Slashdot Mirror


Just In: Yellowstone Is Big (ger)

jd writes "Really big. By using electrical conductivity tests rather than seismic waves, geologists have remapped the Yellowstone caldera. Whilst seismic waves indicate differences in the reflectivity of different materials, it doesn't show everything and contrast isn't always great. By looking at the electrical conductivity instead, different characteristics of molten and semi-molten rock can be measured and observed. The result — the caldera is far larger than had previously been suspected. This doesn't alter the chances of an eruption, and it's not even clear it would change the scale (prior eruptions are very easy to study, as they're on the surface) but it certainly changes the dynamics and our understanding of this fierce supervolcano."

67 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. Potentially an extinction level event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting
    1. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Yellowstone eruption was a little smaller than Toba (2500 km^3 as opposed to 2800 km^3) but you probably don't notice after the first thousand cubic kilometers of ash have landed. There are four other supervolcanos known. Certainly these are extinction-level events - the Year Without A Summer was caused by a tiny volcano in comparison, altering global temperatures a mere 0.4'C, but the levels of famine and disease that resulted were staggering. Scale it up a hundredfold and throw in a continent's worth of ash and you're talking major problems for anything on the surface.

    2. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by sortius_nod · · Score: 2

      You probably wouldn't know about it seeing as you'd more than likely die from the eruption itself rather than the ash. It's people on the other side of the globe that will die slowly from famine and disease. Consider yourself lucky.

    3. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by RobertM1968 · · Score: 2

      Considering I live a couple hundred miles from it I'm a gonner in the first wave

      Yes, and believe it or not, you're the lucky one. At only a couple hundred miles, you'll be incinerated in just a few minutes as the wave of heat and ejected particles & rocks reaches you at over the speed of sound. Much better than the suffering others will go through who survive. Lucky bastard!

    4. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by magarity · · Score: 1

      Considering I live a couple hundred miles from it I'm a gonner in the first wave

      Yeah; a friend of mine in southern Japan was moaning about the earthquake problems the northern part was having lately and I said, 'That's nothing; here in Denver we'll show you a *real* natural calamity just as soon as Yellowstone blows."

    5. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by JWSmythe · · Score: 1

          [/me contemplating a lava flow, and trying to hide in a subterranean bunker as "protection"]

          Ya. good idea. Let me know how it goes.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    6. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by syousef · · Score: 1

      Should Yellowstone go boom, in the USA the best possible outcome would be to go right along with it.

      Go right ahead. More food for the rest of us. If everyone were so defeatist, the human race would have gone extinct long before we developed tools.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    7. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 2

      It works in Minecraft!

    8. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by AmonTheMetalhead · · Score: 1

      Hey, there's always cannibalism

    9. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Internetuser1248 · · Score: 1

      Firstly, you guys and the mayan eotw crowd need to get together and hammer out a compromise. The world can't end twice.

      Secondly, 21st may is only a month away, it is bad business to predict the apocalypse so soon. It is going to take you at least that long just to put out a manuscript. Ideally you want to leave yourself six months for a really polished book ready, then a couple more months for negotiation with publishers and the actual printing process. Then ideally you want 2-3 years for the sales to peak properly, and for talkshow interviews and guest appearances. This way when the predicted date rolls around and your predictions are shown to be totally bogus, you have a nice pile of cash to retire with.

      Thirdly, does it bother anyone else that the country with the highest per capita belief in an impending apocalypse, the USA, also happens to be the country with the largest nuclear arsenal and a rapidly deteriorating political and economic system? I sometimes get this terrible feeling that whatever nutcase is currently in the whitehouse is just sitting with his finger on a big red button waiting for a sign from god.

    10. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Sinn3d · · Score: 1

      ...and you're talking major problems for anything on the surface.

      Good thing most of us are in a basement.

      Better ask mom to bring down some extra sandwiches & dr peppers, ya know. Just in case.

    11. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Even if you live in Michigan [...] Expect every living thing under ash, no Sun for a decade.

      So what's new?

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    12. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The ones Allah (pbuH) has chosen will survive. It is His will.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Even if you live in Michigan [...] Expect every living thing under ash, no Sun for a decade.

      So what's new?

      Ash, instead of snow. So it'll be gray instead of white, outside of the roads where the slush was already gray.

      I welcome this change of pace!

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    14. Re:Potentially an extinction level event? by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

      Actually hemp oil and milled hemp seeds are very nutritious and are less perishable than fresh tomatoes. Just sayin'.

  2. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by countertrolling · · Score: 5, Funny

    is the DHS on top of this?

    Well, we hope they are when the thing blows.. takes care of one problem

    --
    For justice, we must go to Don Corleone
  3. Not directly, but pretty close by billstewart · · Score: 1

    They probably don't have an office much closer than Boise, so they're not right on top, but they've always been a bit over the edge.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  4. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Dude ...

    Best comment in YEARS.

    Ok, so I'm only an Anonymous Coward, but if I could I'd buy you a beer.

  5. Re:New scale by Skidborg · · Score: 1

    What about Duke Nukem Forever Dead? Where does that go on the scale?

