Slashdot Mirror


Android Copy of Danish Man Unveiled

An anonymous reader writes "The Geminoid family, a series of ultra-realistic androids, each a copy of a real person, has a new member: Geminoid DK, a robot clone of a Danish researcher and the most realistic Geminoid yet. The robot has lifelike facial features and movements, blinking, smiling, frowning with incredible realism. The Danish researcher, Henrik Scharfe of Aalborg University, teamed up with Japanese animatronics firm Kokoro and roboticist Hiroshi Ishiguro to create his robot twin, which he plans to use to study human-robot interaction and cultural differences in the perception of robots. This is the first Geminoid that is not based on a Japanese person; it's also the first bearded one."

21 of 147 comments (clear)

  1. realistic looking by Sir_Lewk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was at first shocked at how realistic this was, but then I realized that I probably was thinking that because they didn't model as a young Japanese woman with perfect skin. Seriously, there are so many robot heads modelled that way, real young Japanese women are almost starting to seem robotic.

    --
    "linux is just DOS with a UNIX like syntax" -- Galactic Dominator (944134)
    1. Re:realistic looking by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 2

      Some of the manufacturing shots are pretty disturbing, though.

      this one, for instance feeds exclusively on human fear...

    2. Re:realistic looking by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well... As a guy, I'm waiting for the young Japanese female robot with working pussy and mouth...

      And as a Slashdotter, you're probably also waiting for it to come with realistic fur and a tail.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    3. Re:realistic looking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And as a /b/tard, he's probably waiting for it to come in child sizes.

    4. Re:realistic looking by v1 · · Score: 2

      I was also extremely impressed. Until you see some of the jerky movements a bit into the demo, there's no way you'd think it wasn't real. Realisting looking hair. Even the teeth are naturally a little uneven. None of that "final fantasy plastic skin" CGI look at all. The skin and hair look great.

      I don't understand why it's taken this long to figure out those basic concepts. Maybe they were getting a lot of "I don't know, it just doesn't look REAL" from people, but I know if they'd have asked ME I'd have told them immediately several issues they needed to fix. And this seems to address most of them. Right now the jerky major movements are the biggest issue.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    5. Re:realistic looking by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      realistic looking is just a trick of the eye for few seconds.

      but it's easy. I mean, it's just an artisan straightforward job to make it look "real", it's not even a triumph if they manage it - except if they plan a career in special effects. the article could be renamed "boring danish geezer orders an animatronic from a japanese company with his face with public danish funds".

      the rest of it, making it act like a man when nobody knows how a man should act is quite different. it can frown now, but it's just a clockwork animation, my sock puppet can laugh too.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
  2. Confusing title by zill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Android Copy of Danish Man Unveiled

    OK, who else thought "Danish Man" was the name of game that's being ported to Android?

    1. Re:Confusing title by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Funny

      Android Copy of Danish Man Unveiled

      OK, who else thought "Danish Man" was the name of game that's being ported to Android?

      Not me, but frankly we're more likely to see androids being built than popular games being ported to Android.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    2. Re:Confusing title by wierd_w · · Score: 2

      The adventures of Danish Man and Bun Boy, in "The sticky sweetness of the uncanny valley!" Coming to an Android platform near you!

  3. can you download the app in the official market? by youn · · Score: 2

    am I the only one who thought it was more news about google's smarphone/tablet platform? :)

    androids are cool... but definitely fooled me for half a second

    --
    Never antropomorphize computers, they do not like that :p
  4. FYI:Geminoid by camperdave · · Score: 2

    Just an FYI folks: "Geminoid" is a registered trademark of Advanced Telecommunications Research Institute International.

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  5. !ultra by Troll-Under-D'Bridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Geminoid family, a series of ultra-realistic androids, each a copy of a real person, has a new member

    A bit realistic perhaps, but definitely not ultra. I've bothered to actually watch the fine video, and the movements are still on the near side of the creepy valley. As for its classification as an android, really, it's not even a talking head, just little more than an animated wax dummy, able to blink and sigh but incapable of a decent conversation. The main use I see for this is in big budget Hollywood movies where you have to blow up your star actor. But CG can service that department fairly well already.

    1. Re:!ultra by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Funny

      big budget Hollywood movies where you have to blow up your star actor

      if he's a Scientologist then who cares?

      Perfect - A movie starring Charlie Sheen, Arnold Schwarzenegger, and Tom Cruise, where Cruise gets blown up. You could call it Mission:Impossible - Two and a Half Men!

