Slashdot Mirror


Slashdot Launches Re-Design

Today we are pleased to announce the launch of the third major re-design in our 13.5 year history, and I don't think it looks half bad. The new theme represents a serious gutting of the underlying HTML and CSS, as well as all-new graphics. There will be many design wiggles, bug squashes, and compatibility glitches that survived testing, so bear with us for a bit. Please direct your bug reports and feedback (good and bad!) to Garrett Woodworth who is currently in charge of such things. Thanks to him, Wes, Vlad, Dean, Phil and Tim, who have each worked hard to get this out the door. Juggling the needs of users, editors, and various business functions is a hard job, and you guys did good.

50 of 2,254 comments (clear)

  1. This is slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was sure there'd be ponies in the new design.

    1. Re:This is slashdot? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Informative

      No ponies, but sidebar-hides-content seems a fairly close substitute.

    2. Re:This is slashdot? by Timothy+Brownawell · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and even better, the keyboard navigation seems to be all jacked up. It's like April come early!

    3. Re:This is slashdot? by arth1 · · Score: 5, Informative

      you could still turn off the ajax crap in 2.0
      now you can't

      worse still, the design overrides your minimum font size (which is completely unforgivable), and is absolutely unusable on high dpi screens.

    4. Re:This is slashdot? by Local+ID10T · · Score: 5, Informative

      worse still, the design overrides your minimum font size (which is completely unforgivable), and is absolutely unusable on high dpi screens.

      This is terrible... before I could at least zoom the text, now if I try the columns overlap and cuts off text.

      Big suckage.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    5. Re:This is slashdot? by noidentity · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've found that blocking images.slashdot.org, a.fsdn.com, c.fsdn.com, and s.fsdn.com, and using the classic (D1) view with JavaShit disabled, it loads quite quickly (and it should, as it goes from around 300-400K to about 76K to load for the main page). Sure, it looks like crap, but it works and there's not lots of Web 2.0 crap. Though it seems now none of the stories on the main page show the number of comments. Oh well. What do you expect when the world is constantly moving towards more bloated, frilly designs?

    6. Re:This is slashdot? by whiteboy86 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Bad HTML design, K-Meleon and older Opera render the site completely unreadable (total mess) can't even line buttons well or see the text... have to launch Safari to reveal the page. This is terrible. Also the logo is degraded, too small, this is major design error. The static frames are not very good idea. iPad version on the other hand looks satisfactory, clearly, the designed runs OSX and iOS, but the community around Open Source use other browsers. Please polish.

    7. Re:This is slashdot? by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As for turning off "the ajax crap", well, we'll all just get off your lawn now... but I doubt the rest of the internet is going to oblige.

      If slashdot -- the largest website specifically for the kind of people who do care about the potential for the security blowback of using javascript -- doesn't understand their core userbase enough to make their website functional without javascript, then they can pretty much count on losing that core userbase and ultimately becoming irrelevant.

      99% of the time javascript is form over function (or worse, developers over-engineering because they never learned basic design principles) - there is nothing about Slashdot's functionality that could put it into that 1% where javascript is essential.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    8. Re:This is slashdot? by anti-pop-frustration · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This re-design = New Coke

      It is *incredibly* slow and heavy for no good reason and they pushed put it out way too soon (hello major display bug).

      I'm sorry but this is fucking terrible.

      At least give us the option to turn most that crap off and go back to the old design.

    9. Re:This is slashdot? by IgnoramusMaximus · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I can no longer stand Slashdot because of this. I have a very high resolution monitor and the text is simply unreadable because of this. In the past I used the "nosquint" Mozilla plugin to correct this issue but it is no longer possible with this new nonsensical design.

      The new layout is a study in all the worst excesses and stupidity foisted on the Internet users by "professional" designers: non-optional ajax, non re-sizable contents, breakage of most basic principle of "presentation device neutrality" that is behind markup languages such as HTML, etc and so on.

      It is a total disaster.

      If this is not reversed pronto, my days here are numbered.

