Slashdot Mirror


US Military Commissions Sock Puppet Program

chrb writes "The Guardian and The Telegraph are reporting that US based Ntrepid Corporation has been awarded a $2.76 million contract to develop software aimed at manipulating social media. The project aims to enable military personnel to control multiple 'sock puppets' located at a range of geographically diverse IP addresses, with the aim of spreading pro-US propaganda. The project will not target English speaking web sites (yet) but will be limited to foreign languages, including Arabic, Farsi, Urdu and Pashto. The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."

38 of 217 comments (clear)

  1. Unbellythinkful by Errol+backfiring · · Score: 5, Funny

    Really, calling propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice"? I think a few braincells just exploded.

    --
    Nae king! Nae laird! Nae yurrupiean pressedent! We willna be fooled again!
    1. Re:Unbellythinkful by Magada · · Score: 3, Funny

      What would you want it to be called? "Operation Naked Truth"?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
    2. Re:Unbellythinkful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Operation 15/f/Kabul ;-)

    3. Re:Unbellythinkful by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Really, calling propaganda "Operation Earnest Voice"? I think a few braincells just exploded.

      Actually, the name is perfect, since the name is also propaganda.

  2. Secret op? by danbuter · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Shouldn't something like this have been kept Secret? Letting everyone know about it kind of defeats the purpose.

  3. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by cappp · · Score: 2

    Personally I think it's a fantastic idea, clearly indicative of a government that loves and cares for its people.

    Cappp...translate this into Farsi when you get a chance please.

  4. Earnest... by jeffmeden · · Score: 2

    "The project will be funded as part of the $200 million Operation Earnest Voice program run by US Central Command."

    This word you are using... I do not think it means what you think it means.

  5. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by FatSean · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    --
    Blar.
  6. Re:Good! by suso · · Score: 2

    Even though I was joking, I can't believe I just said that. You can ostracize me now.

  7. OK for furriners by AlecC · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Another case of the US feeling that it is perfectly acceptable to treat foreigners in a way that would bring outrage if it tried it on its own citizens. Such things started, and were found acceptable: in cases of outright declared war (World Wars, Korea, Vietnam), it is OK to deceive and manipulate enemy civilians. But that has been translated to being OK to do the same to all except strong allies - and it would be a small step to apply it to them. The philosophy has become that war justifies lethal force, and non-war justifies anything except lethal force.

    What would the US do if another country started doing the same within the US?

    Hey - maybe they have. Maybe all the appalling right-wing bigots are really Chinese sock-puppets intended to discredit the US. I have never met an American who offered those views: all the ones I meet are nice people. Perhaps the bad side of America that I hear of but never see is just a huge cyber sock puppet! Damn!

    --
    Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
  8. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by August_zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As distasteful as it is, this is hardly a new thing. Pretty much everyone in history has done this to some degree. The only real "news" is that a new mechanism is going into place, but the machinery has been there all along.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  9. PROTIP: If you can understand the program name.. by amanicdroid · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you can understand an intended meaning to a US operation or program name then it's public persuasion / propaganda.

    MKUltra: WTF
    Operation Overlord / Neptune: WTF

    Operation Iraqi Freedom: propaganda

  10. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can opt out of the newspaper market, I certainly have. Can't easily opt out of tax paying.

  11. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits

    Well, people are always saying they want the government "run like a business". Well, friend, "business" has been doing this sockpuppet thing for years. Go look at the web site for "New Media Strategies", the company that provides sock puppets for the Koch Brothers, among others. That's their entire business model - providing sock puppets for businesses.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  12. Are you paying US taxes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    An American would not spell "dishonorable" the way you did.

  13. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by crackspackle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Pro-USA propaganda is already planted in Iraqi news papers, this is a logical step. It's also despicable. Especially when the same government denounces these tactics when used by "the enemy".

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    Ever heard of Voice of America ? Same thing, different media. These aren't subliminal messages, it's propaganda created to directly counter propaganda of those who would seek to continue doing harm in any form, not necessarily just against the United States but also against the interest of humanity - think Gadhaffi for a current example. Having a problem with this is just Naiveté on your part.

  14. If you're anti-american... by FlapHappy · · Score: 2

    ...you should probably ignore all of those friend requests you are suddenly getting.

  15. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by OakDragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is nothing dishonorable at all with the U.S.A. spreading pro-USA propaganda.

