Slashdot Mirror


New MacBook Pro Teardown Reveals 'Shoddy Assembly'

CWmike writes "Apple's new MacBook Pro shows some build-quality problems that shouldn't be seen in a notebook that costs $1,800, a teardown expert said on Monday. iFixit.com found several signs of substandard assembly while disassembling a 15-in. MacBook Pro. Among them: A stripped screw near the subwoofer enclosure and an unlocked ZIF (zero insertion force) socket for the IR (infrared) sensor. '[These] should not be things found inside a completely unmolested computer with an $1,800 base price,' iFixit said in the teardown description. iFixit also spotted an unusual amount of thermal paste applied to both the CPU and the GPU. 'Holy thermal paste! Time will tell if the gobs of thermal paste applied to the CPU and GPU will cause overheating issues down the road,' iFixit said. The refreshed MacBook Pro models launched last Thursday in what one analyst called a 'ho-hum' upgrade."

74 of 531 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Three words: by MrEricSir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Unlike those quality, American-made laptops.

    Oh wait... those don't exist.

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  2. So much for build quality... by silly_sysiphus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The first-generation Macbook Pros were nothing special in terms of build quality, but up until now, the unibody machines had been rather good. If you're not paying for build quality, what ARE you getting (hardware-wise) for the extra money, given that most of Apple's components are industry standard now? I suppose this is a good reminder that regardless of the brand, most electronics are coming out of the same crappy Chinese factories.

    1. Re:So much for build quality... by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Informative

      I suppose this is a good reminder that regardless of the brand, most electronics are coming out of the same crappy Chinese factories.

      That's totally unfair.

      Why single out electronics like that?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    2. Re:So much for build quality... by jjohnson · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anonymous coward offers anecdotal evidence. Well, I'm sold!

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    3. Re:So much for build quality... by Anonymous+Psychopath · · Score: 2

      I suppose this is a good reminder that regardless of the brand, most electronics are coming out of the same crappy Chinese factories.

      That's totally unfair.

      Why single out electronics like that?

      40 years ago the common wisdom in the US said the same thing about foreign quality, except back then it was about the Japanese. Those that don't learn their history...

      --

      Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

    4. Re:So much for build quality... by commodore6502 · · Score: 2

      >>>You're paying for OS X, for an aluminum unibody

      That'll come in useful when I take my Mac off-roading this summer. None of that shoddy welded crap to break when the wheels hit ruts. I wonder if the rubber wheels/suspension will hold up.

      --
      Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
    5. Re:So much for build quality... by DeWinterZero · · Score: 2

      If Apple's laptop assembly is anything like Dell's one person is give all the parts and its assembled in one spot. That amount of errors sounds like it was built by a new start and therefore its training/quality that failed. Dell laptop assembly required 10-15 laptops an hour. Servers was 4-5.

    6. Re:So much for build quality... by Haedrian · · Score: 2

      If you're not paying for build quality, what ARE you getting (hardware-wise) for the extra money

      When you buy expensive brand clothing, you're not paying extra because its made from a rare blend of materials - you're paying for that extra brand which makes people recognise you as cool, modern, hip and rich.

      Same thing.

    7. Re:So much for build quality... by twidarkling · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I've used Macbooks. That keyboard sure as fuck ain't awesome. I could go out and buy OS X and stick it on any machine for under $900, and ...well, okay, yes, damn you, that is a really nice screen. I'd love a better screen on my laptop, and since I should have some cash spare soon, I'm looking in to replacements, seeing if there's anything feasible. As for the aluminium unibody, I've honestly never understood the drooling over that. I treat my laptop carefully, as befitting a costly machine, and it just seems to make Macbooks terribly heavy. Am I missing something about it that just isn't obvious? The protection idea is negligible, it's not really better at dispersing heat, aesthetics are a matter of taste, and it's heavier. I've weighed my 17" HP vs. my friend's 15" Macbook.

      --
      Canada: The US's more awesome sibling.
    8. Re:So much for build quality... by spinkham · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You made me spit coffee out at "awesome keyboard".
      My Model M is an awesome keyboard.
      My ThinkPad has a great keyboard for a laptop.
      My new MacBook Pro has a tolerable keyboard at best.

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    9. Re:So much for build quality... by Missing.Matter · · Score: 2

      You're paying for OS X, for an aluminum unibody, for an awesome keyboard and high-res screen.

      Care to explain my HP Envy, with aluminum/magnesium body, backlit keyboard, slot loading dvd, 128gb SSD, Radeon HD 5650, i5, 1600x900 screen?

      Oh, and I bought it for $980 ($1400 before rebate. I miss you 30% BCB). The closest Macbook configuration (at the time) cost almost $3000, and couldn't even match in some specs (like the video card). Is OSX worth almost $1600? And people scoff at the price of Windows 7.

    10. Re:So much for build quality... by Samalie · · Score: 2

      The fact in my sample size of 4 of the Envy systems at my work, we had 3 defective? The Envy laptops are complete steaming festering floater turds, based on what I've seen.

      Look, my sample size of Apple Computers in my life is exactly zero, so I'm not commenting on their build quality, or lack thereov as suggested by the article.

