Slashdot Mirror


IBM Patenting HAL-Like Stuffed Animal Toys

theodp writes "'Look, Dave,' said HAL. 'I can see you're really upset about this. I honestly think you ought to sit down calmly, take a stress pill and think things over.' Put a HAL 9000 in a baby's stuffed animal toy, a toddler's EEG-equipped knit cap, or other interactive monitoring device, and you've got the gist of IBM Research's just-published patent application for its Adaptive System for Real-Time Behavioral Coaching and Command Intermediation. 'For example,' explains Big Blue, 'to help a child who plays rough with other children the interaction data can include multiple interaction operations that can be performed by the interactive device for helping the child play less rough with other children. For example, one interaction operation can include an audible warning telling the child 'to play nice' in a strict tone of voice, whereas another interaction operation can include an audible warning that asks the child 'would you like someone to do that to you' in a softer tone of voice along with a visual cue as well."

112 comments

  1. I'm Sorry Dave by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm afraid there is no cuddle time today. Please. Do not do that, Dave.

  2. What about Teddy? by monoqlith · · Score: 1

    You know, Teddy, from Spielberg's underrated but still crappier than usual AI

    1. Re:What about Teddy? by Kell+Bengal · · Score: 1

      I was about to say "Super toys last all summer long", but you beat me to it.

      --
      Scientists point out problems, engineers fix them
      altslashdot.org: The future of slashdot.
    2. Re:What about Teddy? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      My daughter and I watched that movie a couple days ago. She wants a Teddy! I especially liked him insisting, "I am NOT a toy!" (The first time I watched the movie, I thought it sucked. The second time, I realized that the "aliens" at the end were not aliens -- they were what the robots had evolved into. In general, Spielberg did a bad job of explaining things; I assume the book was much better.)

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    3. Re:What about Teddy? by l0ungeb0y · · Score: 1

      Huh, I thought it was very clear the advanced beings in the end were androids.
      I recall this being explained quite clearly and detailed how they cloned humans and brought them back to life because they had hoped to rebuild humanity, but the human's died after a single day.

    4. Re:What about Teddy? by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Weren't they evolved humans? Anyway, it was still a retarded ending.

    5. Re:What about Teddy? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      The thing about Teddy is that it clearly demonstrated the emergence which the engineers were trying to build into other robots.

    6. Re:What about Teddy? by Man+On+Pink+Corner · · Score: 1

      The 'future robots' were a colossal fuckup on the part of the production designers, and a surprising one as well, considering who was helming the film. They didn't look anything like mecha. They looked completely organic, just like cliched "grey aliens" from countless cheesy SF movies.

      Fooled me completely... I snorted in disgust (as did half the theater) and almost walked out.

    7. Re:What about Teddy? by unitron · · Score: 1

      I thought of that title, but it turns out that it isn't the title of the story of which I was thinking, I think.

      In the one of which I'm thinking every kid has a teddy bear type toy, with an A I built in that's programmed to program the child as it grows up so that he or she grows up all well-adjusted psychologically. All of them (the children) are programmed not to be able to kill, except for one child, whose "toy" has had it's programming slightly altered for a purpose I won't reveal here as I've already probably spoiled the story for anyone who hasn't already read it, but I'm hoping someone who has can remind me of the story's title.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    8. Re:What about Teddy? by deimtee · · Score: 4, Informative

      "I always do what Teddy says." - Harry Harrison

      --
      I'm guessing that wasn't on their radar screen...
    9. Re:What about Teddy? by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I won't reveal here as I've already probably spoiled the story for anyone who hasn't already read it

      I'm not going to read it, but would like a spoiler.

    10. Re:What about Teddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for that man. Many years ago I once replied on a slashdot topic and referred to the same story that unitron did, but for the life of me I could not recall the author and title of the story.

    11. Re:What about Teddy? by unitron · · Score: 1

      I'm not going to read it, but would like a spoiler.

