Slashdot Mirror


US Gov't Pushing News Through China's Great Firewall

eldavojohn writes "The US government's Broadcasting Board of Governors has revealed in a completed FOIA request the development, testing and planned use of Feed Over E-mail (FOE) to push news through China's firewall. This FOIA request (PDF) indicates that the US government is interested in making sure Chinese people receive up-to-date news, and it wants to expand the arsenal of anti-censorship tools (for news at least). The FOE project is GPLv3 and maintained by Sho Ho of BBG."

116 comments

  1. OSS propaganda is good? by Nikker · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does making it FOSS make pushing one countries point of view make it right?

    --
    A loop, by its nature, continues. If that didn't make sense, start reading this sentence again.
    1. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, because it is FOSS, now *every* country in the world can do it.
      Them chinese are going to be one enlightened buch!

    2. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 4, Insightful

      OK, let's get this out of the way: if a private citizen advocates for 1) freedom of expression 2) accountability of governments to their citizens and 3) some other basic human rights, and sets up a FOSS software project to advocate these things to people living under statist governments, is it good? If his government does the same thing, is it bad? It's the messenger AND the message that distinguishes good from bad, not just a question of who's doing the talking.

    3. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by nurb432 · · Score: 2

      To hell with China's rights as a sovereign nation, we are the good guys, we know best. If they did that to us,we would be up in arms ( and rightfully so ), lets hear it for being hypocrites. Go team!

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    4. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by pushing-robot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, imagine the repercussions if China were to ever give the rest of the world access to Chinese news.

      --
      How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
    5. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      If they did what to us, push information through our government mandated internet censorship filters? If China insisted that we should have freedom of the press, freedom of speech, and freedom to assemble? Yeah, we'd be pissed.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    6. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      >>>imagine the repercussions

      The nearby Philadelphia station (Megahertz or Link - channel 35.3) plays Chinese news three times a day. Nothing shocking about it. Also Korean, Japanese, French, German, British, and Euro.

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    7. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by houghi · · Score: 2

      With the government you nowadays have to think if that is ALL they want. It is the same one that is looking at the Internet Kill Switch.
      For all I know, they do it as some sort of test.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    8. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by phoomp · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thoughts: at the same time the US government is looking for ways to help Chinese citizens bypass Chinese censorship, the US government also looking for ways to be able to censor US citizens.

    9. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by phoomp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Censorship by the American Government isn't that far fetched of an idea ... if you take the blinders off for a moment. What if the Internet Kill Switch proposal goes through, something happens to make the US government decide to disconnect Americans from the Internet and China offers a tool to help Americans reconnect to the 'Net?

    10. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by hedwards · · Score: 0

      It's the Chinese government, they don't want freedom of press or speech because it would make it harder for them to control their own population. The Chinese people might very well want freedom of speech, press and assembly, but they aren't the ones working to keep this out. It is also worthwhile considering that Chinese culture is collectivistic and that it can be a lot harder to get collectivists to go along with the sort of things that it takes to have such a significant course correction.

    11. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by commodore64_love · · Score: 1

      BIG QUESTION:

      How do I install this thing on my computer? I can't find a download link. Also it says "works on most email servers as long as the user has access to POP3 and SMTP." Does that include yahoo or googlemail?

      --
      "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." - historian Evelyn Beatrice Hall
    12. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by biryokumaru · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what I always said about the Nazis! And Pol Pot! And Rwanda! And Haiti (early 90's Haiti... but I suppose humanitarian aid is precluded by steadfast nationalism, too...)!

      Whatever happened to sovereignty, huh?

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    13. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by RightwingNutjob · · Score: 2

      If indeed it came to that, I don't think anyone would be terribly offended. In fact, I'm pretty sure the citizenry would be dealing with more immediate problems should the federal government decide to through the First Amendment out the window like that.

    14. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by bn-7bc · · Score: 0

      not shore about yahoo bat googlemail (also the google apps version) offers pop3+imap but you have to enable it in your account settings

    15. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then good for China.

    16. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by poity · · Score: 1

      This isn't about pushing a point of view, it's about making tools available to those who want greater breadth of information.

