Slashdot Mirror


Google Accuses China of Interfering With Gmail

Hugh Pickens writes "The Guardian reports that Google has accused the Chinese government of interfering with Gmail. According to the search giant, Chinese customers and advertisers have increasingly been complaining about their Gmail service in the past month and attempts by users to send messages, mark messages as unread and use other services have generated problems for Gmail customers. The announcement follows a blog posting from Google on 11 March in which the firm said it had 'noticed some highly targeted and apparently politically motivated attacks against our users. We believe activists may have been a specific target.' The search firm is not commenting further on this latest attack, but technology experts said it seemed to show an increasingly high degree of sophistication."

23 of 131 comments (clear)

  1. Old news? by andrea.sartori · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Already seen that on /. more than once and other sources even date it to early 2010. Is this a gritty reboot?

    --
    Mostly harmless.
    1. Re:Old news? by caroboom · · Score: 2

      Well, it might have happened before. But it is true (from personal experience by me and other people here) that it got a lot harder to use gmail without proxy/vpn the past 2-3 weeks.

  2. Red Chinese arrogance by benjfowler · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The sheer, breaktaking arrogance and aggression of the Red Chinese is unbelievable. I laugh out loud whenever I read an apologist for the Chinese Communist Party accuse teh yankee imperialist dogs of arrogance, when they themselves are shaping up to be the most brutal and self-interested global imperialists the world has ever known.

    People are going to look back on the dominance of the West as a golden age once the mainland Chinese are through with us.

    1. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They refuse to accept that communism is a good IDEA but doesn't work in the real world, due to leadership corruption.

      The same criticism is often leveled at capitalism.

    2. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by milkmage · · Score: 5, Interesting

      not so much arrogance/aggression as pure paranoia.. they don't fucking trust anyone.

      my sister was stationed in China during for her tour in the Peace Corps. She was teaching English at a University.

      My mom sent her a care package - including some nicknacks for her students (candy, shit like that).. the padding in the package was a US newspaper, which just happened to have full color pictures of a gay parade. within 24 hours - Washington got a call from Beijing. Apparently the Chinese didn't appreciate the nature of the packing material and threatened to expel my sister from the country if it happened again.

      when I went to visit, I was a guest speaker in her class - I was peppered by the students with questions like "do i know Michael Jordan, what's a drugstore, do I have a car".. then one guy asks (in much better english than the rest of the kids) - how I felt about the US presence in Afghanistan (this was less than a year after 9/11). The Party put a mole in my sister's class.

    3. Re:Red Chinese arrogance by milkmage · · Score: 2

      the question was totally out of line (based on the rest of the questions) - all of them revolved around "American life" not politics

      he didn't look like a university student (too old) and his English was too good to be in that class (beginner). the rest of the kids paused as they searched for the right words and made mistakes common to folks learning English for the first time. His question was "What is your opinion about the US presence in Afghanistan" - that's not beginner English - my sister taught 3 levels. He didn't need that class.

  3. Behind the Red Door... by MrWin2kMan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is anybody really surprised at this? China is a communist country. They are in the business of world domination. They will never stop trying to steal technology or stop attacking their political enemies using whatever methods at their disposal. A lot of people complain about our (the U.S.) government. We're amateurs at invading privacy and interfering with commerce compared to those guys...

    --
    Nothing to see here but us trolls...move along...
    1. Re:Behind the Red Door... by nomadic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China is a capitalist country, with a veneer of communism, slipping towards fascism, and they are not looking for world domination; they want China to be the world's superpower, and basically control Asia, but nobody in world history since Alexander the Great has ever actually looked to rule the world.

    2. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      We're amateurs at invading privacy and interfering with commerce compared to those guys...

      But here's the rub... in Chinese culture, the state is viewed as the great benefactor of all, your generous uncle, a friendly neighbor. This isn't just propaganda pushed by the Communists, but something that reaches way back into the dynastic periods. It's also one of the few things my SO and I ever really get into big misunderstandings about... to her, the state, while not 100% infallible, always has the people's interests at heart, while to me (and just about any other "westerner"), the state is something to be distrusted even in the best of times. Take a random poll, and most Chinese will agree that "disharmonious" websites such as pr0n (it gets in the way of loving your spouse, after all) ought to be censored or blocked. Sure, to us it's a '1984' style crash-course to the police state, but to them, it's only fitting and proper that impressionable people be protected from seeing someone's naughty bits.

    3. Re:Behind the Red Door... by gman003 · · Score: 2

      China is a corporate state in all but name. The border between businesses and the government has blurred to the point of merging. At this point, they will be content with merely dominating the world's markets, but that could easily change to desiring domination of the world's population (most likely to use as a workforce when enough of China rises above the poverty line that they do not wish to do low-end manual labor).

    4. Re:Behind the Red Door... by Mr_Perl · · Score: 2

      The fallacy in the former past is that he is equating all capitalism (economic concept) with freedom (humanist concept).

      Apples / Oranges.

      --

      My poetry site welcomes the unusual.
    5. Re:Behind the Red Door... by GooberToo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Response like this means China's propaganda absolutely is taking hold. Its really pretty sad so many so so weak minded.

      They are an aristocracy of communist rule where capitalism is growing and leveraged only so long as it benefits the communist party. Its an extremely weird blend of communism and capitalism with very clear shades of every growing fascism. But no bones about it, China is still very much communist at its core.

      The state still owes everything The state still takes from A and gives to B - except where that can be deferred via bribes; and then only at the whim of the party. The giving of A to B is typically to empower additional income via capitalism such that the monies can be used to further the power base and dominance of the communist party.