      But HP licks balls.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    11. Re:So much for build quality... by iluvcapra · · Score: 2

      Although apple's laptops have few unique features, you are not getting as much as you put, according to profit margins of Apple Corp.

      This contention, that a consumer is getting a bad deal if the producer makes a profit, is very strange. Remember, profit come from the fact that manufacturing costs become marginal with volume, producers lock-in low commodity prices through contracts (Apple buys its SSDs and RAM 5 years in advance of you in astounding volumes), and from the various economic rents it gets from proprietary processes and licensing.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    12. Re:So much for build quality... by magus_melchior · · Score: 2

      Well, the iFixit guy didn't see any other major problems (other than difficulty of replacing the LCD, but that's more of a design issue than anything), and all of the problems he cited can be solved by tightening the build process.

      It's also possible that he got a unit built by a n00b. Stripped screws, forgotten ZIF locking, and too much paste are novice errors. The problem with manufacturing in China isn't that the build is consistently crappy, but that the build quality is not consistent.

      --
      "We are Microsoft. You shall be assimilated. Competition is futile."
    13. Re:So much for build quality... by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 2

      I have that feeling all the time, and it pisses me off. Sadly, the ONLY company producing quality right now (in that area) is apple.

      It ain't just the screen and the unibody: the touchpad, the battery, the power supply, everything about it is awesome. Except the privative software, job's walled garden, and awful microsoft-like business practices. That's why I refuse to buy apple. What I want is a macbook-quality laptop with no software, no restrictions, and no logos or any other identifiable marks. NOBODY is producing such a thing. Same thing with tablets. What is so hard about it? Just take the best touchscreen you can get, the best camera, the best mobo with a good processor and lots of ram and stick Honeycomb in that motherfucker. How hard can it be? It isn't. I own several tablets: an aPad with Rockchip 2808A, a Wopad with Rockchip 2818, another generic one with W8505, another generic one with a Samsung S5PV210 and yet another generic with a Telechips 8902. None of them is what they are supposed to be. The Wopad has the beautiful aluminum body, and the awesome capacitive multitouch screen, but a crappy processor, only 256MB of RAM and crappy hardware acceleration, and the battery sucks. The Samsung S5PV210 is almost perfect regarding hardware, but the latest firmware for that one is Froyo, and the casing is awful cheap plastic, and it's resistive. The other ones are crap.

      Why isn't there a single manufacturer that gets it, and starts producing hardware I would actually want to buy?

      --
      WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
    14. Re:So much for build quality... by gandhi_2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you just made his point.

      Everyone made fun of Japanese quality, and now Japanese stuff is first-rate.

      Right now, China makes shit....

      So history doesn't seem irrelevant at all.

    15. Re:So much for build quality... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Most laptops with a MacBook Pro's feature set also cost about the same amount of money. Compared to those around me, I'd say you get a sexy, sturdy exterior and a high-quality screen.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    16. Re:So much for build quality... by mR.bRiGhTsId3 · · Score: 2

      I recently did open up an MBP to upgrade it. The only 2 parts that I wanted to touch (RAM/HD) were easy to get at and swapping them out was the work of a minute once I got the case open. Furthermore, the fan vent was super easy to get access to and clean. I found the experience quite pleasant and it was the easiest disassembly I've ever had on a laptop. What precisely is your objection?

    17. Re:So much for build quality... by Kitkoan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Sometimes its just better to post the truth in something like this as an AC. If you don't, you'll be modded into the ground. I've done the same before. And I've noticed the quality issues of Apple products myself (one of the reasons I don't buy them).

      I've owned 2 iPods, and both died in just under a year and I'm not alone there. Its quite rare I can find someone who's had a iPlayer(Pod, Touch, Shuffle) that has had one live for more then a year and a half. Does this mean there is none? No, but I find them to be quite rare with people who use them. I've had friends had other failing parts in MacBooks (HDs the most common). They just don't live any longer then a good built laptop from other companies. Granted this seems to be were many Mac users get annoying to me when comparing build quality. They will want to compare a $1200+ MacBook to a sub $400-$500 HP or Dell. Thats not a good comparison in any manor. HP and Dell are known to be subpar quality companies. Compare the Mac to something like a Asus, Sony or Toshiba. Do these companies have no failures? No, but they aren't shoddy built either. These are better build quality companies. An suddenly you'll see a more equal in quality build in all these companies. This was even highlighted by Squaretrades review of their records. Thing is, the price tag to the Apple laptops are much higher for the same specs and the review shows that the build quality isn't higher, its just higher priced to make you think your paying for something of higher quality. This is normal in designer products like clothes and perfumes/make-ups because people like to equate "higher price = higher quality" when in many situations, it isn't true but is to make you believe that it is.

      Now, is Apple normally a shoddy build quality company? No, but they aren't the top build quality either. They just know how to give the impression that they are.

      Now does this mean you shouldn't ever buy an Apple product? Not really. You should buy what you enjoy but should approach it knowing the facts and not have false impressions about the product either. In short, if you enjoy the Apple product, then all the power to you, but don't be surprised that not everyone will agree with you that they are the best. Its why there is more then one product out there. Everyone is different.