      The government report on the testing said the technology can carry news feeds as well as vital software applications like Tor, which helps Internet users stay anonymous online, and Freegate, which can be used to access blocked Internet content.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    17. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright enforcement is just censorship dressed up in faux-capitalistic terminology (copyright undermines property rights, as is by now well known). Breaking american copyrights is at least as ethical as breaking the chinese firewalls, and the yanks are at least rabid about respecting their copyright bullshit as the chinese are about preserving their "social integrity".

    18. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by sznupi · · Score: 2

      Yup, luckily we have Free Speech Zones / cages!

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    19. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      It's only the same thing if that private citizen is suppressing everybody else's views while pushing its own. Is the private citizen also shutting down websites of people with differing views? Or accusing them of rape?

    20. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Tavor · · Score: 1

      Censorship by the United States Government has already happened once. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sedition_Act_of_1918

      --
      Windows has detected an undetectable error.
    21. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by evilviper · · Score: 2

      The US government has done a good job, for a very long time, of producing reasonably unbiased news reporting. In fact it may well be the only country where the government funded news media is prohibited from broadcasting to its own citizens, specifically to prevent the temptation of political manipulation and interference from becoming too great.

      Go right ahead and be righteously indignant, but we all know the track record of the two countries involved, and its hardly debatable whos interests are more in line with the Chinese peoples.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by mikael · · Score: 2

      It sounds like something out of the 1980's internet . Back then, many corporate websites didn't have high-speed T1 lines, let alone broadband to access gopher, ftp or USENET. Workers were lucky to get a 64-kbit ISDN link to serve an entire office block. The solution to downloading large files, was to send a Email request to an server, which would in turn ftp the relevant file, chop the file into little chunks and uuencode them to you by E-mail. It would be up to you to reassemble them or to use a suitable E-mail client to do it automatically for you.

      Bring this technique up to date with today technology, and you would either having a mailing list or an E-mail server that could receive requests. In return, these would send out mail attachments comprised of the requested contents as encrypted zip files.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    23. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by mikael · · Score: 1

      You mean TV CCTV-4 International, as made available on the Sky network in Europe?

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    24. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the US gov was censoring us, and the Chinese govt was breaking through that censorship, you can bet I, as a US citizen, would support them (while, of course, remembering that any news they bring might be slanted). I feel exactly this way about Julian Assange.

    25. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      I think the problem is other countries are gonna look at us and realize we're full of shit. I watched Glenn Beck the other day and for the first time in history he said something I agree with, and amazingly his so called fellow conservatives were calling him all kinds of things for even daring to say it.

      He said "Look at the people we have been supporting in the third world, does it match up in ANY way with the values we are supposedly for?" Sure we talk a good game about "freedom" and "rights" but then we hand out billions to scum like Mubarak in Egypt, the Shah, hell look back at the last 70 years and it has been one truly evil bastard after another being propped up with US dollars.

      So I have to say I agree with the man, it is time for the US to be Switzerland. It is time for us to leave everyone else the hell alone and worry about our own country for once. He showed rioters in the streets shouting hate to America in Egypt, and can you blame them? He has been getting the second largest check from us in the middle east, and he is a vicious monster.

      It is high time the USA just left everyone else the hell alone. We are ass deep in debt, we can't afford to be passing out billions anyway, and all we have done is prop up one dictator after another. If the Chinese want freedom there are a hell of a lot more of them than there are of us, let them work for it! It is not our job to be the world's policeman, the world's daddy, or the world's boss. Leave everyone else the hell alone and mind our own business. I can't believe I'm saying this but Glenn Beck was 110% right on this IMHO, just stop it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Does making it FOSS make pushing one countries point of view make it right?

      It's not "pushing" one's POV to make it known to someone who would otherwise be prevented from knowing it.

    27. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by Americano · · Score: 1

      It's already happened once, in a law passed nearly 100 years ago, and repealed in 1920? Well then, I think they've definitely established a tremendously scary pattern of censoring everything they don't like, both in terms of the frequency of the abuse, and in the severity! This jackbooted thuggery cannot be allowed to stand - Katie bar the door, pass the gunpowder, and PRAISE THE LORD!

      What was it I was reading about in another article about how people have a difficult time comparing the impacts of things with a very small likelihood of actually occurring? I wish I could remember, because I'm sure it would be topical here.

