Slashdot Mirror


Google Accuses China of Interfering With Gmail

Hugh Pickens writes "The Guardian reports that Google has accused the Chinese government of interfering with Gmail. According to the search giant, Chinese customers and advertisers have increasingly been complaining about their Gmail service in the past month and attempts by users to send messages, mark messages as unread and use other services have generated problems for Gmail customers. The announcement follows a blog posting from Google on 11 March in which the firm said it had 'noticed some highly targeted and apparently politically motivated attacks against our users. We believe activists may have been a specific target.' The search firm is not commenting further on this latest attack, but technology experts said it seemed to show an increasingly high degree of sophistication."

131 comments

  1. China POWA by jimmerz28 · · Score: 1

    When the economists predicted that China would be the next big power maybe they meant internet power!

  2. Just stop doing business with them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Practice Shunning. Get all your friends to do the name. Tell Nixon to stay home.

    1. Re:Just stop doing business with them. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could just stop buying everything made in China. But then there wouldn't be very much left you could buy.

    2. Re:Just stop doing business with them. by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >>>You could just stop buying everything made in China. But then there wouldn't be very much left you could buy.

      You could just stop buying.
      Wise advice for a US culture
      ~$120,000 in personal debt
      (plus another 140,000/home national debt).

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    3. Re:Just stop doing business with them. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      over 50% of the national debt is owed to the US gov't, citizens, and companies in the US. so 140k/home becomes 70k to US interests, 70K to foreign, after the US pays itself it'll have enough to cover the 70k/home to foreign. (BTW: that's not how it works, but neither does the national debt get evenly distributed to 140k/home so as long as we're using numbers in inaccurate ways...)

      In addition there's no way it's 120k/personal debt a person unless you're counting mortgages (and neglecting the physical value of the home) So If I owe $300k on my house and my house is worth $400k and my credit cards are $50k, I'm worth $50k total, not negative 120K as you seem to imply.

  3. Cut them off. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Google should just fucking cut China off. Let them try to do business while the rest of the world moves on with GMail. Do it for a week, at least. I understand that they want to exert control over their citizens, but Homey don't play that shit over here.

  4. Old news? by andrea.sartori · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Already seen that on /. more than once and other sources even date it to early 2010. Is this a gritty reboot?

    --
    Mostly harmless.
    1. Re:Old news? by caroboom · · Score: 2

      Well, it might have happened before. But it is true (from personal experience by me and other people here) that it got a lot harder to use gmail without proxy/vpn the past 2-3 weeks.

    2. Re:Old news? by andrea.sartori · · Score: 1

      I assume by "here" you mean in China? Asking this out of curiosity, but it might be useful to know if there is trouble using it currently...

      --
      Mostly harmless.
    3. Re:Old news? by mrclisdue · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the original story was sent via chinese gmail; it's all messed up, or so they say.

    4. Re:Old news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes. in Shanghai. It is still possible to use it. But lots of timeouts. And gtalk via the webinterface is mostly dead (empathy runs fine though).

  5. Red Chinese arrogance by benjfowler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sheer, breaktaking arrogance and aggression of the Red Chinese is unbelievable. I laugh out loud whenever I read an apologist for the Chinese Communist Party accuse teh yankee imperialist dogs of arrogance, when they themselves are shaping up to be the most brutal and self-interested global imperialists the world has ever known.

    People are going to look back on the dominance of the West as a golden age once the mainland Chinese are through with us.

    1. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by cpu6502 · · Score: 0

      >>>accuse teh yankee imperialist dogs of arrogance, when they themselves are shaping up to be the most brutal and self-interested global imperialists the world has ever known.

      "The Chinese are not true communists" is what those supporters will say. They said the same about the Soviet Union. They refuse to accept that communism is a good IDEA but doesn't work in the real world, due to leadership corruption.

      >>>dominance of the West as a golden age once the mainland Chinese are through with us

      It may not be that bad. The Western Roman Empire and the Chinese Empire coexisted for centuries. There's enough room in the modern world for both cultures to survive and thrive. Especially since the Chinese will soon be experiencing negative population growth (2030 onward), due to the 1 child per ~2.2 persons policy.

      --
      My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
    2. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They refuse to accept that communism is a good IDEA but doesn't work in the real world, due to leadership corruption.

      The same criticism is often leveled at capitalism.

    3. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by milkmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      not so much arrogance/aggression as pure paranoia.. they don't fucking trust anyone.

      my sister was stationed in China during for her tour in the Peace Corps. She was teaching English at a University.

      My mom sent her a care package - including some nicknacks for her students (candy, shit like that).. the padding in the package was a US newspaper, which just happened to have full color pictures of a gay parade. within 24 hours - Washington got a call from Beijing. Apparently the Chinese didn't appreciate the nature of the packing material and threatened to expel my sister from the country if it happened again.

      when I went to visit, I was a guest speaker in her class - I was peppered by the students with questions like "do i know Michael Jordan, what's a drugstore, do I have a car".. then one guy asks (in much better english than the rest of the kids) - how I felt about the US presence in Afghanistan (this was less than a year after 9/11). The Party put a mole in my sister's class.

    4. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They refuse to accept that communism is a good IDEA but doesn't work in the real world, due to leadership corruption.

      The same criticism is often leveled at capitalism.