      --
      Attention... all grammer nazi"s! Is they're anything; wrong with: my post,
    18. Re:So much for build quality... by Y-Crate · · Score: 4, Informative

      Does that page reference the douchery of their owners, and how those owners seem to need to point out how their laptops are different from every other laptop out there?

      No, but I hear they're considering adding a paragraph or two on smug non-Mac users who absolutely insist on throwing non sequiturs like yours into practically every Apple discussion.

      I hear far, far more from people like you than I do from those you're complaining about. And I work in an industry that is disproportionately Mac-centric, and went to a college where easily 95%+ of the student body and faculty used Macs. And I also love to spend time at coffee shops. I mean come on.

      I'm beginning to think it's a bizarre inferiority complex that is triggered by the sight / mention of Apple products. The same way some people flip out and feel oppressed when they spot "Happy Holidays" or something.

    19. Re:So much for build quality... by jjohnson · · Score: 2

      See, I love Apple keyboards. I love them so much that I use one on my desktop PC and my linux box. They have just the right crispness coupled with the shortest travel. I can't stand model Ms and don't know how anyone who isn't a 'roided freak needing a machine gun soundtrack can use them. When I want exercise, I swim.

      However, I do recognize that this is a matter of personal preference.

      --
      Anyone who loves or hates any language, platform, or manufacturer, doesn't know what they're talking about.
    20. Re:So much for build quality... by perryizgr8 · · Score: 2

      i think you might wanna look at some thinkpads. i've found them to be really high quality and devoid of logos except 'thinkpad' (which i think is awesome) and a small 'lenovo'.

      --
      Wealth is the gift that keeps on giving.
    21. Re:So much for build quality... by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2

      My new MacBook Pro has a tolerable keyboard at best.

      The backlight is really great. The only thing I miss from when I used to buy Macbook Pros.

      They did have great build quality, but now I buy $400 laptops and don't worry about failures (component or klutzoid).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    22. Re:So much for build quality... by clang_jangle · · Score: 2

      I'm beginning to think it's a bizarre inferiority complex that is triggered by the sight / mention of Apple products. The same way some people flip out and feel oppressed when they spot "Happy Holidays" or something.

      It's called "displaced rage". Most geeks have a lot of rage, and one common coping mechanism is venting rage at surrogate issues. Makes it easy and simple to point and blame, which saves one the trouble of actually confronting and taking responsibility for their personal issues.

      --
      Caveat Utilitor
    23. Re:So much for build quality... by mbkennel · · Score: 2

      "What I want is a macbook-quality laptop with no software, no restrictions, and no logos or any other identifiable marks. NOBODY is producing such a thing. Same thing with tablets. What is so hard about it? Just take the best touchscreen you can get, the best camera, the best mobo with a good processor and lots of ram and stick Honeycomb in that motherfucker. How hard can it be?"

      To make, easy.

      To sell, hard. Especially as at $1200 your no-name nerdBook looks just the same as some "Big Name" computer company's POS computer at $800.

    24. Re:So much for build quality... by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 2

      Sure, some people purchase Apple products because of the hipness factor but many of us (scientists) purchase them because they are better than Windows and Linux based computers for our research. I can use Linux for most of the stuff I do research-wise but there are a number of research tools that I use that are Mac specific (and comparable ones for Windows or Linux are not comparable in actual usability or utility).

      A lot of people also purchase Apple products because they do generally "just work."

      If they also happen to be cool and hip, that's just an added bonus.

      Additionally, I find it actually a pleasure to use a Mac. I have a nice GUI, I have a nice and usable CLI, and I have a lot of bundled and often used software. We cannot discount the costs of the software that Macs include. So while I enjoy using Macs, using Windows is not a pleasure, although Windows 7 is alright. Disclaimer: I was using Apple products long before they were hip and cool (the 80s and 90s). Well, they were sort of cool in the 80s but not really in the 90s. I do own a Windows / dual boot Linux system (recently built because I couldn't afford a Mac; although, even if I could have afforded a Mac I might still have built this computer because I like to have a Windows computer around, especially one with a really nice graphics card for gaming) as well as a Mac.

    25. Re:So much for build quality... by FishTankX · · Score: 2

      If you want premium quality Chinese made components, a lot of Chinese audiophile class equipment, like dark voice headphone amplifiers, are of exceptional quality. Massive transformers, point to point wiring, and the housings to match.

      China is excellent on quality when doing high margin stuff, because they can afford to use extremely labor intensive techniques and still be cost competitive due to their lower salaries. However, what most of the west demands, and what causes all of these problems with Chinese manufacturing (labor discontent, mistakes) is an overworked, underpaid worker cranking products out as fast as they can. Japan started cranking out GOOD stuff when their technological expertise rose to the point where they could rise out of contract and low margin manufacturing into high tech, domestically designed products.

