Slashdot Mirror


Egypt Shuts Off All Internet Access

h00manist writes "Several sources are reporting Egypt has shut off all Internet access. There is still no official confirmation. Blackberry, twitter and SMS seem confirmed off. So, if you were there, what would you do to get communications for everyone? Do you still have a POTS modem?"

22 of 840 comments (clear)

  1. HAM by Amorymeltzer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Seems like this is the moment the HAM radio folks always shine. I don't know what kind of following they've got in Egypt but I imagine it'd be pretty useful. That and texting.

    --
    I live in constant fear of the Coming of the Red Spiders.
    1. Re:HAM by devilspgd · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh well, if it's prohibited then I'm sure /no one/ will lie about their call sign while trying to evade a gov't ban on communication.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
  2. Ham radio by mapuche · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This works until the soldiers come for you.

  3. Learning from History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    We still had revolutions before the internet. What do they really think this will accomplish? If anything depriving these good people of essential services will just be like throwing petrol on a fire...

  4. Internet kill switch by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Doesn't this make you want to have an internet kill switch in the US?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  5. Re:If you were there... by Facegarden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    you wouldn't be reading Slashdot, and thus wouldn't be able to answer the question of "what would you do if you were there"...

    The question wasn't: "If you were there, how would you answer this question."

    It was: What would you do if you were in Egypt and found that your connection had been cut off.

    Me, I'd shout the packets.
    -Taylor

    --
    Worldwide Military budgets: $2100 billion. Worldwide Space Exploration budgets: $38 billion. Really, world? Really?
  6. Re:This is unacceptable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just keep in mind, President Obama is now seeking additional powers to give him the ability to shut off the Internet in the United States in the event of an "emergency".

    We seem to be getting closer to States such as Egypt faster than they are becoming like us.

  7. Wrote about this in 2006... by goodmanj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wrote the following back in 2006. At the time, I was mostly writing about the invasion of Iraq, and the saber-rattling with Iran, but it turns out to say a lot about other places too.

    ==================

    Suppose, for the moment, that spreading American values — by which I mean democracy, freedom of expression, and social mobility — throughout the globe is a good idea. How do we achieve that?

    Let’s take a look at our enemies, and see what they fear about the U.S. Yes, our military might is kinda scary, but we’ve shown again and again that as a nation we lack the commitment (by which I mean “tyrannical jack-booted disregard for human life”) to use it effectively. What else have we got? A giant market economy focusing mostly on communication, entertainment, personal expression, and self-improvement, which the world’s dictators, religious fanatics, and thugs see as hedonistic, socially disruptive, and downright insidious.

    Damn right it’s insidious. And we ought to be insidiating like crazy. The requirements for democracy and social mobility are communication, a sense of personal self-worth, and an active free-market economy. Our pop culture, and the stuff we sell, are our best tools for sneaking these values into societies, under the noses of the dictators and the zealots.

    What better tools for personal expression than the cell phone and the Internet blog? What better way to get uncensored information about the world than the satellite dish? What better tools for demonstrating the joy of self-determination than the hit TV show and the Hollywood blockbuster? What better role model for oppressed women than the stars of CSI and ER? Hell, what better role model for what a police force should be than CSI? And what better motivation for starting your own business (black-market or legit), for getting a leg up, than the need to pay for all this crap?

    Maybe the Cold War wasn’t won by geopolitics. Maybe it was won by black-market Levi’s blue jeans and bootleg copies of “Born in the USA” by Bruce Springsteen. Maybe our best hope for eliminating the Iranian nuclear threat isn’t B-2s dropping bombs, but FedEx cargo planes dropping cell phones and laptops. Actually, the world is doing a pretty good job in bombing Iran’s youth with pop culture; maybe all we need to do is sit back, sell more phones, and wait for their oppressive government to be swept aside, or simply ignored and rendered obsolete, by the new Coke generation.

    *That’s* what they fear about us. Not that we’ll bomb them into oblivion, but that their own kids, raised on our pop culture, will vote them off the island.

    ================

    I want to emphasize that this is about spreading American *values*, not American hegemony. The Egyptian riots are a problem for America as an empire, but if we play it right it can be a huge win for American ideals.

    1. Re:Wrote about this in 2006... by h4rr4r · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh noes! The Cultural Imperialism, they will end up being able to vote, have women that are educated and maybe even the Joe Sixpack of Egypt would be able to live a pretty decent life. Some peoples cultures suck, face it.

  8. Re:If you were there... by Qzukk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If I was in Egypt, I'd be pretty pissed at them canceling my circuses and would probably go out and break stuff.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  9. Revolution will not be televised. by headkase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Or in today's language: the revolution will not be tweeted.

    Does anyone think it is still a good idea to give the President an "Internet Kill Switch"?
    Really, those in power tend to cling to it even if their forms are outmoded for the population they rule. I think our democracies only grow stronger through a little unrest and political replacement every once in a while. What do you think?

    --
    Shh.
  10. Re:This is unacceptable by cpu6502 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You overlooked Turkey which wants to become a State of the EU, and has to prove itself to be tolerant of other religions and basic human rights (as required by the Lisbon Treaty).

    And YES I have a POTS modem, but it isn't much good without the internet. It would connect to my ISP and then have no website to access. And of course all the old BBSes I used to call directly have disappeared.

    Some of the old Usenet and Fidonet newsgroup BBSes might still be alive, but I have no idea what their phone numbers are.

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  11. And then there's the Catch 22 by DesScorp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There. Is no such thing as a progressive muslim state. They are all horrendous in one form or another. Human rights, crime, despotism, corruption, justice, the works.