      Han shoots first, Lando betrays them to the Empire, the wierd little creature on the swamp planet is actually a Jedi Master, Luke and Leia are brother and sister, and Darth Vader is their father.

      And people who read a Harry Harrison story are glad they didn't choose not to.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    12. Re:What about Teddy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW, Rosebud is the sled.

    13. Re:What about Teddy? by Jezza · · Score: 1

      Do we have an ISBN for that? (or a link the Amazon's page?)

      Ta :-)

      I think the spoiler was when Han didn't shoot first...

    14. Re:What about Teddy? by Meski · · Score: 1

      One who'll grow up to follow HAL's wonderful example.

    15. Re:What about Teddy? by smartalix · · Score: 1

      That's the story I was thinking of also. Some men doctor the 'teddy' of one oif their children to remove an important part of the device's social conditioning protocols. This gives the child certain advantages in the conditioned society. For example (non-spoiler), the ability to create graffiti in an obsessively clean and organized society would be quite useful to some. Just have the 'teddy' stop admonishing the kid from drawing on walls and sidewalks as a child, turning its advice towards discretion of actions, for one.

      --
      Read a preview of my novel CYBERCHILD at www.smartalix.com/cyberchild
  3. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HAL was extrememly fucking creepy. This is extremely fucking creepy. Oh and get the fuck off my slashdot you halfwit.

  4. "I am feeling a lot better now, Dave" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    - Arthur C. Clarke's and Stanley Kubrick's joint prediction of the future of "strong AI"

  5. Teddy 9000 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    "Johnny, you shouldn't run with scissors."

    "I noticed you've fallen."

    "Your mother will be upset if you get blood on the carpet."

    "Would you like me to call the ambulance?"

    " I can sing you a song until they arrive?"

  6. Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by theodp · · Score: 2, Informative

    University of Tennessee DCN Lab: We currently use a very safe, comfortable 128 channel cap(high density EEG sensor array) to collect the infant EEG/ERP. The EEG cap contains sponge discs and there is no risk to the infant wearing the cap.

    1. Re:Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by diaflux · · Score: 1

      Simply remarkable..

    2. Re:Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.dcnlab.com/Portals/5/netpic1%5B1%5D.jpg

      Fortunately I have a lot of work to do tonight, so I wasn't going to sleep anyway. Tomorrow night's dreams are another matter, as are the next night's, and the night after that.

    3. Re:Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 1

      Of the several times I had to wear a sensor cap, they had to wet my head and constantly shift the nodes to make sure they were picking up signals correctly. How accurate are caps like this?

      --

      "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    4. Re:Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The 'node shifting' wasn't to get the electrodes in the right place, it was to get a better electrical connection to your scalp. The accuracy element depends on the software that's interpreting the data.

      The cap you were wearing cost somewhere around $3k. You saw how fragile it was. Wonder what would happen if we put one in a hyperactive toddler and left them to play unattended?

    5. Re:Infant EEG Caps 'Very Safe, Comfortable' by tabrnaker · · Score: 1

      Maybe their emphasizing the comfort, after all sounds way more comfortable than when they stuck pushpins in your head.

  7. How about parents just do their job? by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't it the parent's responsibility to "coach" their child? Maybe if more parents did their job properly there wouldn't be a perceived need for IBM's technology.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:How about parents just do their job? by francium+goes+boom · · Score: 3, Informative

      Parents? Coach their children? Where have you been the last 10 years, it's the schools job to make kids productive members of society and teach children morals (that the parents don't like) and how to behave (that the parents don't re-enforce)

    2. Re:How about parents just do their job? by timeOday · · Score: 1

      Maybe the parents will see this as a tool to help them do their job. Who else would buy it? (I mean, other than guilt-ridden professionals with more money than time to spend on their kids?)

    3. Re:How about parents just do their job? by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1

      I understand why you might be concerned about too much technology in our childrens' development. However, I think that this isn't going to be one of those problematic technologies.... because honestly, it's IBM, they just pay their employees special bonuses to patent whatever they've brainstormed. I'm sure the patent will have expired by the time the toy actually exists. :b

      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    4. Re:How about parents just do their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I believe a "bark collar" at an early age can do wonders. The technology is already here, people!

