Slashdot Mirror


Old Man Murray Entry Deleted From Wikipedia

shoptroll writes "In what can be best described as an unfortunate interpretation of the 'notability standards' at Wikipedia, Rock, Paper, Shotgun reports that the entry for Old Man Murray, once a mainstay of PC Gaming reviews and commentary, has been deleted. A sad day for gaming journalism everywhere." This is notable both because Old Man Murray was completely and totally awesome, but also because it was notable and influential on countless writers.

7 of 432 comments (clear)

  1. Sad state of deletionist wankers by Winckle · · Score: 5, Informative

    The deletion of OMM was instigated by Ben Schumin, a sad man who still holds a grudge against Erik Wolpaw, a writer at OMM, now working for Valve as a writer for games such as Portal. The fact that some sad sack like him can point at an article and say "this should be deleted" and the circle jerk of deletionist admins ignore the salient points made by users and experts of games journalism such as Kieron Gillen, delete the article and then pat themselves on the back for a job well done.

    Barnstars all-round you deletionist creeps, keep ruining Wikipedia one kangaroo-court AfD at a time.

  2. Wikipedia should allow any info by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 4, Informative

    I wrote some time ago that Wikipedia should allow any content that could be interesting / informative to someone, after all she did not have the space limitation of a physical encyclopedia. I honestly can not understand why something has to be "remarkable" to be included in Wikipedia, especially when the criteria of "outstanding" is usualy being cited in news sites and the like that are not always have ethical criteria to decide what he saw or not "remarkable." or public interest.

    --
    Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
  3. Re:So why was it deleted? by Winckle · · Score: 5, Informative

    Deletion is supposed to be the last resort No notices were put up to improve the article, no messages sent to a relevant wikiproject for volunteers to help out. Just Ben Schumin (a man a writer of OMM made fun off a decade ago) tying to pull a fast one. Schumin also removed references to Erik Wolpaw from several pages recently.

  4. Re:So why was it deleted? by Jaysyn · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yes, because PCGamer, Kokatu, Wired & the UGO Network are completely irrelevant when it comes to the gaming community.

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
  5. Google Cache by Roary · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who may be wondering what Old Man Murray is:

    Wikipedia Google Cache

    Oh the irony

  6. Re:Notability by canajin56 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Actually, outsiders are hated and despised. If any of the wiki admins finds out that YOU have been encouraging people to contribute, expect a lifetime ban.

    --
    ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  7. Re:So why was it deleted? by I+Like+Pudding · · Score: 5, Informative

    Disclaimer: I'm Entropy Stew in the wikipedia deletion discussion

    Sources found included PC Gamer, Gabe Newell, RPS, Kotaku, Wired, MaximumPC, Edge Magazine, Quake 3, Postal 2, Serious Sam, the UGO network WHICH OMM WAS A MEMBER OF and a host of others. All were ignored. RPS reacted immediately to the news because it's insane, and their article being directly about OMM should assuage even unreasonable demands. Wikipedia absolutely loathes outsiders, though, so who knows if it will be restored?