Slashdot Mirror


YouTube Legally Considered a TV Station In Italy

orzetto writes "Italian newspaper La Repubblica reports that YouTube and similar websites based on user-generated content will be considered TV stations (Google translation of Italian original) in Italian law, and will be subject to the same obligations. Among these, a small tax (500 €), the obligation to publish corrections within 48 hours upon request of people who consider themselves slandered by published content, and the obligation not to broadcast content inappropriate for children in certain time slots. The main change, though, is that YouTube and similar sites will be legally responsible for all published content as long as they have any form (even if automated) of editorial control. The main reason for this is probably that it will force YouTube to assume editorial responsibility for all published content, which facilitates the ongoing € 500M lawsuit of Italian prime minister Silvio Berlusconi against YouTube because of content copyrighted by Berlusconi's TV networks that some users uploaded on YouTube. Berlusconi's Spanish TV station, TeleCinco, was previously defeated in court on the grounds that YouTube is not a content provider."

14 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Pretty much completely infeasible. by nonzzero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The best response to this would be "No more YouTube for Italy!"

    1. Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Do you really think this isn't the intended result of this law? Silvio "Mr. Corruption" Berlusconi owns most major TV stations in Italy. He's in the perfect position to get rid of competition.

    2. Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. by by+(1706743) · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I could imagine YouTube voluntarily blocking Italian IPs (or Italy blocking YouTube), and a YouTube-via-proxy How-To being published in Italian (imagine that!). The result could be that YouTube "complies" with Italian law, Italians retain access to YouTube, and Berlusconi looks like an idiot.

      Here's to hoping!

    3. Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. by Yvan256 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I never understood how governments allow such conflict of interest... if you're a politician, your job is politics. Owning companies should make you ineligible to work in politics in the first place, or there should at least be requirements to occupy a function that's completely unrelated to the companies you own.

    4. Re:Pretty much completely infeasible. by statusbar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And any italian citizen sending a message to Berlusconi will get a "visit in the night" just like any other Berlusconi opposers receive.

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
  2. Wow by TheL0ser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    the obligation not to broadcast content inappropriate for children in certain time slots

    Given the nature of the internet being worldwide, that would be.... never.

    But seriously, how do they expect to enforce this??

    1. Re:Wow by TheL0ser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Not a problem. YouTube doesn't "broadcast".

      They're not a TV station either, but that doesn't seem to have registered with them either.

    2. Re:Wow by hedwards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's Italy, so the appropriate term is "Berlusconi's bitches."

  3. This is what happens... by rm999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is what happens when the leader of a country also controls the largest media conglomerate of that country. Control the media, and you control the people. Control the people, and you *keep* control of the media.

  4. Re:Call it by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So what you are saying is that Google now has the power to bring down a democratically elected government?

    No, he's saying its people do. And this is how it's supposed to be.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  5. Re:Call it by dkleinsc · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, that's what Silvio wants them to do. His goal is to eliminate major public venues in Italy that can be critical of him, he does most of that by owning the mass media, but he doesn't (and probably can't) buy Google. So if nobody in Italy can access Youtube, from Berlusconi's point of view the problem is solved.

    --
    I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
  6. Re:Call it by gman003 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Google went toe-to-toe with the People's Republic of China, arguably the second-most-powerful nation on the planet. And they won. Sure, China didn't exactly lose, but Google got exactly what it wanted.

    Maga-corporations have nearly as much power as governments. Fortunately, Google seems to be one of the "good guys", for a slightly looser definition of "good" than I prefer.

  7. Re:Take that Italy by Life2Short · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If YouTube is an Italian TV Station, where are the breasts?

  8. David Eddings suggested this. by Rhodri+Mawr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    David Eddings suggested the ultimate version of this in the Tamuli series in the Second Chapter of 'The Shining Ones'

    On the Tegan government:

    'Our elected officials have no outside interests. As soon as they're elected, everything they own is sold, and the money's put into the national treasury. If the economy prospers during their term in office, their wealth earns them a profit. If the economy collapses, they lose everything'
    'That's absurd. No government ever makes a profit.
    'Ours does,' she said smugly, 'and it has to be a real profit. The tax rates are set and cannot be changed, so our officials can't generate a false profit by simply raising taxes.'
    'Why would anyone want to be an official in a government like that?'
    'Nobody wants to be, Prince Sparhawk. Most Tegans do everything they possibly can to avoid election. The fact that a man's own personal fortune's in the treasury forces him to work just as hard as he possibly can to make sure that the government prospers. Many have worked themselves to death looking after
    the interests of the Republic.'