Slashdot Mirror


Eulogy For Groklaw

akgraner writes "When I got up this morning, the news was all over Facebook and the free software news sites: Groklaw, the site that was influential in the SCO legal cases, will stop publication on May 16. It's news that I hear with decidedly mixed feelings."

44 of 70 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Jurily · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "You simply cannot invent any conspiracy theory so ridiculous and obviously satirical that some people somewhere don't already believe it."

    -- Robert Anton Wilson

  2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, Beavis, it wasn't. The prior article was about Groklaw closing. This article is about one person's opinion on groklaw closing. It might be silly, but it isn't a dupe.

  3. And in the end.. by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    After Right won out, the soldiers returned to their homes, their fields and their shops. Preference for talk of the long bloody battle faded and was replaced by the need for a coat of paint on the house, the weather and cracker barrel politics. A memorial was placed somewhere, where those who remember the dark days could pay homage, but soon too the grass grew high and the leafs of Autumn covered it, all while a new generation ran with boundless energy in the park nearby and soon the heroes were forgotten, with what had passed before living on in the result of deeds.

    And the perfect setting for a new battle to foment on yet another front.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. grok what? by magarity · · Score: 1

    Look, it isn't called grok sco, it's called grok law. Why not re-purpose toward legal issues in general or at least some broad subcategory?

    1. Re:grok what? by gstoddart · · Score: 3, Informative

      Look, it isn't called grok sco, it's called grok law. Why not re-purpose toward legal issues in general or at least some broad subcategory?

      Well, if you read her mission statement, she clearly said it was for SCO related stuff.

      While we all appreciate the work that PJ has done ... she's free to follow other pursuits. She's invested 7 years in it; maybe she feels it's time to move on.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    2. Re:grok what? by fwarren · · Score: 5, Informative

      PJ pretty much says it all. In 2001 the battle was SCO fronted by Microsoft trying to destroy Linux. SCO was attacking IBM, but was also trying to take out Linux with FUD such as the $699 per cpu Linux license. The battle was on the desktop and in the server room. Groklaw was there, and combat the FUD and the community was able to defend Linux from SCO.

      Now the battle is in the cloud and mobile space. Microsoft, no matter what conduit they work through is an attack on Google. Google is a large company with plenty of brains and money. They can take care of themselves.

      There is truth to this, Groklaw relied on our collective memory of computer history from the 1970s to the end of the 1990's. If enough of us looked over the details SCO presented, we would notice where they got the facts wrong. This "community" will not be nearly as useful in the battle over the smartphone and the cloud.

      All I can say is I enjoyed the site, it was quite a ride. Thanks PJ for keeping us geeks in the loop.

      --
      vi + /etc over regedit any day of the week.
    3. Re:grok what? by PyroMosh · · Score: 2

      I never really read Groklaw, but from what I understand, they cover lots of issues outside that scope as well. In fact, it says so on the link you just posted.

      While anyone can respect her desire to bow out (she's put tremendous effort over the years into the project), it seems wasteful to just say "It's over, I'm closing the site" rather than to say, look to name a successor if she wants to move on.

      Other sites could spring up to cover the overlap of tech and legal issues, but why not use a site that's already recognized for leading in this area? She doesn't have to be involved, but I do hope that the folks who are / were close to her within the project have urged her to consider turning the site over to someone else.

    4. Re:grok what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm actually relieved. How many focused advocacy groups, when their cause has won its primary battle, face the same choice, and instead say, "what can we do with this new-found power we (think we) have gotten for ourselves?"

      A group that comes to mind right now fitting this is MADD, but so many groups kind of turn into activist HeLo cancers - they just won't die, and go on and on fighting at real or imagined windmills perpetually. MADD has won the war, but fights the battle still, going after smaller and smaller problems (or strawmen arguments) that in their mind are as big, if not bigger (today), than the original problem, even if they really aren't by most sane and sober evaluations.

      But maybe this is the normal way of humans - we get the prize, and want more MORE! Is it enough for Altoids to have curiously strong peppermint candies? No, so they create curiously wintergreenier mints, curiously cinnamonnier mints, etc.

