Slashdot Mirror


Sony Sends DMCA Takedown Notice To GitHub

Plombo writes "Sony's war against PS3 hacking continues. On January 27, Sony Computer Entertainment America sent a DMCA takedown notice to GitHub demanding the removal of 6 repositories under the 'circumvention device' clause of the DMCA. All of the repositories in question were related to jailbreaking or homebrew development for the PS3."

66 of 266 comments (clear)

  1. All Exploits by wmbetts · · Score: 2

    I wonder if all exploits could fall under the DCMA.

    --
    "Ubuntu" -- an African word, meaning "Slackware is too hard for me". - stolen from Dan C alt.os.linux.slackware
    1. Re:All Exploits by hedwards · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Doesn't matter whether it does or not, precedence indicates that this is protected speech. Or at least that's what the courts said about DeCSS, and this even less ambiguously speech. Not to mention that Sony doesn't get to file a DMCA take down notice on this as the code they're requesting be taken down doesn't belong to them. The key itself isn't subject to copyright.

    2. Re:All Exploits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      The notice they filed isn't about copyright infringement, so it doesn't matter, that the code is not theirs, nor would it make sense for the code to be theirs. The claim they're making is that those repositories contain circumvention devices. I'd imagine the takedown isn't a big deal at all, as whoever put the code on GitHub has a complete copy of the history on their own machines.

    3. Re:All Exploits by buzzsawddog · · Score: 2, Informative

      No... Not all exploits deal with copyright material. The DMCA can only be used in cases involving copyright material. "the DMCA focuses largely on the facilitation of infringement through circumvention tools and services primarily designed or produced to circumvent an access or copy control. In other words, the DMCA represents a shift in focus from infringement to the tools of infringers." 17 U.S.C. 1201-1205 V.A.3. It is stated the purpose is "to prevent large-scale piracy of digital content over the Internet" However the DMCA does cover a lot of crap...: 1. it prohibits "circumvent[ing] a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this [copyright] title." 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1)(A) 2. it prohibits the manufacture of or trafficking in products or technology designed to circumvent a technological measure that controls access to a copyrighted work. 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(2) 3. it prohibits the manufacture of or trafficking in products or technology designed to circumvent measures that protect a copyright owner's rights under the Copyright Act. 17 U.S.C. 1201(b). Also interesting to note: 1. circumvention of access controls, 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(1) 2. trafficking in technology primarily designed to facilitate circumvention of access controls, 17 U.S.C. 1201(a)(2) An interesting fact is that it does not prevent "the act of circumventing copy controls", only the trafficking of tools that circumvent copy controls.

    4. Re:All Exploits by BLKMGK · · Score: 3, Informative

      Would this be the same courts that reamed 2600 magazine for LINKING to deCSS code?

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    5. Re:All Exploits by mug+funky · · Score: 2

      interesting about the "primarily designed to..."

      that does not include homebrew. jailbreaking isn't just about piracy. it's about owning the machine you bought.

    6. Re:All Exploits by QuoteMstr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      All right --- Sony appears to be guilty of perjury after filing a takedown notice for someone else's work.

      Who is going to do something about it? Selective enforcement is wonderful, isn't it? If Sony succeeds in this, it'll embolden others to file takedown notices against anything they dislike for any reason whatsoever.

    7. Re:All Exploits by hedwards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yes, but they don't have a leg to stand on otherwise. It's been settled since all that DeCSS stuff that code is protected by the 1st amendment. So the only way that they could file a takedown notice here would be if they owned the copyright to it.

      Sony can't legally file the takedown as they have to state under penalty of perjury that there is no legal use for the software that they want taken down.

    8. Re:All Exploits by hedwards · · Score: 2

      The developers would, or more likely they'd get the EFF involved. It's not selective enforcement the law leaves it up to the party that's been wronged to enforce it.

    9. Re:All Exploits by 644bd346996 · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's not a real takedown. It's a normal cease-and-desist letter, and even if it were a real takedown notice, it's only perjury if the person submitting it isn't authorized to act on behalf of the person claiming ownership of a work being infringed. Neither the copyright holder or his lawyer are guilty of perjury if the copyright holder lies to his lawyer (or is mistaken) and thus causes a frivolous takedown notice to be sent.

    10. Re:All Exploits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Not that there's "no legal use"... just that its primary purpose is illegal. The Other-OS-to-piracy link is pretty straightforward to lawyers.