    ----------
    Standing by for apk assault.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  6. Re:Miles/km by Fluffeh · · Score: 1

    Does any one else find it kind of cute how they label the axes in miles, in increments of 50km?

    The scientists probably did all of their work in kms, but then changed the numbers to miles so that the average American had a clue to it. It may have been difficult (for some unknown reason) to change the labels to increments of 50 miles...

    --
    Moved to http://soylentnews.org/. You are invited to join us too!
  7. More evidence... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

    ...that the Earth has been sent from the past to kill us.

    1. Re:More evidence... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why we need to kill it first.

    2. Re:More evidence... by ShiftyOne · · Score: 1

      Is that the plot to Terminator 4? I have a feeling Arnold could stop this.

    3. Re:More evidence... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 3, Funny

      Which is why we need to kill it first.

      Hey, give us a break! We're working on it.

      Avariciously yours, Dick Cheney & Co.

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    4. Re:More evidence... by ruiner13 · · Score: 1

      Is that the plot to Terminator 4?

      You mean this: Terminator Salvation (T4)?

      No, you didn't miss anything...

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

  8. Re:New scale by martin-boundary · · Score: 1

    Do you have alert color codes to go with that? I get a bit confused with the words sometimes.

  9. Great! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Lets tap it for geo-thermal. The issue with a previous attempt is that they simply pulled the steam from it. Instead, it should be a recycling generator in which it re-injects the water back into the ground.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    1. Re:Great! by frecky · · Score: 1

      Isn't this what we do already ? Inject water in hydraulic fracturing for Shale gas ?

    2. Re:Great! by Sulphur · · Score: 1

      Lets tap it for geo-thermal. The issue with a previous attempt is that they simply pulled the steam from it. Instead, it should be a recycling generator in which it re-injects the water back into the ground.

      Boom, Baby, Boom.

    3. Re:Great! by jd · · Score: 1

      It's an interesting idea and there should be a way to make it work, but previous attempts at injecting water into geothermally active areas have tended to cause mini earthquakes. It would take some doing to get it right and I'm not sure I'm inclined to trust the companies capable of the drilling necessary.

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    4. Re:Great! by jd · · Score: 1

      If they ever get a commercial fusion reactor, the "waste" heat would be more than sufficient for you to recycle garbage into ultra-pure reservoirs of the elements within it. The radiation might alter a few of them in the process (you can turn platinum into gold even in fission reactors, it's just kinda pointless).

      --
      It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
    5. Re:Great! by confused+one · · Score: 1

      The formation is hot enough that you could use a closed loop, cycling pressurized water in through loop of pipe acting as a heat exchanger.

    6. Re:Great! by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      Nope. Totally different things. In your example, you use pretty wicked chemicals under extreme pressure to force open cracks. With what I am talking about, you pull water out as steam which drops the pressure a bit, but then re-inject the water back into it, which slowly raises the pressure back up to what it was.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  10. Caldera is not what got bigger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The caldera is not any bigger, just the arear of hot rock or melt under the area. The caldera (collapse feature) is still exactly the same size

    1. Re:Caldera is not what got bigger by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      Thank you - I was about to post the same observation

  11. I expect Sony will have their lawyers to it soon.. by damn_registrars · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... as this clearly seems like an even bigger example of "geohot".

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  12. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by Low+Ranked+Craig · · Score: 1

    if not there's always Rosie O'donnell.

    --
    I still cannot find the droids I am looking for...
  13. Re:New scale by neonmonk · · Score: 1

    Stillbirth?

  14. Re:New scale by The+Grim+Reefer2 · · Score: 1

    Sorry, color codes are simply too difficult for us to understand, especially when it never changes. The new system has two levels:

    1. Fucked

    and

    2. Place your head firmly between you legs, and kiss your ass goodbye.

  15. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by ZosX · · Score: 1

    Too bad you are just a coward.

  16. Re:Whilst? 1750 called, they want their word back. by dbIII · · Score: 1

    Me thynketh it acordaunt to resoun

  17. Re:Complete this series by AvitarX · · Score: 1

    without getting all fancy, 700k to 660k to 620k (time between events)

    I think it happened 20k years ago and we're all safe.

    --
    Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
  18. Re:New scale by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Reincarnated aka undead.

  19. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by SeNtM · · Score: 1

    Shouldn't the house and senate be planning a trip to yellowstone soon??? I am sick and tired about hearing how hard it is getting by on $175k a year.

    --
    "There ought to be limits to freedom." -George W. Bush
  20. Re:Complete this series by mkiwi · · Score: 1

    Just to be sure, we better nuke the volcano. From the moon.

  21. Yellowstone's big, yeah yeah by neko+the+frog · · Score: 1

    It's not small, no no

    --
    -- the opinions stated above aren't those of my employer. in fact, they're probably not even my own. you know what, ju
  22. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    ...or Rod Blagojevich's hair, that should plug it nicely.

