Eric Schmidt Out, Larry Page In As Google CEO

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Eric Schmidt Out, Larry Page In As Google CEO

Posted by timothy on Thursday January 20, 2011 @10:45AM from the as-if-you-care dept.

jfruhlinger writes "Google surprised just about everybody at its earnings call by announcing that Eric Schmidt, who had served as company CEO for more than a decade, would be stepping down and that cofounder Larry Page would take over. Schmidt will stay on as chairman and provide 'technology thought leadership,' whatever that is. When Schmidt, an old Sun hand, joined Google in 2001, it was seen as a move to turn the scrappy upstart into a mature company; now on his Twitter feed Schmidt proclaims that his 'adult supervision' is no longer needed."

42 of 185 comments (clear)

Min score:

Reason:

Sort:

Well, I guess we can say... by teh31337one · 2011-01-20 10:46 · Score: 4, Funny

Schmidt Happens
1. Re:Well, I guess we can say... by PatPending · 2011-01-20 10:57 · Score: 2
  
  The trend is clear.
  
  --
  What one fool can do, another can. (Ancient Simian Proverb)
2. Re:Well, I guess we can say... by Anonymous Coward · 2011-01-20 13:18 · Score: 2, Funny
  
  Maybe if it is, they'll make one of 4chan
  The Antisocial Network.
3. Re:Well, I guess we can say... by mwvdlee · 2011-01-20 21:29 · Score: 2
  
  A twitter movie... It's going to have great dialog; no sentences longer than 140 characters.
  
  --
  Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
Freaked out for a second by kenrblan · 2011-01-20 10:48 · Score: 2

I briefly confused Larry Page with Larry Ellison. Whew. That would be terrible.

--
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
1. Re:Freaked out for a second by spun · 2011-01-20 10:52 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  I briefly confused Larry Page with Larry Ellison. Whew. That would be terrible.
  How could you confuse a rock and roll guitar legend with a diminutive, bombastic sci-fi writer?
  
  --
  - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
2. Re:Freaked out for a second by spun · 2011-01-20 11:02 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  I did as well. Do no evil, Larry Ellison edition...
  You misspelled know.
  
  --
  - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
3. Re:Freaked out for a second by Locke2005 · 2011-01-20 11:03 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Jagger is the darker-skinned one with the wider nose.
  
  --
  I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
4. Re:Freaked out for a second by Lemmy+Caution · 2011-01-20 11:04 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Thank you for the briefing, Ambassador Obvious of the Planet Literal.
5. Re:Freaked out for a second by nathana · 2011-01-20 11:08 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  I did as well. Do no evil, Larry Ellison edition...
  You misspelled know.
  You misspelled "now."
6. Re:Freaked out for a second by camperslo · 2011-01-20 11:35 · Score: 4, Funny
  
  Will an analysis of the swap reveal Page faults?
7. Re:Freaked out for a second by CFTM · 2011-01-20 12:49 · Score: 2
  
  I suppose it depends on the generation you grew up in, to me MJ will always be Michael Jordan...
Not unforeseen by bsDaemon · 2011-01-20 10:48 · Score: 3, Interesting

With all the bad press from stupid shit that Schmidt has said in recent years, this isn't exactly an unforeseen turn of events. If Larry Page has been thumbing his nose at the world at large with his blatantly anti-privacy statements, he's been much more quiet about it, as I haven't heard anything to make me automatically suspicious of him.
yeah by Ryanrule · 2011-01-20 10:52 · Score: 2, Insightful

startup : "dont be evil" :: mature corp : "x" solve for x
Beginning of the end? by bigsexyjoe · 2011-01-20 10:55 · Score: 5, Insightful

He says he doesn't need "adult supervision" anymore? Well the child is the worst to judge these things.
If Schmidt is such a good CEO, why change the setup? Page just thinks he'd be a better CEO because it is human nature to believe such things. I think this is an ego driven move and it could turn out very badly. At least they are keeping Schmidt on in a high level role.

