Slashdot Mirror


Getting Past Censorship With Unorthodox Links To the Internet

An anonymous reader points out a short article at The Economist, which says "Savvy techies are finding ways to circumvent politically motivated shutdowns of the internet. Various groups around the world are using creative means like multi-directional mobile phone antennae and even microwave ovens to transmit internet traffic accross international borders."

82 comments

  1. Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ham radio saves the day again !

    1. Re:Ham Radio by swalve · · Score: 1

      Correction: ham radio operators bluster about saving the day again !

    2. Re:Ham Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read something a few weeks ago that mentioned the idea of relicensing the ham radio frequencies to cripple "rogue" communications such as this.

  2. Depends on the country... by arcade · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This really depends on the country in question, but there are many way s to gain access to the Internet. If the country is connected to more free country by land, it should be possible to set up RONJA-devices for cross-border communication. (For more information about RONJA: http://ronja.twibright.com/ ). The devices might seem very conspicious but can be made to be less obvious. If using light outside the visible range, this might be a rather good alternative. Not easily blocked with radio-jamming neither.

    One can further develop this with more links once inside the country - from location to location, without links that are easy to shut down without knowledge of their location available for the government.

    Directional antennas for wireless devices is another alternative - but those are easier to jam with interference.

    Now, it's a completely different ballpark if you don't have any friendly regimes close by. If you're an island nation (say cuba, australia, or others) - you might have to piggyback on existing communication links, and if the links themselves are completely severed - like they were in Egypt - it automatically gets more difficult. You'll need to piggyback on radio or satelite. I don't know the current state of packet radio, nor do I know how easy it is to trace or jam - but my suspicion is that it would be relatively easy to both track down and to jam.

    Satelite, as pointed out in the article, is expensive. I do seem to remember some satelites having support for relaying messages for free for people using amateur radio - however - I suspect this is for voice communication and not for packet radio. It should, however, be possible to get tweets out if you can find someone to type them in outside of the country. Not easy to upload stuff to youtube using this, though.

    Other ideas?

    --
    "Rune Kristian Viken" - http://www.nwo.no - arca
    1. Re:Depends on the country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always RFC 1149, but that's not easy for uploading stuff to Youtube either.

    2. Re:Depends on the country... by cpu6502 · · Score: 1

      >>>Other ideas?

      I'd just use dialup (like the freebie connection provided by France). It's a perfectly acceptable means of transmitting photographs (a few seconds each). Even videos can be uploaded to youtube in 10 minutes or less.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Depends on the country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      But avian carriers tweet really well.

    4. Re:Depends on the country... by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      Directional antennas for wireless devices is another alternative - but those are easier to jam with interference.

      The problem with optical is range, which is piss-poor. As you say, the devices are somewhat obtrusive. A microwave antenna is often even moreso, but you can cover it with something opaque and hide it. An extremely directional microwave link is not necessarily trivial to jam and with fairly small antennae you can easily achieve ranges well more than double what you can practically do with a LASER. In addition these low-power microwave links represent less risk to the user :)

      You'll need to piggyback on radio or satelite.

      Or IOW, you depend on angels dropping you a satellite phone if you don't have one already.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:Depends on the country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dialup has a major downside: if the regime owns or otherwise controls the telephone network, then they can monitor your traffic. This would allow them to block traffic or arrest you, if you would happen to access restricted sites or use encryption.

    6. Re:Depends on the country... by Urza9814 · · Score: 2

      I do seem to remember some satelites having support for relaying messages for free for people using amateur radio - however - I suspect this is for voice communication and not for packet radio.

      If you can send voice, you can send data. It may be slow, but it's certainly possible. You just need someone on the outside to set up the same system.

      I don't know the current state of packet radio, nor do I know how easy it is to trace or jam - but my suspicion is that it would be relatively easy to both track down and to jam.