      The Cold War is dead, so we need to create a new terrorism threat (that, honestly for the west, was far worse in the 70's and early 80's) to replace the Soviets & the Red Menace...

    5. Re:grok what? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 1

      It would seem that the site isn't going away but rather winding down the process of updating. They will complete their backlog of documents, publish, and then call it good. Book done; send it to print.

      I see value in that. PJ did her thing by putting Groklaw together. It served its purpose and made its place in history. And as long as it stays online, people can come back to it as a reference. Passing on the reigns of the site to someone else would risk Groklaw becoming something different than what PJ had created. It could lead to obscuring that reference; damaging a view in history.

      Such a risk is worthwhile when the organization itself offers value in the consolidation of resources. But on the Internet, the next Groklaw is a blog site away. It doesn't take Groklaw to do what Groklaw did.

    6. Re:grok what? by RobertLTux · · Score: 1

      The Idea of Groklaw has basically been handed over to the community. As far as the current site i think the number of Law|Business courses that reference the site would like to have a fixed site to reference. Plus i think running the site has come very close to killing PJ.

      --
      Any person using FTFY or editing my postings agrees to a US$50.00 charge
    7. Re:grok what? by operagost · · Score: 1

      A group that comes to mind right now fitting this is MADD

      I heartily concur. MADD is now a temperance union whose policies appear to be designed to progressively create a new de facto prohibition era, while creating a veritable police state through the use of checkpoints and mandatory breathalyzers.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  5. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 4, Funny

    "You simply cannot invent any conspiracy theory so ridiculous and obviously satirical that some people somewhere don't already believe it."

    Hah, that's just what they want you to believe.

    --
    A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  6. Re:Don't worry. by tomhudson · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Original slashdot article - Groklaw Declares Victory, No More Articles

    You can see the crapfloods Florian Mueller makes there about how PJ isn't a real person (even though she worked for ODSL, and Steven J Vaughan-Nichols wrote that he met her several times, etc.), or hop over to LWN and hear him complain about how HE is more deserving of recognition.

    May 16th is Red Dress Day, in honor of Pamela Jones.

  7. this is rare by gothzilla · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's common for people to create an organization to solve a problem when no solutions exist. Most of the time though those people keep going even after the problems have been solved. Greenpeace and PETA are examples. Their original goals were met and instead of going "ok we won", they just kept going. As they searched hard for relevance, their organizations become more radical and extreme in the process until they get to a point where they become a new problem.

    It's nice to see someone actually be able to quit when there's no reason to still exist. I'm afraid groklaw would take the same route as it tried too hard to remain relevant.

    1. Re:this is rare by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree with your sentiment, but how can you even compare Greenpeace and PETA? Greenpeace is still relevant and still fighting for the same goal they originally started out with. I'd say they are more relevant than ever.

      Maybe you meant Sea Shepherd, a PETA like organisation started by some people that got kicked out from Greenpeace because they were to radical?

    2. Re:this is rare by bmo · · Score: 1

      >Greenpeace is still relevant

      It became irrelevant when the French stopped nuclear testing in the Pacific. Now they're just attention whores.

      --
      BMO

    3. Re:this is rare by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      As others have said, Greenpeace and PETA are horrible examples. Try the March of Dimes and the Rural Electrification Administration

      I vote for NOW and MADD.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  8. Re:Wow by hedwards · · Score: 1

    Facebook? Isn't that MySpace with less child porn?

  9. Re:Quick by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Oh, he'll be by. Just like he was on LWN and zdNet and here and everywhere else, pushing the whole "PJ is not a real person" and "groklaw deletes comments." (Groklaw, a moderated blog, deletes comments? Quel scandale!).

    His moaning and groaning on LWN is typical

    The word "her" needs citation. There was an avatar named "PJ", who claimed that "PJ" meant "Pamela Jones", but there was never any verifiable track record, such as past and current employers, and "PJ" never presented "herself" in public. I just explained in another comment here that this lack of transparency wasn't reasonable.