    The reality of Egypt is that the choices are grim and grimmer; support Mubarek, and you support an oppressive regime. It may be an iron fist in a velvet glove, but the fist is still made of iron. However, if you support real democratic elections in Egypt, then you're almost certainly going to get an Iranian-style theocracy that'll never have real elections again. And that's the way the vast majority of Egyptians want it. Take away the secular despot, and you're almost guaranteed to get a country run by the Muslim Brotherhood.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:And then there's the Catch 22 by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Iranians will have real elections again, we just slowed down their progress.

      That is the point that is lost of our government. At some point, the US govt. (MY govt) needs to learn when to get the fuck out of the business of trying to run other countries, and let the citizens figure it out on their own. I may take a couple of lifetimes, but our history is flooded with us interfering with other countries, and it always backfiring.

      And no, I'm not an idealistic kid. I'm in my 40s, ex military, and the son of retired military. It would also be nice if our military was used for defense, instead of nation building after we destroy the country to begin with.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    2. Re:And then there's the Catch 22 by boxwood · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Democracy is three wolves and a sheep voting on what to have for dinner?

      Democracy just isn't just about voting its about human rights too. Otherwise you can simply intimidate a large percentage of the population, kill all members of opposition parties and get elected. Is that still democracy? Well technically, a party that uses these tactics got the most votes, so I guess anything they want to do is all good. Right?

      What if the entire media is controlled by allies of the government in power. The news says only bad things about the opposition and only good things about the government. They don't report that the government shut down all media that criticised them.

      Too many people have lived all their lives in the developed world and have never seen how democracy works (or doesn't work) in the developing world. You can have all the elections you want but that doesn't mean that people will get the government they want.

  12. This is fantastic news. by Darth_brooks · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I love hearing this. In fact, I hope more countries undergoing political unrest opt to shut off 'net access. Specifically I'm hoping for similar occurrences in places like Syria, Pakistan. Go ahead and try getting your internet kill switch bill passed then ya jackasses. Every political talking head will blaze up a nice firestorm while the chickenshits dive for cover.

    I just wish there was a way to help.

    --
    There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
  13. Re:This is unacceptable by antifoidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This has nothing to do with "religion" per se and everything to do with political power. They aren't cutting off the internet to prevent "Draw Muhammed Day", they are cutting it off to try to prevent a Tunisia style rebellion.

  14. Sorry... I forgot Americans! by denzacar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All Americans are fat and stupid. There. Can I please have my post modded up again now?
    Or do I have to make a stupid generalization about someone else? Like Chinese? Brits? Zie Germans?

    COME ON!
    I too want to be modded +5 Insightful for being a generalizing asshole who pigeonholes millions of people and their cultures into degrading *caricatures of themselves.

     
     
     
    *caricatures are like an exaggerated cartoon of someone, where he looks funny... and then we laugh at him cause he is funny looking.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  15. Re:STEP RIGHT UP FOLKS! by postbigbang · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not so. To some degree, the term "Muslim state" is a misnomer. There are places like Jordan, Indonesia, Malaysia, all with varying degrees of public participation in government, and histories of suppression. Some are pretty dangerous, like Iran. Some seem secular, but are very willing to exploit indigenous peoples (Turkey and the Kurds and Armenians) as an example. But the US has done it, too, as a healthy portion of states have indigenous peoples reservations.

    There are lots of Muslims in Germany, but not enough to make a change in government. In Lebanon, it's been a mixed bag for decades now. For a short time, Lebanon was the beacon of multi-religious tolerance, Christian, Muslim, Druze, etc. Now, Hezbollah is calling the shots, perhaps firing them, too.

    Some Muslims argue that other ostensible Islamic factions aren't Muslim, are infidels, and treat them accordingly. It's a mess.

    --
    ---- Teach Peace. It's Cheaper Than War.
  16. What exactly IS a Muslim state then? by denzacar · · Score: 5, Insightful

    One where there are many Muslims?
    Well, is a Germany a Muslim state? Plenty of Turkish Muslims there? How 'bout France with all them Algerians?
    Or all those Muslims don't really count, cause they are not TRUE Muslims?

    Or are you talking about countries run by sharia law?
    Egypt is a "semi-presidential republic" where religious parties are illegal.

    Or let's turn that around... Which western countries (excluding Vatican) are Christian? And please, specify which denomination.
    Or how about simply - is America Catholic, Protestant or Mormon? Come on... we all know that all that secular bullshit is just for show.
    Come on... Who's their Cloud Daddy?

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:What exactly IS a Muslim state then? by a+whoabot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You: "Or are you talking about countries run by sharia law?"

      Why not?
      An Overview of the Egyptian Legal System and Legal Research by Dr. Mohamed S. Abdel Wahab:

      "The Egyptian legal system is built on the combination of Islamic (Shariah) law and Napoleonic Code, which was first introduced during Napoleon Bonaparteâ(TM)s occupation of Egypt and the subsequent education and training of Egyptian jurists in France. ...
      According to the 1980 amendment of the Constitution, Islamic Law (Sharia) became the principal source of legislative rules. Such wording simply implies that any new law that is being enacted or considered for enactment should not be in contravention of any prevailing principles of Islamic Law (Sharia). ...
      Prior to the 1980 amendment, Islamic Law (Sharia) was merely a source, amongst other sources, for legislative rules."

      So what was your point?

  17. Re:Just remember this by Rob+Riggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You could have just said 'When next President wants an "Internet Kill Switch"' but you had to make it about your political views and not the larger, more important issue. This is a real problem with discourse in the U.S. these days. It is about "which side you are on" and not the discussion of the big issues. I think most citizens agree that an "Internet Kill Switch" is a very bad idea. But our problems keep getting worse because we are constantly distracted by political nonsense and polarizing language and cannot focus on the issue at hand. Let's focus on what's important.

    --
    the growth in cynicism and rebellion has not been without cause