    28. Re:OSS propaganda is good? by severoon · · Score: 1

      So...the point of view we're "pushing" on China here is that people should be free to read whatever news they want? And you're not ok with that?

      How did this get modded up to +5 Insightful? It's beyond ignorant, it should be +5 Evil.

      --
      but have you considered the following argument: shut up.
  2. EVEN OVER FIREWALL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    F.O.E.! F.O.E.!

    1. Re:EVEN OVER FIREWALL by __aatirs3925 · · Score: 1

      Great, now I have to go listen to some Touhou. I bet you that's censored in China as well.

    2. Re:EVEN OVER FIREWALL by monkyyy · · Score: 1

      i think u mean
      "GREAT, now i remember i GET to play touhou for 20 hours strait. i bet that WOULD NEVER be censored in china as only evil people would censor touhou"

      --
      warning pointless sig
  3. F.O.E. by Emperor+BMA · · Score: 3, Funny

    > The FOE project is GPLv3 and maintained by Sho Ho of BBG.

    Even in your internets... FOE

    1. Re:F.O.E. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sho Ho fo sho.

  4. Funny by Pyro.Exe · · Score: 1

    Damn you Mongolians! Stop breaking my Wall!

  5. up-to-date news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    up-to-date news?, lol.

  6. Won't work by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Won't work - it's GPLv3, so all of the Chinese citizens with Tivos won't be able to get the news.

  7. A more direct approach by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    Just tell them to free up political speech or we'll stop buying their lead-filled shit. Let's stop being pussies.

    1. Re:A more direct approach by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      If we stop buying their lead-filled shit, they'll stop buying our shit-filled bonds.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    2. Re:A more direct approach by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      That's what happens when you deal with the devil too long.

    3. Re:A more direct approach by hedwards · · Score: 1

      That was my thinking. We in the US are going to have to stop wasting so much money on defense and start paying down our debt. Realistically the Chinese can't afford to pull out of our bonds any more than we can afford to default on them, however there is also nothing that compels the Chinese to buy our debt instruments other than artificially devaluing the yuan.

    4. Re:A more direct approach by XiaoMing · · Score: 2

      Yeah! If they don't, they obviously know what we'll do for situations like that. I mean, just look at Egypt!

      I hope those Chinese bastards at the top of the chain of command are ready for all the "No comment" and "We are watching the situation evolve" statements that they can handle. Especially the ones that are managing the $900B in U.S. Debt.

      Granted, I shouldn't forget that Egypt isn't even going to the extremes of censoring the internet, all they did was turn the whole thing off.

    5. Re:A more direct approach by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

      As much as I like freedom of speech and democracy (real democracy, not the kind where you choose between a few figureheads who then go on to do nothing of what they promised), at this stage of its development dictatorship is probably a good thing in China, it allows them to get things done. India could never do what China is doing with their infrastructure, they'd be tied up in the courts for years.

    6. Re:A more direct approach by sznupi · · Score: 1

      On which side?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  8. Pushing news over the Wall by Ellie+K · · Score: 1

    I just had a quick glance at that rather link packed story. The FOE project on Google Code has no obvious surprises. I scanned that PDF of the FOIA request. Who/ what is the entity in the document header: Governmentattic dot org? Sorry, I probably misspelled that.

    There's actually a tradition of this sort of thing, I think. E.g. like listening to the Voice of America on shortwave radio when outside the U.S.A. and starved for English-language news. Although that isn't quite the same as it is our one's own government getting news to citizens who are overseas. Might the signal transmissions be blocked so they won't be received in China? Or is that only in movies? Seems like it would work, for those who wanted to listen, and could do so without fear of reprisal....

    --
    tempus fugit
    1. Re:Pushing news over the Wall by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Ekhem, if you're starved for English in some random place, you listen BBC World Service ;p

      But generally, isn't the story about... mailing list software?

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  9. LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, 'cos the US is such a good source of international news...

    And what is the obsession with trying to make China a mini-US?

    1. Re:LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you kidding? Who wouldn't want an extra 1.3 billion consumers.

    2. Re:LOL by mhall119 · · Score: 1

      Except the Chinese aren't consumers, that's the biggest problem with their economy.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    3. Re:LOL by hedwards · · Score: 2

      That's not really a problem. I know that it's popular to claim that consumer spending is important, but that's only in countries like the US where we're pillaging foreign countries for wealth, what little work is left tends to be service sector. An ideal economy would be balanced such that there's as much being produced as there is being consumed and that increases in efficiency would lead to decreases in actual work done.