    10. Re:This is slashdot? by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      My question is.

      How the fuck can I turn on the classic Slashdot look and feel? I don't care about what changed under the sheets, but I can't find shit on the pages anymore, and is a PITA to read easily.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  2. Horrible. by Adambomb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    wayyyyy too much white space and low-contrast text on white.

    --
    Ice Cream has no bones.
    1. Re:Horrible. by EvanED · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's also too hard to tell the indentation level of comments, and the text box on the "edit comment" page is too narrow.

    2. Re:Horrible. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. /. now hurts my eyes to look at it. I had to increase the light in this room to read the comments.

      What's with the borders? I don't need another border. On my right I've got the /. border, the scroll bar, and the window border. Stop stealing my pixels please. Two of those borders are useful, the /. one isn't.

      I don't like top borders as well. Those are just fake toolbar plug-ins. When I read /., I open the main page then any articles in other tabs. If I want to search for something else I go back to the main page's tab a go from there. When I'm reading an article/comments, all I care about is the article/comments. If you want a few things at the top of the page, such as Log In that's great, but I don't need to see it while reading comments. All I want to see is more comments. You're just taking up more of my screen space and making me scroll more. Please stop.

    3. Re:Horrible. by Imagix · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't go so far as to call it horrible, but I do agree that there's too much white space around everything. Example, there's a large blank white space under the summary and before the comments, to the left of the Share links and such. The Share links, the "This story has XXX Comments", "Read similar Stories" and "You may also like to read" could probably be collected into 1 horizontal line. to eliminate the gaping hole in the page.

    4. Re:Horrible. by afidel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree, WAY too much white, in comments and slashboxes as well.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:Horrible. by ronocdh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know it's been said, but you asked for feedback! Way too much white. Very unpleasant on the eyes, especially on a large monitor in a dark room (like the average Slashdot user). Also, the padding around various elements seems excessive. We're tech-friendly people, so remember that we don't mind cluttered interfaces! =)

    6. Re:Horrible. by arth1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      seconded. It doesn't help that the font size is so small either -- the white becomes even more prominent.

      What's wrong with letting the users choose the font size that works for them without overriding it with what amounts to flyspeck on 140 dpi and higher?

    7. Re:Horrible. by Graff · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think pretty much every update Slashdot gets more unusable. All I want out of this site is a clean way to browse stories and read and write comments. I don't want "web 2.0", tags, autoupdating pages, and all that other clutter.

      Can we please at least get a versioning system that allows us to freeze our interface at a certain point?

      I guess the next step is we'll just have to scrape the RSS feed or whatever and build our own interface. Not that I really want to re-invent the wheel or anything.

  3. Stupid fixed-position crap by Osty · · Score: 5, Informative

    And Slashdot has now gotten on the "waste your screen space with bullshit" fixed-position bandwagon. Luckily this is easily solved. Install Stylish and add the following to a new user style:

    @-moz-document domain("slashdot.org")
    {

    div.col_1
    {
    position: absolute !important;
    }

    header.h
    {
    position: absolute !important;
    }

    }

    Now the sidebar/header scroll with the page, rather than remaining fixed in place.

    1. Re:Stupid fixed-position crap by RazorKitten · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yea, what's worse is on my netbook the static bits on the left means I can't actually see everything there due to the screen size. ~RK

    2. Re:Stupid fixed-position crap by nabsltd · · Score: 5, Informative

      Or, if you don't want to waste the space for the sidebar at all, try the following:

      div.col_1
      {
      display:none !important;
      }

      div.col_2
      {
      margin-left:-120px !important;
      }

  4. Re:Unicode? by Desler · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Of course not. Doing useful things like adding Unicode support is apparently less important than adding more Web 2.0 junk to the site.

  5. Review of New Slashdot by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Funny

    No new content.. More whitespace than before. Lame.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  6. Thanks for the redesign! by Bin_jammin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    My already overtaxed old Powerbook can't handle the new site's layout, and it looks like I'll have to either avoid Slashdot, one of my daily religious reads for over a decade, or buy a new piece of equipment just to read a text format site. Seriously? It's text, wtf was so important that it's got to be redone to look fancy? Why not some flash animation while you're at it? Can we switch to an html view? I'm glad you felt the need to flash the place up, but this is pretty stupid.

