Slashdot Mirror


Mozilla To Release Firefox 4 Next Month

Neil writes "Damon Sicore, Senior Director of Platform Engineering at Mozilla, has announced that the company is almost ready to ship Firefox 4. On its mailing list, Mozilla has revealed it has around 160 hard blockers to fix, before proceeding to Release Candidate stage. Both the RC and the final version would arrive in February, according to Sicore. Mozilla was originally planning on having Firefox 4 out by the end of last year, but it had to delay the release till 2011. Last month, Firefox 4 Beta 8 was released for Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux 32-bit/64-bit, with support for 57 languages. Mozilla's roadmap says it still wants to release a Beta 9, a Beta 10, and at least one Release Candidate build before the final version."

10 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. meh by sortadan · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Been using the beta. No real complaints, seems a bit snappier, but on the whole no big whoop. If anyone knows how to get the status bar back that would be nice. And for some reason they always put find at the bottom of the page, which is totally not intuitive since users enter info at the top with the search and address bars...

    1. Re:meh by just_another_sean · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And for some reason they always put find at the bottom of the page ...

      I always looked at that as a nod to vi. In addition to putting the "search this page" on the
      bottom you can activate it by hitting the / key, just like doing a find in a vi buffer. As a
      long time vi user I actually appreciate this and find myself missing it now that I use Chrome
      more often.

      For really hard core vi users their is also this for FireFox: Vimperator.
      For me it was a little too hard core and I never got used to it but never the less I
      appreciate the effort put into it!

      --
      Creationist Textbook Stickers Declared Unconstitutional by CowboyNeal
  2. Re:This didn't release yet? by Monkeedude1212 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For a while, I maintained that I would switch back to Firefox once it matched the speed and minimalist interface that Chrome had, as I didn't like using a browser from Google.

    You know there ARE more than 2 choices, right?

    Did you consider Opera?

  3. Re:how by Mr.+Spontaneous · · Score: 4, Informative

    You'll have to get addons for both. They want to phase out the status bar, and they figured not providing that functionality was for the best. The titlebar is part of an ongoing WONTFIX, because they think Tabs on Top deserves more love. Thankfully, tired of people's complaints, they whipped together this addon that does the trick: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/221514/ (Vista+)

    --
    Its all fun and games until someone loses an eye... then its just fun.
  4. No Status Bar = FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know you can get an add-on to replace it.

    But that requires each and every user to look for and install something that should already be there!

    For the developers to take the status bar completely out... that's just ridiculous.

    At the very least, put a little check box in the options page to turn it back on.

  5. Re:how by Hatta · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They want to phase out the status bar, and they figured not providing that functionality was for the best

    Wow, that's simply awful. The status bar is there for a reason. Do they really want people following links with even less information than they have now? If my browser is stalling out trying to load a page, how will I know what domain to block?

    Looks like Mozilla is continuing to dumb down its user interface. Is there a browser around that targets the geek market? One for those of us who want more information and more control?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  6. Re:I sure hope... by LordLimecat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Its NOT the seamonkey model; unlike opera, mozilla, seamonkey etc, it doesnt have built in mail, torrent, ftp (at least not worth mentioning), an HTTP server (opera...), newsreader, etc.

    Its JUST a browser, like its always been.

    And I raise a motion that all complaining that 3.0 is too slow and bloaty, should be forced to use version 1.0 or 1.5 or 2.0, and see just how slow they really are when used with modern expectations of heavy duty JS, 30 some tabs, and zillions of extensions. I seem to recall an AWFUL lot of complaining from days of yore about 1.0 and 1.5's memory usage and bloat.

    What is it they say, "the grass is always greener..."?

  7. Status bar by bazmail · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Bring back the god damn status bar. Change for change's sake is never a good idea.

  8. Re:how by beardz · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's a show stopper for me.

    Same here for quite a while - fortunately Status-4-Evar plugin showed up to remedy that particular ill.

  9. Re:Status of the status bar by ampathee · · Score: 4, Informative

    Chrome lacks a status bar only when the status bar would be empty. As soon as there is something to put in it, it appears.

    Mouse-over a link, and it shows you the target. Click a link, and it tells you what the progress is, until it's finished. Then the status bar disappears again.