      This is a bit simplistic as it doesn't account for trade and that it's more efficient to raise somethings in say New Zealand and ship them to the US than it is to produce them domestically.

    4. Re:LOL by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      With theirs? With OURS!

      Because in the equation of current global economy, we're the consumers, they're the producers. What people didn't figure out apparently is that to consume, you need money, to have money, you need to earn it, to earn it, you need a job and for a job something has to be produced HERE.

      It baffles me how nothing was learned from the depression of the 30s, which had pretty much the same reason: Good produced cheaply by people who cannot afford them due to wages that did not allow them, a saturated market with those that could and a shrinking number who could. Add a dash of wild stock speculation (also amazing that nothing has changed in that respect, btw, we don't even have any sensible laws against it yet), and welcome to the 1930s.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  10. This is what will happen. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just tell them to free up political speech or we'll stop buying their lead-filled shit. Let's stop being pussies.

    It's a nice fantasy. Unfortunately, it'll never happen - it's impossible. Scenario:

    Senator Blow gets a bunch of other Senators and Congressmen on board. Behind closed doors:

    The Treasury will say, "Um Senator, The Chinese have trillions of our debt. They own our asses and if we stopped trading with them, they'd sell the debt and do very bad things to our economy. Besides, you need them to finance the votes you buy with Government programs (Republican or Democrat: it works with either.) Sure, they'd lose billions but they'd recover quickly."

    Second phase of pressure on Senator:

    The Chinese Outlet Store (Walmart) and every electronics company including Slashdot's beloved Apple will say, "Senator, we own your ass. Your constituents want their electronic gadgets and cheap big screen TVs to watch their TV shows and crap news. STFU or you'll be out of a job next election cycle."

    Congressmen and Senators will all pretty much STFU and start up on some mundane bullshit issue that is spoon fed to them by the pundits on TV and AM radio they'll pump on those big screen TVs. The American public will lick it up like the mindless sheep they are and get all outraged over bogus non-important issues and live they're little cog mindless lives. TVs, religion, and fast food is the bread and circuses for the 2sst Century.

  11. Why GPL? by DAldredge · · Score: 1

    Why is the GPL v3 instead of BSD / public domain?

    1. Re:Why GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We wouldn't want people to actually be free to do what they want with this software, now would we? Ironically, GPLv3 means that if Google wanted to host the code to help free transmission of information they'd be prevented from doing so if it included hooks into proprietary systems. BSD/Apache licenses are much more friendly when it comes to these things.

      Then again, perhaps the codebase had already been infected with GPL but my money's on someone now really understanding the differences or limitations of the license.

    2. Re:Why GPL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why should it not be GPLv3?

  12. Patriotism by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 1

    As long as the US is giving information to citizens of other countries, it's anti censorship. But woe-to-him who gives information to US citizens that the rest of the world already knows, thats treason and terrorism, right?

    1. Re:Patriotism by SeNtM · · Score: 1

      +5 Insightful.

      --
      "There ought to be limits to freedom." -George W. Bush
    2. Re:Patriotism by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      A freedom fighter is also nothing but a terrorist who won. If you didn't figure out that labels are attached by whoever writes the history books and news, you should maybe do some catching up with reality.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Patriotism by cheekyjohnson · · Score: 0

      The difference being that that information endangered the lives of so many innocent people.

      In fact, here's a list of all of the people who actually died because of those leaks:

      --
      Filthy, filthy copyrapists!
  13. Sakuya-san, Sakuya-san, room cleaning stop! by suiminbusoku · · Score: 0

    It's "Hong Meiling", not "China".

  14. Isnt it ironic. by unity100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that american govt is so sensitive about freedom of information of chinese people, whereas trying to censor/suppress anything that wikileaks discloses about american government, to american people ?

    question was rhetorical. it is ironic.

    1. Re:Isnt it ironic. by russotto · · Score: 2

      that american govt is so sensitive about freedom of information of chinese people, whereas trying to censor/suppress anything that wikileaks discloses about american government, to american people ?

