Slashdot Mirror


Duke Nukem Forever Not Edited For Australia

dotarray writes "In case you still somehow didn't believe yesterday's news that Duke Nukem Forever had been given an MA15+ rating in Australia – effectively evading the notoriously strict censors, GamePron now has confirmation that the Duke has not been edited in any way for an Australian release. Hooray!"

6 of 156 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Won't somebody think of the children!? by deniable · · Score: 5, Funny

    Age verification question: Do you remember the initial announcement?

  2. This joke is going too far by iYk6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This joke is going too far. They have official ratings now? Can they get in trouble for submitting something that they have no intention of finishing?

    1. Re:This joke is going too far by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      It is actually rated for 8 year olds, but that is because they'll be ten years older before the game releases.

  3. Re:This worries me greatly. by dadioflex · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Probably similar to Germany in that they're okay with killing non-humans and nobody outside of the US hates tits.

  4. Censorship, sorry "classification" board is useles by mjwx · · Score: 4, Informative

    effectively evading the notoriously strict censors

    The Classification Board is aware of just how much of a joke it's become. They've figured out that anything remotely popular now has to be given an M15+ rating regardless of content because they've been threatened by state governments to have their mandate pulled if they start trying to censor things. Basically they've become toothless, refuse classification and the media will drag you thought the mud so they'll just rubber stamp any level of violence and nudity even when it should be clearly restricted.

    Basically this was the worst possible scenario for former attorney general Michael Atkinson, as 15 yr olds can now legally buy material that should be in the Restricted (R18+) category ironically because Atkinson opposed the introduction of a restricted category for video games. Hell, a 12 or 13 yr old could get it as they dont really do ID checks for M rated films, not to mention parents who dont understand the content that will buy it.

    Well you made the bed Michael, now you have to lie in it.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
  5. Re:This worries me greatly. by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The problem with our current video game rating system is that MA15+ is the highest we have. The only other option the classification board has is to refuse the game classification altogether, thereby preventing it from being sold in Australia. This results in things that shouldn't pass a MA15+ rating getting one, because they're not so bad they should be refused classification altogether.

    It's also why the idiotic "gotta protect the children!" crowd who oppose a higher rating for video games are showing themselves to be unthinking hypocrites who have zero interest in actually reducing the ease of access to violent or 'harmful' games by minors, and are instead interested only in shoving their own particular moralities down the throat of every adult in the country.