    11. Re:All Exploits by Runaway1956 · · Score: 2

      BULL SHIT. You file a legal document, in which you attest that all the facts set forth are true and correct to the best of your knowledge, then you have committed PERJURY. You lied to your lawyer, to induce him to file the legal document? That's PERJURY. Are you Bill Clinton, trying again to parse words to meaningless noise? In short, don't lie to the court, don't lie to your lawyer, don't lie anytime anywhere that any type of legal "facts" are being discussed. Asshole.

      --
      "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
    12. Re:All Exploits by Nursie · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's all gone back up at gitorious anyway, which is based in Norway and harder to fuck with.

    13. Re:All Exploits by mysidia · · Score: 2

      Nowhere in the text of the DMCA is there any "take down letter" procedure whatsoever for "circumvention devices".

    14. Re:All Exploits by anomaly256 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Which is most unfortunate as it is complete hogwash in practice. Pirates are using psjailbreak devices, not OtherOS. OtherOS doesn't facilitate piracy of any kind. Nor does Asbestos. Nor do the 'Open' SDKs. The clear and obvious fact that everyone seems to be missing is that piracy continues completely unabated by the legal actions of Sony or the censorship it's trying to enforce. People really need to stop confusing these 2 issues as being the same thing.

    15. Re:All Exploits by shentino · · Score: 3, Informative

      First of all, Universal WON that DeCSS case, so it's actually unfavorable.

      Second, Sony can file any takedown notice they darn please. All they have to worry about is how much trouble they'll get in if they're caught.

    16. Re:All Exploits by shentino · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If corporations like it, it's not good for you.

    17. Re:All Exploits by 644bd346996 · · Score: 4, Informative

      According to the law at issue, the only portion of a DMCA takedown notice that is under penalty of perjury is that the person filing it is authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner alleging infringement.

      For a DMCA takedown counter-notice, the poster needs to assert under penalty of perjury that they have a good faith belief that the takedown was a mistake or misidentification. The lack of a requirement that the party issuing the takedown make a similar statement of belief under penalty of perjury is the real bullshit here, as it violated the principle of equal protection under law.

    18. Re:All Exploits by roystgnr · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's been settled since all that DeCSS stuff that code is protected by the 1st amendment.

      The DeCSS case specifically was "settled" exactly the opposite way. Freedom of speech didn't do jack to help the glider or bnetd authors either.

    19. Re:All Exploits by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      OtherOS is a legitimate feature, since it was advertised on the Boxes by Sony themselves

      No, it wasn't. Check your PS3 box...I'll wait.

    20. Re:All Exploits by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      Money talks, bullshit walks.

      That doesn't really apply in this case - the bullshitters have the money (so, nothing new there then - or had you not noticed the amount of crap that the monied mega-corps get away with?)
      More like "Money talks, everything else bends over and reaches for the vaseline."

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    21. Re:All Exploits by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2

      The takedown notice provision of the DMCA is actually fairly benign. It is there to protect safe harbours. If you host someone else's content for them, then you must comply with a takedown notice filed. You must also comply with a subsequent counter-notice to reinstate it, if the person putting the stuff on your site claims that copyright is not infringed. At that point, it's out of your hands and you still count as a safe harbour (you are not filtering, so you are not responsible for infringing content). The person asserting copyright must then sue the person who uploaded it directly, not the person hosting it[1]. This, however, is a cease-and-desist letter, which has no legal force but serves notice that the person receiving it has to either comply or be taken to court.

      [1] It's not clear to me how this works if the host is in the USA, but the uploader is elsewhere. Does this provide a loophole? Can someone China upload stuff to YouTube, file a counter-notice, and allow Google to continue to host infringing material with impunity?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    22. Re:All Exploits by russotto · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uh... it cites the DMCA act and specifically sites the anti-circumvention clause as grounds for removal.

      That's how DMCA takedown notices are made.

      No. A DMCA takedown notice is a specific type of notice which follows the provisions of 17 USC 512. The anti-circumvention provisions are a completely separate part of the DMCA, codified in 17 USC 1201. And the DMCA does not provided a process for filing a takedown notice for circumvention devices.

    23. Re:All Exploits by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2

      It's quite possible that sending frivolous takedowns could result in some kind of fraud charges for the copyright holder and FRCP rule 11 sanctions for the law firm, but the DMCA itself does almost nothing to dissuade frivolous notices.