    But assuming that "PJ" is a person, I don't know what you mean by "talent". "PJ" claimed to be a paralegal, admitted not to have programming knowledge, and very apparently failed to understand the world of business. In other words, we talk about a person who apparently would have liked to become a lawyers but failed to get there, and who missed some other important perspectives that "she" would have needed to provide holistic analysis of the issues "she" covered.

    What a load of crap, considering
    1. not only that Mueller is not a lawyer, but has done his best to give the impression he is, and not corrected it when people fell for it
    2. has always been aware that PJ is a real person - he posted his crap on SJVNs blog at zdnet, the same Steven J Vaughan-Nichols who wrote that he's met PJ.

    3. when I pointed out to this piece of work on the weekend that PJ had spoken with SJVN and RMS, he didn't ask for any citation for SJVN, just RMS. He already had seen the SJVN article. He's such a bad liar.

    Of course, what can you expect from someone who is trying so desperately, and failing so badly, to re-invent themselves as a mouthpiece for hire for somebody ... ANYBODY ....

    He's just another amateur troll, one of those "useful fools" we occasionally hear about ...

  10. Re:Wow by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

    And more prom porn.

    --
    There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
  11. I posted about this yesterday.... by bmo · · Score: 2

    ... but it's worth posting here, but without the aliens.

    Go on over to LWN and look at Florian's continued meltdown about how PJ isn't relevant and he is.

    http://lwn.net/Articles/437650/

    There's a lot said there that exposes Florian's true colors.

    He heaps praise on the people who spread the most FUD about Linux. Robert Enderle, MOG, Dan "Lyin'" Lyons, and Ed Bott led the charge in the media against Linux. The only person he left out to praise was Rudy De Haas ("Paul Murphy" pseudonym). I'm sorry, but the list of above people have nothing worth listening to and his defense of them shows what side of the fence he's on.

    --
    BMO

    1. Re:I posted about this yesterday.... by RotateLeftByte · · Score: 1

      Ah yes. FM is there in force.
      Does he not realise that by always having to get the last word in weakens his position?

      Then he has the gall to call Linus just plain Torvalds. IMHO, every time he writes that it must be through gritted teeth.
      (There is not need to reply FM. You really don't have anything worthwhile to add to the debate. It has been said already.)

      --
      I'd rather be riding my '63 Triumph T120.
    2. Re:I posted about this yesterday.... by HBI · · Score: 2

      Florian's just a paid shill. who cares what he has to say? Hell, the people he listed are all paid shills. If you can't determine who is paid to feed you company propaganda and who is not, the battle is lost with you anyway.

      If someone had told me in 1994 that Microsoft was responsible for the destruction of productive new technologies to preserve their bottom line, I wouldn't have believed them and would have disbelieved everything and anything they said afterward. There was tons of data out there already documenting just this. I just hadn't seen it and didn't want to search it out. They were crushing IBM, then the heart and soul of closed, high cost computing. Why try to think badly of them?

      Nowadays, the scales are off the eyes of those who are paying attention. You still have to care, though. Same with Apple and Google et al.

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:I posted about this yesterday.... by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Nowadays, the scales are off the eyes of those who are paying attention. You still have to care, though. Same with Apple and Google et al.

      Indeed. I'm an Apple fan and have been with them since the late 80s, but not so much a fanboi that I'm blind to their issues.

      Bottom line: A big, massive organization with any significant influence and/or moving lots of money must always, always be watched. Apple, Google, Microsoft, MADD, the Gates Foundation, hell even the Red Cross and various multinational charity organizations. And of course government at all levels.

    4. Re:I posted about this yesterday.... by Ant+P. · · Score: 1

      He seems to have no shortage of free time to sandbag most of that thread with ego-stroking PR and vapid credential assertions.

      I find it more informative to look at which comments he doesn't respond to. Not even to say "that's false". The silence is deafening.

  12. Re:Tinfoil hat? by DrXym · · Score: 2

    And the amazing thing is Alex Jones is the curator for most of them.

