Slashdot Mirror


Does Syfy Really Love Sci-Fi?

brumgrunt writes "Has Syfy fallen out with science fiction altogether? A look at its latest scheduling shows that it's further away from its roots than ever. 'There's still a lot of the older sci-fi content on the airwaves, but it's slowly being phased out, and forget about original programming. After all, this is the programming crew who ruined Caprica by stuffing it into the Friday night death slot and splitting the season into two parts. These are the geniuses who killed off Stargate Atlantis and Stargate Universe. These are the people who wrecked Farscape, one of the most inventive and fun sci-fi shows to ever be on television. They also ended Mystery Science Theater 3000, only the greatest show ever invented by robots in space.' Is this now as good as it gets?"

24 of 742 comments (clear)

  1. What you say? by Daetrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    "and forget about original programming."

    You could not be further from the truth! I'm very much looking forward to Mega BearLion vs Giant Robo-Piranha 2: The Revenge!

    --
    This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    1. Re:What you say? by jedidiah · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For this reason, I could exclude SciFi channel from my Sci-Fi movies recording rule and be much better off for it.

      TCM or AMC are much more likely to show Sci-Fi classics than SyFy.

      Although the local PBS station does show old B movies. However, even those seem better made than the self-produced stuff from SyFy.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  2. Wrestling now by guspasho · · Score: 4, Informative

    They killed SGU so they could put wrestling in its place. What more evidence do you need?

    1. Re:Wrestling now by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 5, Insightful

      SGU was terrible.

      I really wish they ran a live version of the Skeptic's Guide to the Universe in place of it.

      SG:Atlantis and SG1 were great shows. SGU just lacked any of the wit and fun those shows brought us. I watched SG:A and SG1 because they were fun, last thing I really needed was a giant bummer.

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Wrestling now by discord5 · · Score: 4, Funny

      They killed SGU so they could put wrestling in its place

      On the bright side, wrestling has a more credible plot and more likeable characters.

  3. Until it's cheaper, yes by jandrese · · Score: 5, Informative

    From what I can tell, SyFy doesn't hate Sci-Fi so much as it hates shows that require money to produce. That's why it's chock full of Ghost Retards type shows and horrible Canadian subsidized horror movies.

    That said, the costuming reality show (Face Off) has been fairly interesting, even if the producers are hitting the "reality show drama" notes quite a bit too hard. There is some skill and technique on display, and I would be ecstatic if they added little segments about the different techniques they're using "this material takes a couple of hours to set and require different kinds of paint, but allow for more realistic mobility..." instead of the "But Person X is hitting on Person Y, and that's making Person Z jealous" manufactured bullshit.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  4. Syfy is to science fiction... by KingSkippus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Syfy has become to science fiction like MTV is to music television. Or TechTV (now "G4") is to technology.

    It's a shame. I used to love their original programming. Now... wrestling? Really?

    1. Re:Syfy is to science fiction... by FreonTrip · · Score: 5, Interesting

      And Syfy's still better off than TLC, which has dropped any meaning associated with those three letters and shows endless permutations of freak show reality TV gawkery. Network decay is an ugly thing.

  5. SyFy Channel Saved Me Money! by footNipple · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The programming has become so bad that when deciding on a cable tv package the only significant difference (for us) between the tier I ordered and the one above was the Syfy, Bravo and an extra c-span.

    I ordered the lesser priced service specifically because I was no longer interested in that channel. So Syfy sucking has saved me $20+/month

    It looks like I'll get my science fiction in print and from any number of the streaming services.

  6. Bills to Pay by Rydia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "After all, this is the programming crew who ruined Caprica by stuffing it into the Friday night death slot and splitting the season into two parts. These are the geniuses who killed off Stargate Atlantis and Stargate Universe. These are the people who wrecked Farscape, one of the most inventive and fun sci-fi shows to ever be on television. They also ended Mystery Science Theater 3000"

    How DARE they cancel that show that nobody liked, and those two shows that had bad ratings. And that other show that had bad ratings. And that nine-year-old show that had a good run for years on their network.

    I sometimes get the feeling that Sci-Fi fans are so desperate for more content that they religiously and desperately cling to whatever they get, and in the process make shows into far more than they actually are. It's understandable, and even sympathetic. Then again, so is the network trying to pay the bills.

    1. Re:Bills to Pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So, why run a sci-fi channel if you don't believe (correctly, or otherwise) that sci-fi shows are going to pay the bills?

  7. Nope by whitroth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's see, come up with interesting shows... then kill them, or ruin them. Then, you've got a specific niche market that you're targeted at, why not "rebrand" yourself, and try to appeal to an overfull market, while treating the folks who made you viable as ignorant , and chasing them away as hard as you can?

    *Great* business plan.

    But then, most of them a) don't read SF, b) don't understand it, and c) flunked 5th grade science, and know so much about how the world works that they'd electricute themselves cleaning a toaster (you have to clean them? Really? How? Why?)

    And on the sf side, as a lifelong sf fan, it *used* to be that there were 10 year or so cycles, where you'd get more fantasy for 10 years, then more sf; the last 15 or so, it's overwhelmingly fantasy. My take is that with the dumbing down of the educational system, and especially the unravelling of the Space Program, kids don't see a chance for them, so they go off into fantasy worlds where *something* can happen, and maybe they'll win the lottery, too.

