Slashdot Mirror


X Prize $30 Million Robot Race To the Moon Is On

coondoggie writes "The master competition masters at X Prize Foundation are at it again. Today the group announced the 29 international teams that will compete for the $30 million Google Lunar X Prize, the competition to put a robot on the moon by 2015. To win the money, a privately-funded team must successfully place a robot on the Moon's surface that explores at least 500 meters and transmits high definition video and images back to Earth. The first team to do so will claim a $20 million Grand Prize, while the second team will earn $5 million."

5 of 189 comments (clear)

  1. Prize is not intended to fund the effort by tm2b · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cue comments about $20 Mil not paying the bill.

    The prize is not intended to entirely pay for the effort, it is intended to lower the cost and provide a base level of return as well as publicize the effort. The X-Prize to "space" did not pay nearly enough to pay Rutan's costs, and people don't work at getting a Nobel for the cash prize.

    --
    "It is our blasphemy which has made us great, and will sustain us, and which the gods secretly admire in us." - Zelazny
  2. Re:Unfortunately, by mrsquid0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No, it is not that hard to put something on the Moon. We have the parts, and we know how to make them. We can soft-land rovers on Mars, and the Moon is a lot easier to get to and easier to land something on than Mars is. The problem is not the technology, that is essentially a solved problem. The problem is doing it cheaply.

    --
    Just because you are paranoid does not mean that no-one is out to get you.
  3. Space Robot Fight? by Stregano · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would personally put some kind of weapon on my robot in the case the other robots got there first. Send a signal back to earth of my robot kicking your robot's ass. That would be badass

    --
    The world is how you make it
  4. Re:The Mythbusters should try to win this! by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 4, Funny

    But bad rocket science = masterful cinematic effects.

  5. Lunar Lander by mrbcs · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Please, please, please, would the winner send back a hi def photo of some of the Nasa junk left there. This would end all tinfoil hat theories on whether Nasa actually went there.

    --
    I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.