    1. Re:Thanks for the redesign! by DJGreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      leave java-script turned off. works nice and fast, looks clean, don't need the latest core iWhatever to render it.

      --

      Yes, one day I may actually learn to spell...
    2. Re:Thanks for the redesign! by NeMon'ess · · Score: 5, Informative

      One tab of comments is using about 15% of one of my two cores which are running at 3 GHz. Two tabs uses another 15% and four tabs maxes out that core. Which sucks since I prefer to read the front page and open multiple tabs of stories and comments all at once.

  7. Stupid Floating Headers by dangthill · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is the obsession with obnoxious floating headers that always stay at the top of the screen? Whatever utility they provide is outweighed by the fact that it screws up the paging behavior when you hit the spacebar to scroll. It's annoying to have the bottom two lines of text scroll behind the floating bar--not everyone reads to the absolute very, very bottom before hitting space.

    1. Re:Stupid Floating Headers by pz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I agree. It's like another toolbar on my browser, effectively reducing the available screen area. Same for the excessive (and visually distracting) excessive whitespace. Now if I ever managed to USE the icons / links at the top of the Slashdot page (and now on the Slashdot toolbar) more than once every 3 months, it might be good to have them handy. But that really almost never happens, so it's wasted area.

      It's a symptom of developers who have big monitors: they forget that many people don't have a huge amount of screen real estate, and actually like to look at content.

      Thumbs down on the new look.

      --

      Put my fist through my alarm clock with its ding-dong death inside my ear. - The Blackjacks.
  8. Impressed by Admiral+Lazzurs · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to say I have always generally been impressed with the /. redesigns and this is no exception. Well done team, thanks again not just for a great site but for continuing to make it look and work better for all the users.

  9. Looks pretty bad here. by John+Hasler · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is shaving off the left edge of every article part of the plan, or just a bonus?

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  10. Re:Unicode? by zach_the_lizard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Armenian text:
    Georgian text:
    Hindi text:
    Japanese text:
    Korean text:
    Greek text:
    Hebrew text:
    Vietnamese text: Vit Nam
    Cyrillic script:

    Notice how /. scrubbed the text away for most of these (including a single Vietnamese character).

    Still broken.

    --
    SSC
  11. Missing one thing by pancake_lover · · Score: 5, Funny

    Overall I like it. But it wouldn't hurt to throw in a few ponies around the page. And maybe a little bit of pink wouldn't hurt.

    --
    Homer no function beer well without.
  12. Classic Discussion System (D1)? by dysfunct · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why can't I select the classic discussion system (D1) any more? Please don't say this has been discontinued :(

    --
    :/- spoon(_).
    1. Re:Classic Discussion System (D1)? by Zephiris · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They let you select the classic Slashdot style before, instead of the awful and slow abomination that replaced it...if they're getting rid of both for this pile of crap,with no way to select the classic classic, personally, I'll be finding some other way to get vaguely sane/interesting news. .-. That's rather depressing, since the first thing I've done for the last decade (at least) on installing/reinstalling any browser is switch the homepage to slashdot.org.

      It's depressing to know that most 'web designers', at least those of the '2.0' variety, have absolutely zero sense for aesthetics or usability.

      --

      "A Goddess rarely smiles for she is forced by others to be an island unto herself." - Zephiris
    2. Re:Classic Discussion System (D1)? by rsmith-mac · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try the following:

      http://slashdot.org/users.pl?op=editcomm

      That's the D1 preferences page. As far as I can tell, there's not actually a link to it anywhere on the site.