      Is the US government soliciting and obtaining Chinese government classified documents and then broadcasting their contents worldwide? No, they are not. There's no irony or hypocrisy here. Give the Devil his due, why don't you?

    2. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The American government is not attempting to censor/suppress anything. The documents were stolen. If these documents were requested using a FOIA request then this would be a non-issue. The fact that the American government may press charges against Wikileaks is no surprise to me. If you want to play espionage then you have to suffer the consequences of your actions when you get caught.

    3. Re:Isnt it ironic. by poity · · Score: 2

      I'm trying to understand you, unity100. I know you support Wikileaks as I do, but do you also support this initiative that targets Chinese people?
      Also, the appropriate word is "hypocritical". Of course, that would require the US to actively censor what its citizens can access in the name of "social harmony" as China does.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    4. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not, and never has been about subjective "freedom" of the worker drones. These are the early trappings of war.

    5. Re:Isnt it ironic. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      espionage != leak. look up for the meaning of "!=" from internet. and, stop making concepts out of your ass.

    6. Re:Isnt it ironic. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      if american government is going to fight for freedom of information, they should stop trying to suppress wikileaks first.

    7. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If that holds any drop of water in court, most journalists and their papers (at least those still worth the name) should better hire a lot of lawyers.

      Publishing dirty laundry of some company? Must have been spying, we sue.
      Publishing anything about celebrities they don't want you to know? Must have been spying, we sue.
      Reporting pretty much anything someone does not want you to know? We sue.

      In short, news will be even more boring, even more drivel and even more "everything's perfect" propaganda than they already are.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    8. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does it matter what you're censoring in the name of?
      Google "seized by ICE" for example.

      Is censorship only bad when it's done with political motivations? I'm sure you can find examples of the US government doing that as well.

    9. Re:Isnt it ironic. by jebblue · · Score: 0

      so it irks you that we do something good?

    10. Re:Isnt it ironic. by poity · · Score: 1

      But do we really need to do one thing at a time? Can't we make progress on both fronts -- encourage the US to be more accepting of WL, while also supporting this initiative? Like Obama once said, "it is not necessary for us to think we can do only one thing and suspend everything else." How about it, can this project get some words of encouragement from you?

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    11. Re:Isnt it ironic. by poity · · Score: 1

      Rare cases of abuse notwithstanding, most ICE seizures are related to ip issues, i.e. stopping counterfeiters, or the online hosting of copyrighted material.
      You can of course take a fundamentalist view of freedom of expression and include protection for counterfeiters and copyright violators, but that brings with it an even larger can of worms.
      Your last sentence seems confused, as you seem to agree that censorship is indeed bad, yet you immediately fall to the "they do it too" fallacy. It's difficult to discern which you value more -- anti-censorship initiatives, or winning silly arguments.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    12. Re:Isnt it ironic. by unity100 · · Score: 1

      i cant give any encouragement on this project, because, american government, is a source which we cannot trust for freedom of information at this point.

      simply, it is illogical to support an endeavor for spreading information by a government which has been hostile to freedom of information regarding itself.

      see ? it doesnt have enough credibility. had the american government been open to freedom of information up till this point, one could say that 'well, depending on their record, we can say that they are doing this out of principles', and support them. but, the record has been horrible.

      moreover, despite there is similar repression in iran, american government is not doing a general, broad project for providing freedom of information to people under censorship, but, specifically targeting china. why ?

      numerous reasons can be found. china holds huge american public debt, china holds american manufacturing, china is the biggest single-unit market on the planet, china is one of the few countries which american corporations cannot penetrate with their resources (like how they do for a lot of countries) and effect the political decision making process and twist it to their ends and so on. moreover, china is not intimidated, coerced or fooled by any advances of american government at all - it is totally the opposite. (due to the public debt situation, and manufacturing).

      china also has been out of acta or similar negotiations, didnt give any credence to it at any given point, and has generally been acting against american private interest agendas being propagated.

      especially, in the last 2 months, there has been quite stern exchanges in between officials of the two countries, in differing levels of government in various areas. to the point of a chinese trade representative (i believe it was a rep) outright declaring in a retort to american rep that america was practically bankrupt, dollar was water vapor and therefore there was no reason for anyone to care when america threatens economic pressure. (it was probably in regard to yuan being overvalued and america demanding it be adjusted and making various threats).

      and now suddenly american government cares about the freedom of information, in china. at this stage, i would say freedom of propaganda, for its own self interests, under the light of the above advances, and couldnt bear myself to bring support behind anything american govt was doing in that direction.

      moreover, freedom of information has a lot of true and real supporters everywhere. from freenet to darknets, from proxies to tor, there are lot of people doing real work with pure intentions. id much rather support them, before i support anything from a government with a horrible track record of hypocrisy.