  2. They should file a counter-notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They should file a counter-notice, citing the interoperability clauses :)

    1. Re:They should file a counter-notice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They should file a counter notice, citing the fact that they wrote the code themselves and it even compiles with PSl1ght SDK, not the sony SDK, su they are completely in the clear and Sony is just harrassing them. What Sony is doing is completely illegal.

  3. That was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Perhaps the real news should be how quickly github caved and removed all of the projects in question.

    1. Re:That was fast by Plombo · · Score: 5, Informative

      On the other hand, as a response to Sony's takedown notice, they started posting all of their DMCA takedown notices publicly. That's what enabled me to find this information in the first place.

    2. Re:That was fast by hedwards · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Basically what's going on is that Sony had their attorneys file a fraudulent take down request. Github will look at it and probably put the materials back online in the near future. Right now they're pretty clearly commiting perjury
      Question: What are the notice and takedown procedures for web sites?

      Question: What are the notice and takedown procedures for web sites?

      Answer: In order to have an allegedly infringing web site removed from a service provider's network, or to have access to an allegedly infringing website disabled, the copyright owner must provide notice to the service provider with the following information:

              The name, address, and electronic signature of the complaining party [512(c)(3)(A)(i)]
              The infringing materials and their Internet location [512(c)(3)(A)(ii-iii)], or if the service provider is an "information location tool" such as a search engine, the reference or link to the infringing materials [512(d)(3)].
              Sufficient information to identify the copyrighted works [512(c)(3)(A)(iv)].
              A statement by the owner that it has a good faith belief that there is no legal basis for the use of the materials complained of [512(c)(3)(A)(v)].
              A statement of the accuracy of the notice and, under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on the behalf of the owner [512(c)(3)(A)(vi)].

      Once notice is given to the service provider, or in circumstances where the service provider discovers the infringing material itself, it is required to expeditiously remove, or disable access to, the material. The safe harbor provisions do not require the service provider to notify the individual responsible for the allegedly infringing material before it has been removed, but they do require notification after the material is removed.

    3. Re:That was fast by ChrisLambrou · · Score: 2

      Thanks to the DMCA, GitHub has no meaningful choice other than to comply with the take-down request, unfortunately. It's now down to the repository owners to ask GitHub to reinstate them, at which point it becomes a legal matter between them and Sony, with GitHub being free of any legal liability to Sony (at least with respect to the DMCA). It's not particularly newsworthy that they caved - it would have been far more newsworthy if they hadn't.

    4. Re:That was fast by shentino · · Score: 2

      It's hardly caving to comply with a federal law that allows the affected party to file a counter notice.

    5. Re:That was fast by shentino · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, to send a counter notice you have to allege under penalty of perjury that the violations are untrue, and you also have to consent to be sued.

      Seeing as how Sony already sued Geohot without legal provocation on their *own* initiative, I do not think anyone is going to instigate a lawsuit by slapping back a counter-notice.

    6. Re:That was fast by 644bd346996 · · Score: 2

      They don't have any immunity in the first place, as this notice is not about infringement (it's about circumvention devices), so it isn't covered by the DMCA's safe harbor provision.

    7. Re:That was fast by jopsen · · Score: 3

      Perhaps the real news should be how quickly github caved and removed all of the projects in question.

      Agree... The fact that github can be bullied around like this is pretty upsetting...
      By the way, may I suggest that someone prints these numbers in a newspaper... Either through a letter to the editor, or in an ad, how hard can that be...

    8. Re:That was fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's not a fraudulent takedown request, it's a trick. It's a letter demanding removal of the code, on the basis that it violates the law (a different clause of the DMCA, the one that bans circumventing copyright protection devices, NOT the clause that allows for rapid takedowns of copyright material that you own).
      Of course, there is no provision for takedown notices under that clause. You simply might (or might not) be breaking the law if you write, distribute etc. such code.
      Sony's letter actually just says "You may be breaking the law, please remove those materials since they are considered illegal". It doesn't have any legal status. However it is designed to look closely like an actual DMCA takedown, so that GitHub will do what people usually do (in fact, usually have to do) when they get DMCA takedowns - remove the content first, ask questions later.
      The clue is in this part

      [6] I have a good faith belief that the circumvention of effective access controls and/or copyright protection measures identified above is not authorized by law;

      A lot of things are 'not authorized by law'. That doesn't make them illegal. At worst, it makes them unlawful. In fact, section 3 says that 'the file-downloads identified below are unlawful".