      Define 'Work'. I find that capitalism (far from perfect) works better than com-nom-nomunism (that's the sound of government officials eating while you starve).

    5. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by kipin · · Score: 1

      The Western Roman Empire and the Chinese Empire coexisted for centuries.

      The world moves a lot faster nowadays. It may have been able to handle two mega empires simultaneously solely because of geographical limits. Natural resources were also not nearly as in demand as they are today.

      Just my $.02

      --
      If I can not smoke in heaven, then I shall not go. -- Mark Twain
    6. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      People are going to look back on the dominance of the West as a golden age once the mainland Chinese are through with us

      No they won't. Red China will rewrite history to say Western Dominance was the dark age of human history.

    7. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by nosferatu1001 · · Score: 0

      No country is truly capitalist.

      True capitalism is incredibly bad, as once you remove pesky government controls you end up with a single monolithic organism controlling everything,.

    8. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by milkmage · · Score: 2

      the question was totally out of line (based on the rest of the questions) - all of them revolved around "American life" not politics

      he didn't look like a university student (too old) and his English was too good to be in that class (beginner). the rest of the kids paused as they searched for the right words and made mistakes common to folks learning English for the first time. His question was "What is your opinion about the US presence in Afghanistan" - that's not beginner English - my sister taught 3 levels. He didn't need that class.

    9. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I used to correspond on ICQ with a girl in China.

      When I asked her about opinions of Chinese on the Iraq war (perhaps a year in), she gave not much answer at all.

      Next time I heard from her a couple of weeks later she warned me "not to bring up the bad topic anymore".

      That ended that. Cannot speak clearly with somebody who is under duress by their government relative to free speech. It sucks bad.

    10. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by greenbird · · Score: 1

      They refuse to accept that communism is a good IDEA but doesn't work in the real world, due to leadership corruption.

      The same criticism is often leveled at capitalism.

      Communism is a good idea that doesn't work because people tend to be greedy self centered pricks. Capitalism does work (at least better than communism) for the same reasons. Capitalism is the worst economic system ever, except for all the others.

      --
      Who is John Galt?
    11. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Chinese are not true communists" is what those supporters will say.

      They aren't. China is a Capitalist country. If you haven't paid attention in the last few decades, they had a few economic reforms.
      Yes, the party in power is the "Communist Party", and maybe they really are Communists and know that now is not the right time, but the country certainly is not. A name is just a name, nothing more.

      They said the same about the Soviet Union.

      The Union of the Socialist Soviet Republics wasn't Communist. It wasn't Socialist either, but that's more difficult to explain, go read about it yourself if you're interested.

    12. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by jooey · · Score: 1

      I'm from China. Actually many college students don't like the Party, though many of them have joined in it (for finding a good job or being a public servent). The party say that it represents the benefits of the people and the nationality, but there is an opinion spreading that loving the nationality doesn't mean supporting the Party. Last year, an government officer, who told the truth, confronted with the journalist's tough questions, said "do you voice for the party or the people?"

    13. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're as communist as people's democratic republics are democracies.

      But hey, if I say "I'm a fan of C64Lover, and I think he's a racist fuckwit" does that mean that your real fans think you're a racist fuckwit?

      Learn to differentiate between the name and the thing, before you make yourself look stupid again.

  6. Behind the Red Door... by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is anybody really surprised at this? China is a communist country. They are in the business of world domination. They will never stop trying to steal technology or stop attacking their political enemies using whatever methods at their disposal. A lot of people complain about our (the U.S.) government. We're amateurs at invading privacy and interfering with commerce compared to those guys...

    --
    Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
    1. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China is a communist country.

      Um, not really.

    2. Re:Behind the Red Door... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China is a capitalist country, with a veneer of communism, slipping towards fascism, and they are not looking for world domination; they want China to be the world's superpower, and basically control Asia, but nobody in world history since Alexander the Great has ever actually looked to rule the world.

    3. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Its China that are the amateurs, the fact that you even hear stories about it means they don't control the media as they want to. The way the US Government does it on the other hand is masterful - so good in fact most of the time you don't even realize its happening until long after the fact.

    4. Re:Behind the Red Door... by UnknownSoldier · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > China is a capitalist country, with a veneer of communism,

      Jailed Nobel Peace Prize winner Liu Xiaobo might beg to differ...

      http://www.google.com/search?q=chinese+peace+prize+jailed

    5. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're amateurs at invading privacy and interfering with commerce compared to those guys...

      But here's the rub... in Chinese culture, the state is viewed as the great benefactor of all, your generous uncle, a friendly neighbor. This isn't just propaganda pushed by the Communists, but something that reaches way back into the dynastic periods. It's also one of the few things my SO and I ever really get into big misunderstandings about... to her, the state, while not 100% infallible, always has the people's interests at heart, while to me (and just about any other "westerner"), the state is something to be distrusted even in the best of times. Take a random poll, and most Chinese will agree that "disharmonious" websites such as pr0n (it gets in the way of loving your spouse, after all) ought to be censored or blocked. Sure, to us it's a '1984' style crash-course to the police state, but to them, it's only fitting and proper that impressionable people be protected from seeing someone's naughty bits.

    6. Re:Behind the Red Door... by gman003 · · Score: 2

      China is a corporate state in all but name. The border between businesses and the government has blurred to the point of merging. At this point, they will be content with merely dominating the world's markets, but that could easily change to desiring domination of the world's population (most likely to use as a workforce when enough of China rises above the poverty line that they do not wish to do low-end manual labor).