--
Democracy Now! - your daily, uncensored, corporate-free
1. Re:Beginning of the end? by Lemmy+Caution · 2011-01-20 11:07 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  Perhaps because Google has been playing catch-up for too long, and Schmidt's strategy has been too caution, too safe, too corporate. There have been a lot of failures and disappointments coming out of the Googleplex recently, and Google needs to recover some of the optimism and energy of its earlier years. Morale is rather low; a lot of their best researchers have left. The "always in beta" aspect doesn't work anymore, because it contradicts their "the cloud is ready for primetime" narrative.
  A big change was needed. I'm just surprised they did it.
2. Re:Beginning of the end? by alvinrod · 2011-01-20 11:17 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  The probably dropped him as CEO because he just comes off as creepy and not giving a damn about privacy; and this from the CEO of a company that's collecting information about everything and everyone. His insights and abilities are probably appreciated, but when he's in front of a camera he ends up saying something stupid that makes Google look evil. Here's an example from the WSJ. Here's another from the Atlantic. The crap he says makes him sound like someone who's Google's enemy and trying to scaremonger the public.
3. Re:Beginning of the end? by farnsworth · 2011-01-20 11:24 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  He says he doesn't need "adult supervision" anymore? Well the child is the worst to judge these things.
  No, it is Eric Schmidt who said "Day-to-day adult supervision no longer needed!" It should be taken as "The founders no longer need an experienced management guy to run their company. They have matured over the last few years, and I think they'll do fine on their own."
  
  --
  There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.
4. Re:Beginning of the end? by Red+Flayer · 2011-01-20 11:45 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  Offtopic, I know, but re: your sig:
  
  There aint no pancake so thin it doesn't have two sides.
  Obviously you have not had the pleasure of eating a Möbius pancake. Once you can figure out where the butter and syrup go, they are delicious.
  
  --
  "Trolls they were, but filled with the evil will of their master: a fell race..." -- J.R.R. Tolkien on Olog-hai
5. Re:Beginning of the end? by VGPowerlord · 2011-01-20 11:53 · Score: 2
  
  Obviously you have not had the pleasure of eating a Möbius pancake. Once you can figure out where the butter and syrup go, they are delicious.
  You order them on the side, of course!
  Oh wait, you make them yourself?
  
  --
  GLaDOS for President 2016! "Well here we are again. It's always such a pleasure." -- GLaDOS, 2011
6. Re:Beginning of the end? by TheRaven64 · 2011-01-20 11:58 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  JWZ wrote that the beginning of the end of Netscape was when they stopped hiring people who were there because they wanted to change the world, and started hiring people who were there because they thought it was a cool place to work. I've visited Google offices a few times in the last couple of years, and everyone I've asked has told me that they're there because it's a cool place to work...
  
  --
  I am TheRaven on Soylent News
7. Re:Beginning of the end? by TheGratefulNet · 2011-01-20 12:17 · Score: 4, Interesting
  
  I interviewed there a few times (separate occasions). it IS a cool place TO BE. to work? not sure, but certainly VERY comfortable to BE.
  I am quite sure its why most people are there. that and they can turn a blind eye to the fact that they are the power behind 'ad[vertising] men'. yup, just a newfangled advertising company. but its VERY cool to be on that campus, eat free lunches (gourmet, really), collect free cool phones and toys and have super company name recognition.
  but how many *believe* in what they do, or the ulterior motives of the megacorp? do they realize that they help the Big Co eat away our privacy? they look the other way and plan what they'll have for lunch.
  easy to understand if you've been there or even been around it.
  but again, few who see what the company is really about would be behind it. if it wasn't such a comfy status-clad place, few would want to contribute to what google is actually about.
  (data collection on you and targeted advertising. you think that's all noble lofty stuff? really?)
  
  --
  
  --
  "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
8. Re:Beginning of the end? by Lemmy+Caution · 2011-01-20 12:31 · Score: 5, Insightful
  
  Those are the steps of a business trying to improve morale, not the steps of a business with high morale.
9. Re:Beginning of the end? by bonch · 2011-01-21 09:21 · Score: 2
  
  Because you're an advertising company that's collecting and indexing the world's personal information, anonymous Google employee.
Schmidt to take over Apple? by BitterKraut · 2011-01-20 10:59 · Score: 4, Interesting

I don't see how this could be a smart move for Google. Page and Brin may have become too big for their boots, but I suspect something else. Perhaps Schmidt will follow Steve Jobs to lead Apple.
1. Re:Schmidt to take over Apple? by Stregano · 2011-01-20 11:07 · Score: 2
  
  Same great iSeries of products, now with less black turtlenecks
  
  --
  The world is how you make it
2. Re:Schmidt to take over Apple? by DragonWriter · 2011-01-20 11:41 · Score: 4, Informative
  
  I don't see how this could be a smart move for Google. Page and Brin may have become too big for their boots, but I suspect something else.
  
  The official explanation seems plausible: its streamlining operations and clarifying roles and responsibilities in an organization where three people have been functionally working together as co-leaders (and, in a sense, will continue to do so.)
  