  16. So when should we expect sock puppets here? by morikahnx · · Score: 2

    Is site considered on US soil, or should we start expecting military trolls here soon?

    1. Re:So when should we expect sock puppets here? by Abstrackt · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nah, the military is way too busy defending our freedoms and improving the world we live in to spend time posting on Slashdot!

      (This message brought to you by the US military)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  17. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by LWATCDR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is it dishonorable if the stories are true? People do not understand that propaganda does not have to be lies and frankly the best propaganda is the truth.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  18. Re:This is a good idea! by Chrisq · · Score: 2

    And bully for the good old US of A, the bastion of democracy and goodness, for coming up with it!

    I, and all of my attractive, intelligent and clever friends agree with this! You should agree as well!

    Absolutely. Let us all lay down our arms, convert to Christianity and promise to uphold copyright law.

  19. Budget problems? What budget problems? by osgeek · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's $200 million that should come directly out of the defense budget.

    I know that this kind of shit can be done. I know that it could be useful to "win".

    But jesus fraggin' christ... do we have to go there first? Do we have to piss on our own credibility at every turn?

  20. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But Voice of America is a branded product. You tune into VoA and it tells you you're listening to VoA. It's propaganda, but it's a million miles away from sock-puppeting -- sock puppets don't tell you they're sock puppets.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  21. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by kilfarsnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As distasteful as it is, this is hardly a new thing. Pretty much everyone in history has done this to some degree. The only real "news" is that a new mechanism is going into place, but the machinery has been there all along.

    I agree. And yet, when I say that the US population is massively propagandized by its government, I get called a conspiracy theorist. I know the program in question is aimed at only foreigners, but we know how that can go don't we? I once heard that the difference between Soviet and American propaganda was that the Soviet people recognized it for what it was; the Americans, not so much.

    --
    "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
  22. Let's be fair by walterbyrd · · Score: 2

    Considering the source, I think it's fair to assume that this news has an anti-military slant.

    Also, could this be considered "counter propaganda?" A lot of people get a lot of misinformation about the USA, often from official sources. There is no way for the US to defend itself in the government controlled media of those countries.

    I like this sort of action a lot better than dropping bombs, or rolling tanks.

  23. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by aaaaaaargh! · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Are you sure you have an idea what the term "propaganda" means? For a start, it doesn't imply any commitment to truth...

    There is nothing to object to propaganda that is clearly marked as such (see above comments about "Voice of America"), but if it comes in disguise then it is, of course, dishonorable.

  24. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by plover · · Score: 4, Informative

    The technical term for the whole process run by the rich to sway decision-makers is "astroturfing," because they're creating an artificial grass-roots effort. Sock puppetry is only one tool in their toolbox.

    Nicky Hager's book Secrets and Lies, has terrific detail on how such a campaign is run, documenting the New Zealand timber industry's bought-and-paid-for efforts to run roughshod over the environmentalists in order to log the islands.

    --
    John
  25. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by Mongoose+Disciple · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not with my taxes, please. Dishonourable shits.

    Considering you spell dishonorable with a 'u', I assume it actually isn't with your taxes.

  26. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by cayenne8 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Well, I'd say it would have been a good idea....if they could have kept it fscking SECRET....

    Now..wouldn't any pro-USA comments on any ME message board or whatever now be suspected of being a sockpuppet?

    I guess we now have a new meme: On the internet...

    All the men are men

    All the women are men

    All the kids are FBI agents

    And...all the pro-USA guys in foreign forums are CIA agents.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  27. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by tophermeyer · · Score: 2

    Sure you can! Just head to any US embassy in the world and renounce your citizenship. There are lots of people all over the world that don't pay taxes to the US.

  28. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by August_zero · · Score: 2

    Knowing it exists, will not tell you what is and isn't tainted with propaganda. For this reason, I don't think they are going to lose all that much sleep over the big secret getting out.

    Embarrassing? Well maybe a little, but remember this is the same nation that had a pretty damning video of a helicopter attack on civilian targets go public, and there was disturbingly little backlash from the public all things considered.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
  29. Of course it's a business by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Judge by their actions, not their words. Looking at history, the primary goal of government is growth -- expanding their business slowly but surely for the elite few who can exploit it. And it shows. The US government of today absolutely dwarfs the US government of only 50, let alone 100 years ago, both in revenue and power over the people. Every year government spends more, borrows more, and seizes more power over the people -- which will be leveraged as precedent for the next expansion of revenue and/or power.

