Slashdot Mirror


Google Art Project Brings Galleries To Your PC

Zothecula writes "Google has announced a collaboration with 17 of the world's most acclaimed art museums that lets people view over 1,000 high res-artwork images and 17 gigapixel images while taking a virtual stroll through their galleries using Street View technology. While nothing can beat seeing a work of art in person, the Google Art Project could be the next best thing for those without the time and money to pop on a plane and trade elbows with crowds of tourists looking to catch a glimpse of what some of the best museums have on offer."

22 of 103 comments (clear)

  1. Time and money? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Only rich people can afford to get airplane tickets, book a hotel room for a few days oversea and skip work just to go see some paintings.

    And don't give me crap about where I live. Half of the families in Canada earn less than 15$K per year, and that's with the 1 Canadian dollar = 1.01204 U.S. dollars
    of today.

    1. Re:Time and money? by SuperSlug · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong, the median family income is closer to 65K a year in Canada. http://www40.statcan.ca/l01/cst01/famil108a-eng.htm

      --
      The information wants to be free, I just give it somewhere to go.
    2. Re:Time and money? by Methuseus · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm in the US, my wife and I make under $50k combined per year, yet we found the time and money to go to Germany for 2 weeks and visit various art museums there. Yes, it's not the Louvre, but that would be about the same expense. Get rid of your cable TV, don't buy so much porn and video games, and don't eat out every night. There, you have an extra $300-500 a month to plan a trip for about $3000. No big deal.

      --
      Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity, though I'm not yet sure about the universe. - A Einstein
    3. Re:Time and money? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 2

      That median is completely wrong.

      Cite your sources please? Stats Canada gets their info directly from census results of a large random sampling. Responding to the census is mandatory in Canada. Therefore, if anything, the numbers are low (due to non-declared income) not high. However, the value could still be slightly high, as the number of homeless people included in the census tends to be a bit skewed (they've been getting better at that recently). All in all, the outlying factors tend to cancel each other out, giving us pretty reliable statistics.

      $15k/year = $300/week, or $7.50/hour for a 40-hour work week for one person (with everyone else in the household being a dependant). Considering this is below minimum wage in ALL Canadian provinces and territories (excepting BC's "probationary wage" which only lasts a max of 6 months),

      $65k/year = $32.50/hour, or $16.25/hour for two people in a household. This sounds MUCH more reasonable.

      However, this is before taxes, which will bring this down to $13/hour per person (on average).

      That said, I grew up below the median, and my family was still able to save up for 2 intercontinental trips including visits to the Louvre, etc. The trick was that we saved up for them by saving money instead of frittering it away on incidentals. Considering as of December 2009 the average household debt in Canada was $96,000, I have a feeling people tend to go travelling whether they can afford it or not.

    4. Re:Time and money? by geezer+nerd · · Score: 2

      It's not always about how much you have. It's also about how you use what you've got.

    5. Re:Time and money? by Digital+Vomit · · Score: 2

      ...don't buy so much porn...

      I know what those words mean, but that phrase makes no sense.

      --
      Modern copyright is theft of culture from everyone and it retards the progress of the useful arts and sciences.
  2. 3... 2... 1... by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

    Gee, what are the chances that the servers serving up these 17 GPixel images are already slashdotted?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  3. I Disagree by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While nothing can beat seeing a work of art in person....

    I disagree wholeheartedly here. If Google, or someone else, can, one day, download the world's most famous art projects directly into my visual, auditory, olfactory, and other sensory lobes in my brain, that would beat the hell out of traveling through the meatspace to see a piece of art in person. I know we're not there yet, but we're chugging forward baby steps at a time. So yeah, nostalgia and all that says that a visit to The Louvre is a life-changing experience, blah blah blah.

    But frankly, I don't have the time or patience to deal with the hordes of gawking art patrons at a museum. So yeah, Google, keep up the work (along with everyone else bringing information to the masses). One day, when I can press a button on my phone, and have my brain light up like it just saw Mona Lisa in person, then I certainly will proclaim that such an experience beats the hell out of actually seeing that painting in person.

    1. Re:I Disagree by Locke2005 · · Score: 2

      Don't give me that BS! You know full well that when they have the technology to deliver sensory input directly to your brain, you'll be using it not for art, but for porn!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    2. Re:I Disagree by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Funny

      Porn, art, the only difference is what part of your body you're masturbating over it.

    3. Re:I Disagree by nomel · · Score: 2

      No problem!

      I found some images of the insides of the museum (also from google) that I'm printing on my home printer right now that I plan to paste on my walls. It only took me a few minutes to make a full resolution tile downloader, so all that's left is to get Costco to make me some poster prints and invite some rude strangers into my house!