      Because when you move 20 million products, saving a buck a product (which could otherwise go towards, you know, giving the Chinese worker a living wage, instead of having them living in a dorm and skipping breakfast because they can't afford it) can save you 20 million bucks. CHINA is not the problem. The corporate-consumer complex demanding that Chinese product manufacturers make AS LITTLE AS POSSIBLE to pad their own pockets, is the problem. And if a particular Chinese manufacturer doesn't want to pay his workers horrible wages and make them work 25 hours of overtime a week (which causes mistakes to happen) to keep things rolling, then another Chinese manufacturer will step in to fill the void. If not that ,maybe a Vietnamese one.

      In summary, China isn't at fault for the poor quality of it's products, the corporations that demand the low price of manufacturing (which leaves very little room for quality checks and healthy, happy, alert workers) are responsible for the poor quality of their products. This quality level is maintained at JUST a high enough point that people don't bail from the product line in droves, so they're locked into buying low quality products which break often and create more opportunity for the manufacturer to sell additional products. High quality products don't tend to produce repeat purchases. If it aint broke don't fix it.

    26. Re:So much for build quality... by rhook · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have that feeling all the time, and it pisses me off. Sadly, the ONLY company producing quality right now (in that area) is apple.

      You should have a look at the T-Series ThinkPads, the quality is top notch, best keyboard on the market, touchpad is great, carbon fiber reinforced plastics, a titanium rollcage, liquid drain ports in they keyboard (just in case you spill your drink), and the 1080p display is one of the best displays you can get on a laptop. Did I mention you can get one of these with more options and onsite warranty with accidental damage protection for less than a Macbook Pro? I ordered one about 2 months ago with almost every option and it came out to less than the base 15" MBP.

    27. Re:So much for build quality... by afabbro · · Score: 2

      So...just because Japan followed a certain route, that means China must as well? Wow, that is incredibly racist. Those yellow slants all look alike, eh?

      No, because one developing nation that set out to develop its industrial base by exporting consumer goods to North America has already paved the trail and the next developing nation that is trying to develop its industrial base by exporting consumer goods to North America is probably going to follow a similar path. That was the poster's point, and only you saw anything racist in it.

      How can you possibly walk, staggering under the weight of that giant chip on your shoulder?

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    28. Re:So much for build quality... by spinkham · · Score: 2

      Pretty damn well.

      Are you implying there's some great functionality I'm missing out on? I've used tons of keyboards, and the Model M is my favorite by far. The only thing I occasionally miss is a "windows" key, but everything else I might want a "fancy" keyboard can do can be done in software. The Cherry MX key switches are decent also, but have a few niggles like the reset point on the most common ones.

      If you want a simplicity analogy, the Model M is more like a sword, and less like a fixie. Fixies are fashionable, not designed for practicality except for a few tricks. The best swords today are still made the same way they were many years ago, and the modern mass produced varieties are worse, despite their flashy handles or detailing.

      The model M is far from fashionable. It's a serious tool, built well, that has stood the test of time. I've been using my current model since 1997, when I bought it 2nd hand. It was built in 1990. I type measurably faster on it with less subjective fatigue then any other keyboard I've tried.

      If you've never used a Model M (or other tactile response and/or clicky keyboard like the Cherry MX based ones) I suggest you do. You might have less to smirk about, and be more productive. ;-)

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups.
    29. Re:So much for build quality... by Duradin · · Score: 2

      "The model M is far from fashionable." Isn't that the pinnacle of hipster fashion, in this case /. hipsterism?

      Swords are a bad example. Modern metallurgy shatters ancient techniques. You know why katanas were made with folding techniques? It's because the iron that was available sucked and folding drove out impurities and homogenized what was left. A milled blade out of modern alloys with temperature controlled (to the fraction of a degree and second) tempering may not seem as sexy as your 2,000 fold blade but it will cut through your precious like it wasn't there.

  3. Ho hum? by mozumder · · Score: 2, Informative

    These MacBook Pro's are the top laptops in the industry. There is nothing better.

    This refresh is almost as fast as my 8-core Nehalem Xeon Mac Pro, which is rather incredible.

    All great products have high resale value... I just sold my 4 year old MacBook Pro 17" for $920.

    1. Re:Ho hum? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Amazing you can speak with your mouth full of Steve Jobs' cock.

    2. Re:Ho hum? by node+3 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but you are a fanboi, that's what you're *supposed* to do, for God's sake - in fact, how you escaped the hypnotic clutches of Steve's Charisma Beam and lasted two years without an upgrade is probably worthy of some deeper investigation by the clerics of the Holy Church of Apple.

      The problem with the Apple haters here is the rampant hyperbole. He upgraded his two year old computer, but you have to spin it into some sort of insanity. It's strange that you first call him a "fanboi", then note that he somehow managed to avoid this imaginary mystical superbeam emanating from Cupertino which would have made him a fanboi.

      In other words, you just called him a fanboi while noting that he wasn't a fanboi. Fantastic!

      Look at it from my perspective - if I proudly crowed about standing outside queuing in the rain the day before a new Dell Laptop or Ubuntu Linux 11.04 was released, you'd call me a sad loony!