      Somewhat, yes. I doubt that most governments would bother though. If they jam it, you can always jump to another frequency - there are quite a few amateur radio bands, and more than one that would allow digital transmission. If they block all the amateur bands, they've probably already blocked every other wireless link you could possible use (including satellites - quite a few of the arabic countries have already done that), so you're pretty thoroughly screwed without a land link in that case. Tracking it down is no different than tracking down any other radio source - which yes, is not all that difficult, but it does take a fair bit of time. And it's quite easy to mount one of these radios in your car and connect on the go with a laptop. They can't track you if you don't stand still. And I know people with relatively simple equipment (including parts of antennas made from pizza trays, for example) who have managed mobile contacts over distances hundreds of miles. If you make your antenna directional, it gets even better range, and much harder to track (but harder to use mobile as well)

    7. Re:Depends on the country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm no expert but isn't it illegal to use encryption over the amateur radio frequencies in the States? You can use packet radio over your HAM rig to surf the net but the FCC will bust your chops if they catch you visiting a site that uses shtml...
      Considering that the governments themselves are the ones who most heavily depend on radio links in most cases (police, fire, military...) it might level the playing field even more to just supply people with jamming gear themselves.

    8. Re:Depends on the country... by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      I've personally built a laser link using two laser pointers, it was capable of reliable communication at 115200bps at the distance of 2 kilometers. With better lasers and/or lenses, this distance can be easily extended to 10-15km.

      I used the system described here: http://www.cqham.ru/link_1.htm (sorry, no English version)

    9. Re:Depends on the country... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      there are lots of mirrors on the moon... could you bounce some lasers off them to and from other places to communicate... (yeh hitting in the first place is probably hard enough was it is without having to setup receivers etc... and hit them too)

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    10. Re:Depends on the country... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I posted somewhere else... but there are a lot of shiny things... like mirrors on the moon... though they may be more prisms and bounce stuff right back at you.

      a tricky bit of trigonometry but possibly possible... well in some cyber-punk fantasy book maybe.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    11. Re:Depends on the country... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ham radio operators call this "EME QSO". Radio waves are reflecting from the surface of the moon.

  3. Re:Waiting by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    Only if their number includes one of those capitalists to pay for it. Space is expensive, and is going to stay that way for a long time.

  4. Multi-directional mobile phone antennae by pushing-robot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Any ideas where I can pick up a multi-directional antenna for my phone? The unidirectional antenna it came with is a huge pain.

    --
    How can I believe you when you tell me what I don't want to hear?
  5. "microwave OVENS"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please correct this typo. You do not want people fiddling with microwave ovens and in the process getting first-degree burns and cancer. You are meant to say "Microwave LINKS"!

  6. Needs more work. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

    This is a start, but the tools are still firmly in geeks-only territory. Can't all us in the idealistic open-source community come up with new technologies? How about some program that lets mobile phones exchange data with people as they pass in the street, maintaining a shared high-latency store akin to Freenet? Or maybe some company would like to improve on the sat-internet antenna to make it even more strongly directional, thus making it harder to trace?

    1. Re:Needs more work. by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      It will remain geeks-only until people need it and it will be too late then. We need to have a resilient network while staying on the geeks-only realm.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Needs more work. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      There's a Systems problem here too.

      For all the cool tricks we can develop, all the authorities have to do is Ban X, which is the modified object, then just continue the fear campaign. We can't develop 50 new tricks per day.

      Also, the range is a problem. I can think of any number of short-range Godel Encoding themes, but it does me no good if the audience is my neighbor. To get news out of Country Z, you need some kind of data that leaves Country Z that can't just be the subject of more regulations.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    3. Re:Needs more work. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The solution is to find an X that is difficult to ban. Something that can be assembled from scrap with minimal training, like a cantenna. Or that is so useful and popular that to ban it would further feed the rebel's cause. Or even just something that is small and cheap enough to be easily smuggled or hidden, so that enforcing a ban would become very difficult. You might not be able to stop the secret police, but you can make their job very difficult.

    4. Re:Needs more work. by sjames · · Score: 1

      One strategy is to have so many X to choose from that the government can't think of all of them and get bans implemented. Another is to make X easily built from common items and hard to detect and track. That's why things like the modulated microwave oven make sense. If authorities claim you have an illegal transmitter, nuke them a cup of tea with it and they may decide they were mistaken. Laser pointer links are limited range compared to radio, but very hard to detect for example. The equipment for that is small and fairly easy to hide when not in use. If you make the link to it wireless, you can also make it difficult to determine who is responsible even if the transmitter is found.