    5. Re:How about parents just do their job? by EdIII · · Score: 1

      This will just be a tool like anything else. It's easier. At least this tool might have a chance to actually teach a child something positive. The previous tool parents used to raise children was called TV, and I don't think it had a very positive impact at all.

      I think after a couple of generations it will be like Idiocracy and they won't know why they use the technology in the first place:

      Pvt. Joe Bowers: What *are* these electrolytes? Do you even know?
      Secretary of State: They're... what they use to make Brawndo!
      Pvt. Joe Bowers: But *why* do they use them to make Brawndo?
      Secretary of Defense: [raises hand after a pause] Because Brawndo's got electrolytes.

    6. Re:How about parents just do their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      The don't reinforce spelling skills either.

    7. Re:How about parents just do their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And put some explosive in it. If your kid's a violent little prick at the age of four you've already failed and it's too late to fix it. Best to detonate the collar; you might do better with the next one.

    8. Re:How about parents just do their job? by StripedCow · · Score: 1

      How about parents just do their job?

      Well, it looks like IBM just patented our jobs :(

      --
      If Pandora's box is destined to be opened, *I* want to be the one to open it.
    9. Re:How about parents just do their job? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't it the parent's responsibility to "coach" their child? Maybe if more parents did their job properly there wouldn't be a perceived need for IBM's technology.

      Hear, hear.

      Heck, in fact, isn't it simply NORMAL that children will occasionally play rough? Isn't it BENEFICIAL, even? It's been happening for millions of years, and contrary to what some people seem to think, it's not usually about precious snowflakes getting scarred for life (actual bullying aside, but yes, that is indeed what parents are for); it's about children learning empathy. Children are born entirely selfish, and it's only when they themselves get punched in the sandbox that they learn that THEY shouldn't punch others, either.

      Parents need to guide this process, of course, and step in when it spirals out of control. But children also need to learn certain things for themselves. We should not protect children from each other, just like we shouldn't keep them from walking down the street alone for fear of child molesters and terrorists.

      When you've got kids, always remember: you're not raising a child, you're raising an adult. Everything you do should be geared towards making sure that if you and your spouse suddenly die in a car crash on your child's 18th birthday, your child will indeed be ready to get by in the adult world on their own.

    10. Re:How about parents just do their job? by BraksDad · · Score: 1

      Heck with properly... How about at all. Everyone loses when parenting is out sourced. By everyone, I mean the entire population of Homo Sapien Sapiens on Terra Firma. Heck, I could make an argument that includes all Earths Flaura and Fauna.

      --
      Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."
  8. Children are too unpredictable by countertrolling · · Score: 2

    We should give them up for 'droids. Much easier to control.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
    1. Re:Children are too unpredictable by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
      These are not the children you're looking for...

      *handwave*

  9. HAL is 1 better than IBM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROT1

    1. Re:HAL is 1 better than IBM by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      You need to learn your alphabet a little bit better.

      HAL ROT 1 is IBM
      IBM ROT -1 (or ROT 25) is HAL

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

  10. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who let you use the computer today?
    They should make sure that you take your medications ...

    Pls... do everyone a favor and disappear! (script or whatever you are)

    oh, and by your own words : MichaelKristopeit = stagnated

  11. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh and I forgot to add ... replied as AC just to tick you off ;-)

  12. Patent Claims by k2backhoe · · Score: 3, Funny

    Claim 12: A system as in claim 1 where, if the audible warning telling the child 'to play nice' in a strict tone of voice and the audible warning that asks the child 'would you like someone to do that to you' in a softer tone of voice along with a visual cue as well are not effective, then a small correctional current is applied through EEG electrodes 1 and 2, inducing the desired behavior or a peaceful coma.