  13. Re:Unicode? by yuhong · · Score: 5, Informative

    The funny thing is, from the HTML:
    <meta charset="utf-8">
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">

  14. Re:Not bad by snl2587 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I agree with that for the most part, one of the things I've always liked about threaded discussions on Slashdot is that, because of the moderation system, really great discussions could be seen and take place nested 4 or 5 threads under the original post. Since 3rd-level comments and above aren't visible in the redesign without clicking through, it's now much less likely that discussions beyond 1st or 2nd level will even be seen.

  15. Slashdot Launches Re-Design: SSDD by Tumbleweed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Validate -> "94 Errors, 14 warning(s)"

    Some things never change. :/

  16. Re-purpose left bar by T+Murphy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I browse slashdot by going to the main page, scrolling down the list of stories, and opening any interesting ones in new tabs. I never browse by category, so I never expect to use those links on the left that sit there wherever I am on the site.

    How about giving me the option of using that space to notify me of stuff? Stuff like new stories being posted, replies to my comments, my comments being moderated and comments being posted with split infinitives (so I can mod them into oblivion) . Being optional, people opting for a low-overhead (and poorly grammared) site don't have to worry about it.

    I'm aware the most popular suggestion for changing that left bar is "remove it", but I'm on a wide screen so that would just give me more white space and nothing useful- I expect I'm not the only one. So, anyone else have ideas for something useful to put over there?

  17. Seems very fragile by thetoastman · · Score: 5, Informative

    First of all, as many people have commented the text is small and the whitespace is huge.

    Second of all, even in Chrome it eats CPU and memory. Why is it necessary for an idle page to consume so many resources? I can no longer have anything else running besides Slashdot. While I don't visit as often as I used to, this will make Slashdot much more difficult to visit.

    In order to fix the font size, I tried Shift-Ctrl-+. That did increase the font size, but it broke the fixed left sidebar. The left sidebar then scrolled with the rest of the page. Resetting the page back to my default font sizes with Ctrl - fixed the scrolling problem.

    I'm curious. What user interface / site requirements were you trying to address with this new design? A quick look at the generated HTML makes me cringe. Hopefully the back end Perl code is much cleaner.

    In short, it seems that there has been a lot of effort spent for very little end user enhancement.

    Preview also seems to be slower.

  18. Re:The horror! by quantumphaze · · Score: 5, Informative

    On the topic of scrolling, like in Idle in the old version, the top bar thing breaks the behaviour of page up/down. Usually when you press page down the browser keeps a little of the previous page in view to help you keep track of reading. Now it is the exact opposite, where you actually lose a few pixels when you press page down. I might as well attach a belt sander to the scroll wheel.

    When I click on the arrow buttons on the scroll bar it will sometimes use so much CPU that Firefox becomes unresponsive to the fact that the mouse button is no longer clicked on the scroll button and will continuously scroll down slowly for about 4 screens worth before stopping. (It could also be the shitty 2D of Nvidia's Linux driver factoring in, but it hasn't happened to any other pages.)

    Firefox is eating 26% CPU (52% of one core) doing barely anything.

    Why is there a preview button in the preview? It does nothing when I click on it

  19. Fuck this shit! by internewt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, I've been looking for an excuse to stop using slashdot.... it's the same bullshit over and over, and the few gems that do crop up have gotten so rare that trawling through the shit spewed by consumer-capitalist apologists is just too much.

    I do not use javascript, and will not spend any effort on making this site work without it. I discovered with D2 that if you have D2 on in you prefs, set the threshold to -1, and use /. without JS enabled in the browser, you get a better experience than D1 in one way - all the comments load on 1 page. But without JS you couldn't mod, nor look at mod histories, without opening the comment in another tab and allowing JS temporarily.

    What I got on the /. homepage just was a huge white position:fixed box thing floating over the content, blocking most of it. Presumably that box is hidden when JS is on, but I am not going to fight with another site that is trying to be a "web application" just for.... fuck knows why. Bandwagon jumping, I'd say. Perhaps /. think they can get 500mill out of Goldman too, if only they appeared "trendier"?

    I've got 1 mod point, I'm gonna go mod taco a troll or something, and that's it.

    --
    Car analogies break down.
  20. Re:Hidden content by Announcer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Same problem, here. It's also sluggish. The only "cure" to the sidebar overlap, is to reduce the size of the text to "microdot" and use my jeweler's loupe to read it. :P

    Seriously, WHY do so many sites default to a 5 point font size? The site should allow users to enlarge fonts, and the formatting adjusts... like it did when we had PLAIN HTML.

    --
    Willie...
  21. Re:Not bad by macshit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Have you seen where the "Show X More Comments" button is? I hope there's some way to just get all the comments without having to scroll all the way down again and again (if there is, I haven't found it yet).

    It's especially silly because there are now two non-scrolling fixed panes (sidebar and topbar), but they're filled with relatively useless and redundant links (and lots of empty space), whereas the two controls that would actually be pretty useful if always available -- the "show more comments" button and the "minimum score" slider -- are relegated to inconvenient positions at the end/beginning of the scrolling page!

    My impression is that the person who did the redesign is not so bad at graphical design (it's fairly clean and polished looking), but isn't very experienced with UI / usability issues...

    --
    We live, as we dream -- alone....
  22. Re:The horror! by Firehed · · Score: 5, Informative

    Huh. Sure enough, having 3 slashdot tabs open is eating an entire core for me (out of 8, so meh - but still...). Spending five seconds with Chrome's JS profiler reveals the guilty party: adupdate:

    adupdate(){
            if($("#tophat #fad1 img, #tophat #fad1 iframe, #tophat #fad1 embed, #tophat #fad1 div, #tophat #fad1 table").width()!=728) {
                    $("#tophat").remove();
                    setTimeout("adupdate()",0)
            }else{
                    $("#tophat").show();
                    setTimeout("adupdate()",0)
            }
    }

    So, run this very computationally-intense function (that selector is pretty bad, and the width calculation is disgusting) in a continuous loop. Nice work, guys. The goal of this is what, exactly? Continually scan the width of the banner ad, and if it's not 728px, hide it, otherwise show it? Oooookay....

    I could see this as valid to run... once. Even once every five seconds, if there's a good reason for it. But calling itself again after a 0ms delay? *sigh*

    Please fix this, guys.

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  23. History by jwdb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Oy, what happened to "yesterday's news"? I can't filter by date any more?

    1. Re:History by dragor42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This was my first question too. I get behind in reading slashdot and like to go back. Now I have to keep loading stories until I get back to where I was. When I get months behind, that's just crazy. PLEASE create a way to easily read old stories!

  24. Past dates by tvarsa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Today I was reading the news of 2010-12-10 (yeah, I have a lot to catch up with). When I clicked to get the news from 2010-12-11 I was redirected to today's news and for the life of me I cannot see how I can get back to that date using some on-screen control. I hope I have missed something because if this option is not available then I'm outta here. The "Many more" button link at the bottom of the page shows how you can get articles from a specific date but you have to type this yourself. And from there you can't move to the previous or next date without retyping the url. That's not right surely...

  25. Re:Not bad by CCarrot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Since 3rd-level comments and above aren't visible in the redesign without clicking through, it's now much less likely that discussions beyond 1st or 2nd level will even be seen.

    Yes, this is definitely a loss of utility for the site. I wish I could mod you higher than 5, to bring this to the developers attentions...hello? Anyone paying attention out there?

    I know when I get a fistful of mod points to spend, I enjoy looking through some of the 'low-level' discussions (or, I guess it would be 'high-level' if it's 4th level or above, whatever) for particularly insightful or informative posts, and often that's where I find some hidden gems.

    Unless Slashdot is trying to get people to start a new thread every time they want to reply to someone else's post? That could get real old, real fast...we already have quite enough redundancy when people fail to scan the comment history before posting their 'unique' insights on the topic at hand...

    btw, could someone please post a quick 'hello world' response to this, so I can see how notifications have changed? 'k thanks!

    (oh, wait, I'm in the dreaded third level! oh well, maybe I'll go re-post this as a new thread...;)

    --
    "I love animals! Some are cute, others are tasty, what's not to like?" - Betsy Schroeder, Jeopardy contestant