    5. Re:Needs more work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ban unauthorized radio transmissions and wires. /story

    6. Re:Needs more work. by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I'd rather not be condemned to repeat 1950's Russia.

      --
      My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
    7. Re:Needs more work. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      At which point you have to ban mobile phones. Doable, for a sufficiently oppressive regime, but it's going to upset the population. The more angry they are, the easier it will be for rebellion to take hold. There is also an economic penalty in banning technology.

    8. Re:Needs more work. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a start, but the tools are still firmly in geeks-only territory. Can't all us in the idealistic open-source community come up with new technologies?

      New technologies aren't going to be any less geeks-only unless you have a large manufacturer throwing R&D money at making these "new technologies" both cheap and efficient.

      How about some program that lets mobile phones exchange data with people as they pass in the street, maintaining a shared high-latency store akin to Freenet?

      All that needs is new battery technology that'll let aphone constantly ping for other phones and not run dry in 3 hours.

      Or maybe some company would like to improve on the sat-internet antenna to make it even more strongly directional, thus making it harder to trace?

      You can't make a satellite phone too strongly directional, otherwise you'll lose signal if you don't have the phone held up to your ear in the correct orientation.

      This is why it hasn't happened. It'[s easy to make suggestions when you don't know anything about the engineering they'd require. Your suggestions are akin to saying we can make existing cars all get 100mpg if we just try hard enough.

  7. Re:Waiting by mfh · · Score: 0

    I'm extremely patient. I could wait forever, but I suspect that once the enlightened discover matter replication technology and how to spontaneously generate unlimited energy, space travel will be affordable because there will be no economy.

    I notice someone voted my other comment down. I suppose that person wants humanity stuck on this rock forever, probably for the lulz, right? Stupid troll would keep us here even when our Sun supernovas. It's only a matter of time you know.

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  8. Yes, microwave OVENS. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The last paragraph of the article describes a modified microwave oven.

  9. biting my nails by ckeo · · Score: 1

    Great !!
    As soon as the DIY crowd gets wind of the microwave oven hack, it wont be safe to walk down the street without getting cooked.

    1. Re:biting my nails by swalve · · Score: 1

      Same thing with the lasers. One of my biggest waking nightmares is that some fucking kid builds a massive kit laser out of a DVD burner to burn ants at 1000 yards, and accidentally blinds me while I'm driving down the street.

      "What's that humming noise? Why do I suddenly feel so hot?" [hmmmmm-click-DING!-"You've got mail!"] "Fuck, my balls just exploded!"

    2. Re:biting my nails by rgbatduke · · Score: 2

      IIRC microwave ovens were "discovered" when soldiers learned that they could put things like hot dogs on sticks and dangle them in front of radar dishes in WW II and cook them in a few seconds. A radar technician who noticed that a chocolate bar in his pocket melted when he was working on an active radar had the bright idea of confining the microwaves and using them to cook food. Hence the early Ratheon "radar range".

      So it's not so crazy that someone would learn to reverse engineer (in a sense different from the usual one:-) a microwave oven into a radar unit, or into an information transmission link. The biggest catch, I imagine, is the need for near line of sight (so you'd need to be very high up or very near the border) and a suitable receiver on the other side. Also the fact that moisture attenuates the frequencies used in microwave ovens by design, but I imagine that's less of an issue in Libya.

      rgb

      --
      Even when the experts all agree, they may well be mistaken. --- Bertrand Russell.
    3. Re:biting my nails by PPH · · Score: 1

      The biggest catch is to develop a power supply for the magnetron which is not modulated by the supply frequency (50 or 60Hz). And can be modulated at the data frequencies. For a DC supply of a couple of kilovolts, this is a non-trivial task.

      Not that I'm putting this approach down altogether. The easy availability of rated at hundreds of watts (I imagine some derating from cooking levels would be appropriate) makes this an interesting starting point.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    4. Re:biting my nails by clanrat · · Score: 1

      You do know that microwave ovens operate in the same frequency band as 2.4 GHz wifi, right? They're usually centered around ch.9 in the wifi spectrum.

    5. Re:biting my nails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Remember there's a ham band just below/overlapping 2.4GHz ISM band -- some hams have modded microwave ovens to pull their frequency into range and use them in the ham band.