    13. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heck, the Democrats in Virginia want to pass a law prohibiting FOI requests from getting taxpayer funded climate temperature data! The Democrat Party is scared to death of this data and communications getting out to the public. They could end up taking the Party down via RICO!

    14. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its just Newspeak propaganda.

      It should read "use of Feed Over E-mail (FOE) to push propaganda through China's firewall.

      There fixed that for ya!

      You are right it all is rather ironic the pot calling the kettle black.

    15. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Americano · · Score: 1

      Really, so where in the article do they report that we're stealing classified Chinese military & diplomatic documents, and publishing them for the entire world to look at with this software?

      I must've missed that "ironic" part!

    16. Re:Isnt it ironic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      moreover, freedom of information has a lot of true and real supporters everywhere. from freenet to darknets, from proxies to tor, there are lot of people doing real work with pure intentions. id much rather support them, before i support anything from a government with a horrible track record of hypocrisy.

      Perhaps you should learn where many of these technologies get their funding. TOR, for example, started out as a US government project and continues to get funding from the US government.

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/01/05/censorship_grants_wikileaks/

      http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/24/us/24iht-letter.html

  15. This is what's going to happen by conscarcdr · · Score: 1

    US government will now feed them information that Chinese government no longer has enough credential to get through. A new era of brainwashing.

  16. a proper name by gcnaddict · · Score: 1

    It's probably fitting that one of China's foes is doing this.

    --
    Viable Slashdot alternatives: https://pipedot.org/ and http://soylentnews.org/
  17. What about... by thestudio_bob · · Score: 2

    I wonder if they're pushing WikiLeaks?

    --
    The real Sig captains the Northwestern. This one captains /.
    1. Re:What about... by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      What would they do if China's government used the same FOE source code to send information to Americans?

    2. Re:What about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What would they do if China's government used the same FOE source code to send information to Americans?

      China should get info from wikileaks and use the same technology to push the news to the americans

    3. Re:What about... by ljgshkg · · Score: 1

      Good one. XD

      That said, they always make these stuff a big deal, as if general Chinese population really care about news from foreign source.

      See, it's not like Chinese really can't push through the firewall if they really want. tens of thousands of Chinese quickly break through the firewall to view a Japanese porn star's blog (twitter? I forgot) after the news about her blog got spread through the word of mouth, adding tens of thousands of "follower" to her blog in just a few days.

      But how many push through for news? The fact is clear about what matters.

  18. NOT irony. Learn the difference. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ironic would imply this things are just happening because. These are not accidents.

    It is hypocrisy at its worst, not irony. And could even be considered an act of war, since it's pushing US-favoring propaganda on another sovereign country.

    The US government's moral superiority is utterly non-existant. China's too, yes, but at least they don't kill people outside their borders on a massive scale.

  19. Government Attic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.GovernmentAttic.org has published a lot of other useful stuff also. Has anyone looked at what's there?

  20. This is how it was invented: by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

    Some American official: I know what to do -- we should SPAM them with propaganda!

    --
    Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  21. Not new by sjames · · Score: 1

    This is a natural extension of Voice of America in the internet age.

  22. State media across state borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We wouldn't want to have China believing in global warming, would we?

  23. The only problem I have with it by Opportunist · · Score: 2

    The problem I have with the US's zeal to "export democracy" is that they go so overzealous with it that there's now a shortage of it at home.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    1. Re:The only problem I have with it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem that I have with it is that democracy isn't always the most ideal system and the founders understood that.

      Look at Africa for example, does democracy work over there? Plenty of dictators have been democratically, Hitler being the most famous example.

      And how about the sad state that the US is in right now? Is this the brand of democracy we're trying to export to the rest of the world? If so, I do feel bad for the rest of the world because we're on track to becoming third-world.

