Slashdot Mirror


House Fails To Extend Patriot Act Spy Powers

schwit1 writes "The House failed to extend three key expiring provisions of the Patriot Act on Tuesday, elements granting the government broad and nearly unchecked surveillance power on its own public. The failure of the bill, sponsored by Rep. James F. Sensenbrenner Jr. (R-Wis), for the time being is likely to give airtime to competing measures in the Senate that would place limited checks on the act's broad surveillance powers. The White House, meanwhile, said it wanted the expiring measures extended through 2013."

20 of 284 comments (clear)

  1. Good. by headkase · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If the Stanford Prison Experiment has taught one and only one thing is that given power without oversight always leads to abuse and corruption.

    --
    Shh.
    1. Re:Good. by dougmc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If the Stanford Prison Experiment has taught one and only one thing is that given power without oversight always leads to abuse and corruption.

      No, it didn't teach that. It taught that it might -- it's just one instance.

      HISTORY, on the other hand, has taught us that power without oversight usually leads to abuse and corruption. (And even then it's not always.)

    2. Re:Good. by fishexe · · Score: 4, Funny

      If the Stanford Prison Experiment has taught one and only one thing is that given power without oversight always leads to abuse and corruption.

      No, it didn't teach that. It taught that it might -- it's just one instance.

      What are you saying, that a sample size of one isn't enough to go on when drawing universal generalizations? Preposterous!

      --
      "I don't care about the Constitution!" --Bill O'Reilly, November 17, 2009
  2. Re:Read it and weep: by lul_wat · · Score: 5, Funny

    Also seeing as I'm about to get modded down .. I just watched Canadian Bacon for the first time, a film from 1995. In one scene the US President is receiving ideas about what should replace the Cold War. Someone suggests Terrorism and he laughs it off saying that no one would fall for it.

    --
    Divide a cake by zero. Is it still a cake?
  3. I got an email from EFF the other day by rodgster · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was going to send a comment to my congressman demanding that he vote against this unconstitutional atrocity. Thankfully this didn't pass and hopefully has finally begun to sunset. I can only hope we can someday resurrect the Constitution.

    --
    Who will guard the guards?
  4. Bold prediction: by straponego · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The bill will be reintroduced and will pass easily, probably with an end to sunset provisions. It's amazing how many erstwhile defenders of the Constitution, like Patrick Leahy, have become rubber stamps-- fig leaves, at best-- for the surveillance state ever since the Patriot Act made wiretapping of important people ubiquitous. Well, it wasn't just since the Patriot Act. It was right around the time US Government anthrax went out to the most liberal members of Congress and Paul Wellstone's plane crashed. Good times.

  5. Re:good job Republicans! by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Save your praise: most of the Republicans actually supported extension. It only failed by seven votes, and that because almost every Democrat and some of the Tea Party newcomers opposed it.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
  6. Stop celebrating - it's going to pass by AdmiralXyz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hate to put a damper on things, but the only reason this failed was that the Republicans assumed that passage was a fait accompli, so they pushed it in under an expediting procedure that requires a two-thirds vote, and the bill only failed that by 7 votes. All they have to do is reintroduce it under the usual majority vote rule and it will be a done deal.

    Though I will admit, for the first time since I became aware of their existence I feel something other than blinding hatred for the Tea Party, who are basically responsible for the Republicans not having enough votes. Looks like some of them really do care about civil liberties, and for that at least they should be congratulated.

    --
    Dislike the Electoral College? Lobby your state to join the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact.
    1. Re:Stop celebrating - it's going to pass by yuhong · · Score: 4, Insightful

      At least this time it will be debated and amendments will be considered.

  7. Amazing with all we are facing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Massive debt, an economy on the brink of collapse and all the House Republicans are interested in is repealing health care for the people that couldn't get it, tax breaks for the rich and extending domestic spying/the Patriot Act. How about trying to fix something that's actually broken? When I saw the Republican proposed budget cuts they were all things like education, EPA, NASA and the FBI of all things. Not a single cut was actual fat and none of it affected the rich or corporate America. Remember where their priorities lie next time around.

