Slashdot Mirror


Photosynth Gets a Little Competition

andres32a writes "Using existing open-source Structure From Motion Libraries and incorporating a WebGL pointcloud viewer, we have created a new website called 3dtubeme.com that allows users to create and share on the web amazing 3d models using virtually any digital camera. Point clouds are dramatically denser than Photosynth, and best of all... it works on any WebGL browser!"

29 of 62 comments (clear)

  1. Unbelievable processing power for a pittance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    ...but web servers still can't handle the load of a minor Slashdotting even before a single comment is posted. Looks like you're doing it wrong.

    1. Re:Unbelievable processing power for a pittance... by mrclisdue · · Score: 5, Insightful

      What is truly unbelievable is that it requires a Facebook login to see a fucking picture.

      If that's the case, then how's about a giant "Who gives a fuck".

      cheers,

    2. Re:Unbelievable processing power for a pittance... by itsanx · · Score: 1

      From top of the page: "Announcement: We will lift the facebook account verification for model viewing by monday. You guys are right: it's plain dumb. We are not trying to spam you! "

  2. Maybe Hold Off On The Slashvertisement by omni123 · · Score: 2

    until your website can handle the load. And it's not even a busy period.

  3. Re:Yes Slashdotted by clyde_cadiddlehopper · · Score: 1

    Should get bitter in a while.

    *better, not bitter. Alternatively, we could complete the fragment: "The performance of the web site should get better in a while. Visitors from slashdot should only be bitter for while."

    --
    Obi-Wan: "I felt a great disturbance in the Force, as if millions of voices suddenly cried out in terror and were sudden
  4. Facebook Integration by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Seriously?

    You want access to my personal facebook information just so I can view one of the existing uploads? Oh please.

    Chrome thanks you for taking it out in a massive lag spike, though. I think this is one case where open-source went for greed and Microsoft went for "just works".

  5. Slashdotted by Meltir · · Score: 1

    Anyone smell the burning plastic ?

    (that said, ill have a look once the fire brigade leaves - sounds cool!)

    1. Re:Slashdotted by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      (that said, ill have a look once the fire brigade leaves - sounds cool!)

      Don't forget to bring your facebook login. No, I'm not kidding. Fail.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
  6. ARC3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    There are already much better alternative to photosynth for free 3d reconstruction.
    www.arc3d.be has a new prototype version online that gives you a complete dense and textured mesh.. no more sparse point clouds!

    1. Re:ARC3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Fuck off. Free means free as in speech around here, not "open source upload tool to a proprietary web service".

    2. Re:ARC3D by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Free means free as in speech around here, not "open source upload tool to a proprietary web service". So take your ad and kindly fuck off!

  7. Re:Yes Slashdotted by v1 · · Score: 1

    Remember though, sometimes it's more a case of bandwidth than backend. My primary line is 768k dsl. I don't care of you have a cray optimized with a team of sevants behind it, it won't handle it unless you're serving a 4k page with nothing embedded.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  8. Re:Yes Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It's never(*) the bandwidth. (*) never: generalization, means "extremely rarely"

    We're not talking about some really big video file of Natalie Portman and hot grits or something. The sites that in this day and age still can't handle a little attention are invariably the ones with shoddy programming in hipster script languages.

  9. slashdotted by deathguppie · · Score: 1

    21 comments and the site is already down.. not ready for prime time yet... or was this a test?

    --
    once more into the breach
  10. "This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ago?" by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

    "This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ago? We made a ripoff of it! And it doesn't work right now!"

    Exciting news.

  11. Re:"This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Really? Then how dare Microsoft build their own C compiler? What a ripoff!

    And if it is done in WebGL and works reliably across a range of browsers, that is surely a Good Thing.

    On the other hand, we can't really tell as indeed their website melted down.

  12. Re:"This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So, they're bringing the site slowly back online, but to see anything beyond the front page they want to scrape and rape your facebook friends list. Ick.

  13. Re:Requires Facebook Log-in? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Webpage is in very early Beta testing, Google account login will be coming up soon and normal viewing after that. Facebook logjn verification does not take any of your data like some applications do on Facebook, it is simply login you in to be able to make comments and likes as it is now. Along with the possibility for you to make your own models.

  14. Add Web Workers by westyvw · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they are using Web Workers? Distributing the work while people are visiting the web site would surely help speed up the processing and distribute the load. Nothing to do with the site being down, just a thought after I saw this page: http://blog.0x82.com/2010/11/22/map-crowd-reduce

  15. Re:"This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ag by yacc143 · · Score: 1

    Hint, does not work for my FF4 on Linux. And trying to click on any of the links gives me a facebook login page. Sick.

  16. Site kind-of working right now... by Zaiff+Urgulbunger · · Score: 1
    The site is responding *very* slowly for me, and says:

    Our servers are experience a huge amount of traffic. We will be back very shortly. Thank you for your patience.
    Update: we are setting up new servers quick for handling load of traffic. We hope we can get things up and running very soon. Thanks again!
    Update: Traffic has soared till 14 M/B second but we now have clones that are accesible at this point. The server balancing is kicking in now, meanwhile you can go to any of the following mirrors:

    Thanks for your patience! We are working hard to keep things up in this traffic. (This kind of hit us by surprise)

    However, I can only view one image... all the others require me to log into facebook and allow access to my personal info!! So... that ain't gonna happen.

    1. Re:Site kind-of working right now... by andres32a · · Score: 2

      You know what? You are right about the facebook thing. We will take that away and allow viewing of models (creation would it though) from anonymous users.

    2. Re:Site kind-of working right now... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      That's a good idea. I wouldn't mind connecting if I saw what it was all about and wanted to make something, but requiring FB just to view makes it look like a fake site to lure people in so it can spam their FB accounts.

      I am a FB user, but I avoid the apps; too many of them are evil.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    3. Re:Site kind-of working right now... by mattr · · Score: 1

      I totally will not use the site because it requires FB.

      Went in and tried though.

      Let me just make a normal account there.

      M.R.

  17. Re:Yes Slashdotted by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    OK, you fixed one mistake. Now what's up with having to link to a Facebook account?

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  18. Re:Requires Facebook Log-in? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

    Too bad, you're still not fucking getting it. Deal with it.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  19. Re:"This really impressive thing MS did 3 years ag by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

    Why else would you need to give them access to that information of they're not going to use it.

    Making this thing a Facebook app is a giant slice of FAIL.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
  20. Re:Yes Slashdotted by andres32a · · Score: 1

    Ok. Got it! We will kill the facebook thing!