    7. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2

      The fallacy in the former past is that he is equating all capitalism (economic concept) with freedom (humanist concept).

      Apples / Oranges.

      --

      My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    8. Re:Behind the Red Door... by idontgno · · Score: 1

      Capitalism* didn't put Professor Liu in prison. Communism** did.

      *As an economic system, capitalism doesn't acknowledge the existence of dissidence. You're a worker or a capital owner.

      **Communism functions (poorly) as an economic system, but in practice it has always functioned primarily as a political system. In China and the former Soviet bloc, as an authoritarian political system, where dissident speech is a crime. This has nothing to do with economic-theoretic capitalism. (Practical capitalism loves to have authoritarian political power at its disposal, of course, since that makes many economic frictions and externalities disappear like magic.)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your naivete attempts to masquerade as cynicism, but does it very poorly.

    10. Re:Behind the Red Door... by kvothe · · Score: 1

      No no, China's ok with Apples. They are a major supplier, after all... /facetious

    11. Re:Behind the Red Door... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      And they will achieve it. My estimate is 4-5 years they will fully assert their dominance. They are #2 now and at any time could flex their economic and political muscle and severely cripple an already reeling U.S. With the rest of BRIC, the U.S. has already slipped from the top, it just isn't official yet. It's either corrupt corporations or China, neither is a great option.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    12. Re:Behind the Red Door... by GooberToo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Response like this means China's propaganda absolutely is taking hold. Its really pretty sad so many so so weak minded.

      They are an aristocracy of communist rule where capitalism is growing and leveraged only so long as it benefits the communist party. Its an extremely weird blend of communism and capitalism with very clear shades of every growing fascism. But no bones about it, China is still very much communist at its core.

      The state still owes everything The state still takes from A and gives to B - except where that can be deferred via bribes; and then only at the whim of the party. The giving of A to B is typically to empower additional income via capitalism such that the monies can be used to further the power base and dominance of the communist party.

      Even the extremely wealthy, who have made all of their money via capitalism, absolutely understand they must be gracious to the communist in power else they can lose everything over night. So while they do participate in a capitalistic trade, they do so only to further the means and reach of the communistic party.

      Lastly, I also get the impression people confuse capitalism with democracy . One does not depend on the other. Which is why, for example, much of the pro-pirate community are actually advocating socialism; although frequently far too ignorant to realize it.

    13. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Cimexus · · Score: 1

      Well there's a continual scale there, it's not always one extreme or the other. Not ~all~ Westerners have the 'government should always be mistrusted' mindset. That particular attitude is prevalent in America, but many Europeans, or even Aussies or Canadian or New Zealanders, will disagree. To you it might seem that they have the Chinese view on the matter, but it's really somewhere inbetween that view and yours. They have a more central or moderate opinion than either.

      I'm Australian. I personally think that the government here does generally do its job reasonably well by international standards and has the public's interest in mind ~most~ of the time (this doesn't mean they necessarily ~succeed~ in getting this right, but there are many passionate politicians I can think of that have a genuine drive to improve things). To me, the American attitude seems a little paranoid. In a way that's understandable given the difference in history between the two countries: the US was formed via violent rebellion against England and a rejection of overbearing government; Australia peacefully federated after asking permission from the UK to do so, and still retains the Queen as a head of state (though largely as an empty, symbolic figurehead rather than someone that actually does anything WRT running the country).

      Also, the Westminster system genuinely does seem more open, more responsible and more transparent than the American system most of the time. There are much stricter laws against lobbying and corporate donations to political parties, FoI and transparency laws are tougher, and the proportional representation system used here means that third and fourth parties, and even completely independent candidates, can and do influence laws that pass. The flip side of this, however, is that the American system is technically more democratic/representative: we don't directly vote for the Prime Minister and most other top positions in government are filled based on the winning parties internal votes, rather than publicly elected. Judicial roles are appointed rather than elected as well. So there are pros and cons to each system.

      Anyway that was a bit of a tangent. My point is that I and many other Westerners have a position somewhere in between the Chinese view and your view. Government needs a close eye kept on it, and must be accountable to the people, of course. But I don't 'distrust' it. Skeptical of the views of some particular politicians or parties, sure ... but the system as a whole is sound and trustworthy with the checks and balances that exist. Sometimes there's blatant incompetence on display, but generally speaking it does a decent job. The country I live in is prosperous and successful as a result. If I were to grade it on having the people's interests at heart, it'd be getting a B- or something like that :)

    14. Re:Behind the Red Door... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, they have done a pretty good job re-creating themselves along the lines of what they used to think capitalism was. Cozy relationship between the economic elite and high government officials? Check. Labor unions suppressed? Check. Psychological class warfare where workers are duped into working against their own interests by xenophobia and fear? Check. Meddling in economic outcome for the benefit of the politically connected, while maintaining a fig leaf of market freedom? Check. Imperialist policies under the false flags of national sovereignty and concern for the well-being of the natives? Check.

      They've become everything they loathed about us. Unfortunately, so have we.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    15. Re:Behind the Red Door... by DarkOx · · Score: 1

      he fallacy in the former past is that he is equating all capitalism (economic concept) with freedom (humanist concept).