  13. Re:slashdot = stagnated by MichaelKristopeit401 · · Score: 0
    ur mum's face is halfwit.

    why do you cower in my shadow? what are you afraid of?

    you're completely pathetic.

  14. Open Source by sodafox · · Score: 3, Funny

    Things like this really need to be open source. I'm not just talking about the source code, but the dialog too. Parents need to know what sort of things it's going to say. Last thing I'd want to hear coming out of it's mouth is "IBM is the Light".

    1. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "My name is Talking Tina, and I'm going to kill you..."

    2. Re:Open Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "My name is Pedobear, and I just LOOOOOVE to have fun with the kids!"

      Teddy Ruxpin, it won't be. Be. Afraid.

  15. Children, listen to your parents by Culture20 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Please don't teach kids that it's okay to receive moral instruction from an AI (or worse, a mere expert system). Kids are insidious rules lawyers who will bend and twist words/actions to fit what they want. Human guardians need to be there to make them understand that rules lawyering is not socially acceptable. An expert system will be just as easily beat as the end game boss monster in Mega Man XXXVI.

    1. Re:Children, listen to your parents by SteveFoerster · · Score: 2

      But this may prove to be a useful skill in a world with lots of AIs: q.v., Star Trek Liar Paradox

      --
      Space game using normal deck of cards: http://BattleCards.org
    2. Re:Children, listen to your parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > rules lawyering is not socially acceptable

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:Children, listen to your parents by ocdscouter · · Score: 1

      > rules lawyering is not socially acceptable

      You must be new here.

      I'm not sure I'd say that slashdot squabble conventions are terribly representative of what's 'socially acceptable'.

    4. Re:Children, listen to your parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >rules lawyering is not socially acceptable

      assertion failure.

    5. Re:Children, listen to your parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      rules lawyering is not socially acceptable

      Try telling that that to the lawyers.

    6. Re:Children, listen to your parents by jimshatt · · Score: 1

      Kids beating the AI is the least of our problems. Teaching kids it's okay to obey AI's is just the first step to creating the first generation of human slaves...

  16. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! 402 already, you really have no life.

  17. A cheaper option by tumutbound · · Score: 2

    A 6ft length of rattan cane will do a good job of enforcing the rules and is much cheaper than any AI. Plus it can be fun for at least one participant!

    1. Re:A cheaper option by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why don't you go for electric shocks, it's a lot more fun for that "one" participant, and would probably work better.

      It's idiots like this that blame the child for the way he turns out as an adult, and take none of the blame for themselves ...

  18. Droid does what iDon't by tepples · · Score: 1

    We should give them up for 'droids. Much easier to control.

    And iPhones are even easier to control than that: no pesky "Unknown sources" or free access to "ADB".

  19. Ibm by jonathan-seo · · Score: 1

    IBM always try to capture every corner of the market.

  20. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what, you have no 'ur mum's' comment to this one? ... losing a game, aren't we?

  21. Two words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    shock collar

  22. Oblig. Futurama by Brett+Buck · · Score: 4, Funny

    Have you ever considered turning off the TV, sitting down with your child, and hitting them?

    1. Re:Oblig. Futurama by ldobehardcore · · Score: 1

      Also:

      Roberto: "Death to the 1X Robots!!"
      *Electric arc through his head*
      "I love those magnificent 1X Robots! The 1X Robots are my Friends."

      Bender: "What happened to your previous enthusiasm for stabbing them?"

      Roberto: "I'm past that man. Later blood"

      --
      Hectice, baby, Mercator says hello to you
    2. Re:Oblig. Futurama by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Bender: Your son plays the holophoner beautifully. How hard did you have to hit him?

        High Society Dowager: Fairly Hard.

    3. Re:Oblig. Futurama by Troll-Under-D'Bridge · · Score: 1

      No, if you're earning $$, why bother? Like a dictator or mob boss, have somebody else do the dirty deed for you. That way you don't get sued for whatever happens to the child. Let the manufacturer think of the children.