    2. Re:The only problem I have with it by pandrijeczko · · Score: 1

      I think you would have to be very naive to believe this is just about exporting democracy...

      This is actually about the minority of the uber rich who have spent years selling their souls & the souls of everyone else to the highest bidders for a few dollars/pounds/euros.

      There's a lot of new wealth in China and a lot of "investment opportunities" for the Chinese rich classes, assuming you get the information to them.

      --
      Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  24. freedom of information is good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Perhaps the Chinese should try to push through the high crime rates of Mexicans and Blacks that the American government is trying to hide from its white citizens.

  25. Why bother? by Froggels · · Score: 0

    I can only imagine that the US is trying very hard to make itself look good in the eyes of the Chinese people. There is otherwise no incentive for the US to push "freedom" in China. The last thing the US needs right now is a new wave of "free" Chinese immigrants. All hail China for the time being. For they somehow manage to keep over one billion people in check an out MY backyard. Not get off my lawn!

  26. Or by Stargoat · · Score: 2

    Or you can just use Alta-Vista or any other not-so-well-known news provider. That's what I did last time I was over there, in China that is. I was reading a lot of African newspapers online as well.

    All it requires is a little imagination people. These are dullard Communists who specialize in IT who set the Great Firewall up.

    --
    Hoist Number One and Number Six.
  27. Free, we? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is the presumption that the US has no censorship or perhaps the US does such a skilled job that we do not think we have any?

  28. How about we build a Great Wall around the Yanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    While I don't agree with the Great Firewall of China, I also think the Yank Goverment need to keep their nose out of it as well! Where do they get off pushing their POV into place where it is obviously not wanted.

  29. How does it work? by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    I'm puzzled how this works. the description does not make sense to me:

    "FOE is different from the average feed reader in that it's able to fetch content from censored sites without requiring the user to visit those sites to set up the feed. Once FOE fetches the content, it encrypts it and sends it via e-mail much like an attached file. The user's client gets decrypts the feed once it's arrived and displays it on the local machine. Ho adds that FOE should be easy for activists to set up and maintain because it uses existing infrastructure."

    Is there some proxy that does the encryption? How does the site know to send an e-mail. very confusing.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  30. Loss of credibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The U.S. government's reaction to Wikileaks and its current attacks on domain names of supposed P2P distributors has made any efforts against China by it lose all credibility in my eyes. If anything, this only supports government efforts by nations like China, etc. to censor their Internet as they now have additional evidence that the U.S. is trying to feed propaganda to its citizens and waging information war. I love the way its called "news" - lets be real, this is U.S. propaganda coming through.

    I don't like the idea of the Chinese firewall and censorship, but seeing how western media outlets control such a large proportion of information, or propaganda being released on the tubes - I can understand why they are concerned and why they do it.

    Its not right, but neither is what the U.S. government and its allies are doing either - if they would just let things run their course and ideas spread freely- eventually we will all come to conclusions on how things should work and what system is best for the people.

    For those in power - whether they are the corporate capitalist elite, or the authoritarian opportunists - it won't be anything we have today - so keep trying to silence us - you are witnessing the beginning of a worldwide revolution coming as more people start to wakeup to what is going on.

  31. How it works by goombah99 · · Score: 1

    The only article I've found so far that explains this mystery is this:
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/6028780/What-is-the-Feed-over-Email-system.html

    But this seems to say it requires a special server. In which case it seems like this is just an encoded version of the 2008 service "feed-my-email". it still has to have a special server that the user must communicate with.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  32. Waste of US tax payer money by hackingbear · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They had "success" in testing simply because nobody is using this. There are thousands other ways to do the same if only you and the few recipients know the route. Chinese government does not worry the information getting it, today you can read CNN or many other English sites in China unrestricted; they worry the information being spread to wide population and cause social unrest, like in Egypt. If it can ever be popular among to millions of people, say a lot more than the number of people using proxies or reading English news over there, they can find way to shut it down and it will be shut it down.

    1. Re:Waste of US tax payer money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree 100%.

      Contrary to what some may believe, most Chinese don't feel oppressed by their government and don't seek any increase in their freedoms. (Much like how most Americans give up freedoms daily without any protest.)