      I am sorry but that is a silly distinction to make. True Capitalism requires the freedom to act in ones own self interest and the that there be no force used to compel any sacrifice to others. Its true that capitalism might be an economic concept but its one that can't really exist in the absence of freedom, thus implies freedom. What the Chinese do is not capitalism it might not be the traditional centralized command economy we associated with communism but it is certainly not capitalism. It might be true to say that modern China is not really communist under its original definition I'll have to thing on that one.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    16. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wrote that comment yourself, didn't you, to have something to respond to. Great style of argument, btw, equating disagreeing with you and being "weak minded".

    17. Re:Behind the Red Door... by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

      True Capitalism requires the freedom to act in ones own self interest and the that there be no force used to compel any sacrifice to others.

      In other words, throughout recorded history there's never been a capitalist country because capitalism is incompatible with the concept of society?

      Where do you get this bullshit?/aP

    18. Re:Behind the Red Door... by GameboyRMH · · Score: 0

      Response like this means China's propaganda absolutely is taking hold. Its really pretty sad so many so so weak minded.

      They are an aristocracy of communist rule where capitalism is growing and leveraged only so long as it benefits the communist party. Its an extremely weird blend of communism and capitalism with very clear shades of every growing fascism. But no bones about it, China is still very much communist at its core.

      "You are weak minded for thinking that China isn't really communist. It's actually a complex mix of communism and capitalism that is turning fascist. But make no mistake, it's totally communist."

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    19. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Charliemopps · · Score: 1

      Ever heard of Hitler? Napoleon?

    20. Re:Behind the Red Door... by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 1

      China flexing their economic might on the US would be like the US flexing their military might against China over Taiwan.

      NEITHER OF US WANT TO FUCK EVERYTHING UP.

    21. Re:Behind the Red Door... by rAiNsT0rm · · Score: 1

      Not at the moment, but what exactly would China be "fucking up" by choosing to in 3-4 years time if BRIC continues to grow as slated? They will easily be able to supplant us and also keep us beholden to them in a number of key areas. The U.S. has far more to lose at this time than any other in history.

      --
      http://teasphere.wordpress.com - A little spot of tea
    22. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      nobody in world history since Alexander the Great has ever actually looked to rule the world.

      I beg to differ, good sir? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinky_and_the_Brain

    23. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      An excellent post. I don't have mod points for you so I'll reply instead.

      I think the key difference between our two systems of governance - speaking as a Kiwi to an Aussie on the matter of Westminster versus American Constitutional politics - comes down to the power and influence of the lobby groups. Such things are either non-existent or extremely circumspect down our way from what I can work out.

      Conversely it seems, from my uneducated position, as if big money more or less runs the US when it comes to any matters of consequence. Much like the sig I see from time to time: "In Soviet Russia, Commerce controls the Government!"

      Perhaps erroneously, I too see Westminster as slightly more resistant to corruption that the US alternative. Could it be that our tighter laws on lobbying have had an influence on the opinion we hold of the robustness of our own political systems?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    24. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lets assume we agree with your statement. What freedom would you need to be capitalist?

        Freedom of speech, press, religion? - Can't see how.

      Freedom to act in your self interest? - Oh, you will have plenty of that.

    25. Re:Behind the Red Door... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Capitalism* didn't put Professor Liu in prison. Communism** did.

      No, no, no. China hasn't been a truly communist country since the 1980's. What put Liu in prison is authoritarian nationalism; a government that is incapable of accepting criticism.

  7. Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I find it interesting that, when the media talk about Chinese hackers, they invariably refer to it as attacks by "China" -- not "Chinese hackers", as would be the case in just about any other country in the world.

    Can we really always assume that the Chinese government or China as a country is behind each and every attack, or is it just the work of some extremists within the country's borders?

  8. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...or is it just the work of some extremists within the country's borders?

    Yes, they go by the handle 'PRC'.

  9. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interfering with traffic in-transit is beyond the ability of all but the best hackers without government aid. They would need to either be good enough to compromise and operate network infrastructure without detection (hard) or actually be employed by an ISP in a high enough position that they don't have someone else checking their configs (Also hard). It can't be the work of some basement-dweller gang. It's either an organised group of super-hackers, or a government agency. The latter seems more probable.

  10. the west's pursuit of capitalism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    is hobbled by this pesky thing called democracy, human rights, a free press. it interferes with profits

    china is autocracy combined with capitalism. it is the gilded age of victorian times in the west when workers rights were nonexistent, squared. china is a giant capitalist machine that treats its citizens as robots without rights. why the chinese people accept this is beyond my understanding, but for now, they do

    chinese people: your government does not respect you. you do not have a voice in the composition of your own government. you are a slave. in the name of respecting you as my fellow human beings, i disrespect the policies of your government. rise up and reject their illegitimate claims to rule you without your input

    i will fully respect a china that is democratic. until then, your country is doomed, because it is unstable. no government that does not subject itself to the will of its people via a regular vote ever lasts very long. only democracy manufactures legitimacy, and therefore stability. all other forms of government crumble and fall, until after any number of revolutions, the people finally adopt democracy, and are able to keep it

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by MrEricSir · · Score: 1, Interesting

      As opposed to the United States, where the free press is censored by advertisers, democracy is subverted by corporate interests, and we offshore our human rights violations to Cuba?