                          mark

  8. Advertising demographics trumps genre by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It boils down to this:

    Science fiction and fantasy programming, no matter how high-quality or compelling, do not draw a sufficiently advertising-targetable, high-spending audience to justify a seperate channel.

    In lieu of this, Syfy has chosen the fallback position, which is to appeal to a much broader but reliable audience, young men. Programmers know what shows appeal to this demographic, and advertisers know which products to pitch to them during the breaks.

    Thus: Wrestling, ghost hunting, lurid monster movies.

    Science fiction is not the only genre or category to suffer. A&E and Bravo were concieved as outlets for artsy movies. MTV used to show music videos and be about, well, music. What kind of programs do these channels show now?

    Under the current rules of broadcast and cablecast TV, the situation will never get better. Non-premium channels will get more and more generic and lowbrow. Cheap "reality" shows and infomercials will fill more and more programming slots.

    If you really want high-quality SF&F content, you're going to have to be willing to PAY for it. Either on a premium channel, or by some kind of net subscription.

    1. Re:Advertising demographics trumps genre by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, Stargate is not great science fiction.

      But it is the perfect combination of decent science fiction and an entertaining plot with likable and relatable characters.

  9. Same as other networks by acoustix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look at other "specialty networks": The Learning Channel (TLC), MTV, VH1, etc have all bailed on their original programming and having nothing to do with the name of their network. Hell, even the History Channel has bought into the reality TV bullshit. For the most part all of the networks are showing the same crap now.

    --
    "A plan fiendishly clever in its intricacies"- Homer Simpson
  10. No, Syfy does not love Sci-Fi by gurps_npc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They stopped loving Sci-Fi the second they put wrestling on. Just like MTV stopped loving music the second they switched to reality programing in stead of music.

    --
    excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
  11. Re:Fantasy is now king by Animats · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Fantasy Books are now king while interest in science-based fiction is almost null.

    Yes. Our local Barnes and Noble has four shelf sections of "Paranormal Teen Romance", plus one of "New Paranormal Teen Romance". Half of the SF section is now vampire-related. So is a big fraction of the romance section, plus some of the main fiction section. All the vampire books combined into one section would be impressive. One of the goths who works there says that vampire book sales are down, but zombie books are picking up.

    At retail, SF is either space opera, paranormal, or reprints.

  12. What's the point? by Beelzebud · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What is the point in having niche channels, when you abandon your niche? As someone else mentioned, a lot of channels on cable (The Learning Channel, History, Discovery, etc) are just reality TV and conspiracy theory BS. Why even create niche channels, if they don't want to serve that niche? Even the Science channel is bad these days. There are thousands of good science based documentaries that have been produced, but yet every time I try to watch something on the Science Channel it's just that silly "How Things are Made" crap. Seeing how the Cheetos got from a bag of orange shit, to my face, isn't exactly science!

  13. Science Fiction Fans don't Watch Ads by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 5, Insightful

    While "SyFy" is on cable and therefore sees a bit of revenue off your cable bill, a big percentage of their revenue comes from advertising. Unfortunately their target market (geeky males) generally don't watch ads. They torrent SyFy shows or PVR them and skip through the ads - So it's likely harder for SyFy to recoup their costs for expensive shows with lots of FX if ad revenues are down. Yeah, yeah, I know 'content wants to be free' blah blah blah, but anyone who has watched fan-produced Star Trek or Star Wars webisodes knows that producing quality Science Fiction television programming is complex and expensive.

  14. Re:Fantasy is now king by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 4, Funny

    I used to work at my local B&N. When the 4th Twilight book came out (New Moon I think?) we had a huge release party packed full of preteen/young teen girls. One of the girls got so excited to actually purchase the book that, when I waved her up to my cash register from the line, she ran as fast as she could to get to me. She slipped on the tile floor in front of the register, sprawled head first into the counter, and knocked herself clean out. Maybe the reason zombie sales are picking up is due to the brain damage inflicted on the young populations from the Twilight series. They're just studying the current masters' methods of replenishing their brain supplies....

  15. Re:Fantasy is now king by meerling · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always thought they changed it because what had once been a great channel for Sci-Fi (and occasional fantasy) became a venereal diseased mess absolutely riddled with SyFylis.

  16. There is already a replacement Sci-Fi channel by initdeep · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's called BBCAmerica.
    Dr Who
    Torchwood
    Being Human
    Etc.

    more original and better programming than "Sci-FI" ever had.

    (BTW, Stargate SG1 started on Showtime, not Sci-Fi)

  17. Re:Fantasy is now king by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    You and I may think they were the best shows. But really, these people aren't stupid. They don't put the shows that people WATCH into the death slot. A bunch of geeks may think these shows were awesome. But the "unwashed masses" didn't or the shows would be on in prime time good slots. End of story. I don't care how stupid the people at the network are - they know enough to put their well rated shows in good slots. It just turns out that a good portion of the collective slashdot "we" like different shows than the majority of people - and we are a small minority.

  18. Re:Fantasy is now king by Gorshkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nope, nothing gay about muscled, oil men, rolling around on the floor, while pretending to wrestle, while trying to present bad drama. Normally that roll is reserved for drama queens.

    The most mysterious hold in all of wrestling is the one it has on it's viewers.