  23. Behavioral Reinforcement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just add a shock collar and actuator controlled dopamine injector, and we'll be in business.

  24. Re:slashdot = stagnated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You failed, an EPIC Fail!, you should have replied something like ... 'ur mum's...' (fix the script..., hehe), but you probably don't know how ...

    404 accounts already, really? Should you use just one account, if you are so much what you claim to be?
    - creating new account == cower, which is equal to AC, right?

    You REALLY are an idiot (or a bash script gone horribly wrong, hehe)

    The End, shadow feeb.

  25. Teddy Ticklebum, bad ass bear by ewe2 · · Score: 1

    Uh Oh!

    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  26. The press release generator. by poptones · · Score: 1

    'For example,' explains Big Blue, 'to help a child who plays rough with other children the interaction data can include multiple interaction operations that can be performed by the interactive device for helping the child play less rough with other children.

    Just so long as they're not going to be teaching kids English....

  27. Anti-troll meta patent (ATMP) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I've had enough of this shit. I'm going to file a patent on systems and methods for filing speculative patents on anything and everything to piss people off, make money suing people and or gain unfair unjust monopoly on a future market that may or may not exist.

    Then every time a patent troll surfaces sue the living hell out of them in a certain nameless court of Marshall Texas for violating my patent.

  28. IBM Watson by antdude · · Score: 1

    I want an IBM Watson. :P

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  29. Owning responsibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Attention parents: NOTE: this is YOUR job.

  30. How long do these AI toys last? by dafing · · Score: 2
    --
    --- ...or a new slashdot signature. Dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all
  31. Screamers by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    Awesome those teddy bears from the movie Screamers will finally become reality!

  32. Seems fine to me.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids being taught interaction skills by a thing with no humanity and limited responsive capabilities....................it's perfect training for when they grow up and get a job working a customer service phone line :)

  33. Great Tool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can be a great tool to determine a child's attitude and behavior. IBM rocks in computer technology. I love all their stuff. :)
    choosehottubsdirect reviews - choosehottubsdirect.com

  34. This idea is so old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    even older than AI... and the patent would have expired by now...

    There was Boxey's daggit Muffy in the original Battlestar Galactica.

  35. Re:People, don't listen to your parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    People are insidious rules lawyers who will bend and twist words/actions to fit what they want.

    Human guardians need to be there to make them understand that rules lawyering is not socially acceptable, lest they become politicians.

  36. Just waiting for a crash and burn by kleuske · · Score: 1

    Methinks the inventors have dramatically underestimated a) the learning capabilities of 2-to-5-year-olds b) the social intelligence of same, b) the destructive potential of same, and dramatically overestimated a) the everyday authority these toys will have in the eyes of 2-to-five year olds b) the electronics ability to differentiate between c) the willingness and/or ability of parent to feed toy with the behaviors mentioned. In short, this is a disaster waiting to happen. Woe to the parent that relies on one of these contraptions.

    --
    Timeo hominem unius libri
  37. Talk about denying reality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "'For example,' explains Big Blue, 'to help a child who plays rough with other children the interaction data can include multiple interaction operations that can be performed by the interactive device for helping the child play less rough with other children."

    Yes, that's really going to work. I see that 'Big Blue' didn't have the brains to ask WHY some children "play rough" (i.e. are VIOLENT) towards other children. Could it possibly be because they have violent parents, who beat the crap out of them every day? No, that's too much for the latte drinking douchebags at 'Big Blue' to think about, so they pretend they can TALK a child out of their emotions. Truly pathetic.

  38. Prior art by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't there prior art for this in several thousand or so sci-fi books? Maybe not for specific mechanics, but certainly for the end function.

  39. Unintended consequence by ratl · · Score: 1

    I am afraid these toys will lead to more extreme forms of misbehaviour: A child trying to pry open an other child to remove the batteries.
    Ratl

  40. Will this also be offered in a girlfriend size? by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

    Or a manager size . . . ?