      When it comes to knocking China's problems, we certainly don't have the moral high ground. Same shit, different culture.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by jbonomi · · Score: 2

      When it comes to knocking China's problems, we certainly don't have the moral high ground. Same shit, different culture.

      Until the US starts putting people in labor camps for not being harmonious enough, I would say that we do. I don't think we need to be perfect before we point out the shortcomings of other governments.

    3. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      why the chinese people accept this is beyond my understanding, but for now, they do.

      Because of a ton of propaganda. The Chinese government has very tight reigns on all information sources. Even the Bible had to be rewritten according to the CG's standards.

      But if you don't accept it, you'll get put into a re-educational institution for an indefinite period, if you're lucky. If you're unlucky you'll just get imprisoned or executed. There are literally millions of spies among the Chinese population, eager to aprehend anyone to the government if they could potentially pose any form of threat to its authority.

      The way Gaddafi has been treating its citizens would be considered kind in comparison to how the CG would react. The really big problem is that China is huge - it has almost twice as many citizens as America and Europe combined. Not to mention the amount of nuclear weapons. If there would be a third world war with China, I doubt the Earth would survive it.

    4. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      eventually, the chinese economy will stop growing. when unbridled horizons end, the people's expectations will turn to other matters. hopefully this sort of pressure will lead to peaceful reform, internally. nightmare scenario, the economy actually contracts or tanks, like japan in 1990 or thailand in 2000, and the domestic discontent is seized upon by some sort of demagogue, who effectively marshalls the propagandized hordes into power. then what, i don't even want to imagine, so powerful china is now becoming

      for the sake of the future of civilization and mankind on this planet, it is imperative china becomes democratic, for the sake of legitimacy and therefore stability. without the legitimacy of democracy, the current chinese form of government is doomed as soon as the economy stops growing

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like their (the US) native inhabitants?

  11. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Posting AC as to avoid undoing a previous mod.

    I find it interesting that, when the media talk about Chinese hackers, they invariably refer to it as attacks by "China" -- not "Chinese hackers", as would be the case in just about any other country in the world.

    Can we really always assume that the Chinese government or China as a country is behind each and every attack, or is it just the work of some extremists within the country's borders?

    The reason that people usually say "China" as opposed to "Chinese" is that most hackers within China are affiliated with the government. There are units both in the People's Liberation Army and in the Chinese State Security apparatus that are devoted solely to hacking and other forms of online attacks. Most university students studying these things are getting recruited by the government, if not having their education paid for by the government. The university professors teaching them are virtually kept on call by the government. I actually wrote a paper that dealt with this for one of my graduate-level IR classes, unfortunately it was in my old laptop so I lost it, so I can't give you the exact sources or unit designations devoted to this.

  12. Noozflash! by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    Company does business with censoring government; complains when government censors.

    Next up: War in the Middle East! The unthinkable has happened!

    1. Re:Noozflash! by dadelbunts · · Score: 1

      What happened. Did someone die?

    2. Re:Noozflash! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's all good, a few people have gone to live, on a farm, with a lovely old couple.
      You're dog however, is dead.

  13. Re:Issue? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    China don't own Bartertown.

  14. Re:Issue? by vawwyakr · · Score: 1

    Is that you President Jintao?

  15. Uh.. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been living in Shanghai since September, and this place is annoying as hell to stay connected. I should not complain too much as I have not been jailed as others have (yet) for winge-ing, but my digital life in the Emerald City (Seattle) is difficult to maintain over here. Forget streaming as China Telecom breaks the connection every 10 minutes just to keep things boring. The last few weeks have been especially bad, as the riots elsewhere scared the police here poopless and they shut down large network segments in order to inhibit riot-forming people (presumably). Our entire company was shut down for a morning, and connections were flaky for a few days. If they are targeting Gmail, next, then I am screwed (Google bashers will say I already am :). My VPN services are being attacked as well.

    It's real and it's real bad.

    1. Re:Uh.. Yeah by surgen · · Score: 1

      My VPN services are being attacked as well.

      It's real and it's real bad.

      I know this is a bit of a tangent, but how prevalent is the use of VPNs in china? What is your reading on how many people who want to get around the great firewall, are actually trapped by it?

    2. Re:Uh.. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, every ex-pat I know, has a VPN. But one can simply disconnect it and "go naked". When I first moved here, I would routinely go naked, but each month, fewer and fewer URLs make it through Great Firewall. So I am now reduced to using it only for banking transactions.

      No locals that I have met, use VPNs. College educated, they have come to not care what the non-filtered news, is.

    3. Re:Uh.. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Our entire office LIVE in google apps, for the last week or so i get a about 5-10 minutes outage or laggage each hour or so. It's a bit annoying but nobody is downing tools and going home. Gtalk remains connected somehow, but gmail and docs will have problems.

      At home, video streaming, chunky downloading, IM and wiki browsing to international sites is still a-okay (not counting youtube), the occasionally bizarre lagfest on minecraft (server in UK) and some web pages are a bit slow to load. But nothing that is too annoying.

      Staying connected in Shanghai these days is a breeze. My phone has 3g-china style, switched on all the time, and for all my intents and purposes is unlimited (it's like 5gig per month for not much money) and my house has newly plugged in 10mbit optic fibre and TV on separate cable (+ hacked satellite TV for next to nothing).