      Real life experience, here I come! :D

  4. Re:What about Bill Gates? by mangu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Don't worry, the Google Art Project will be available on Bing soon.

  5. Museum gift shops by ksheff · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is Google going to provide links the gift shops at these museums too?

    --
    the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
    1. Re:Museum gift shops by ksheff · · Score: 2

      grrr s/links the/links to the/

      --
      the good ground has been paved over by suicidal maniacs
  6. Some commentary would be nice, too by jfengel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't really understand art. I would like to. These museums picked these paintings for a reason, and it goes beyond "they look pretty". (Some of 'em don't.)

    I know that art requires context. How do these paintings relate to the culture they were painted in, the other paintings that were made at the same time, the paintings that came before?

    I could, presumably, google them, and that would be a nice neutral answer. This is just the first step, and perhaps there's some API that will allow curators to include the high-res Google images in with whatever technique they use to provide context. Every museum is different, of course, and some will simply want to ignore the distractions while others would like a guided tour.

    But on it's own, the technical feat of producing these images intrigues me as an engineer, but the paintings themselves are just fodder for screen wallpaper. I don't want to be a philistine, but somebody will have to help me out here.

  7. Very cool by Lev13than · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is very cool tech. I went to the Uffizi and zoomed in on Venus' boob until it filled the screen. Then I noticed all the brush work on the (strategically placed) hand and saw how Botticelli had subtly shifted the placement of the fingers as he painted. Would be very cool if they could add an X-Ray overlay.

    Thanks a lot Google - I went looking for 15th-Century nudie picks but instead I ended up learning something.

    --
    When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
  8. Re:What about a Google Uni Project? by nzap · · Score: 2

    There's something wrong when people choose their schools as tourists choose their attractions.

  9. Cool, but not the same as being there... by spiedrazer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having seen several works by the major impressionists in person, I can say that no 2D rendering of a truly great painting can do it justice, no matter how high the resolution. Looking at a Van Gogh, for example, the paint depth in the brush strokes can be up to a centimeter thick, and this depth interactes with the light in person in a way that you can't capture in a 2D image. Which is not to say the whole thing isn't still really cool.

    --
    Keep passing the open windows...
  10. Re:D2 bugs by icebike · · Score: 2

    Off topic.

    But I'm seeing the same thing, especially following a link in an email to a specific reply.
    Drag the slider any direction, and it seems to magically fix it. But you have to do this each time
    you follow a link to a specific post. Very annoying. And don't even try to move that slider on
    an Android device.

    There is a control for re-parenting in the settings or account page that got checked even
    without me doing so.

    It seems the bugs are taking an awfully long time to get fixed. You would thing they would
    work on the big ticket items first.

    --
    Sig Battery depleted. Reverting to safe mode.
  11. Sometimes not even that by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sometimes not even that. I wish I could say that all those sculptures and paintings of naked women were purely for aesthetic appreciation of the human body, but that really wasn't the case. Outside of church frescoes, most paintings fall into one of the categories of immortalizing oneself (portraits) or essentially softcore porn. All that was different is essentially the social contract that it's ok to look at naked women if you pretend it's a representation of Venus ;)

    The age of masturbating another part of your body, as you aptly put it, only came much later and is largely a recent phenomenon.

    Kinda puts it in perspective, I think. I wouldn't be surprised if, assuming one could get cryogenically frozen until the year 3000 like in Futurama, in a future museum one would hear the guide going, "And to the left we have Larry Flint's unnamed recently-discovered masterpiece, which we tentatively call 'Venus with still life up the ass'" ;)

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  12. I wonder if I helped? by scubamage · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Funny enough I submitted this very idea to google about a year ago. I submitted it as a project improvement since its damn near impossible to find an idea submission avenue. I got the idea after using Google street view to take a virtual tour of the Pompeii ruins (I highly recommend checking them out, super cool). So, I sent in a suggestion that they could do something similar with museums around the world, thus allowing people to visit exhibits they may never get to see face to face. I wonder if my submission helped spur on the idea? I never got any kind of response. I'm not really worried about money, I'd just like to know if my suggestion actually gained traction, or if there were a ton of other submissions or what. I can't wait to see how far they take it. I'd love to see it extended to other places. Super cool :)

  13. irresponsible museums by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 2

    ...that lets people view over 1,000 high res artwork images and 17 gigapixel images while taking a virtual stroll through their galleries using Street View technology.

    Doesn't it seem a bit irresponsible on the part of the museums to let those VW Bugs drive around their hallways?

    --
    This guy's the limit!