  13. Re:Because it needs to be said. by bmo · · Score: 2

    BGE spotted.

    (bitter groklaw exile)

    Emphasis on the "bitter"

    Even _Arthur has gotten over his exile, why can't you?

    --
    BMO

  14. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Eggplant62 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When PJ started this, it was to defend Linux, which at the time didn't have much in the way of large financial support, and only a very few outfits openly using it. The tides have simply turned. SCO no longer poses a threat since they're no longer able to do business in any capacity. They've sold their assests, their money is gone, their management team that brainstormed this whole mess has been scattered to the winds, and PJ wants to move on and go about her life. I think the mission of Groklaw has come to its fruition. Let the lady have her peace.

    If anything, this further deconstructs the theories that there were big influences behind this small lady. Big influences can keep things going. PJ needing to step down and being willing to say so just confirms that there are no big interests pushing her to keep on.

  15. Re:Don't worry. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    hop over to LWN and hear him complain about how HE is more deserving of recognition.

    He's right. He has received many major awards and is constantly being consulted by world leaders for opinions on free software, software patents, string theory and the meaning of life. He has saved the world many times over and is also popular with the ladies. So you should all stop talking about PJ who has achieved NOTHING and talk about me^Whim instead.

  16. Thanks P.J. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On a job well done. Many times the case was a PR campaign, and Groklaw painted the picture plainly from the legal briefs. Time to celebrate the victory, and victory it is, Its sad that a rogue bunch of idiots burned SCO to bankruptcy, as well as wasted a lot of time and money instead of improving a non-microsoft brand. But Groklaw stood as a beacon of clarity.

    Thanks again, in honor of what you have done, and the standard you have set for others to follow.

  17. Sad day by applematt84 · · Score: 1

    It's a sad day ... There's no other resource like groklaw.net. I remember when the site first went up ... Any suggestions on similar resources?

    1. Re:Sad day by schestowitz · · Score: 1

      If you wish, http://techrights.org covers similar subjects.

      --
      My Linux - (L)ove (I)s (N)ever (U)tterly eXPensive
  18. Re:Repost? by RollingThunder · · Score: 1

    Not really. It's not about groklaw shutting down, per se, but that some people have mixed feelings about it shutting down.

  19. Re:Tinfoil hat? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

    Does this re-enforce the conspiracy theories that Groklaw may have been a hired work by one of the parties in the SCO suit?

    Blathering morons stand unitedly proud...The 9/11 Truthers are buying tickets to hear you in concert.

  20. Re:Don't worry. by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    May 16th is Red Dress Day, in honor of Pamela Jones.

    For some of us, Red Dress Day comes after I Drank So Much I Don't Remember What Happened Night you insensitive clod. For others of us, we fondly call that day, Wednesday. Don't judge me!

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  21. Groklaw's end will leave a hole by Julie188 · · Score: 1

    Anyone can understand why P.J. would want to move on, but it's a shame! The legal complexities surrounding FOSS and patents and games that Microsoft and Google play seem to be getting more complicated, not less, than the days when SCO made it's bold and ridiculous claims. (At the point that SCO started its anti-Linux campaign, that company was already starting to whither.) There's some good work going on at Silicon Flatirons in Boulder by lawyers interested in tech. Maybe one of them will pick up the hole that Groklaw will be leaving.

    Julie Bort
    Open Source Subnet

  22. ohh bulll oney by decora · · Score: 1

    look. PJ was posting about the Hotz case only a few days ago. She was digging into details of Caliornia vs New Jersey computer law because Sony was trying to sue Hotz in California even though he lives in New Jersey.

    Now she just vanishes?

    There is -more going on here-. we might not be able to know about it, for years. but something smells wrong. Someone who is as brilliant and inquisitive as PJ doesn't just dump everything for no apparent reason. The site is not called 'SCOvsLinux', it is not called 'scoville' or some other witty name, like so many other 'cause' based sites are (Operation Clambake). It was called Grok Law - > Grok the Law.