      My office has business strength 25mbit somethingarather.

      maybe one key point is I don't care for youtube, facebook or twitter, and very seldom use VPN to reach outside china (I VPN to my house or office quite often).

      There have been far worse times in terms of 'staying connected' in china during the last 5 years or so.

      Don't let a little muscle flexing from the party for a few weeks bother you. Actually, if you really care, buy a VPS in HK and install your own proxy solution. it'll work just find 99.9999% of the time.

  16. Yeah, my heroes by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Is that the same Google that censors its Chinese search results to block terms like "democracy"? Guess oppression is okay unless you try to steal their source code or interfere with the quality of their services.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Yeah, my heroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's right: you can take my freedom, but don't fuck with my email.

    2. Re:Yeah, my heroes by uss_valiant · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google China stopped serving censored results. Source: The very same Wikipedia article you reference.

    3. Re:Yeah, my heroes by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, only after China tried to steal their source code. Again, Google was fine with this until China actually threatened their profits by trying to steal their precious search algorithms.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    4. Re:Yeah, my heroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They didn't steal their source code. They went after the gmail accounts of known dissidents. That's how Google knew that it was the Chinese government (or groups related to it).

    5. Re:Yeah, my heroes by smelch · · Score: 1

      Oh shut your mouth. I'm tired of hearing this bullshit. There are shades of gray in the world. Before Google was allowed over in China there were articles and debates over what was worse, no Google or Google without some of the results. They looked at it and realized "well shit, they aren't getting the democracy links either way, may as well open it up with censored results...." but you could tell they weren't happy about it. Not everything is a war for the human fucking spirit. Sometimes a straw breaks a camels back, sometimes people aren't thinking about ethics violations they have no power to control. Sometimes, people are just trying to provide a service that is better than what was out there. Its good to know dicks like you will always be around to tell them it wasn't pure enough. Maybe Google didn't have the clout to stop censoring until China overstepped itself.

      Now go somewhere else and tell all your friends how the only charitable giving is done in secret for causes the donators disagree with so they don't even get satisfaction out of it. Anything less is just people being selfish dicks. Thats what you believe, isn't it?

      --
      If I can just reach out with my words and touch a butthole, just one, it will all be worth it.
    6. Re:Yeah, my heroes by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      And sometimes companies just want to make money. In fact, that's *all* they want to do.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:Yeah, my heroes by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      That was just Google's cover story at first. Read the Wired article above for more details on what the hackers were *really* after (and they apparently actually got some of it too).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  17. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    It gets a lot easier when you have your own certificates ... I remember seeing some outcry about certain Chinese telecoms getting them a year or 2 ago. Perhaps people should be removing those from their trusted lists?

  18. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i mean their own certificate authorities (CAs)
    I would suggest all software released outside of China should prohibit any CAs in the default trusted list that are Chinese or owned by China.

  19. So the plane just landed on your head? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell did you think was going to happen.. in China?

  20. China sucks for this... by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    In China, China decides what China wants, and what it doesn't want, and if you do not offer them a way to do what they want your app to do, they will find a way themselves, and usually not a very efficient way either...

  21. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Nerdfest · · Score: 1

    Thank you for the correction, yes, that was my meaning. A MITM attack becomes quite easy with your own CA.

  22. Is this really news? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    A country infamous for their "great firewall" screws with yet another service.
    Be honest, the service being screwed with (Google) is the only reason this is a headline.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
  23. How is this surprising? by Stan92057 · · Score: 1

    How is this surprising? China is a communist country they are not a democracy. They will not hesitate to bring military actions against there own people in order to bring them back into line. You do business with the devil and somewere down the line your going to pay

    --
    Jack of all trades,master of none
    1. Re:How is this surprising? by voidness · · Score: 1

      How is this surprising? Western are not communist country they are democracy. They will not hesitate to bring military actions against other people in order to bring them back into line (read headlines news now!). You do business with the devil (to get oil) and somewere down the line your going to pay

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
    2. Re:How is this surprising? by surgen · · Score: 1

      How is this surprising? Western are not communist country they are democracy. They will not hesitate to bring military actions against other people in order to bring them back into line (read headlines news now!). You do business with the devil (to get oil) and somewere down the line your going to pay

      The nice part is we can openly question our governments for doing so.

    3. Re:How is this surprising? by voidness · · Score: 1

      granted. But is that effective? I'm more interested in result rather than procedure.

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
  24. Re:And yet sadly, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since you felt the need to be pedantic, it should be, "If his penis were the size[...]"

  25. google will fail in China anyway by voidness · · Score: 1

    The problem with google is that they are taking political posture too much as a private company. Politics and moral ground wouldn't get along well with business. If google see itself as the God, get out from China. Is that simple? The problem is google wants to do business with China but also pretend to be the God. Adding too much Western value it. China is entirely different country and culture. It has no history to be altered by out force. They will never get succeed in China. Losing China in business is losing the world in nowadays. LOL.

    --
    Everything comes from nothing.
    1. Re:google will fail in China anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL indeed voidness, LOL indeed. Well spoken.

    2. Re:google will fail in China anyway by surgen · · Score: 1

      So how much do you make as an internet shill for your government? If language skills at your level are good enough to get the job, I'd be a shoo-in.

    3. Re:google will fail in China anyway by voidness · · Score: 1
      Beating around the bush? Typical. Why do I have to speak my third language (not even the second) as you do to get job? Besides, I have good job. Don't shoo-in. LOL.