      DMCA takedowns mention 'clause 512(c)', the paragraph that limits liability if takedowns are respected. This letter says nothing about that paragraph, but only mentions 1201 and 1202, a completely different part of the bill. This is a neat legal trick that GitHub apparently fell for, and is undoubtedly worded very subtly so as not to make any false statements while giving a misleading impression. Whichever lawyer thought of this definitely earned his $750 for that hour.

  4. what will they do where there is no DMCA? by youn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    repositories in the US may work, but It'll just get some dudes to host them from a country with more loose ip laws

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
    1. Re:what will they do where there is no DMCA? by DurendalMac · · Score: 3, Interesting

      THIS. Anyone hosting DMCA-questionable content should damned well get a server offshore in a country that doesn't care about IP laws and then be sure to take every step to keep their real identity separate from it. I hear Russia is a good place...

    2. Re:what will they do where there is no DMCA? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2

      Egypt perhaps.

    3. Re:what will they do where there is no DMCA? by angus77 · · Score: 2

      There are plenty of countries out there that have strong IP laws but don't truck with the bullshit that is the DMCA.

    4. Re:what will they do where there is no DMCA? by Nursie · · Score: 2

      You mean like gitorious in Norway - http://gitorious.org/ps3free

  5. Online assets? There are better ways than that. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 4, Informative

    Screw their "online assets." The link to the contact list of offices for the law firm responsible is right here. Sony's corporate contact numbers are here. I suggest that each of their offices should receive a good few calls Monday, letting them know what we think about free speech and about restraining it.

    It takes a lot fewer calls to pull off a denial of service than it takes packets.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
    1. Re:Online assets? There are better ways than that. by laughingcoyote · · Score: 2

      Uh...if I posted my bank and credit card information on a public facing website, and someone else linked to it, I guess I'd have no one but myself to complain at. That's why I've never put my bank or credit card information on a public facing website.

      You'll note that here, in contrast, all I did here was give links to information they did freely choose to make available to the public. Seeing the difference here?

      --
      To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  6. Re:wow. they are upsetting pretty dangerous crowds by Derekloffin · · Score: 2

    All that kind of radical reaction will do is put Sony in a better light. One hacker apparently already tried a blatant 'stop or else' blackmail threat. All that does it give Sony ammo saying 'hey this lot is a bunch of anarchists and criminals'.

  7. Re:wow. they are upsetting pretty dangerous crowds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    arent they. the real hacker underground is intertwined with open source. targeting the places where these crowds regular, is not something wise.

    but morons which are dubbed as lawyers in some countries naturally would have no idea about that. they got too much used to bullying defenseless citizens through law.

    i wonder what will they do to sony's online assets.

    Nothing. Stop dramatizing.

  8. Re:Corporate Censorship, Thy name is DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Agreed, more fundamental issues (things like freedom and human rights) were the trigger for what happened in Tunisia and Egypt.

    Now that i think of it, while freedom and human rights and all that jazz were central to the unrest in the arab world, the thing that got the Middle-class Muhammeds off his behind and into the streets was the economic situation. Runaway inflation and the price rise probably acted as the one issue hot enough to move the usually reluctant masses to action.

    Goes to show that you can get away with pretty much anything, as long as you can keep people busy working hard just to make ends met. You let the situation get out of hand enough so that now matter how hard he/she works, the ends just aint(sic) going to be met, that's when people give up on the rat race, and suddenly have time to think about protests, placards and maybe even the guillotine.

    Reminds me of a humorous headline i read last week :- For the first time in history, the prices of necessity, comfort, and luxury are all the same.(Onions - Rs 65/Kg, Petrol - Rs 65/Liter, Beer Rs. 65/Glass).

    RkR

  9. Dirty Tricks by index0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If you google "sony geohot $1" http://www.google.ca/search?q=sony+geohot+%241 you will get some info along the lines that Sony tried to paypal George Hotz $1 dollar ("Attached hereto as Exhibit DD is true and correct copy of a redacted PayPal receipt from George Hotz, using an account registered to..." from http://psx-scene.com/forums/attachments/f6/23998d1294899764-scea-vs-geohot-day-2-more-files-day-3-now-over-more-files-added-04-pdf ). You can imagine why Sony did this ...