  10. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by Dayofswords · · Score: 4, Informative

    it's correct actually

    an American naval-intelligence analyst at a NATO cyberwar unit in Tallinn, Estonia, describes a curious microwave oven. Though still able to cook food, its microwaves (essentially, short radiowaves) are modulated to encode information as though it were a normal radio transmitter.

    --
    Someday we'll hit the human carrying capacity. And the band will just play on.
  11. Re:Waiting by __aaqvdr516 · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Our sun is to small to supernova. Just sayin'.

  12. Laser by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Point to point laser will also work in the right situation, and be almost impossible to detect.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Laser by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      Exactly, fog, smoke, dust and "waving a stick in the air" are the only things capable of detecting a laser...

    2. Re:Laser by nurb432 · · Score: 2

      And if you use visible light lasers, you deserve to get detected.

      --
      ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    3. Re:Laser by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Visible to what? Human eye, easy. Cheap modified camcorder, not so easy...

  13. Re:Resistance to Tyranny is Liberty by swalve · · Score: 0

    That's all well and good when it is done for the right reasons. Unfortunately, most people spouting those slogans are the ones whose performance-art grants have been pulled.

  14. Re:Waiting by Auroch · · Score: 1

    Sorry. Our sun is to small to supernova. Just sayin'.

    That's only a theory. I want the crackpots to participate equally in this conversation.

    --
    Quartz Extreme and Core Image. Are there any other real reasons to spend all that money on generic hardware?
  15. Re:Waiting by digitig · · Score: 1

    Well, good luck (to your descendants) when the sun turns into a red giant then. Although where the OP plans to send humanity at the heat-death of the universe I'm not sure.

    --
    Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
  16. Re:Waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok. A nova then?

  17. Re:Suppression is the mother of invention by webmistressrachel · · Score: 1

    What's this? You're called counter-trolling? Now it's getting confusing.

    Are you like the troll who trolls the trolls or something? Cos this ^^^, my friend, is a troll.

    --
    This tagline was transcoded to result in at least one smirk. If you experience failure to smirk, please consult your Gen
  18. RFC1149 by Nimey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who'd look twice at some pigeons?

    --
    Hail Eris, full of mischief...

    E pluribus sanguinem
    1. Re:RFC1149 by nbauman · · Score: 1

      Pigeons carrying 8GB thumb drives. Perfect!

    2. Re:RFC1149 by PPH · · Score: 1

      Hungry people?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    3. Re:RFC1149 by tloh · · Score: 1

      eagles, hawks, and other raptors? I wonder what the current situation for the art of falconry is around the world.

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    4. Re:RFC1149 by DMacedo · · Score: 1

      Who'd look twice at some pigeons?

      As silly as this RFC1149 reference might be; it is actually a pertinent view.

      In this modern age, we like to think any access to information is always high tech and all.
      But there are less technical but nevertheless worthy ways to exchange information, talking about transmitting packets through amateur radio actually bypasses the very important thinking of using the amateur radio itself as the information exchange.

      A lot of revolutions in the past were started with radio (both by taking official broadcasting stations or using amateur transmissions) as well as even less technical fliers and good old word-of-mouth.

      Granted, few things are as powerful as the plethora of multimedia accounts, the videos and pictures especially; and first hand accounts are always different from the editorial media. But there's nothing so unique about using YouTube or Vimeo, Twitter or Identi.ca as well as your social network and blogs, etc that can't be accomplished using other communication methods. Sometimes it's just a matter of the need forcing ingenuity.

    5. Re:RFC1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Talibans banned pigeon keeping...

    6. Re:RFC1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pigeon RAID array? Or even..... [wait for it]..... A Beowulf cluster of pigeons....

    7. Re:RFC1149 by Nimey · · Score: 1

      You might be able to implement PAR2 over this transport.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
    8. Re:RFC1149 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anti-aircraft missiles?

    9. Re:RFC1149 by Nimey · · Score: 1

      I don't think birds have a large enough radar or infrared signature to make that possible, let alone worthwhile. Possibly anti-aircraft guns, but that's still an awfully big expenditure for something you don't know is "hostile", and proximity fuzes won't get a big enough radar return to be effective, so it's fairly likely you'd miss anyway.

      Back in the Olden Days, they'd use falcons/hawks or shotguns, depending on how high the birds were flying.