      Ignoring the fact that he didn't say anything about lining up in the rain a day in advance for the new MacBook Pro (in fact, no one has ever done this, the lines have only been for the iPhones and iPads, more on this in a sec), yes, you would look insane waiting for Ubuntu or a Dell laptop.

      Why do people line up for iPhones and iPads? Because demand far outstrips supply. People in line know that if they don't line up, they will have to wait some uncertain amount of time before they can get one. Has this ever happened with a Dell laptop? Is this even possible with Ubuntu?

      On the other hand, there have been plenty of geeks downloading Ubuntu (and other distros) the day of availability. Haven't you ever tried to download an ISO on release day only to find download speeds horribly slow? Do you hurl the same "fanboi" insult at people who line up for video games, concerts, movies, etc?

      But no, only Apple users are "fanbois", because, well... "Fuck you, that's why"? That's all it really boils down to. What sort of insecurity leads someone to throw about effeminate insults to someone who upgraded his two year old notebook? What is it about other people's computer choices that bothers you so much?

    3. Re:Ho hum? by FxChiP · · Score: 2

      Actually, Apple has a regular habit of making the next given version of Mac OS X simply not run on what they deem "old" hardware, regardless of whether or not that old hardware is actually still capable of running the OS or not. It's not even a technical check; it's a "if allowed_vendor(venid) && allowed_product(prodid) then run else fail" type check. It's one of the things that's most irritating about Apple. Thankfully and luckily, those machines they choose to arbitrarily obsolete usually wind up running Linux extremely well in OS X's stead, since no distribution is going to play that kind of silly game.

    4. Re:Ho hum? by node+3 · · Score: 2

      What is it about other people's computer choices that bothers you so much?

      When those other people get up in your face all the time crowing about how damn good their computer is and how superior it is to everything else ever made EVER, you start to get pissed the fuck off. I'm just saying. (Yes, this cuts both ways.)

      The guy posted about how he upgraded his old MBP to a new MBP, in a story about the new MBP. He didn't get all up in anyone's face. He did not say they are "superior to everything else ever made EVER". This is exactly what I'm talking about when I mentioned the rampant hyperbole.

      If a Mac user says he likes the new Macs in a story about the new Macs, that's not something that should piss you off.

  4. So... by rabblerabblerabble · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...does this mean suicides will be up at whatever sweatshop Apple is building these or will they do what they did at the iPhone factory that had the same problem: put up more nets to catch the jumpers

  5. What's the point of this story? by dicobalt · · Score: 2, Informative

    It was made by people who are in a daze, overworked, and totally unskilled. Apple always overcharges for their hardware. There is no revelation here.

  6. Sample size: n=1 by Entropy2016 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They found a bad apple. So that makes our sample size is n=1 so far. Can anybody cite evidence of additional issues, or is this being hyped up like the iPhone 4 antenna story?

  7. Re:Despite this, Apple will make billions of sales by Jackdaw+Rookery · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You now have to be a fan-boy to buy Apple products? They are no longer available to the public? Since when? Do I need a badge? To join some kind of club?

    Oh wait, maybe Apple came around your house and clubbed your puppy to death? No?

    Perhaps take a deep breath and relax. People are free to choose Apple, Linux and even Windows. Each has strong points and reasons why they are good at what they do, so no need to start dropping both your IQ and elitist tech wang on the table by throwing the term 'fan-boys' around.

  8. Re:HP - Dell? by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

    A complex/intricate design makes one tend to strip screws and leave ZIF sockets open? Sounds more like a lazy assembler to me.

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  9. And, yeah? by bryan1945 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What new computer line doesn't have problems? And Apple is known for having 1st generation problems. A stripped screw, extra thermal paste, and an unlocked ZIF? Shocking, pure shock I say.

    The best part it was ONE sample, yet somehow because it got attention from a sorta-credible source it is given more credence than the usual ancedotal observation.
    And no, I'm typing this on a Dell.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:And, yeah? by Solandri · · Score: 2

      The best part it was ONE sample, yet somehow because it got attention from a sorta-credible source it is given more credence than the usual ancedotal observation.

      Actually, the fact that it was from ONE sample makes it even worse. If these types of defects/shoddy assembly were rare, you'd expect to find one in a typical laptop teardown. Maybe two if you got an extraordinarily unlucky sample. The fact that they found three suggests that statistically, this sort of stuff is present in a high percentage of the laptops.

    2. Re:And, yeah? by isomer1 · · Score: 2

      And Apple is known for having 1st generation problems.

      This is hardly a first generation product. You could get away with that excuse on the FIRST imac (poor bondi blue) or the FIRST ipod. But this is just another re-up of what is supposed to be a stable product evolution.

  10. Re:Sample size: n=1 by pushing-robot · · Score: 5, Funny

    I asked a friend; he said the line between this one data point and his preconceived notions shows a definite trend.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  11. Re:Sample size: n=1 by BradleyUffner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They found a bad apple. So that makes our sample size is n=1 so far. Can anybody cite evidence of additional issues, or is this being hyped up like the iPhone 4 antenna story?

    Well, they found at least 3 independent problems on a single sample. Since each of these problems is possible separate from each other, the fact that all 3 show on a single item could indicate that the rate each problem is fairly high in general. There are other possibilities besides high problem rates, but it does raise the chances that this isn't just a single isolated incident.