  10. Re:git clone time by Plombo · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's already been done for the original repositories; they've been uploaded to Gitorious, which is hosted outside of the US. A remaining problem, though, is that all forks of the repositories were also taken down. Those weren't uploaded to Gitorious, and there were too many of them to count.

  11. DMCA? FOAD. by Sarusa · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Hay Sony. I think I'm gonna circumvent you now. Seriously regretting buying that PS3.

  12. How the mighty have fallen... by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Back in the day, Sony was a pretty cool company. They made affordable audio equipment with decent performance for the price; through high school and college, my turntable (vinyl LPs... remember them?) was a Sony. I also remember my first Sony Walkman cassette portable (early 1980s) and CD DiscMan with great fondness; Sony pretty much single-handedly invented the portable audio industry. My first camcorder was a Sony too, and I enjoyed the PlayStation and PlayStation 2 immensely.

    Somewhere along the line, they lost their way. Maybe it had something to do with their transformation into a combination of consumer electronics giant and content provider; I'm not sure. But the CD rootkit fiasco was an indication of where they were heading. My opinion of them also took a nosedive when my second Sony camcorder (purchased around 6 years ago) turned out to be a piece of crap.

    These days, they are solidly on my "avoid" list. I used to consider a Sony nameplate to be a badge of quality; now it is more of a warning label.

    1. Re:How the mighty have fallen... by Blue_Wombat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Absolutely. I used to own a lot of their gear - including a walkman, a beta VCR (that dates me!) and a very expensive trinitron screen. I was quite a Sony fanboi in my day. Now I loathe and detest them - CD rootkit, mania for proprietary connectors, lying about Minidisc "playing" MP3s, what they did to LikSang, the rootkit, DRM mania, retroactive removal of freatures people had paid for (OtherOS), being behind the RIAA, being behind the MPAA...... the list goes on and on. They actively hate and screw over their own customers, their product is overpriced, and their legendary quality is a didtant memory. Now just I regard Sony as the vermin of the consumer electronics industry, with products that are defective by design, and I avoid them like the plague. I successfully warn numerous other people off their overpriced DRMed rubbish as well. NB: to /. mods - can we have the old interface back please? The new one is *horrible*

  13. Re:Looks like Github complied by hedwards · · Score: 2

    It's not. Sony or their attorneys perjured themselves. Either that or their wilfully ignorant. I'm a bit fuzzy where the line is. In order to file the take down notice they have to certify that there is no legal use for the software. It's pretty clear that there are legal uses for the software so they're likely guilty of perjury and if the developers opt to round up funds and sue they'd likely win.

    Sony like a lot of corporations files these sorts of notices without any real consideration for the legality and unfortunately because the corporation would be held responsible there's little to no accountability.

  14. Re:To laughingcoyote by laughingcoyote · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not giving out any Sooper Seekrit information, just stuff that's on a public website. If it's illegal to "incite" people to protest things by speaking to the parties responsible, then it's even worse than I thought.

    --
    To fight the war on terror, stop being afraid.
  15. Talk about a double standard by surfdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sony entertainment had no problems a few years ago fubaring up my XP system by installing a rootkit after I inserted one of their music CD's. Seems they can care less about us, but don't reveal their precious encryption keys.

    Between all that and their proprietary memory in digital cameras, I avoid ALL thinks Sony. They aren't worth the time. So sad a former leader of technology has descended so low.

  16. start mirroring. by lkcl · · Score: 4, Informative

    all but GaiaManager can be found here:
    http://gitorious.org/ps3free

    there's also a story:
    http://www.ps3-hacks.com/2011/01/29/dmcaed-ps3-git-repositories-cloned/

    but the site is a bit... busy right now.

  17. Dear Sony by swordgeek · · Score: 2

    For the first time in 2011, let me offer you a hearty "Fuck You."

    Gotta get that in every year, it seems--this year it either came early, or will come often.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  18. Re:It won't change a damn thing. by Mathinker · · Score: 2

    > But these are the numbers which matter to Sony.