      So how much do you make as an internet shill for your government? If language skills at your level are good enough to get the job, I'd be a shoo-in.

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
    4. Re:google will fail in China anyway by surgen · · Score: 1

      Beating around the bush?

      Actually it was pretty damn direct. I posited my assumption rather than ask for conformation. Don't worry about not understanding my first post, being bad at English makes it easier to identify shills such as yourself, and for that we thank you.

    5. Re:google will fail in China anyway by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      Oh man, seriously....where do these clowns come from...haha....

      The 50-cent army strikes again. Question - is that 50 RMB cents, or some other currency that isn't intentionally devalued by your own country to be worth peanuts? Lol indeed....

      And I'm sorry, but if your English skills are that appalling, then they paying you 50c for that post was a sour deal for them. (Disclaimer - I'm Chinese, just not a PRC hoon. And my point is this - if somebody was paying me to troll on a foreign language forum, I'd make sure I trolled well, and actually bothered to know the language before trolling...idiots).

      Cheers,
      Victor

    6. Re:google will fail in China anyway by voidness · · Score: 1

      Your comment only shows your disabled mind. You should come out some thoughts more rational. If you r Chinese with this attitude, good to you. You will be not the part of prosperity PRC, loser. LOL.

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
    7. Re:google will fail in China anyway by voidness · · Score: 1

      If you can't come out sth rational to fail my points, then it IS good strategy to attack sth irrelevant. But still, convince me if I'm wrong. Do not beat around the bush!

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
    8. Re:google will fail in China anyway by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      The PRC is totally not getting value for money, if you're posting rubbish like that...lol. They should ask for a refund. Oh wait...Chinese don't give refunds *grins*. (No seriously, we don't...haha...try asking a Chinese shopkeeper for a refund. Doesn't happen. Customer service is something that seems strangely endemic to the West, although even then it's hit and miss).

      And buddy, if you're not from the 50C army *shrugs*, then you're another sad little Han-supremacy boy who believes that we're still the Middle Kingdom, and sits around playing Perfect World all day...lol.

      Cheers,
      Victor

    9. Re:google will fail in China anyway by victorhooi · · Score: 1

      heya,

      Now, I don't doubt that China will rise again *shrugs*, but I suspect the form that it rises in will probably resemble their hated West more than they'd like. They'll just become another modern economy, along with the US, the EC and Japan.

      See, we have this weird quasi reverse-racist relationship with the West. It's probably got something to do with being subjugated and being the laughing-stock for several hundred years. We hate the "West" because they've toppled us from our perch which we held for thousands of years, and we're now the weak men of the East - yet we secretly revere them because well, they've just done just that. It's the same reason Chinese companies try to blatantly rip off and copy everything from the West, or why Western brands hold such sway in the mainland, or why Chinese companies will hire Western faces to look like they have connections.

      Cheers,
      Victor

    10. Re:google will fail in China anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can't come out sth rational to fail my points, then it IS good strategy to attack sth irrelevant. But still, convince me if I'm wrong. Do not beat around the bush!

      Beating the bush is perfectly reasonable if you're trying to flush out a vile, filth-loving little Chinese cockroach like yourself. You are the most disgusting race of inhumane, torture-loving scumbags to ever befoul the Earth with your presence.

      I long for the day when the West goes to war with China. If only it were possible I'd want to look each and every one of you grotesque people in the eye before blowing out your skulls with a shotgun. You make me sick, sick as a dog and your violent deaths are the only remedy.

    11. Re:google will fail in China anyway by Sardaukar86 · · Score: 1

      Your comment only shows your disabled mind. You should come out some thoughts more rational. If you r Chinese with this attitude, good to you. You will be not the part of prosperity PRC, loser. LOL.

      Is this rubbish really the best response you can summon to his argument? And you suggest he should 'come out some thoughts more rational'! A previous post regarding the PRC's overwhelming arrogance seems to be nicely supported by your example.

      Seriously, you're not actually grossly mentally incompetent enough to think that you're actually going to share any of that prosperity are you? Really? How old ARE you? Fourteen?

      --
      ..Mullah or Pope, Preacher or Poet, who was it wrote: "Give any one species too much rope and they'll fuck it up"?
    12. Re:google will fail in China anyway by voidness · · Score: 1

      Ha, now everybody can see who you are now. I don't have to say anything. Thanks.

      --
      Everything comes from nothing.
    13. Re:google will fail in China anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ha, now everybody can see who you are now. I don't have to say anything. Thanks.

      And who is that then, O wise roach?

  26. FUCK CHINA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good country with a shitty government. Hope they throw that government out.

  27. HOW DARE THEY! by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    That's the NSA's job...

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  28. a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    bound to pop up in any discussion like this

    sir: with your words, you are only announcing your profound ignorance of places outside of the west, and what it is really like there

    let's just say that if you were chinese, in china, or iranian, in iran, or cuban, in cuba, you wouldn't dare criticize the chinese or iranian or cuban government like you criticize the usa. you criticize the usa however, with impunity, merely because you are perfectly free and entitled to do so. and i'm glad you do. is anyone knocking on your door sir? no? is anyone in the american government going to persecute you for the words you just wrote? no?

    so when you realize the truth of how different it is for citizens in these other countries to express themselves freely, maybe you can begin to understand the subject matter you are so ignorantly commenting on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No one is knocking on my door? Well no, because I'm not Muslim.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    2. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      no american police or government enforcement is knocking on anyone's door just because they are muslim

      really, you ignorant moron

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    3. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      I like how your arguments always end with calling me a "moron." I guess you must feel pretty bad about yourself if you have to call people names to make yourself feel better. But the relief one gets by bullying is only temporary, and will not improve yourself in the long run.

