Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

SQL and NoSQL are Two Sides of the Same Coin

Posted by Unknown on from the dualistic-monadic-monsters-from-the-sea dept.

An anonymous reader writes "NoSQL databases have become a hot topic with their promise to solve the problem of distilling valuable information and business insight from big data in a scalable and programmer-friendly way. Microsoft researchers Erik Meijer and Gavin Bierman ... present a mathematical model and standardized query language that could be used to unify SQL and NoSQL data models." Unify is not quite correct; the article shows that relational SQL and key-value NoSQL models are mathematically dual, and provides a monadic query language for what they have coined coSQL.

9 of 259 comments (clear)

  1. You forgot the inverse tachyon pulse by 0p7imu5_P2im3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    An inverse tachyon pulse would disperse the relational quantum silica into a focused warp field, thus purging all forms of slipstream space based SQL databases from subspace.

    --
    Resistance is futile. Your technological distinctiveness will be added to our own. You will become one with the morgue
  2. The real reason people like noSQL... by MrEricSir · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is that SQL sucks as a language. It's not terribly expressive, the ordering of arguments is inconsistent, and whoever designed the way JOIN works should be in jail.

    Frankly, I'd like to see SQL die and get replaced with something more modern. We don't program in Cobol anymore, so why the hell are we still using SQL?

    --
    There's no -1 for "I don't get it."
    1. Re:The real reason people like noSQL... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      so why the hell are we still using SQL?

      Why are we still using C? Why are we still using HTML? Why are we still using FORTRAN (in the scientific community)? Same reason.

      Might add that all these - C, HTML and FORTRAN - are still being updated, with new standards. So is SQL. It's really the same thing, and they all stick around for the same reasons, too.

    2. Re:The real reason people like noSQL... by sexconker · · Score: 5, Insightful

      We DO still program in COBOL.
      And we DO still use SQL.
      And we do so because it works.

      Not only does SQL work, it is the best at what it does.

      The only people who hate on SQL are the people who don't understand databases.
      Generally, these are the same people who like labels, tag clouds and ruby on rails.
      They produce a lot of high level hand waving with regards to the actual code and endless amounts of "herp derp I dunno" when asked why their shit performs slower than the 10 year old system it's supposed to replace. These are bad people.

      What really pisses me off is that everyone fucking agreed with me until Android came out, then suddenly Java was cool, the performance was considered "good", and the quality of code and coders that it tends to bring about is now the acceptable norm.

    3. Re:The real reason people like noSQL... by garyebickford · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually COBOL predates SQL by about 10 years. AFAIK nobody has written a language that implements the relational query model to replace SQL. And (though I have never written anything in COBOL he says thankfully) COBOL has its place even today. I would not be surprised if there are as many lines of COBOL still running in enterprises everywhere as there are of PHP or Perl in those same enterprises.

      And COBOL even now is without question a better solution for business and application programming than C ever was or ever will be. (Of course it's arguable that there are other languages better for those tasks than COBOL as well.) C is good for device drivers, kernels and as a target for interpreted and scripting languages with compiled code generators. C is, as Kernighan, Ritchie or Thompson (I forget which) said, "a structured PDP-11 Macro-assembler". Today (putting my Nomex suit on...) IMHO application programmers should not be wasting their time coping with segfaults and compile-link cycles. Their time is worth more than the machine time that any cycle-saving difference. :)

      --
      It's easier to be a result of the past, but more fun to be a cause of the future! http://www.spacefinancegroup.com/
    4. Re:The real reason people like noSQL... by DavidTC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There are a few things with SQL that could be done better, and there's still some standardization needed. I'd like to see a SQL 2012 standard or something.

      But you're entirely right. There is one place nosql makes sense, and it's gigantic data stores like facebook and google, where the quantity is overwhelming, and the quality isn't that important...it's okay miss a few things, and you're looking for sorta-random stuff. That is why NoSQL was invented.

      No one should ever 'choose' to use NoSQL...if you're on the size of a project that needs NoSQL, I promise you you are nowhere near that decision...it will be decided between the seven project architects as they buy thirty servers to run the damn thing. That's the guys who have a legit need, or at least it's a legit option, of using NoSQL.

      It's not useful for any other system in existence.

      It's especially funny when toy projects try to use NoSQL. It's like idiots trying to run their watches off geothermal power. 'It's free power! FROM THE EARTH!'

      Dude, you're using half an amp, perhaps you should learn how to use a watch battery instead of driving 2 mile polls into the ground as you walk around. It's not like SQL is fucking rocket science. In fact, right now, NoSQL is actually more complicated to use.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:The real reason people like noSQL... by DogDude · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not painful. It's just different than what web developers doing "select *" are used to. As a system, it works well for tiny projects, all the way to the largest databases in the world. In the world of "develop it now, deal with problems later", people just can't be bothered to learning the right way to do something.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
  3. Re:not surprising by MightyMartian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To my mind, SQL's biggest problem over the years has been really shitty implementations (and yeah, I'm looking at you, MySQL).

    --
    The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
  4. Endless debate by alex67500 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There are only 2 types of languages:
    - those people bitch about, and
    - those no one ever used