Slashdot Mirror


MySpace Loses Ten Million Users In One Month

Goldiloxx writes "Social networking website MySpace lost over ten million users between January and February 2011, according to comScore. In February 2011, the Internet website had less than 63 million users, down from a previous total of approximately 73 million."

5 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. QQ by disopaos · · Score: 5, Interesting

    MySpace has no change in surviving anymore. Facebook has 600+ million users and Windows Live Messenger has 330+ million users. The only larger network than those two is interestingly Chinese QQ, which has 636 million users.

    1. Re:QQ by amicusNYCL · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Oh, and nice racism there, calling QQ "Chinese", thus implying it is strange and weird.

      I'm pretty sure you're the one who equated Chinese with strange and weird, I don't see that in the OP. Due to the fact that QQ is developed and operated by a Chinese company, there's nothing racist in saying that QQ is Chinese. It is. "Chinese" is not a racist term, it's a demonym.

      --
      "Our two-party system is like a bowl of shit looking at itself in a mirror." - Lewis Black
  2. I don't think it's that bad... by fivevoltforest · · Score: 5, Funny

    I doubt they actually lost 10 million users, probably just a few thousand 50-year-old men *pretending* to be 10 million teenage girls.

  3. 10,000,001 by DynamoJoe · · Score: 5, Funny

    i knew I forgot something....

    --
    bah.
  4. this is facebook's fate too by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    anyone remember friendster?

    it's my belief that social networks will rise and fall, endlessly in succession. simply because ubiquity eventually becomes a liability amongst a crowd who views exclusion and superiority to be more important. eventually, one of these smaller exclusive networks becomes the object of envy for others to be "in" that exclusive group, and the long march to ubiquity begins, until you start all over again

    its an empty vapid game. its also pretty much boilerplate sociological fact. consider nightclubs in cities: the small chic "in" club that everyone wants to get into, overexposure, then decline because the "cool" kids want their own exclusive club. rinse, repeat

    and no, facebook will not become ubiquitous plumbing. because they need to make money to survive. to make that money, they need to sell the personal details of their members. which is a force that will drive people from facebook as they wise up to how creepy that really is: by feeding their personal details to the machine, they are telling their abuser how to abuse them

    so be on the lookout for the next friendster/ myspace/ facebook. could be diaspora. or maybe being programmed right now in some dorm room. $$$ to the chaps who start/ find the right network at the right time, and ride that rocket all the way up

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it