      And really, before you come up with these sort of patriotic defenses of our country, maybe it's time to meet some folks from other places -- or even visit those places -- and see what life is really like outside of the USA. It's not at all what you think.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    4. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i'm not insulting you. i'm making a fair, objective appraisal of your intelligence based on the words you have written

      for example, you ask me to know what its like for people outside of the usa. i asked you to do the very same thing in support of my argument in the grandfather post above this. like i said, you're a moron

      additionally, i am not being patriotic. fuck the usa. i am not defending the usa, the usa has plenty of problems. but clearly, it is no where near the likes of china, cuba, iran, on the scale of lack of basic human freedoms. this is a logical coherent judgment anyone can make: brazilian, south african, egyptian, etc. you would know this if you, how do i say this, hmmm... "even visit those places -- and see what life is really like outside of the USA. It's not at all what you think."

      oh, sorry, i forgot, one more thing: you're a moron. a genuine low iq ignorant moron. not an insult. a fair appraisal of your cognitive faculties based on your words on a subject matter you pretend to have an understanding of. you imagine that muslims are somehow persecuted in the usa as well. i believe muslims in the usa have more freedom in how they choose to practice their religion than in some muslim countries. you know, that whole freedom of religion thing, and all that. respected in the usa. not respected in many other countries. i'm sorry, did you know that?

      please try to educate yourself on the subjects you try to talk about. then open your ignorant mouth

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    5. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      ...right.

      Another day, another Slashdotter who believes he's smarter than everyone else.

      *yawn*

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    6. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i'm not smarter than everyone else. i work with people i clearly understand as more intelligent than i am. i understand my limitations on many issues in the world in which my comprehension is quite limited

      but on the issue of the status of various freedoms in the usa as compared to other countries, i am clearly, unequivocally, much more intelligent than you. no, i don't have an alternative opinion than you. i am simply more intelligent on the issue than you. thi sis not an opinion. this is a fact when objectively evaluating what you have written above on this subject matter

      you really need to educate yourself. you are quite genuinely, objectively ignorant, on a subject matter you feel a need to talk about. you really need to know what it is like in cuba and china in terms of political expression, religion, the press, before you start blindly, unintelligently, comparing it to the status quo in the usa

      again, i'm not an apologist for the usa. you can find the usa guilty of many crimes and shortcomings. but you can't look at one of the usa's strengths, its respect for various domestic freedoms, and see equivalency with some of the most vile regimes in this world on the subject of those same freedoms. unless you are purposefully trying to sound like a low iq individual. again, not an insult. this is objectively determined by the quality of the words you have written, falsely equating pretty much polar opposites in the world in terms of respect for domestic freedoms

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    7. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Are you still at this? I mean you can say you're right over and over again, but who cares? I don't. No matter how many times you use words like "objective" or "fact," it doesn't make you more correct; on the contrary, it makes you sound like a weak-minded person who hasn't a clue.

      Anyway, you sound like you're probably a troll or an aspie. Since I can usually tell, in your case I'm going to have to go with both.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    8. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i'm motivated by outrage at how ignorant your words are about the subject of relative domestic freedoms in the usa versus china or cuba or iran

      there are a number of americans who will engage in the false equivalency you do, and it makes me very angry, because these are people who have not even the slightest clue about how bad things can be in terms of freedom of political expression in other countries as compared to the usa

      i am angered by your ignorance, and i would really like to see you admit how incredibly wrong your thinking is on the subject

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    9. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      Wow. How incredibly arrogant. You need to get over yourself, and see a shrink. Pronto.

      You have serious problems, and I feel sorry for you.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    10. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i have problems because ignorance makes me angry?

      furthermore, the only arrogance here is displayed by someone with zero understanding of the status of political freedoms in other countries delivering opinions about them

      you need an education. moron. or learn to shut up about things you don't understand

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    11. Re:a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by MrEricSir · · Score: 1

      You have problems because you're still trolling.

      Don't you have something better to do? How sad.

      --
      There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
  29. Re:Issue? by SETIGuy · · Score: 1

    That's President Hu to you.

  30. Nooz be teh breakin' by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

    I don't know! O_o

  31. Re:And yet sadly, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Indeed, thanks.

  32. You guys make me a Troll... by HKcastaway · · Score: 1

    As a non US citizen I think I am going to come across as a troll.... by making this coment.

    America is in great danger, China is going to take over the world and you should live in fear and prepare for war...

  33. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    most hackers within China are affiliated with the government.

    Citation needed.

  34. Why don't they buy Google? by sourcerror · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just buy Google? They have enough dollars saved in the piggy bank to buy 100 Googles.

    1. Re:Why don't they buy Google? by the_other_chewey · · Score: 1

      Because google is not for sale.

      Despite google being a publicly traded company, the founders retain
      enough voting rights to keep the majority no matter what.

  35. Shutting down gmail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The best China can do is shutdown gmail in China. In this way Google will cease to complain.