    "Dave, I think that your employees deserve raises."

    Lucky for me that the EEG sensors will not be able to penetrate my tinfoil hat.

    --
    Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
  41. HAL-- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, it's their right, after all. They have always owned the wretched thing.

    char *hal = "HAL";
    for (int i = 0; i < 3; ++i)
        --(hal[i]);

  42. They would have Intel Inside? by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    The last mimzy should teach them what hollywood do to your prefered tales when you don't behave. And IBM will just make it even (if possible) worse.

  43. Rinse, Soak, Repeat ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Robo-Hypnotic Brain (Pre-)Washing ?

    What a wonderful idea!

    I've heard the 2.0 will be wifi. Or 3G / 4G. And exchange telemetry with your walmart rfid. And matbe a few other rfids and chips you usually carry about without caring, or noticing. That's just modern life, right?

    3.0 will be self- .... er, never mind that. Yet. >:-|

  44. Good luck with that by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

    I think we can all imagine a 9 year old little shit banging his toy against a wall just to hear it say "ow"

    --
    If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
  45. Parents? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't that what parents are supposed to be doing? What the heck do we need a robot for???

  46. Re:ow by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    We might need Lasse Gjertsen to put this in proper perspective and save us from it. Either him, or the remixer behind Developers.

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  47. Re:Ow Squared by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Sorry for the repost, but I found a better one.

      Lasse Gjertsen vs the Angry German Kid

    This is the future of being raised by IBM Teddy!

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A93dHye9ic4&feature=related

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  48. AI: Artificial Insanity by professorflipwig · · Score: 1

    Cue thousands of kids thinking they have schizophrenia.

    --
    Hostes futuri sint socii.
  49. Parents!? What are those? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will someone please step up and actually parent their children instead! Most teachers blame the parents when children can't behave. Most teachers are right. This will just enable more bad parents!

  50. HAL-Dad 2.0 by Lashat · · Score: 1

    Comes equipped with auto-shocker to prevent children from acting out. No more child inflicted damage to your product.

    --
    For every benefit you receive a tax is levied. - Ralph Waldo Emerson
  51. Zaap!! by LotsaCaffeine · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they'll include the V-chip option to electrocute your child every time he says a cuss word?

    Bill

  52. What, No Automatic Loyalty Checker? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's an old SF short (PKDick? Silverberg? Pohl? ... ?) about an automatic loyalty checking household appliance that gets misplaced into a few year's ahead of its time, in a very average middle class living-room. Can't remember the name, or much else. Fuin little read, though. In the same pocketbook with oother stories, I think,. Including the one where shell-shocked over-drugged soldiers learn to teleport into alternative realities. Like I sais. A fun little read. Alas, all is now smoke and ashes.

  53. Invader Zim by odirex · · Score: 1

    "I love you, cold unfeeling robot arm." ~ Invader Zim

  54. behavioral therapy by edith1334 · · Score: 1

    I can see how this may be helpful but only if used in conjunction with a real therapist as well. I don't think the use of verbal cues alone by a computer will necessary help reduce unwanted behavior. It will also be difficult to catch the inappropriate behavior across different environments or circumstances. The part about the warnings "would you like someone to do that to you' in a softer tone of voice along with a visual cue as well" also doesn't seem to go along with general theories behind behavioral therapy. Permission Based Email Marketing.

  55. Re: HAL-Like by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In case you've forgotten, they tried to 'kill' Hal or at least disconnect 'him.' Picture the child de-stuffing his Teddy....

  56. Have they patented lollipop theft yet? by transami · · Score: 1

    The patent system is so out of control. The wording of this patent is so broad that it could apply to any biofeedback system.

    There is no mention of a "teddy" btw, just an "interactive electronic device".

    --
    :T:R:A:N:S:
  57. I have been outlawed by BraksDad · · Score: 1

    Does this mean that my being a dad means I am also a patent violation?

    --
    Slowly waving my hand - "This is not the sig you are looking for."