Slashdot Mirror


Europe Plans To Ban Petrol Cars From Cities By 2050

thecarchik writes "Can you imagine a future — thirty-nine years from now — where there are no engines humming, no exhaust smells, no car sounds of any kind in the city except the presumably Jetsons-like beeping of EVs? The European Commission can, and it has a transportation proposal aiming to do just that by 2050. Paris was the first city to suggest a ban on gas guzzlers in their city core, but this ban takes it to whole different level by planning to phase out all petrol cars completely from the city streets. While Paris was motivated by reduced pollution, the EU has broader aims of reduced foreign oil dependence, reduced greenhouse gas emissions, increased jobs within the EU, and improved infrastructure for future economic growth."

9 of 695 comments (clear)

  1. UK govt blocked it. by no+known+priors · · Score: 5, Informative

    The UK government has already said they don't like the plan. From the BBC UK rejects EU call for city centre ban on petrol cars:

    But UK Transport Minister Norman Baker said it should not be "involved" in individual cities' transport choices.

    "We will not be banning cars from city centres anymore than we will be having rectangular bananas," he said.

    It's certainly an interesting idea. And it seems, using the example of London's congestion charge, that it wouldn't be a bad thing. I certainly encourage more people to use public transport, and ride bikes.

    And for the Yanks who will complain they live in the suburbs, maybe lobby your local government for better public transport? And stop complaining, this is an article from Europe.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. The maximum is 120 characters.
  2. Re:That all makes sense for SUVs . . . by indeterminator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's easier to replace 2 coal power plants than 100k privately owned cars.

  3. Re:That all makes sense for SUVs . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Where do all these electric cars get their power from? It's okay to pollute wherever the power plants are built, just as long as it's not in the city limits, eh?

    It isn't China or the States. There is MUCH more green and nuclear energy in the Europe.

  4. Outraged! by naota-kun · · Score: 5, Funny

    Outraged! Outraged, I say! Wait...Europe? 2050? I don't live there. Oh, and I'll be dead. Well then, carry on!

    --
    dull-eyed footstool-temporary octopus
  5. Fake Environmentalism by bkmoore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There's a lot of this going on in Europe and to a lesser extent, N. America. Make a commitment, but put it so far off into the future that you can take credit for being "green" or visionary without having to actually do anything or make any hard choices. If the technology works out, you get to take credit for it. If the technology fails, then it's some other person who gets to repeal the law, but you'll be long gone by then.

    Good stewardship of our natural resources is a good thing, but the problem with environmentalism is it has become a movement which can do no wrong and knows no self-criticism. Any inconvenience or failure is either a misunderstanding (stupid people), or poor implementation (the people are too stupid to to it right, so we have to make it simpler). So the EU will go on mandating Ethanol-based fuel additives which deplete the rain forests, energy-saving lightbulbs, which contain mercury and need to be properly disposed of, etc.

  6. Why is that hard to imagine? by pablo_max · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Seriously, how is it a stretch to imagine a future where the primary source of energy is not derived from burning dead dinosaurs and plants?
    Dont get me wrong, I love my Jeep! It is a hobby for me, but I certainly do not expect it will be my primary mode of transport in 20+ year. At least I hope to god we would have progressed a bit faster than that.
    The move off fossil fuels is just like anything else that's hard; if you don't start at some point, you will never get there.

  7. Re:To expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Who ever said regulations had to be rational?

    Wouldn't it just be better to keep tightening the emissions requirements on new cars until only electric cars qualify?
    If everyone were forced to drive 100mpg cars or cars with near-zero CO2 output, wouldn't the result effectively be the same -- but without having to resort to a "ban"?

    That way, people don't have to buy new cars immediately and we don't end up with landfills full of perfectly functional cars.

  8. Venice by Zoxed · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am pretty sure Venice should be counted as "modern" and it is not just "petrol car" free but totally car free :-)

  9. Re:To expensive by Lord+Kano · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Works for lightbulbs. Dispite the popular ramblings of the internet, neither the EU nor US have actually banned incandescent bulbs - they just set efficiency standards high enough that no incandescent can achieve them.

    Just because you don't use the word "ban", doesn't mean it's not really a ban.

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano