Slashdot Mirror


Congressman Introduces Video Game Warning Label Legislation

Gamasutra reports that Congressman Joe Baca (D-CA) has introduced legislation that would require video games with a rating of T or higher to have a warning label that alerts buyers to the dangers of simulated violence. The warning would read: "Excessive exposure to violent video games and other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior." Congressman Frank Wolf (R-VA), who introduced similar legislation in 2009, co-sponsored the bill, and said, "Just as we warn smokers of the health consequences of tobacco, we should warn parents — and children — about the growing scientific evidence demonstrating a relationship between violent video games and violent behavior. As a parent and grandparent, I think it is important people know everything they can about the extremely violent nature of some of these games.”"

9 of 208 comments (clear)

  1. Citation Needed by drmacinyasha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Can we get some citation on the whole "linked to aggressive behavior" bit? Last I heard... The opposite was shown.

    1. Re:Citation Needed by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However, they have been shown to cause aggressive behavior in children and young teens (who are still learning what is socially acceptable behavior).

      Even a child's mind is not that fragile (let alone a teenager's). Given the number of children and teenagers that play violent video games, the amount of them that are violent and possess minds that are that fragile appears to be abysmally small and not worth worrying about.

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
    2. Re:Citation Needed by Kilrah_il · · Score: 4, Informative

      A quick search shows many articles on the subject. While I didn't read all of the, a quick look showed that many are observational, prompting the famous "causation != correlation" argument, but some are intervetional and show a causative link between video games and aggressive behavior.
      On /. there have been a few articles on the subject, many showing positive correlation, but some didn't show a connection. As someone wrote before me, given so much evidence, can we still cry vehemently against the "weak science" regarding video games and violence? Aren't we better than other groups that do not let evidence stand in the way of a good argument?

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
  2. Priorities by MrDoh! · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Huge unemployment, wars still raging in Iraq/Afghanistan, debt at crippling levels, and people losing their homes at huge levels, great to see the important stuff like video games is being addressed.

    But...

    Every time a politician brings this up, it just shows how out of touch (old?) they are. Hopefully this won't be too much of a problem in not too many years as people who grew up gaming end up in positions of power and see that it's just a pastime. Golfing/Tennis/few rounds at the bar. It's just so not worth spending any time over, and shows they probably shouldn't be holding any positions where their opinions matter if this is the best they can come up with on something todo.

    --
    Waiting for an amusing sig.
    1. Re:Priorities by Supurcell · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For real. It'll be a golden age once my generation takes power. At least until the generation after mine shows up with all the things I don't like.

  3. I propose another warning by Totenglocke · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I propose we put a warning before every comment on the news (print, online, or televised)by a politician that says "Warning: Being a politician has been linked to severe defects in reasoning ability and to rampant paranoia of all things invented after 1950. All statements should be assumed false until verified by independent sources".

    --
    "The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants." ~Thomas Jefferson
  4. Warning by ensignyu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Excessive warning labels may lead to a distrust of warning labels.

  5. Re:relationship between violent video games and... by Volguus+Zildrohar · · Score: 4, Funny

    Everything except pay for it!

    --
    When confronted with one problem, some think "I'll use recursion". Now they are confronted with one problem.
  6. Fox News? by Sockatume · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I saw a study recently that showed Fox News viewers held significantly more incorrect beliefs about recent news than viewers of other channels, and that this effect scaled with the amount of viewing. Very neatly showed a causal effect. If it had been about a food additive and brain damage, we'd already have people screaming about a ban. Perhaps there should be a mandate that Fox carry a disclaimer at every ad break: "Studies show that watching Fox News results in you believing things that aren't true." The research is just as solid and incontrovertable as the research on violent video games.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?