Slashdot Mirror


FCC Giving Away Wi-fi Routers For Broadband Tests

An anonymous reader writes "The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will be giving away 10,000 Wireless-N routers as part of their program to perform a number of broadband tests, for the benefit of a better connection in the future. They are striving to work on improving a number of issues including latency, packet loss, connection speeds and much more."

15 of 196 comments (clear)

  1. First post! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do I win a free router?

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    1. Re:First post! by GameboyRMH · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well if the news is only reaching us now, that should tell them that the latency is pretty bad...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  2. $50 for your privacy by jimbolauski · · Score: 5, Funny

    My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

    --
    Knowledge = Power
    P= W/t
    t=Money
    Money = Work/Knowledge so the less you know the more you make
    1. Re:$50 for your privacy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

      They're the Feds. If you won't turn your browsing activity over for a free gadget, they'll just go to ATT and get it from them.

    2. Re:$50 for your privacy by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 3, Informative

      My privacy is worth much more then a crappy router that will accidentally send all my browsing information.

      So... What type of sites do you browse that you don't care for the feds to know about? Anime Tentacle Porn usually isn't illegal, you know...

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    3. Re:$50 for your privacy by Askjeffro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I find it cute that you believe you have privacy as it is.

    4. Re:$50 for your privacy by spun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, the FCC is sending out routers to ten thousand random people because the FCC wants to spy on, uh, ten thousand random people. The government is out to gitcha! RUN! Fucking moron. The government does tons of terrible shit, like giving all the wealth generated by the middle class to about 400 well connected guys, but guess what? This is not one of those terrible things. When you act like a paranoid schizophrenic, and tell everyone the government is ALWAYS out to screw EVERYONE over, ALL THE TIME, you are doing the work those 400 well connected guys want you to do. They want everyone to mistrust the one thing, the only thing that can possibly stop them: the power of people working together, i.e. government. So thanks for that. You do know that even if you were to fellate them 24/7 for the next fifty years, they won't let you into their little club, right?

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:$50 for your privacy by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So... What type of sites do you browse that you don't care for the feds to know about?

      All of them.

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
  3. Re:caps! by yelvington · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Making sure everyone has fast, reliable access available is great; but the FCC also has to worry about internet caps! Now that AT&T is cutting people off after a certain amount of bandwidth use, someone with the power to stop this monopolistic abuse needs to flex some muscle. What is the FCC doing about internet caps?

    I'm just guessing, but perhaps it would be wise to first measure and document what the carriers do, as opposed to what they say?

  4. Re:stupid by 0racle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Money has been pissed away to bring broadband to the US because at one time people saw the utility of it. Someone is now looking into why it never materialized but the checks were cached.

    --
    "I use a Mac because I'm just better than you are."
  5. I'm involved with this by dave562 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is a simple program. I plugged in the Netgear router in between my firewall and my cable modem and configured it as a bridge. It analyzes the traffic and sends the information to the FCC.

    I love how some people here are whining about privacy. I think those people will whine about anything. What is the alternative? The data needs to be collected. Either you want the government to step in and regulate the telcos, or you don't. If you don't, then STFU and stop whining about the crappy service they are giving you. If you do, then realize you have to be part of the solution. Whining about it never fixed anything. At some point, someone has to collect some data.

    If you don't want to participate in the program, don't. On the other hand, I'm happy to know that the FCC is getting some real data to show that when I fire up my VPN client from home to do some work, everything else on the network (NetFlix, et al) gets throttled back to next to nothing. I'm happy to be a guinea pig so that the FCC an see that the supposedly "faster" connection that I'm paying for is not really any faster than the basic package.

    If you're doing something with your internet connection that the government cares about, they already know about you. Participating in some research is not going to suddenly put you on their radar. Your browsing history is a lot less interesting to most people than you think it is. The country is involved in two wars and the economy is crumbling around us. Do you really think the government cares if you want to wank off to www.fatmomfetish.com, or whatever other "super secret private" stuff you are doing with your internet connection? Running a Tor exit node? Seeding the latest movie rip? Ooooo, you crazy rebels you!

  6. Re:Proper Heading by macraig · · Score: 3, Informative

    Simple: the router must use custom firmware that performs bandwidth tests during idle periods and reports the results. Can't do that with any old random router off the shelf.

  7. Re:"It's a trap!" by skids · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once it is yours (after the test) just nuke the custom firmware and load your favorite WRT flavor. I mean, unless you are paranoid enough to think they have custom hardware in there just to spy, and if you are that paranoid, you probably already think they have it in commercially sold routers.

  8. Re:stupid by mcelrath · · Score: 3, Informative

    eventhough its one of the cheapest crap routers out there

    Ahem. The WNR3500L they're giving away is a linux-based (openwrt) high-end wireless router. It was $150 when new, now can be had for $80. Its successor the WNDR3700 retails for $185 and it's freaking awesome. A customizable linux-based router is precisely what I'd choose if I wanted to do an experiment like this.

    --
    1^2=1; (-1)^2=1; 1^2=(-1)^2; 1=-1; 1=0.
  9. Old news, but the router and tracking is awesome by Frozen-Solid · · Score: 3, Informative

    Old news, and it was even posted on Slashdot when the program started last summer. I've been running an FCC White Box for several months now and love it. The router is a high quality Netgear with QoS filtering and all the bells and whistles you expect out of a $100+ router. It beats the ever living crap out of my old Belkin Wireless N. The tracking software doesn't monitor actual sites or any actual private information. Just packet loss, ping times, download and upload speeds, streaming stability, voip stability, etc. The graphs and charts it spits out are extremely useful and I've been using them for the past 2 months when complaining to Mediacom about my slow speeds, packet loss, and horrible ping times. It keeps 2 weeks of hourly data, and after that just tracks it as an average/min/max for the day. http://i53.tinypic.com/35bt5ro.jpg

    --
    Frozen Insanity
    http://frozen-solid.net