    2. Re:!ultra by Hojima · · Score: 2

      I've bothered to actually watch the fine video, and the movements are still on the near side of the creepy valley.

      Saying that it's a bit creepy is like saying that Nazis are a bit anti-semitic. If I saw that thing in my room I wouldn't rest until a priest douses its ashes with holy water.

    3. Re:!ultra by HungryHobo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      surprisingly enough many people are almost the opposite.

      If you get too far into the uncanny vally people can be hostile but stay well back and people will relate to machines just fine, they won't relate to them as people but they'll be fine thinking of them like really smart pets/animals.

      I came across a lovely article a while back.

      http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/05/AR2007050501009_pf.html

      People are quite ready to treat machines as they would animals, even going so far as to consider something that's happening to a bot to be inhumane.

      "The most effective way to find and destroy a land mine is to step on it.

      This has bad results, of course, if you're a human. But not so much if you're a robot and have as many legs as a centipede sticking out from your body. That's why Mark Tilden, a robotics physicist at the Los Alamos National Laboratory, built something like that. At the Yuma Test Grounds in Arizona, the autonomous robot, 5 feet long and modeled on a stick-insect, strutted out for a live-fire test and worked beautifully, he says. Every time it found a mine, blew it up and lost a limb, it picked itself up and readjusted to move forward on its remaining legs, continuing to clear a path through the minefield.

      Finally it was down to one leg. Still, it pulled itself forward. Tilden was ecstatic. The machine was working splendidly.

      The human in command of the exercise, however -- an Army colonel -- blew a fuse.

      The colonel ordered the test stopped.

      Why? asked Tilden. What's wrong?

      The colonel just could not stand the pathos of watching the burned, scarred and crippled machine drag itself forward on its last leg.

      This test, he charged, was inhumane. "

      It might be easier to get people to bond to a machine as they would a guidedog rather than as they would to another human.

      The veteran explosives technician looming over Bogosh was visibly upset. He insisted he did not want a new robot. He wanted Scooby-Doo back.

      "Sometimes they get a little emotional over it," Bogosh says. "Like having a pet dog. It attacks the IEDs, comes back, and attacks again. It becomes part of the team, gets a name. They get upset when anything happens to one of the team. They identify with the little robot quickly. They count on it a lot in a mission."

  6. Re:Can you... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ah yes. Japanese and Danes. The most expressive people on planet earth.

    When they make an Italian, wake me up.

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  7. Animatronic vs. Robot by orkysoft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This robot is really just an animatronic device, like they have at Disneyland (or so I hear). It's controlled by someone behind the scenes using a computer. The purpose is to study how people interact with it, knowing that it's not real. The interesting thing about regular robots is that they're supposed to control themselves, and research concentrates not just on designing new kinds of sensors and actuators (limbs) and body plans, but especially the software to control them.

    Still, it looks very impressive, but I'm not sure how this progresses the development of sensors, actuators, or control software. It seems more like a sophisticated crafts project to me. Are the researchers also going to have test subjects interact with a non-realistic human-shaped robot to see how they react to it, to compare with the realistic looking one?

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  8. Not Quite Human by nmb3000 · · Score: 2

    The pictures and video are pretty interesting, but also awfully short. It would be neat to see some combined expressions rather than just simple blinking and mouth movement. Speaking of the movement in the video, was anyone else reminded of Not Quite Human? Haven't thought about that movie in quite a while :)

    Also, can anyone say "uncanny valley"? They've definitely made progress, but there's still something... not quite right about it. Considering that the easiest part of creating an android is probably the static external features such as skin, hair, and eyes (lots of practice from movie/TV makeup), it's interesting that a still photo still triggers the cues which tell us "that's not real."

    Now only a few things left to do:

    1. Create an evil twin bent death, carnage, and annihilation
    3. ???
    4. Profit! (well, that, or doom the human race)

    --
    "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
    /)
  9. Re:Sex with yourself by orphiuchus · · Score: 2

    It would just be masturbation, which is perfectly natural.

  10. Re:Just saying what you're thinking. by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    A robot doesn't have to perfectly mimic a human to be commercially viable, just be close enough to be convincing in the dark.

    Actually, if it perfectly mimicked a human being, it wouldn't be economically viable. Imagine, after some robo-sex, the fem-bot starts asking "So, when do you want to get married?" or "Why can't we live together? There is no reason for us to pay two rents."

  11. Data upload by macraig · · Score: 2

    I think Brent Spiner should be Geminoided next. Can you imagine the convention possibilities? Trekkies everywhere will be wetting their pants.