2

    I'm more surprised by How much weight the ball has gained in the past 30 years. The ball used through 1980 weighed only 150 pounds. Our newest iteration weights over eleven thousand pounds. I know plenty of people who have put on some weight lately, but I don't know anyone currently over the age of 30 who saw their own weight increase one-hundred fold in the past 30 years.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
    1. Re:More Surprising... by durrr · · Score: 1

      A quick guess is that like most things gaining weight, it also became a lot bigger.
      And being a ball, it won't die of cardiovascular complication before becoming really really huge.

    2. Re:More Surprising... by Lumbre · · Score: 1

      Well, look at these people. They've tried.

    3. Re:More Surprising... by Spazmania · · Score: 1

      Wacky. According to your link, it gained an order of magnitude in weight in from 1999 to 2000 when the aluminum ball was replaced with a crystal ball (150 lbs to 1200 lbs) and then it gained another order of magnitude in weight when it was replaced with a larger crystal ball between 2008 and 2009 (1200 lbs to 12000 lbs).

      --
      Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    4. Re:More Surprising... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Thankyou. Someone who doesn't mix their units in the same sentence. I now know how the units relate without having to resort to google. How many tonnes is 400 pounds anyway.

    5. Re:More Surprising... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I presume you're a Brit.

      Bet you're happy that you switched to decimal from Lsd.

      That whole 12 Pence to a Shilling and 20 Shillings to a Pound was just wacked.

      Not to mention farthings and florins and crowns.

  12. The next one should be a hypersphere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Get to it, engineers

  13. Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do you think of the ball and the bizarre status it holds in our culture?

    None. It's a Dick Clark thing.

    How would you change it for years to come?

    For the exception of this comment, I have never thought of it nor will I ever. I don't give a shit. Of all the shit happening in my life, this low tech ball with light bulbs (LEDs? BFD!) is completely meaningless to me. Jan 1 is just another fucking date on the calendar.

    Tonight, I'll watch a movie with my wife and then go to bed at 10PM and wake up tomorrow with the same fucking problems I have today. Valentines Day means more to me than this holiday.

    1. Re:Oh God! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, perhaps you could use those two hours that you waste watching a movie to do something to address the problems that beset you?

      No, that would be much too proactive. Better just watch some canned "entertainment" to avoid thinking about it.

  14. Old news? by WoOS · · Score: 1

    From the linked article:

    "On November 11th, 2008, The co-organizers of New Year’s Eve in Times Square (Times Square Alliance, Countdown Entertainment) unveiled a new Times Square New Year’s Eve Ball at a press conference at Hudson Scenic Studio in Yonkers, New York."

    So the new ball already bounced around on two new year's eves. But hey, its about the history anyway.....

  15. Ships set your chronometers by twrake · · Score: 5, Informative

    Watching a dropped ball was a historical way of setting a marine chronometer up and until the advent of radio signals. Pre 1920 watching a dropping ball was essential tech.

    from :
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marine_chronometer

    It was common for ships at the time to observe a time ball, such as the one at Greenwich, to check their chronometers before departing on a long voyage. Every day, ships would anchor briefly in the River Thames at Greenwich, waiting for the ball at the observatory to drop at precisely 1pm.

  16. Interesting, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...I wanted Snooki inside of it!

  17. Just do the whole thing in CG by Animats · · Score: 1

    Just do the ball in CG. It's a made-for-TV event anyway. Going to Times Square on New Years Eve sucks.

  18. Tweets of course! by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

    I think it should be connected to tha intarweb and allow the world to tweet to it. The tweets then displayed on the surface. Censor filter at their discretion. lol. -AI

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  19. LCD Ball by Stenchwarrior · · Score: 1

    They should make the next ball one big spherical LCD TV, so they can project whatever they want all the way around.

    --
    Loading...
  20. One word . . . by Rob+the+Bold · · Score: 1

    Lasers!

    --
    I am not a crackpot.
  21. Which Ball Game? by ZappedSparky · · Score: 1

    That green I sunk in the corner pocket last week was a shot worthy of....eh? Oh a big lightbulb. Meh.

  22. depleted uranium by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    only if they're planning on taking out all the spectators.

  23. Yankees by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

    I want to see the NY Yankees smash that ball to bits with their baseball bats while it's still plugged in. Cats and laz0rz is always welcome.

  24. Next year ... by PPH · · Score: 2

    ... a Death Star!

    That's no moon!

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  25. Plasma, one way or another. by falzer · · Score: 1

    I'd use 1 to 3 high powered electrodeless fluorescent lighting tubes at the center of an empty ball, and have the skin of the sphere be made from some sort of light-diffusing glass or plastic. Electrodeless fluorescent lighting is very efficient and long-lasting.