    No, I think the numbers which really mattered to Sony (not that they are going to figure this out) are:

    • 4 years = amount of time before geek rage focussed on cracking the DRM of the PS3
    • 10 months = amount of time PS3 DRM withstood geek rage

    OTOH, I rather doubt Sony will initially sell their next generation consoles with "OtherOS", while at the same time the high-performance computing community is more and more focused on GPGPU acceleration. So maybe they don't care that they're just giving themselves bad PR with the geek crowd while not really preventing anyone from obtaining tools to develop / run homebrew / run pirated games.

    After all, the rootkit incident didn't cause a general focus on cracking the PS3. So perhaps this won't cause their next console to become a target from the very start --- or maybe yes, because it won't have OtherOS. Only time will tell.

  19. Re:The cat...... by im_thatoneguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because they don't care about customers who don't buy games? And why should they? Why should you care about unprofitable customers?

  20. Github won't put them back online. by Otis_INF · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Do you really think Github can afford a lengthy trial with mammoth Sony? Not in a million years. The legal team of Sony will bury Github's with so many documents they either have to give up or will lose.

    Big corporations have big law departments. The only purpose of these law departments, which cost a lot of money each year, is to make life as easy as possible for the employer, Sony in this case. This means: they'll do everything they can to make the life of the opponent as miserable as possible: lawsuits, burying with massive amounts of documents etc. Github doesn't have a chance.

    --
    Never underestimate the relief of true separation of Religion and State.
    1. Re:Github won't put them back online. by smallfries · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually GitHub can have every chance. What they needed to do in this case was simple enough. Contact the owner of the repository and hand over the responsibility to them. If the owner decides that Sony has acted badly and made an incorrect claim then GitHub is cleared of any legal responsibility and can put the work back online.

      The procedure is explained at Chilling Effects. Although the DMCA is widely detested, one of the (only?) things that it does get right is that the legal battle is not between Sony and Github. If Github comply then they get to step to one side with any liability.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  21. Not the land of the free by business_kid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When faced with the threat of continuing legal bills for asserting your rights, the pragmatic thing to do is comply. The Net is not the anonymous place we all thought it was. It seems America is not the land of the free unless you can afford to pay for it! Note to self: Make sure to have multiple legislatures for any controversial site I put up. E.G. service registered in country A, selling into country B and located in country C :-D.

    1. Re:Not the land of the free by Urkki · · Score: 2

      It seems America is not the land of the free unless you can afford to pay for it!

      Freedom is never free. You have to pay for either with money or with blood. And like always, you have to be careful that you buy the real stuff and don't fall for some sort of scam, wasting your blood or your money and getting nothing for it.

  22. The Rise and Fall of Sony by trydk · · Score: 2

    Following Sony's rise and fall is rather interesting, I think.

    They started off by making tape recorders and became famous by producing small, transistorised radio receivers that were affordable but rather poor quality. I remember my first one that after a few months developed the most scratchy volume control (metal wiper on a carbon path -- I took it apart in the end).

    After WWII (not, I'm not that old :-) the Americans introduced the quality movement in Japan and in 1968, Kaoru Ishikawa outlined the tenets of TQC (Total Quality Control) management:

    * quality comes first, not short-term profits
    * the customer comes first, not the producer
    * customers are the next process with no organizational barriers
    * decisions are based on facts and data
    * management is participatory and respectful of all employees
    * management is driven by cross-functional committees covering product planning, product design, production planning, purchasing, manufacturing, sales, and distribution

    Akio Morita, the founder of Sony, was a proponent of this quality movement and worked hard to make Sony products fairly affordable and good quality, which was the hallmark of their products for many years.

    After Morita's brain hemorrhage in 1993, he was unable to lead the company and stepped down as chairman in 1994, at the height of the company's glory. After that time, Sony seemed to slide slowly downwards in its respect of customers with a marked disregard for the second tenet of the TQC "laws".

    Sony has been -- and still is -- very innovative, but they have gone down the slope quite a bit since Akio Morita's time with regards to affordability and respect for customers.

  23. Re:The cat...... by Jesus_666 · · Score: 2

    That's what Sony gets for wanting to eat their cake and have it. IIRC they added Other OS as a way to avoid higher import tariffs (computers vs. game consoles). At the same time the didn't want people to actually use it because they were selling the PS3 at a loss and it would only generate money through game sales. Then someone turned Other OS into something useful, they took it away and now they're up in arms because people went to great lengths to re-enable it, undermining the entire platform in the process.

