Slashdot Mirror


Google Releases Stable Version of Chrome 10

An anonymous reader writes "Google has released version 10 of the Chrome Browser. The update brings hundreds of bug fixes as well as many features that have been available on the Chrome beta and dev channels to users interested in using Chrome's latest builds. Chrome 10 also addresses 23 security vulnerabilities in the WebKit-based browser (easily more than Google has ever fixed before): 15 rated as High, three rated as Medium, and five rated as Low."

18 of 169 comments (clear)

  1. RAM for cache? by TheMadTopher · · Score: 2

    Can I finally use RAM for the browser's cache like Firefox to avoid frequent hits on my SSD?

    1. Re:RAM for cache? by nschubach · · Score: 2

      It's not about lifetime concerns... some SSDs have a slow write time which can be very apparent in normal everyday operation. Granted, I only noticed it when I was fooling around and disabled write caching (platters were also slow, but SSD plain locks the PC for the entire write operation it seems...)

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
    2. Re:RAM for cache? by nschubach · · Score: 2

      There's a "workaround"? (I have not tried this, but I just searched for it...)

      http://www.wagnerdanda.me/2010/08/how-to-fix-google-chrome-problems-with-ssd-move-cache-to-ramdisk/

      Of course, if you have a spinning disk, that would work as well.

      --
      Every time I start to have faith in humanity, I ruin it by driving to work between 7 and 8 am.
  2. Re:Awesome! by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flash is sandboxed in the most recent version, which should lead to better protection against exploits against Flash. And for a while now Flash should only crash itself if it crashes; not the whole browser.

  3. Wow! by atomicbutterfly · · Score: 2

    Version 10! Oh man, and here I am feeling like a chump with Firefox 4. I'm waaaay behind on my Internet power level compared to Chrome. I gotta switch before I completely miss out on the Internet awesomeness provided by the much newer Chrome 10! It's 6 additional levels of awesomeness people!

    // For those who lack the ability to detect sarcasm - mod me down and I shall become more powerful than you can imagine.

    1. Re:Wow! by Missing.Matter · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm on Opera 11. How you feel about your puny Chrome 10 now?

  4. Re:Awesome! by PickyH3D · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now, I hope the next one on their list to add Sandboxing support to is Java. Until then, Java will remain disabled in Chrome.

  5. As long as they stick with that UI by AbRASiON · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Then I'll stick with Firefox, it might get a bit bloated but I have my fingers crossed as hardware improves and they end up making the multithreaded code, it'll at least remain the speed it is now, while retaining good functionality for me.

    Yes, I know they are copying the _ridiculous_ tabs on the top UI from chrome, it can be disabled in the default options though, no addon required to do so.
    Need my status bar down the bottom too.
    FireFox 3 needs only one thing for me.
    More speed, just more and more speed - that's it. It's otherwise, EXACTLY what I want in a browser.

    1. Re:As long as they stick with that UI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Chrome UI = slick and to the point
      Firefox UI = clunky

    2. Re:As long as they stick with that UI by blair1q · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Interesting. I find myself doing a lot more hunting for stuff in Chrome. Firefox functionality seems to be just there where I need it. At least, after I configure a couple of buttons back into play, and turn off a toolbar or so.

      Except the status bar. They're freaking me out with making it go away, then bringing it back only it's broken, etc. But there's a 3rd-party status-bar plugin that makes it behave the old way. I forget the name or I'd plug it here.

    3. Re:As long as they stick with that UI by jrcamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Please explain why tabs on top are "ridiculous".

      Also, it appears the only reason you think the Chrome UI is inferior to Firefox's is because you're used to Firefox. And you know what, it's perfectly reasonable to say "I stay with Firefox because I'm used to the UI". But to say you don't use Chrome because it's not Firefox is patently ridiculous.

  6. Re:Back button by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

    But does the back button work properly? It has been broken for ages on certain sites...

    out on the net today
    i saw a dead head sticker on a cadillac
    a voice inside my head said don't look back
    you can never look back

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  7. Re:Awesome! by vlueboy · · Score: 2

    Browser-based Java programs can't modify the host computer.

    My Windows Vista and XP internet explorer would have to disagree on this one.
    I've twice seen the java box running before realizing exactly how Opera and IE have let spyware thru.

    I really don't have a daily reason for java, but last I remember it is like 60+MBs to reinstall, and the download licensing you "sign" with Sun Microsystems is annoying to get an offline installer exe, so I stopped uninstalling it for those rainy days when a corporate site requires java.

  8. If only flash just crashed by goombah99 · · Score: 2

    If flash would just crash then sandboxing would at least solve that. But instead it happily gobbles your CPU with runaway rendering crap. The only limit on it now is it is single threaded. Not looking forward to multi-cpu flash.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  9. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it allows you to run 'restricted' native libraries using exposed APIs, (re)compiled for NaCl, which are then sandboxed.

  10. Re:Booksmarks by amicusNYCL · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Now how about we get you fellas a good ass bookmarks manager, huh?

    You're having problems managing your ass bookmarks, are you?

    --
    "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  11. Re:Migration guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not true anymore. Adblock Plus for Chrome now is virtually indistinguishable from Firefox's and has been for some time.

  12. Re:A stable version of Chrome -- that's different! by prockcore · · Score: 2

    It doesn't need addons to be good at web programming/debugging. The built in inspector and javascript debugger is better than firebug.