    Let's put it this way. Imagine a government strictly limited in power and revenue (like the US government was supposed to be). A government that simply can't afford to spend money on pork like this -- what's in that for the career politician? What's in that for the elite who benefit personally from big, unaccountable government? Nothing at all.

    But now imagine a government that has their hands in every aspect of life, costs trillions of dollars per year, and has so much money passing through it that it's literally impossible to account for it all -- now THAT is a government fit for crooks.

    Finally, although government is run like a business in just about every aspect, there is one important distinction: government has the special right to employ coercion (meaning physical force) as their business model. Hence there is no penalty for failure -- in fact, failure in government is typically rewarded with yet even more revenue. For the career politician, can this possibly get any better?

    1. Re:Of course it's a business by PopeRatzo · · Score: 2

      i didn't think it was terribly controversial that the federal government had expanded quite dramatically as a percentage of GDP over the past 100 years.

      A recession means GDP is shrinking, which means revenue shrinks (especially when you're giving tax benefits to the richest group. That would make the percentage of GDP used by government increase temporarily. "Spending as a percentage of GDP" is a very misleading measurement.

      You'll notice that currently we are not at the highest level of "government spending as a percentage of GDP" in our history. We reached that peak in the '40s, during WWII. Since our military presence in the world is much, much greater than it was during WWII, plus the two wars (three as of today) we're fighting, it should not surprise you that your metric is increasing.

      Further, by cutting taxes for the richest people at a time when incomes are down for everyone else, you are guaranteeing that the percentage of gov't spending over GDP is going to increase. We are currently at our lowest level of total taxation in almost 100 years, despite people's claims that we are being "taxed to death". Quite on the contrary, in fact.

      Finally, if you look at a graph of the top tax rates and GDP, you will find that GDP increased (thus lowering your "spending over GDP" metric), every single time the tax rates on the richest went over 50%. Also, whenever taxes for the rich went below 50%, our GDP shrank (not to mention that an economic bubble was created). Let me repeat that: when taxes on the rich went above 50%, we had growing GDP and no economic bubble. When taxes on the rich go below 50%, we get shrinking GDP and inevitable economic bubble. The shame of it all is that the exact same correlation exists between corporate tax rates and GDP.

      If you were to cut every single penny of the federal government's discretionary spending and zero the entire discretionary budget out, the federal deficit would only decrease by 1/3. What does all this tell you? That we cannot cut our way out of our economic woes. "Austerity" measures during slow economic times has never, ever helped. Poor women and infants did not get us into this mess. Teachers, firefighters and the police did not get us into this mess. We cut off our income source just as our bills were coming due.

      Your concern about "government spending" and the "deficit" is misplaced. You are being misled.

      --
      You are welcome on my lawn.
  30. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by mdm42 · · Score: 2

    "The diety-led Hebrews" - does this mean that Abraham was a really skinny guy? Or just that he had some books to sell "Smash Idols to Lose 60 Mina in 30 Days"?

    --
    New mod option wanted: -1 DrunkenRambling
  31. Re:Good! by Omestes · · Score: 2

    When I say I'm watching T.V. my friends call me a bullshitter... I never watch TV.

    When I say I'm watching T.V., I'm sitting in the living room staring at the giant black monolith, staring carefully. You can never be too safe, those things are dangerous. It hasn't been plugged in since I go it, the last thing you want to do is give those damn things POWER. The sad thing is no one believes me either... my girl friend left me, I can hear my cats chitter with contempt and amusement... But I will continue my vigil, for the good of the humane and just society.

    I'm a hero. A hero damnit.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
  32. Re:I, for one, salute our new sock-puppet overlord by davester666 · · Score: 2

    No. He either was God, or he rode a bicycle.

    --
    Sleep your way to a whiter smile...date a dentist!
  33. Um. I think I found a program to cut by objectdisoriented · · Score: 2

    Republicans are on a tear to eliminate social programs.

    Lordy, this program is all about social (media) programs. Cut it, cut it, cut it.

    Bachmann, you are a self-described cutter. Cut it. Come on, cut, cut, cut.

    Maybe once we see Glen Beck crying about this on Fox the patriot citizenry will kill this outrageous social program.
    .

    --
    Performance must be inherent in every aspect of the system. It is not an afterthought, but always thought. - me