  Perhaps Schmidt will follow Steve Jobs to lead Apple.
  Staying on as "executive chairman" without being CEO and still keeping primary responsibility for most of the "business" (non-technical) operations suggest that that's not all that likely.
Re:First Jobs, now Schmidt by MrEricSir · 2011-01-20 11:00 · Score: 4, Funny

I think they should keep Ballmer for the entertainment value.

--
There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
In other news by should_be_linear · 2011-01-20 11:05 · Score: 4, Funny

Hours after suspension of adult supervision, new CEO Larry Page gave Android Platform to Apple in exchange for remote controlled car and a two video games.

--
839*929
1. Re:In other news by Anonymous Coward · 2011-01-20 12:56 · Score: 5, Funny
  
  In his defense it was a really cool remote controlled iCar.
Hopefully Schmidt's privacy ideas leave with him by schwit1 · 2011-01-20 11:11 · Score: 5, Insightful

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/09/google-mocked/
"If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."
"I think that over time, on the internet, there will be less anonymity. And I actually think that's good"
Re:First Jobs, now Schmidt by exomondo · 2011-01-20 11:29 · Score: 4, Funny

while(1){ printf("developers "); }
ObStarWars by martin-boundary · 2011-01-20 11:32 · Score: 2

Schmidt: " Good, I can feel your anger. I am defenseless. Take your weapon. Strike me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!"
Page: "Zing!"
If that were the case, he'd never have joined by rsborg · 2011-01-20 11:39 · Score: 4, Informative

I'm sure Schmidt was comfortably rich after being the CTO of Sun and the CEO of Novell.
Guys like him don't do it for the (extra) money, but because they want to be/do something important.

--
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
Clearly threatened by a real competitor in search? by rsborg · 2011-01-20 11:40 · Score: 5, Interesting

DuckDuckGo :-)

--
Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
Re:First Jobs, now Schmidt by oatworm · 2011-01-20 11:56 · Score: 3, Insightful

Oh, so...

While 1
MsgBox "Developers!", vbExclamation, "Developers!"
Wend

That a little more Microsofty?
Re:Hopefully Schmidt's privacy ideas leave with hi by _Sprocket_ · 2011-01-20 12:58 · Score: 5, Interesting

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/09/google-mocked/
"If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place."
What's more interesting is the next piece:

But if you really need that kind of privacy, the reality is that search engines, including Google, do retain this information for some time. And [...] we're all subject, in the US, to the Patriot Act, and it is possible that that information could be made available to the authorities.
Schmidt is telling us that Google is being served PATRIOT Act notices without breaking the law and telling us that they're being served. It's a pity everyone is hung up on the nothing-to-hide idiocy. Of course, it's little wonder we're missing the important pieces when served up ham-fisted attacks by the likes of Consumer Watchdog.
Sell GOOG by BulletMagnet · 2011-01-20 12:59 · Score: 4, Interesting

Hmmmm....Maybe Schmidt sees the handwriting on the wall, like he did with the last employer he left....
Re:Hopefully Schmidt's privacy ideas leave with hi by martin-boundary · 2011-01-20 13:34 · Score: 3, Interesting

It's a pity everyone is hung up on the nothing-to-hide idiocy.

The reason everyone is hung up on that "idiocy" is that Schmidt is a hypocrit.
It's all right for him to tell others that they should kiss their privacy goodbye, but when his own privacy is breached in the same way, he doesn't think twice about retaliating with all of google's resources.
Moreover, it's a bit rich for the CEO of a search company to claim that privacy can't be respected by search engines, when he's making the rules as CEO. Corruption starts from the top, and he's responsible for a lot of bad choices Google has made towards privacy in the past and present, and that "idiocy" tidbit sums up his actions pretty well.
Re:First Jobs, now Schmidt by shutdown+-p+now · 2011-01-20 15:18 · Score: 2

That would be WriteConsole,actually.
But you still know that it's a Microsoft API because it's a function that takes 5 parameters, only one of which is the string that you want to print, and at least one of which is "reserved". ~
The problem with Schmidt is ... by Super+Dave+Osbourne · 2011-01-20 15:19 · Score: 2

he brought in a very unethical and overtly authoritarian leadership to what could have been a very 'don't do evil' company with great potential and shaped it to be the latest extension of the NSA for the US governmint/CIA. Its sad, but its true.
What harm has google done you? by walterbyrd · 2011-01-21 03:46 · Score: 2

I really want to know.
I see all kinds of posts screaming, and crying, about having their privacy invaded by google. I am bewildered. What has actually happened to these people? Are they just parroting the Microsoft propanganda, or has google really hurt these people?
If you are complaining about google invading your privacy, then please tell us, anonymously if you like, exactly how google hurt you personally. Don't just echo the anti-google slogans, tell us exactly how google hurt you.