    Actually, come to think of it, since it used one day a year, so what if the light source has 100,000 hours of useful runtime? Damn this fixation on longevity and efficiency!

    I would make each vertex of the geodesic sphere a tungsten electrode (cooled if necessary) and have fairly high powered plasma arcs flowing across the ball's surface, switching directions, forming patterns, and suchlike. The viewers should avoid staring too long.

  26. Rebel LEDs by Undead+Waffle · · Score: 1

    The current ball weighs almost six tons and uses 32,256 Philips Luxeon Rebel LEDs.

    Why are we buying LEDs from rebel scum?

  27. Improve it by Walzmyn · · Score: 2

    What would I do to improve it?
    Drop the damn thing. It's boring as hell watching it slowly slide down a big pole. Actually drop it like a gallows drop or a bungee jumper diving off.

    1. Re:Improve it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes. Because nothing says "Happy New Year!" like bombarding Times Square with 6 tons of broken glass.

  28. So much for LED energy efficiency by russotto · · Score: 1

    100 25W light bulbs = 2500W
    32256 Phillips Luxeon Rebel LEDs, 3V @ 350ma = approx 34kW, not counting the driver circuitry that the 25W bulbs didn't need.

    Bring back the incandescent bulb!

    1. Re:So much for LED energy efficiency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They could have a duty cycle that reduces it. Also does it have to run one of those LEDs at 350 mA?

    2. Re:So much for LED energy efficiency by JerRocks · · Score: 1

      From TFA: "Changing to an LED ball was not only more green, the decrease in electricity costs allows the city to host the ball on top of One Times Square, where 100,000 visitors marvel at the sparkling ball all year. In tune with the changes, the 2011 ball will be lit completely off the grid by bike pedal-generated electricity contributed by those who visited the exhibit and pedaled at the station."

  29. and increase in ad speak by cinnamon+colbert · · Score: 1

    original ball: 25 Watt Light bulbs
    Now: Luxeon Rebel LEDs
    It is the "luxeon rebel" part that really bothers me , indicative of the overwhelming pressure to put advertising everywhere at all times

    1. Re:and increase in ad speak by socsoc · · Score: 1
      Phillips. It's Philips Luxeon Rebel LEDs, get it right consumer.

      -Phillips Marketing Dept

  30. You forget the largest component by kriston · · Score: 1

    Don't forget the New Year's Eve Ball's largest component: a decades-vacant One Times Square building.

    --

    Kriston

  31. In 20 years.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We could ignite a fusion reaction creating a miniature sun.

  32. Other time balls by calidoscope · · Score: 1

    In the late 1800's, several cities in the Northeastern US had balls that were dropped at noon as defined by the electric time service. Time standards were distributed by a special telegraph line from an observatory in the Alleghenies.

    --
    A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  33. Two words: Independent Contractors. by denzacar · · Score: 1
    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  34. Now how many CCs is it, by crovira · · Score: 1

    and how much would it weigh if it was actually a dodecahedron with LEDs for facets?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  35. Dr. Octavius? by denzacar · · Score: 1

    Is that you?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  36. Kewl! They should drop it from the top by crovira · · Score: 1

    of the new World Trade Tower right into one of the memorial pools, once its finally up.

    THAT should show Bin Laden, eh?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  37. Greenwich Observatory and other time balls by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    The Times Square ball is a decorative and symbolic version of a practical time signaling system used at Greenwich Observatory, in which a large ball, visible from a long distance, was dropped rapidly under the force of gravity--not the slow, majestic descent of the Times Square ball. Apparently this system worked well because the ball could be released directly by electricity, and observed visually (no speed-of-sound delay). See the Wikipedia article time ball

  38. What's up with ending posts with dumb questions? by detroitindustrial · · Score: 1

    >What do you think of the ball and the bizarre status it holds in our culture? How would you change it for years to come?

    I think I liked slashdot a lot more back when every post didn't end in a stupid question.

  39. Classical style by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High tech would be fluorescent lighting

  40. A bit like [Port] Adelaide's Semaphore Time Ball? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Semaphore (near Port Adelaide, in metro Adelaide, South Australia) has a clock tower (not far from its -working- Merry-Go-Round... but I digress), with a time-ball that's still capable of working...

    Before GPS's,the idea was to help synchronize ships' clocks (needed, then, for navigation)[before they left the area, by sea... :-)]

  41. Ewen from Bagel Tech News by BagelTechNews · · Score: 1

    OK So you know that the Ball you have in Times Square is a representation of the Ball at Greenwich in London which descends twice everyday as an indication to all ships captains setting sail from London as the correct time. Hence Greenwich Mean Time which is the zero time zone for the world. So as for the ball being in YOUR culture, I have to take issue in a good natured and nah nah ne nah nah kinda way