  12. Re:Sample size: n=1 by sqlrob · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We have 4 Macs (2 iMac, 2 Powerbook) that have been in the shop a total of five times (1 iMac twice, everything else once). Their build quality has gone down a lot.

  13. ZIF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    You had me at zero insertion force

  14. A fluke by MaWeiTao · · Score: 2

    For now I'd say it's a fluke. You're not likely to find any of these problems even in a cheap Dell computer. In all the years I've owned and happened to open a computer or some other bit of electronics I can't say I've seen improperly assembled components. The only exception being toys where it's an absolute disaster how things get put together.

    It is possible that in the rush to anticipate demand that factories are forgoing some quality control and maybe even overworking their employees.

  15. Re:HP - Dell? by commodore6502 · · Score: 4, Funny

    >>>Lets try open an equivalent HP/Dell then eh?

    Damn straight! This whole Slashdot Summary should be modded troll. Apple would never, ever, never have "build quality problems" in their $1800 machines. Everybody knows their laptops are better quality than my - I mean those half-price $900 PC laptops.

    That's why we Apple users pay so much for them!!! It's like buying Lexus/Acura instead of Toyota/Honda, even though they are made by the same engineers in the same factory with identical engines & chassis.

    (kneels before porcelain Jobs)
    Did I do alright master?

    --
    Information wants to be expensive AND wants to be free. So you have Value vs. Cheap distribution fighting each other.
  16. Re:Three words: by hey! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Blaming China or low quality is misplacing the blame in any case. The low quality of so many Chinese-made goods isn't because China is unable to make good quality; it's because Americans are addicted to buying shiny cheap junk and the Chinese give us what the retailers ask for. The market segment that is willing to pay more for quality is quite small in America.

    That said, Apple *does* target the quality minded consumer with its computers. Normally the design and build quality on Apple stuff I've seen is first rate; this example comes from a sample size of one. Even a top notch manufacturer can have a bad unit. Except for the unclosed ZIF socket the problems listed don't seem to be the kind that are easy to spot in inspection. Probably the worst issue was the excessive thermal paste, and that's under the heatsink.

    Does this one unit mean that build quality is slipping at Apple suppliers? Possibly, but not necessarily. The negative publicity about Foxconn could mean Apple has more on its plate than quality these days when dealing with its suppliers, but that's pure speculation.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  17. Not stripped by Culture20 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That screw wasn't stripped! It's Apple's new screwdriver design. They take their ordinary pentabular screws, and apply a drill to eat out the head of one of them, forcing you to drill the screw out if you open it yourself.

  18. Re:Hate to say it by Culture20 · · Score: 2

    You're paying $1400 dollars for a titanium shell...

    Robocop approves.

  19. Re:HP - Dell? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Compare the innards of a MacBook Pro and any other laptop manufacturer and you'll know what I'm talking about.

    Instead of making me tear apart computers, why don't you just tell us. what you're talking about?

    How is a Mac "more complex/intricate" than say a Lenovo or Toshiba or HP? Does the Mac have "17-Jewel Swiss Movement"?

    I've been inside my Mac Pro as well as my homebuilt i7/1366 and they've got pretty much the same components. I'm not doubting you, just asking for clarification regarding the laptops.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  20. Re:Sample size: n=1 by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    hyped up like the iPhone 4 antenna story?

    Get a load of that: "Hyped up like the iPhone 4 antenna story".

    You mean the "hyped up" story that had Jobs and Apple tap-dancing like the Nicholas Brothers and then shipping out hundreds of thousands of cases to "fix" the problem? That hyped up story?

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  21. OK by SnarfQuest · · Score: 3, Funny

    So, you spend $1800 on a status symbol, and you expect quality too?

    --
    Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
  22. Re:Three words: by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

    Assemble, quite possibly(even Dell does, or did until fairly recently). That just covers the "shoving customer's choice of CPU and expansion cards into motherboard and case" part of the job, though.

    Intel silicon is likely made in the US, AMD Germany, both packaged in Malaysia or other cheaper locations. RAM probably Taiwan or Japan, among other possibilities.

    PCB stuffing and physical assembly(except for last-stage card-level customization) almost certainly China.

  23. Re:Despite this, Apple will make billions of sales by Jahava · · Score: 2

    ...thanks to the Apple fan-boys.

    I bought one. I'm not an Apple fanboy. This is, in fact, the second (alongside a third-generation iPod) Apple product that I've ever purchased. I've generally been rather anti-Apple, namely due to their shoddy Linux support (remembering early iPod days), their gross bloatware that is Windows iTunes (slash Safari, slash QuickTime, slash who the fuck knows), and my experiences working with Objective C and the Cocoa APIs professionally some early OSX builds.

    That said, I went laptop shopping and, after soliciting several opinions, reading dozens of reviews, and looking at numerous potential models, I decided to go with the MBP. It was the only laptop (that I could find) that matched my criteria in terms of weight, battery life, touchpad functionality and size (was a huge selling point), keyboard layout, screen resolution, and power. I intend to use Boot Camp to dual-boot a Kubuntu distribution and will likely give both OSX and Kubuntu equal face-time. I also hope to contribute to various Linux drivers and software tweaks that target MBP hardware (camera, touchpad, etc.).