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  23. Re:Whilst? 1750 called, they want their word back. by ThePromenader · · Score: 1

    Whence the vitriol? Whither your goal? Nitpicking natter is worth but a lump of coal.

    --

    No, no sig. Really.

    ThePromenader
  24. Better Article by Scorch_Mechanic · · Score: 4, Informative

    The one in the summary is fine, but the original (better) article is here:
    http://www.unews.utah.edu/p/?r=032411-5
    It talks more in depth about how they actually did the imaging. It's actually quite interesting.

    --
    You should turn signatures off.
  25. Re:is the DHS on top of this? by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    if not there's always Rosie O'donnell.

    Yes, but fire can't melt rock.

  26. Re:Complete this series by Sulphur · · Score: 1

    Just to be sure, we better nuke the volcano. From the moon.

    Just to be realistic, nuke the moon. From the volcano.

  27. Re:Whilst? 1750 called, they want their word back. by samjam · · Score: 1

    me-thinkerish perfectous cromulatory expressionator

  28. Re:New scale by EdZ · · Score: 1

    I'm not seeing "Mostly Dead".

  29. Re:Whilst? 1750 called, they want their word back. by dbIII · · Score: 1

    It's a quote written in 1387 from the prologue to Canterbury Tales and just about everybody here will be able to understand all six words (I used to be an engineer not a literary type). It just shows how much the above poster is whining about something not fitting in a 600 word doubleplusgood dictionary.

  30. Re:Whilst? 1750 called, they want their word back. by Rysc · · Score: 1

    You're out of line. Whilst is not nearly as archaic as your other examples and is still often found used for artistic or stylistic purposes, especially in formal contexts.

    --
    I want my Cowboyneal
  31. Lets do some grade school math! by DontBlameCanada · · Score: 1

    2Million->1.3Mill->642,000 years ago. Let's following the series!

    2M->1.3M = 700,000
    1.3M->642,000=658,000
    642,000->??

    Interval of ~670,000 years +/- 21,000.

    Next eruption: 642,000 - 670,000 = 28000 +/- 21000 = essentially any time, ouch.

    1. Re:Lets do some grade school math! by Ol+Olsoc · · Score: 1
      But this isn't grade school math. It's probabilitiesI've seen this in a lot of places, and the Quaking Fear and Apocalypse channel uses it to good effect. (History Channel)

      The eruption interval gives some idea of what might be expected, but there is no such thing as being "due" for an eruption. There would be nothing to stop an eruption next year, then another one a hundred years form now. or 5 million years later. Likewise, with the hot spot staying more or less in one place, and the land moving over top of it, does the new overburden have a mitigating or accelerating effect? Does entropy play into this?

      Is there going to be another eruption? Probably. As to when, for us humans, and for what we might do about it, it might as well be a stochastic process.

      --
      The shepherds did so well protecting the flock that the sheep no longer believed that wolves existed.
  32. Re:New scale by Skidborg · · Score: 1

    Hiya, apk. You don't disappoint.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  33. Geothermal energy question by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    I have a serious (and perhaps stupid) question related to the topic. Given the interest in alternative energy, the size of the Yellowstone caldera, and its proximity to the surface, is it a completely silly idea to exploit it as an energy source? Are there already geothermal power plants in the Yellowstone area?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:Geothermal energy question by spike+hay · · Score: 1

      I don't know about Yellowstone in particular, but there are some tentative plans to exploit Newberry Crater (another shield volcano caldera, but much smaller). Interestingly, the same types of magnetotelluric techniques are being used to map promising sites for geothermal plants.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  34. Two different concepts by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    What you are talking about is EGS. It is about drilling DEEP and then injecting below the bedrock. Minor tremors would be expected, but nothing major. As confused one speaks about, you want a closed loop in shallow well. THat is not a big deal. The reason why the only small one was shot down, is that they were not injecting back. As such, they were depleting the water out of the system. That would destroy geysers all over. And few want to see old faithful gone.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  35. Re:New scale by Skidborg · · Score: 1

    I was trusting in your vast intellect to figure it out and tell me. After all, I don't have a doctorate degree in neurology like you do. I probably can't be trusted with a formidable question such as the one you pose.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  36. Re:New scale by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    The "Hollywood" episode of Happy Days played on TV here in Houston today. Both parts (it was a two-parter).

    Yes, that's the one where Fonzie jumps the (now proverbial) shark.

  37. Re:I expect Sony will have their lawyers to it soo by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    He was only prevented from messing with the PlayStation series of consoles, not volcanic features of national parks.

  38. Re:I expect Sony will have their lawyers to it soo by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    The joke: >>---------------->





    .....



    You: :(

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  39. Re:New scale by Skidborg · · Score: 1

    I don't have to answer it. I am a being with free will. I choose to defy you, and egg you on.

    --
    Supporter of the +1 Over Dramatic mod option. In memory of apk.
  40. Re:I expect Sony will have their lawyers to it soo by mr_mischief · · Score: 1

    um, no.

    Straight man ----> .....

    people who take a second to get that the straight man is also making a joke .....

    people like you who point out that the straight man's joke missed the joke .....

    humor for pond scum