    PJ obviously had a deep intellectual interest in matters of Law, Patents, and Copyright, and open source software, as well as writing and explaining it to the rest of us. That interest has not disappeared, it is like saying that Mick Jagger decided to give up singing or something. (OK, so actually some artists do stop, like Joni Mitchell. But show me anything where PJ has decided to become a painter or something).

  23. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

    Before Alex Jones, it was Art Bell

    --
    Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
  24. My thoughts by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 1

    PJ was gracious enough to give us all many years or her life to increase public awareness of the truth, I suspect she is still quite overwhelmed with her famous anonymity.

    I hope she is moving on to do something fun, and not being made "an offer she can't refuse".

    --
    I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
  25. Re:Tinfoil hat? by uninformedLuddite · · Score: 1

    Stop reading my mind

    --
    The new right fascists are bilingual. They speak English and Bullshit.
  26. Re:Quick by harlows_monkeys · · Score: 1

    It's interesting how Mueller was widely praised in the free software world for his work in fighting software patents, and given financial support by major free software companies like Red Hat, right up until he started criticizing IBM for their use of software patents and their unbridled enthusiasm for them (IBM told the Supreme Court that software patents were necessary for free software!), and then suddenly a huge anti-Mueller FUD campaign started. Coincidence?

  27. Re:Quick by tomhudson · · Score: 1
    Mueller has also gone on record to say that RedHat's business model destroys value, and that RedHat is a parasite (his words).

    It's the whole "broken windows" economic fallacy.

    The anti-Mueller campaign started on slashdot when he tried to BS a bunch of us on the weekend over TurboHercules, got caught in a bunch of misrepresentations, and tried to weasel out of them. There were more than a dozen of us who jumped in, because what he was saying was a huge distortion of history, as well as misrepresenting the instant situation.

    I remember it because before then I didn't know the guy from a hole in the ground - I figured he was just one more idiot spouting nonsense. Then I find out that people think he's some sort of "authority", a lawyer (that I trashed immediately by pointing out that even the stupidest lawyer in the world wouldn't be making some of the statements he made since they had zero basis in law anywhere on THIS planet (I can't speak about Mars, or whatever :-), and if he's really a lawyer he should be disbarred, etc. - sure enough, he wasn't a lawyer, he just encouraged people to think he was, and never corrected the mistake when he had an opportunity.

    The only "coincidence" was that he tried to continue elsewhere (as well as to some extent here), but people were now willing to challenge him head-on, and had the links to prove he was just spouting nonsense.

    The whole groklaw thing was really pitiful - the guy who was the actual maintainer of the Hercules hardware emulator (istr his name was Jay Maynard) got stuck in the middle, made the mistake of assuming that the claim that IBM was threatening to sue the Hercules project was true (it wasn't), and really, REALLY put his foot into it.

    TurboHercules (not the Hercules project) wanted to have IBM customers make unlicensed copies of IBM's mainframe OS to run on other machines, atop the Hercules hardware emulator. When that didn't fly, TurboHercules (again NOT the Hercules project) tried to claim it would be only "transferring" the OS to a second machine, for "recovery purposes."

    But even under that scenario (again, not permitted under the license, since you'd still have 2 copies of the OS floating around, even if you weren't using both at the same time, and the OS is licensed to a specific machine because the fee is based on work units), at some point you'd have to have 2 copies running, to transfer updated data back to the mainframe.

    TurboHercules then tried to pick a fight with IBM by asking what patents might be infringed by Hercules, and IBM sent them a list. All of a sudden, TurboHercules and Mueller are claiming that IBM is going to to sue the Hercules project for patent infringement, based on IBM's response to their request.

    See the problem here? Then ask yourself if it's a coincidence that TurboHercules took money from Microsoft.

    Pile on the FUD he pushed over supposed Android violations of the linux kernel, etc., and you have a clear agenda: The guy did what he could to worm his way into FLOSS territory so he could attack from inside, like a wolf in sheeps clothing, and it almost worked.

    The problem is, when it comes to trolling on sites like slashdot, he's a rank amateur :-)