  8. Re:good job Republicans! by odd42 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Good job Republicans! Wow, never thought I'd say that.. Well, after being in power for 17 of the last 20 years, it's about time you did something right.

    Um... 90% of Repubs voted FOR extending it...! http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll026.xml

  9. Re:So it worked exactly like it was supposed to wo by amRadioHed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People were uppity because they should never have had the powers in the beginning.

    --
    We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
  10. Re:good job Republicans! by besalope · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's the vote list:

    http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2011/roll026.xml

    Key Stats:

    Republicans:
    Yea: 210
    Nay: 26

    Democrats:
    Yea: 67
    Nay: 122

    Republicans killed the bill my ass.

  11. Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For those who thought Obama was going to change the status quo, you should read the provisions the White House wants to keep:

    The three expiring Patriot Act provisions are:

    â The âoeroving wiretapâ provision allows the FBI to obtain wiretaps from a secret intelligence court, known as the FISA court, without identifying what method of communication is to be tapped.

    â The âoelone wolfâ measure allows FISA court warrants for the electronic monitoring of a person for whatever reason â" even without showing that the suspect is an agent of a foreign power or a terrorist. The government has said it has never invoked that provision, but the Obama administration said it wanted to retain the authority to do so.

    â The âoebusiness recordsâ provision allows FISA court warrants for any type of record, from banking to library to medical, without the government having to declare that the information sought is connected to a terrorism or espionage investigation.

    In the best traditions of bipartisanship, both parties want to take away your civil liberties and sell out the middle class to big business. The only difference between the two is which big business group they are puppets for.

    And this is coming from a Constituional law professor, by the way. A guy who taught at one of the top Universities in the country - the University of Chicago - and was educated at the top law school in the country. If this is what he thinks the Constitution stands for, we're fucked.

    Obama is as much of a disgrace to this country as Bush ever was.

    Don't tell me it's just politics. Where would be if everyone - Lincoln, Jefferson, etc. - acted as if it were just politics? Sometimes you got to take a stand. But alas, the sad truth is that Mr. Obama simply does not have the balls.

    I will now go back to listening to the Who.

    Posting anonymously because that's just what this country has come to.

    1. Re:Meet the new boss, same as the old boss by freakinangry · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The public, us, is fed so much disinformation that most of us don't know which way is up anymore. In the meantime, concentrated interests are pushing through the same agenda no matter whether the administration is Republican or Democrat... and what was once a middle class is slowly being pushed into extinction via economic pressures perpetrated by banksters and absent fed regulatory agencies, the highest incarceration levels among free and industrialized countries, a constant slashing of education, and to keep us frog from jumping out of the boiling pot... endless entertainment online or through the media (news and other junk). But no worries folks, as Egypt demonstrates, people can go hungry for only so long before they start to fight back, so there is hope on the horizon ;-)

  12. Re:Hmm. by davester666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I, for one, welcome Congress's inability to come together as one bipartisan group in an effort to eliminate my rights as a non-incorporated citizen.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  13. Re:Who is Roblimo by Roblimo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Actually, I'm retired and just helping out a little when others are taking breaks/vacations or are out sick.

    - Robin

  14. Re:Who is Roblimo by Jello+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

    could you please tell the other editors to post better

  15. Re:Minority government by Third+Position · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, don't start celebrating yet. This was lost only due to being submitted under a special procedure that require 2/3 majority approval. If it gets resubmitted under the standard procedure requiring only a majority approval, it has more than enough votes to pass.

    Unfortunately, I expect this to be a short lived victory.

    --
    American Third Position
    Finally, a real choice!
  16. Sarcastic news placement on NPR this morning? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It might have been deliberate, but NPR segued straight from talking about the (sadly almost certainly temporary) failure to renew the Patriot Act provisions... to discussing protests in Egypt over the decades-old 'emergency provisions' that gave 'sweeping powers to the security services'.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!