      Worse, even many of the Chinese who do seek more freedoms will take offense of a foreign government trying to meddle in Chinese affairs. Wanting political reform does not equal copying the American model, nor does it mean wanting "help" from Americans.

      As hackbear noted, it's already trivial to read western news in China. (I live there for many years now.) Free proxies, paid VPN's, pirate networks, corner-DVD guys, etc. But guess what, most people just use these to access Facebook and download entertainment, they're not really interested in reading the western opinion on topics they didn't care all that much about to begin with. The government rarely cracks down on people using these methods.

      There's just one strong western force in China and that's Hollywood. Ironically the US gov. is pushing China to crack down on this force. Apparently making money on the 100 million rich in China is more important than spreading western propaganda to the 1.3 billion poor. So much for the US gov's "good intentions".

  33. OLD GLORY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Woohooo! This is the US that I love.
    Hope it works as news post explained

  34. Good for them. by steeleyeball · · Score: 1

    Have they asked Julian Assange for help? I Think the US should have hired him years ago... I'm sure he could get information across the great firewall of china back to the rest of the world as well.

  35. FOE SPAM in 3....2....1.... by methangel · · Score: 1

    V1@GRA

  36. self defeating move isn't it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since the Americans are obviously doing this as an altruistic operation to bring justice and prosperity to an obviously destitute China, wouldn't this just one day make China a formidable competition...oh wait a minute, China is already a formidable competition! In which case I fail to see the logic of trying to "help" somebody who is doing much better than you are.
    Last time I offered business advice to the bank holding my mortgage, they told me to get lost and jacked my rates by 20 points.

  37. Re: just a short length of pipe by mikexcite · · Score: 1

    Agree, and the go-to article on this is always James Fallows' "The Connection Has Been Reset" http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2008/03/-ldquo-the-connection-has-been-reset-rdquo/6650/ Well worth a read if you're interested in this issue. Short version: The literally Orwellian internal censorship is so effective that the government can shut down almost any unpleasant message from spreading beyond a plugged-in elite (the Chinese equivalent of Slashdot readers). Fetishizing breaching the external firewall is just one small length of pipe needed to reach even the new urban middle class of Chinese.

  38. DMCA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that a violation of the DMCA :)

  39. wtf? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean seriously, lets just call it what it is: A daily newsletter
    how long have these been around for? (yes, even filtering by certain content)

    rss in basic terms provides a list of summaries and links (plus dates) of news
    a subscriber's rss reader will periodically check the feed for updates
    (that is, has the xml in the rss changed)

    FoE dumps those updates into an email and sends it to a user
    when there's nothing new it doesn't send an email
    the only thing different i see is the email is getting encrypted

    so seriously. wtf is going on with the stupid FoE name?

    btw. from the project's homepage:

    http://code.google.com/p/foe-project/

    Technically, FOE is built on top of SMTP and work on most email servers as long as the user has access to POP3 and SMTP.

    which is fine except for the current (and only) issue with the project:

    http://code.google.com/p/foe-project/issues/detail?id=1

    Issue 1: GFW of China censors SMTP transfer

  40. SSH tunnel by SwedishPenguin · · Score: 1

    Any computer with an SSH server installed can act as a SOCKS5 proxy.. Seems like it would be somewhat easier to just set up a few of those and allow the Chinese people free roam of the Internet. (of course then they could learn all sorts of things not endorsed by the US government, that can't be good :P)

    1. Re:SSH tunnel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These would be too easy to block.

      How do you let the Chinese people know about the proxy while stopping the government officials running the firewall from finding out about it?

  41. CCTV channels are all available on cable/satellite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comcast here in norcal carries several on basic cable, and you can get more in a package, not just CCTV International.

  42. Isn't this illegal computer trespass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't this illegal computer trespass? You know, exactly like Palin's email "hacker" and McKinnon wrt DoD?

    The Chinese government has said "Do not" and then the US goes and hacks access through. Now China will have to spend BILLIONS fixing all the machines so compromised, therefore the people in the US doing this will have to be extradited.

    Yes?

  43. Messing with a big bully here... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I am not sure if they understand the implications, but let Obama tighten the bonds first before you go muck about in someone else's backyard and ruin not only diplomatic ties, but also alienate a nation that is already control hungry, and needs any excuse to bombard us again with cyber activity.