      Even the extremely wealthy, who have made all of their money via capitalism, absolutely understand they must be gracious to the communist in power else they can lose everything over night. So while they do participate in a capitalistic trade, they do so only to further the means and reach of the communistic party.

      Lastly, I also get the impression people confuse capitalism with democracy . One does not depend on the other. Which is why, for example, much of the pro-pirate community are actually advocating socialism; although frequently far too ignorant to realize it.

    6. Re:Behind the Red Door... by hey! · · Score: 2

      Well, they have done a pretty good job re-creating themselves along the lines of what they used to think capitalism was. Cozy relationship between the economic elite and high government officials? Check. Labor unions suppressed? Check. Psychological class warfare where workers are duped into working against their own interests by xenophobia and fear? Check. Meddling in economic outcome for the benefit of the politically connected, while maintaining a fig leaf of market freedom? Check. Imperialist policies under the false flags of national sovereignty and concern for the well-being of the natives? Check.

      They've become everything they loathed about us. Unfortunately, so have we.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    7. Re:Behind the Red Door... by nomadic · · Score: 2

      Capitalism* didn't put Professor Liu in prison. Communism** did.

      No, no, no. China hasn't been a truly communist country since the 1980's. What put Liu in prison is authoritarian nationalism; a government that is incapable of accepting criticism.

  4. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by SuricouRaven · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Interfering with traffic in-transit is beyond the ability of all but the best hackers without government aid. They would need to either be good enough to compromise and operate network infrastructure without detection (hard) or actually be employed by an ISP in a high enough position that they don't have someone else checking their configs (Also hard). It can't be the work of some basement-dweller gang. It's either an organised group of super-hackers, or a government agency. The latter seems more probable.

  5. Re:Just stop doing business with them. by SuricouRaven · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You could just stop buying everything made in China. But then there wouldn't be very much left you could buy.

  6. Re:Why always 'blame China' and not 'blame Chinese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Posting AC as to avoid undoing a previous mod.

    I find it interesting that, when the media talk about Chinese hackers, they invariably refer to it as attacks by "China" -- not "Chinese hackers", as would be the case in just about any other country in the world.

    Can we really always assume that the Chinese government or China as a country is behind each and every attack, or is it just the work of some extremists within the country's borders?

    The reason that people usually say "China" as opposed to "Chinese" is that most hackers within China are affiliated with the government. There are units both in the People's Liberation Army and in the Chinese State Security apparatus that are devoted solely to hacking and other forms of online attacks. Most university students studying these things are getting recruited by the government, if not having their education paid for by the government. The university professors teaching them are virtually kept on call by the government. I actually wrote a paper that dealt with this for one of my graduate-level IR classes, unfortunately it was in my old laptop so I lost it, so I can't give you the exact sources or unit designations devoted to this.

  7. Re:Just stop doing business with them. by cpu6502 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    >>>You could just stop buying everything made in China. But then there wouldn't be very much left you could buy.

    You could just stop buying.
    Wise advice for a US culture
    ~$120,000 in personal debt
    (plus another 140,000/home national debt).

    --
    My AC stalker: " I personally agree with your posts most of the time, but that won't keep me from modding you troll"
  8. Uh.. Yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been living in Shanghai since September, and this place is annoying as hell to stay connected. I should not complain too much as I have not been jailed as others have (yet) for winge-ing, but my digital life in the Emerald City (Seattle) is difficult to maintain over here. Forget streaming as China Telecom breaks the connection every 10 minutes just to keep things boring. The last few weeks have been especially bad, as the riots elsewhere scared the police here poopless and they shut down large network segments in order to inhibit riot-forming people (presumably). Our entire company was shut down for a morning, and connections were flaky for a few days. If they are targeting Gmail, next, then I am screwed (Google bashers will say I already am :). My VPN services are being attacked as well.

    It's real and it's real bad.

  9. Re:Yeah, my heroes by uss_valiant · · Score: 3, Informative

    Google China stopped serving censored results. Source: The very same Wikipedia article you reference.

  10. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by jbonomi · · Score: 2

    When it comes to knocking China's problems, we certainly don't have the moral high ground. Same shit, different culture.

    Until the US starts putting people in labor camps for not being harmonious enough, I would say that we do. I don't think we need to be perfect before we point out the shortcomings of other governments.

  11. Re:the west's pursuit of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

    why the chinese people accept this is beyond my understanding, but for now, they do.

    Because of a ton of propaganda. The Chinese government has very tight reigns on all information sources. Even the Bible had to be rewritten according to the CG's standards.

    But if you don't accept it, you'll get put into a re-educational institution for an indefinite period, if you're lucky. If you're unlucky you'll just get imprisoned or executed. There are literally millions of spies among the Chinese population, eager to aprehend anyone to the government if they could potentially pose any form of threat to its authority.

    The way Gaddafi has been treating its citizens would be considered kind in comparison to how the CG would react. The really big problem is that China is huge - it has almost twice as many citizens as America and Europe combined. Not to mention the amount of nuclear weapons. If there would be a third world war with China, I doubt the Earth would survive it.

  12. a yes, here's our false equivalency morons by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Insightful

    bound to pop up in any discussion like this

    sir: with your words, you are only announcing your profound ignorance of places outside of the west, and what it is really like there

    let's just say that if you were chinese, in china, or iranian, in iran, or cuban, in cuba, you wouldn't dare criticize the chinese or iranian or cuban government like you criticize the usa. you criticize the usa however, with impunity, merely because you are perfectly free and entitled to do so. and i'm glad you do. is anyone knocking on your door sir? no? is anyone in the american government going to persecute you for the words you just wrote? no?

    so when you realize the truth of how different it is for citizens in these other countries to express themselves freely, maybe you can begin to understand the subject matter you are so ignorantly commenting on

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it