      --
      Hail Eris, full of mischief...

      E pluribus sanguinem
  19. Re:Suppression is the mother of invention by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Not at all.. It's never too soon to resist... But unless we can neutralize their real weaponry, we're still fucked. The mesh won't save us from a 500 pound bomb falling from the sky.

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  20. We in the supposedly free west ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... would do well to use this window of opportunity to develop as many different means of working around censorship as possible and to disseminate that information as widely as possible before they come for us. After all, how much of what Homeland Security et al does, really protects citizens from outside threats as opposed to protecting governments from their citizens ? V was prophetic.

  21. Re:Suppression is the mother of invention by countertrolling · · Score: 1

    Troll?

    Oh, so sorry.. didn't mean to offend your sensitivities.

    What I meant to say was, relax, enjoy it, roll over and take it like a man..

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  22. photographic stenography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Post some pictures to Flickr, facebook, or any other medium. Then post some with data embedded.

  23. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm curious to see how the microwave oven was modified. I imagine the modulation rate is poor due to a variety of factors, the primary one being that microwave oven magnetrons aren't designed to be switched on/off at high speeds and their centre frequency could be anywhere from 2.3 GHz to 2.5 GHz - mostly due to thermal instability and impedance load changes. Modulating the signal as opposed to switching the magnetron would likely work, possibly by splitting the signal into two waveguides and adjusting the phase of one to create destructive/constructive interference, or by using phase modulation on the waveguide.

    Another method of phase control is using an external low power RF source allowing one to control the phase of the magnetron. That would require opening up the magnetron (which is under vacuum), not exposing yourself to the beryllium coating on the inside (highly carcinogenic), adding a loop internally, then somehow closing it and getting it back under vacuum. Sounds like a serious pain-in-the-ass.

    The receiver would likely need to be custom as well, and making this a two way communications link without introducing ridiculous amounts of noise on the near-by receiver would be tough.

    Maybe accepting a modulation rate of 2 kHz is acceptable to some people though.

  24. Re:Waiting by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    Not worried about a nova. I'm more worried about some stupid rock blundering into us. The real worry seems to be that we might just kill ourselves here without any intervention. The greenies think we're killing ourselves with CO2, lots of people think we'll kill ourselves with radiation, and lots more people think we'll just go out in an orgy of violence. Then, there is the possiblity of some new (or ancient and forgotten) disease wiping us out.

    I'd kinda like to see colonies established before all that.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  25. Re:Waiting by Runaway1956 · · Score: 1

    If we haven't figured out time travel by that time, along with interdimensional travel, then we deserve to be extincted, right along with our universe.

    --
    "Windows is like the faint smell of piss in a subway: it's there, and there's nothing you can do about it." - Charlie Br
  26. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by wierd_w · · Score: 2

    Perhaps if you replaced the magnetron with a custom built klystron of similar size, it would work.

    There are any number of "Extremely small" CRT devices you can get for pennies. (Like the eye-pieces of old VHS camcorders) These are basically a vacuum tube type electron gun, and which with some modifications, could be used to drive such a tiny klystron quite effectively.

    [really blurry image I found on the internet depicting the tiny size of the CRT in question]

    Amusingly, you could probably use the already existing magnetic deflection system of the CRT to help modulate the beam inside the klystron waveguide.

    Obligatory wikipedia on Klystrons

    Using one of those as the transmitter of your directional antenna would net you a VERY long distance connection.

  27. 802.11S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    802.11S is a game changer. Its sometimes called 'darknet' or a backhaul network, but it does get the job done, so long as you have people willing to maintain it. Two routers on either side of a border, can connect to one another. If you have one that is solar powered, near a border, then its self maintaining. All you need then is another router within a kilometer or so of that router. If someone then has an 802.11S router connected to their computer, plus the 'official' wired internet, and the outside world is on the 802.11S side, then everyone on the wired side is connected to the 802.11S side. I have a feeling 802.11S will never be officially sanctioned in a place like the United States, where the government has gone all draconian and 'post 9/11' and 'homeland security', and 'gitmo' and 'patriot act' all over everyone. Since 802.11S allows for preservation of civil liberties, the absolute control of corporations and the government over every aspect of peoples lives could come into question. The gover/corp would never allow it.