    I think the lesson here is "don't sell your product as something it isn't supposed to be". That just makes you look evil when you try to keep people from using it for what they thought you allowed them.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  24. Re:"It's a Sony!" by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 2

    Here's an interesting factoid for you: design and manufacture of most of the Sony video hardware is outsourced...

    Sony VCRs: usually made by Samsung. There's a lovely design cockup in the FX-series -- a capacitor was installed the wrong way round, which screwed with the controller and ended up wiping the EEPROM. Only way out of this is a VHS alignment tape (custom to Sony/Samsung and only available to their service centres) and a full reset. Oh, and a new capacitor.

    Sony DVD players: Samsung or Philips. Usually bottom-of-the-barrel crap.

    Sony DVD recorders: Almost always Philips. Utterly crap, slowest processors and worst laser pickups imaginable. Hit STOP then PLAY and you'll be waiting a good minute for the thing to get its act together.

    I like my Bravia and my MZ-RH1 Minidisc recorder (great for recording lectures) but the rest of my Sony kit (not much)? Crap.

    I love how they use proprietary connectors for the camera USB ports, and change them with every new model series. They do the same with the batteries too... absolute evil. Point of comparison -- the Canon NB2LH battery from the 400D? Used in almost all their SD-card camcorders. Costs about £30, runs the thing for 90 minutes or so. Sony equivalent? £69, and there are four variants depending on which camera you have. Upgrade your camera, and you get to replace all your spare batteries. The chargers are (usually) cross-compatible, but that's about it. Lose a Sony charger, expect to pay a good £50-£60 for a replacement. Lose a Canon one and you can probably replace it for £20-£30, or less on Ebay.

    As far as I'm concerned, Sony can FOaGDIAF. Canon are getting first-dibs if I need any new imaging gear -- my Pixma iP4600 is the first inkjet I've had which didn't suffer a fatal head clog just by leaving it idle for a few months, and my 7D has taken the worst the British weather can dish out and kept on going. I've seen customers bring Canon 10Ds back into the shop, wanting to try out a new lens. The cameras usually look like hell, but work perfectly. That kind of reliability gets you lots of brownie points.

  25. Re:"It's a Sony!" by NotQuiteInsane · · Score: 2

    Sony DVD recorders: Almost always Philips. Utterly crap, slowest processors and worst laser pickups imaginable. Hit STOP then PLAY and you'll be waiting a good minute for the thing to get its act together.

    This surprises me. Sony manufacture pickups and having personally used them I can say they are amongst the nicest that I've seen. Fantastically easy to interface and produce a very nice clean datastream.

    They do make nice laser pickups (and I think the Philips players use them almost universally), but the CPU, MPEG decoder and error-corrector circuitry (all designed by Philips) is astonishingly bad. If the disc isn't perfectly clean, scratch free and absolutely perfectly mastered, the ECC engine falls over and the picture starts to break up. The CPUs are generally WAY underpowered for what they're doing. I used to hit Record on my Aiwa VCR and it'd start recording within a second or two. The Sony DVD recorder hooked up to the TV downstairs takes almost a minute to start recording. The MythTV box is almost instant. Guess which one gets used more often... the DVD recorder is used more-or-less like an expensive DVD player (the Myth box falls over on some DVDs).

    I concur with the camera gear. I know someone who's been through two Alpha 200 cameras without doing anything extreme with them. My D200 has worked (briefly) at -55degC and made a fully recovery once warmed up, gets used in dusty and corrosive environments and has fallen out of the car more times than I'd like to admit. Sony really don't make them like they used to. My MD player took similar abuse.

    Oh, my MD players have been through a ton of punishment. The RH1 has been absolutely babied, but my MZ-N710 (bought as a refurbished unit several years ago ago) was dropped, banged, and got dragged to Terra Firma by its USB cable once or twice. Still works fine. The RH1 lives in a Lowepro camera pouch, and only comes out occasionally. I've been meaning to try time-syncing it with my brother's camcorder -- if only as a "can this be done?" experiment.

    As I understand it, most of the BBC Regional Radio off-site interview / RNG teams still use Sony MD recorders for field recording. If they're good enough for Auntie Beeb... well...

  26. Oh no by rawler · · Score: 2

    If only git was a de-centralized VCS, these repositories would already have been cloned in the dozens around the world, and this take-down would be completely futile!

    Oh, wait.