    That said, let's talk Apple fanbois. I will use my experience with this device as almost my sole judge of my opinion of Apple software. How it boots, how it operates, and my experience with the UI will determine whether or not I become an Apple fanboy. I sincerely hope I do; from what I've seen, Apple is one of the few companies that is actually innovating in terms of user experience (I'll cite every music player, laptop, phone, and window manager that is playing catch-up; I understand things go deeper, Superkaramba, etc., but largely most modern composed UIs were first fully-realized by Apple). I really hope that Apple is as good as it seems on paper.

    Now, granted, Apple has a negative reputation for several things. Overpriced hardware is one, for sure, but the one that really bothers me is their gatekeeper role in device software. I've always written this off because part of me definitely sympathizes with their perspective on users - that a device that "just works" is more valuable than an open platform. This definitely reflects what I've observed in the amateur computer user base, and is why I have an Android phone (and will never own an iPhone). If they had similar lockdowns of their notebooks, I'd feel similarly.

    What Apple products need, I suspect, is a thriving open-source community, and looking at the thousands of Apple-targeting OSS projects out there, this seems to be the case. Just as with Windows, and MS-DOS before it, the open-source community needs to thrive in the face of adversity, provide compelling alternatives, and change both the foreground and background of the operating system - in other words, do what it does best.

  24. Re:Three words: by Unoriginal_Nickname · · Score: 2

    The most durable, highest-build-quality consumer electronic device I've ever owned is a Thinkpad. 100% Chinese manufactured.

  25. "Ho Hum" WTF? by rthille · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The machine is 2x as fast as the one I bought last year, has 10Gb I/O, for the same price.

    Please have the "analyst" compare my 1989 VW Jetta to today's model for a "ho hum" upgrade...

    --
    Awesome furniture, accessories and cabinetry in Santa Rosa, CA: http://humanity-home.com/
  26. Re:extra thermal paste is NOT a problem by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Thermal paste increases thermal conductivity between chip and heat sink.

    Overclocked your first gaming rig, huh? No. Thermal paste is a crappy conductor. From Wikipedia:

    The metal oxide and nitride particles suspended in silicone thermal compounds have thermal conductivities of up to 220 W/(mK). (In comparison, the thermal conductivity of metals used particle additions, copper is 380 W/(mK), silver 429 and aluminum 237.) The typical thermal conductivities of the silicone compounds are 0.7 to 3 W/(mK). Silver thermal compounds may have a conductivity of 3 to 8 W/(mK) or more.

    So, "good" silver compound will be approximately 1% as conductive as aluminum. The only thing near a CPU less conductive than thermal paste is air. You want to use the bare minimum necessary to fill the minor imperfections in the surfaces of the CPU and heatsink. Any more than that and you might as well wrap your processor in a nice cozy wool sweater.

    --
    Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  27. Re:HP - Dell? by Simon80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know if lazy is really the appropriate word to use when talking about cheap labour.I think it's much more likely that they're actually hard-working people who are overworked and underpaid.

  28. Re:HP - Dell? by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

    Logic board design is far neater. Less individual components hanging off the main board, so instead they are integral

    OK, but wouldn't that make it less "complex/intricate"?

    My question to you was how is a Mac laptop's innards more "complex/intricate" as you claimed.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  29. Re:Three words: by sorak · · Score: 2

    Maybe it is because it is so difficult to quantify quality, but price is a simple, universal, metric that can always be evaluated on an apples-to-apples basis.

  30. Re:HP - Dell? by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2

    >> Perhaps I was just trying to show some perspective

    By comparing to something half the price?? I smell fanboi fart...

  31. Re:HP - Dell? by Entropy2016 · · Score: 2

    The throw-away issue isn't an Apple one, it's a laptop issue in general. It's not like CPU/Graphics on laptops have had a history of being an easy do-it-yourself job, regardless of brand. Laptops have always been inherently hard to upgrade since they're attempting to be as compact as possible. And at least Apple attempts to mitigate the damage of a throw-away society by putting a checkbox on the order form that gives you an option of mailing in your old computer so they can recycle it.

  32. Re:Sample size: n=1 by dogmatixpsych · · Score: 5, Informative

    And we have 5 Macs (3 iMacs, 2 MacBooks/Pro) that have never been in the shop. Out of the about 30 different Mac owners that I personally know and interact with regularly, only one has had his Mac in for repairs. My anecdote is just as valid as your anecdote. Further, based on my anecdote, I can argue (just as validly as you argued) that the build quality of Macs has at least remained stable or even increased.

    My point with my reply is that when we look at objective data (I'm not commenting on the quality of these data but they have to be better than your anecdote and my anecdote), Apple computers are the most reliable: http://www.rescuecom.com/2010-annual-computer-reliability-report.html

    Here are some somewhat subjective data (but still data with a larger sample size) showing Apple on top: http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2368167,00.asp

    Maybe Apple's build quality has gone down but objective data don't seem to show that at all.

  33. Re:Three words: by mirix · · Score: 2

    Funny how that works. I had an old Thinkpad (forget the model now, 600?). It was made in US IIRC.
    Then I got a T21, Made in the UK (I thought that was a bit odd?).
    T23 was Mexican, IIRC.
    X24? Korea.
    T42 ... China.

    And then the whole division was sold to the Chinese around then. Evolution I guess. And that's only going back fifteen years or so.

    --
    Sent from my PDP-11
  34. Yeah, comparing a crap PC with a topend mac doesn' by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It is the same old story, people comparing a top end Mac with a bottom end PC and then complaining about the price difference. Mac is now the first with the new intel stuff, so HOW exactly do they come up with this price comparison when there isn't a regular laptop out there with the same hardware?

    Not that I think Apple is all that hot myself. They are to me the old sony. You pay a bit more then you should but know you get reasonable quality in return. In the real world, that matters. I might get the same cheaper but it might be crap or I can lots more and it can still be crap. Old Sony made good mid quality stuff that gave you the insurance that you got decent gear for an okay price. I would be wilinng to pay more for my ordinary hamburger if I knew that the service would always be great, the hamburger always hot etc etc. That MID range, decent quality for a decent price is VERY hard to nail. Cheap and crap is easy, expensive and good is easy. Hitting the middle reliable, that is where you can make a fortune.

    Until you start cutting costs. Sony went bye bye. Apple is not imune to this. For all the Sony haters now, once they were a darling just like Apple is. The mighty do fall.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  35. Re:Damagecontrol by MemoryDragon · · Score: 2

    I guess so to, or the Stockholm syndrome is applied at full force. Build quality problems have been there in the past.
    And it always was a random luck if apple fixed it on the machines or not. Most of the time Apple acnowledged it only after they have been dragged to court with a class action lawsuit. If that did not happen users were left hanging dry in the air.
    Been there done that, first gen macbook air, constantly overheating if you did more than websurfing.
    A problem which according to apple never existed and yet there were thousands of complaints and they rolled out a fixup model half a year later which fixed exactly this issue!
    But no the problem does not exist and we wont fix it for you, thank you for your 2500 Euros!

  36. Re:HP - Dell? by wisty · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "Rushed" is probably more like it. I bet Apple has ordered a large number of items in a short time.

    Good, Fast, or Cheap. Pick one.

  37. Re:HP - Dell? by MachineShedFred · · Score: 2

    I'm talking about your comparison, not Apple.

    In your comparison, you say that the luxury lines of automotive companies are nothing but their regular cars with larger digits on the price tag. I'm telling you that your assumption is completely incorrect. You further define how incorrect this is by making a snarky response about couches in their waiting area, which is a strawman.

    The reality is that every car, no matter how expensive or not, will require maintenance. Most 'luxury' brands build this maintenance into the price of the car up front. You cry about the standard maintenance required to keep the warranty intact. The reality is that I take my car to the dealership, get a loaner to get about my day while they do the work, and then come back at the end of the day to get my car without paying once red cent for the loaner or maintenance service.

    I don't even pay (after purchase) for oil changes because it's covered by the standard maintenance and warranty. When I have a problem - any problem, I just drop it off and drive away in a loaner, and they call me and tell me what the problem is later, asking for approval to fix it, which also doesn't cost me a dime.

    Next time, make a comparison to something you actually know about.

    --
    Slashdot still doesnâ(TM)t support Unicode after it was added to the HTML standard in 1997.
  38. Re:HP - Dell? by rjstanford · · Score: 2

    I've been inside my Mac Pro as well as my homebuilt i7/1366 and they've got pretty much the same components. I'm not doubting you, just asking for clarification regarding the laptops.

    Oh, come on. I could buy that argument on the laptops, but the Mac Pro? I've personally never seen such a well-designed and -constructed enclosure. Machined aluminum tracks for everything, swappable sub-assembelies, etc. I wouldn't claim that the components themselves are superior, but the case is phenomenal - easily the equal of the average well-built rackmount server from most companies.

    --
    You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
  39. Re:Despite this, Apple will make billions of sales by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 2

    More to the point: Installing and configuring a wireless network card is an incredibly simple process that can be managed by even the least experienced home user in well under 10 minutes. If it took you *hours* to perform such a simple and basic task, you have absolutely no business operating a computer, let alone making a living using them.

    Dude, it is not the problem of "installing" the hardware. It is the supposed to be simple task to connect to an actual network or to set up your own one.
    Incompetent? No idea. It took you 10 Minutes to set that up when you where picking up some medicals for your father? It sounds more like you are incompetent. On my mac it is ... 5 seconds perhaps? If I click a bit slower ... 15 seconds?

    Oh, I took a look at your website -- I can only imagine the code horrors that someone as incompetent as you has unleashed upon unsuspecting clients.

    Then perhaps you should learn german to read it properly. And as a side note the last part I quoted from you makes you liable for a libel and defamation case. You should get some manners imho ;D

    Best Regards

    angel'o'sphere

    --
    Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.