    1. Re:802.11S by 32771 · · Score: 1

      Uh, it is child's play so to say:

      http://www.zdnet.com.au/olpc-achieves-2km-range-in-802-11s-tests-339277912.htm

      Also note that the methods mentioned in the economist article are much better suited for places like Libya where most people may have a radio but probably not a computer or even a network connection.

      --
      Je me souviens.
  28. Re:Waiting by Hylandr · · Score: 1

    heat-death of the universe

    Another Theory, No matter how educated, very few can actually grasp the concept of mass existing without humanities demarcations of 'beginning' or 'end'.

    - Dan.

    --
    ~ People that think they are better than anyone else for any reason are the cause of all the strife in the world.
  29. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by tloh · · Score: 1

    >Using one of those as the transmitter of your directional antenna would net you a VERY long distance connection.

    But wouldn't it be just a one way connection?. For whatever effort it'll take to modulate a signal with a cooking tool, it'll be orders of magnitude more difficult to rig the same as a receiver sensitive enough to decode a strong but still poor quality signal. It is really too bad that the article itself offers this short tease without anything substantial for the curious to follow up on. Any googlers out there willing to track this down?

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  30. Re:Suppression is the mother of invention by 517714 · · Score: 1

    The guy got $8.7M for one night of being sodomized,. That's a lot more than Charlie Sheen pays.

    --
    The US government have made it clear that we have no inalienable rights; any we do not defend vigorously will be taken.
  31. Re:Waiting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, there's these laws of thermodynamics and Einstein to contend with there. Most people can't grasp the concept of four-dimensional spacetime, either. You seem to forget as well that the universe is finite and bounded, or ignored all evidence to that effect. Heat-death is the most likely scenario given the accelerating expansion of the universe. But I'm sure that you knew that, too.

    But go ahead and believe whatever you like. Be an intellectual rebel, or whatever farcical role you prefer.

  32. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by wierd_w · · Score: 1

    The beauty of a klystron is that it can serve as an amplifier. In the bunching section of the homebrew klystron, you insert a generic USB WiFi dongle. The signal from the dongle does the initial attenuation that causes the bunching in the klystron-- that is to say, it is the source of the reference signal.

    The output cavity is then directed outward, away from the wifi dongle, and toward your target with a waveguide. The wifi dongle's reception ability should be mostly unaffected by this.

  33. Re:"microwave OVENS"? Nope, not a typo by budgenator · · Score: 1

    magies are frequently modulated by switching the cathode voltage on and off to produce pulses or by varying the current to cause an amplitude modulation or by varying the voltage produce an FM modulation. An other possibility is constructing a waveguide with a flash tube through it, when the flash tube fires, the waveguide shorts out and causes the power output to shift allowing for modulation of the RF output. Magnetrons is notoriously frequency unstable, this usually isn't a problem in radar where a portion of the output of the transmitter RF is fed into the receiver's magic T mixer for frequency tracking. Personally I'd stay with FM modulation, the infinite sidebands will mitigate a lot of the carrier frequency instability.
    OBTW I was a missile guy not a radar guy, it was 30 years ago and certainly a long way from being a microwave engineer so anything I said may be full of shit.

    --
    Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
  34. iPhone 'hot spot' extend option? by An+anonymous+Frank · · Score: 1

    Can you extend a wifi network originating from a mobile device such as a mifi or iPhone (w/ iOS 4.3)?

  35. Re:strategies by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 1

    Good effort, but you're not evil enough.

    Allow me to change about seven words from the draft bill floating around congress:

    "Any unathorized viewing of any copyrighted item is a felony."

    And since everything that exists has an instant copyright from the moment it was created, the first 1000 "country destroying IP-terrorists" made an example of will go way past chill - it will be cultural nuclear winter.

    "Wheel Of Fortune 2.0! Is that screen of data in front of you the single authorized copy? No? You lose! Thanks for playing!"

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  36. Re:Suppression is the mother of invention by cffrost · · Score: 1

    The guy got $8.7M for one night of being sodomized,. That's a lot more than Charlie Sheen pays.

    Okay, but Charlie Sheen's cock probably doesn't cause perforated colon.

    --
    Thank you, Edward Snowden.

    "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan